Effectiveness of Percutaneous Lumbar Epidural Adhesiolysis and Neurolysis on Low Back Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Clinically significant improvements in the percutaneous adhesiolysis patients with hypertonic neurolysis compared to those patients randomized to the control group who did not receive adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis. Improvement will be assessed in relation to the clinical outcome measures of pain and function.
Improvements among patients with adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis and compare to control group.
Compare adverse event profile in both groups
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Patients with chronic low back pain and lower extremity pain secondary to spinal stenosis or post lumbar laminectomy syndrome, non responsive to conservative therapy with physical therapy or chiropractic and medical therapy and fluoroscopically directed epidural steroid injections.
Single-center, prospective, controlled, double blind, randomized study. If non-responsive or at patient's request, the patient may be unblinded anytime after 3 months, and will be offered adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis if the patient was in the control group. All patients will be unblinded at 24 months.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Caudal epidural injection Caudal epidural with placement of catheter in sacral canal with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution |
Procedure: Caudal epidural injection
Caudal epidural injection with catheterization
|
Active Comparator: Percutaneous adhesiolysis Pecutaneous adhesiolysis and targeted placement of Racz catheter with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 10% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution |
Procedure: Percutaneous adhesiolysis
Percutaneous adhesiolysis with hypertonic saline neurolysis
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Numeric Pain Rating Score [3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post treatment.]
Numeric rating scale represented 0 with no pain and 10 with the worst pain imaginable
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Functional Status [3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post treatment.]
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - ODI score is ranged from 0 to 50. Total score is converted in to percent disability. ODI Scoring: 0% to 20% (minimal disability), 21%-40% (moderate disability), 41%-60% (severe disability), 61%-80% (crippled) and 81%-100 These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Over 18 years of age
-
History of chronic, function limiting low back pain of at least 6 months in duration
-
Able to give voluntary, written informed consent
-
Able to understand investigational procedures and willing to return for follow-ups
-
No recent surgical procedures within last 3 months
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Large contained or sequestered herniation
-
Cauda Equina symptoms and/or compressive radiculopathy
-
Narcotic use of no greater than 100mg/day Hydrocodone, 60mg Methadone, or 100mg Morphine
-
Uncontrolled major depression or psychiatric disorder
-
Uncontrolled or acute medical illness
-
Chronic sever conditions that could interfere with outcome assessments
-
Women who are pregnant or lactating
-
Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product within 30 days of enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ambulatory Surgery Center | Paducah | Kentucky | United States | 42003 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Pain Management Center of Paducah
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD, Ambulatory Surgery Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- protocol 11
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | An interventional pain management practice, a specialty referral center, a private practice setting in the United States |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Caudal Epidural Injection | Pecutaneous Adhesiolysis |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Caudal epidural with placement of catheter in sacral canal with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution. | Pecutaneous adhesiolysis and targeted placement of Racz catheter with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 10% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 60 | 60 |
COMPLETED | 60 | 60 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Caudal Epidural Injection | Pecutaneous Adhesiolysis | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Caudal epidural with placement of catheter in sacral canal with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution | Pecutaneous adhesiolysis and targeted placement of Racz catheter with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 10% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 60 | 60 | 120 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
44
73.3%
|
48
80%
|
92
76.7%
|
>=65 years |
16
26.7%
|
12
20%
|
28
23.3%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
52
(13.9)
|
52
(12.5)
|
52
(13.2)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
35
58.3%
|
35
58.3%
|
70
58.3%
|
Male |
25
41.7%
|
25
41.7%
|
50
41.7%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
60
100%
|
60
100%
|
120
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Numeric Pain Rating Score |
---|---|
Description | Numeric rating scale represented 0 with no pain and 10 with the worst pain imaginable |
Time Frame | 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post treatment. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Sample size is calculated based on reduction of NRS. A 25% clinical difference change of 1.15. |
Arm/Group Title | Control Group | Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | caudal epidural injections since no adhesiolysis was performed and there was no injection of 10% sodium chloride solution. | adhesiolysis and targeted placement of Racz catheter with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 10% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution |
Measure Participants | 60 | 60 |
Baseline |
7.9
(0.8)
|
8.1
(0.8)
|
3 months |
4.9
(1.6)
|
3.4
(0.8)
|
6 months |
5.8
(1.5)
|
3.7
(1.1)
|
12 months |
6.1
(1.4)
|
4.0
(1.2)
|
18 months |
6.1
(1.4)
|
3.6
(1.2)
|
24 months |
6.2
(1.4)
|
3.6
(1.2)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control Group, Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | Comparisons were made between groups and within the group between baseline and different time points. | |
Method | Repeated measures ANOVA. | |
Comments |
Title | Functional Status |
---|---|
Description | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - ODI score is ranged from 0 to 50. Total score is converted in to percent disability. ODI Scoring: 0% to 20% (minimal disability), 21%-40% (moderate disability), 41%-60% (severe disability), 61%-80% (crippled) and 81%-100 These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms. |
Time Frame | 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post treatment. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Control Group | Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | caudal epidural injections since no adhesiolysis was performed and there was no injection of 10% sodium chloride solution. | adhesiolysis and targeted placement of Racz catheter with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 10% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution |
Measure Participants | 60 | 60 |
Baseline |
28.6
(4.1)
|
31.2
(4.1)
|
3 months |
20.2
(6.6)
|
15.2
(4.1)
|
6 months |
22.3
(6.1)
|
15.2
(5.2)
|
12 months |
23.3
(5.8)
|
15.8
(5.6)
|
18 months |
23.3
(5.7)
|
14.6
(4.6)
|
24 months |
23.2
(6.7)
|
13.9
(5.1)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control Group, Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.001 |
Comments | There were significant differences in Oswestry Disability Index between both groups | |
Method | Repeated measures of ANOVA | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Caudal Epidural Injection | Pecutaneous Adhesiolysis | ||
Arm/Group Description | Caudal epidural with placement of catheter in sacral canal with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution | Pecutaneous adhesiolysis and targeted placement of Racz catheter with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 10% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Caudal Epidural Injection | Pecutaneous Adhesiolysis | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Caudal Epidural Injection | Pecutaneous Adhesiolysis | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/60 (0%) | 0/60 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Caudal Epidural Injection | Pecutaneous Adhesiolysis | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/60 (0%) | 0/60 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Laxmaiah Manchikanti |
---|---|
Organization | Pain Management Center of Paducah |
Phone | 270-554-8373 ext 101 |
drlm@thepainmd.com |
- protocol 11