SMD-transfu: Impact of 2 Transfusion Strategies on Quality of Life of Multitransfused Patients With Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Sponsor
Lille Catholic University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03643042
Collaborator
(none)
174
19
2
49.2
9.2
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are heterogeneous malignant bone marrow disorders characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis, peripheral blood cytopenias and variable risk of leukaemia transformation.

Anemia is the most common manifestation of bone marrow failure in MDS. After failure with first-line treatment by Erythropoietin, patients survive in average 5 years under long term blood transfusion. Modalities of blood transfusion are not clearly defined.

Then, the objective of this randomized comparative multicentric study is to compare two modalities of threshold for transfusion:

  • Restrictive group: Hb < 80g/L and Hb maintain between 80 and 100g/L

  • Liberal group: Hb < 100g/L and Hb maintain between 100 and 120g/L

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Transfusion
N/A

Detailed Description

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are heterogeneous malignant bone marrow disorders characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis, peripheral blood cytopenias and variable risk of leukaemia transformation. The median age at diagnosis is 75 years. The incidence is about 30 per 100,000, over 70 years. Etiology is unknown in more than 85% of cases, chemo-induced causes and family cases are well individualized.

Diagnosis, prognosis, and classification (WHO) are based on joint cytologic analysis of peripheral blood, bone marrow, and spinal cytogenetic analysis. The main therapeutic objectives in low-risk MDS are to correct cytopenias, improve quality of life and prevent aggravation of co-morbidities.

Anemia is the most common manifestation of bone marrow failure in MDS. It is encountered in 80% of cases at diagnosis and almost always occurs in the progression of the disease. Its presence and importance have a pejorative prognostic value, but it is not clear whether this anemia is indicative of a more serious clonal disease or whether it is the repercussions of anemia that lead to a more severe prognosis. After failure with first-line treatment by Erythropoietin (EPO), patients survive in average 5 years under long term blood transfusion. Modalities of blood transfusion are not clearly defined.

Studies in the general geriatric population and in cases of acute anemia are in favor of a restrictive transfusion regimen (threshold around 70 g/L), while experience during MDS with EPO suggest that maintaining a higher hemoglobin count could have a favorable impact on quality of life, physical performance, or even survival of patients with MDS.

Then, the objective of this randomized comparative multicentric study is to compare two modalities of threshold for transfusion:

  • Restrictive group: Hb < 80g/L and Hb maintain between 80 and 100g/L

  • Liberal group: Hb < 100g/L and Hb maintain between 100 and 120g/L

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
174 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Two modalities of threshold for transfusion: Restrictive group: Hb < 80g/L and Hb maintain between 80 and 100g/L Liberal group: Hb < 100g/L and Hb maintain between 100 and 120g/LTwo modalities of threshold for transfusion:Restrictive group: Hb < 80g/L and Hb maintain between 80 and 100g/L Liberal group: Hb < 100g/L and Hb maintain between 100 and 120g/L
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Impact of 2 Transfusion Strategies on the Quality of Life of Multi-transfused Patients With Low Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing a Liberal vs. Restrictive Transfusion Regimen
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 24, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Restrictive group

Transfusion with: Hb < 80g/L and Hb maintain between 80 and 100g/L

Other: Transfusion
Transfusion with Hb maintain between 80 and 100g/L or Hb maintain between 100 and 120g/L

Experimental: Liberal group

Transfusion with: Hb < 100g/L and Hb maintain between 100 and 120g/L

Other: Transfusion
Transfusion with Hb maintain between 80 and 100g/L or Hb maintain between 100 and 120g/L

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of Life by Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS) score [six months post-randomization]

    Quality of Life assessed by a specific validated and adapted disease scale :Quality of Life by Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS) score at six months post-randomization. The QUALMS consists of 38 items, and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. Scored on a scale of 0 to 100 higher score is correlated with better MDS-specific quality of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of Life by Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS) score over the twelve months of follow-up [3, 6, 12 Months]

    Evolution of the QUALMS score over the twelve months of follow-up. Scored on a scale of 0 to 100 higher score is correlated with better MDS-specific quality of life.

  2. Timed up and go test over the twelve months of follow-up [3, 6, 12 Months]

    Evolution of physical performance (the time required for the Timed up and go test) at six months post-randomization and over the twelve months of follow-up

  3. Transfusion incidents rate over the twelve months of follow-up [3, 6, 12 Months]

    Transfusion incidents rate during the twelve months of follow-up among allo-immunization, hospitalization for pulmonary overload, iron overload (ferritin, transferrin saturation), TRALI (Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury)

  4. Transfusion costs over the twelve months of follow-up [3, 6, 12 Months]

    Transfusion costs (number of Packed red blood cells (PRBC) used) during the twelve months of follow-up

  5. Time of occurrence of diagnosis of heart and liver damage due to transfusional iron overload over twelve months of follow-up [3, 6, 12 Months]

    Time of occurrence of diagnosis of heart and liver damage due to transfusional iron overload over twelve months of follow-up. The diagnosis will be established according to the standard procedure based on annual MRI, in particular by measuring the LIC (liver iron concentration), the MIC (myocardial iron concentration) and the cardiac T2* value.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with low risk or intermediate risk MDS: Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) less than or equal to 4.5

  • Relapse or failure after Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) therapy or others treatments (Lenalidomide, Thalidomide, 5-Azacytidine, antithymocyte globulin (ATG), Luspatercept, Decitabine, allograft)

  • Transfusion dependent: in average at least 3 transfusion episodes in the last 6 months and total of packed red blood cells (PRBC): more than 8 in the last 12 months and less than 150 in total.

  • ≥ 18 years of age

  • The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score < 4

  • Life expectancy > 12 Months

  • Patients willing to participate in the study and who have signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with disease modifying agents for their MDS such as: ESA therapy, Lenalidomide, Thalidomide revlimid, Vidaza, Allograft, antithymocyte globulin (ATG), Luspatercept, Decitabine, experimental agents, other clinical trial, taken within 3 months prior to inclusion (chelators are accepted)

  • According to physician: unable to tolerate restrictive or liberal red cell transfusion thresholds (e.g. clinically significant cardio-respiratory failure)

  • Cognitive alteration (inability to complete QUALMS)

  • Inability to perform the physical performance test Timed up and go test

  • Splenomegaly > 3 cm below the costal margin

  • Severe renal failure with creatinine clearance < 30ml / min

  • Patients presenting with active bleeding or evidence of significant haemolysis

  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Abbeville CH Abbeville France 80142
2 Amiens CHU Amiens France 80054
3 Arras CH Arras France 62000
4 Henri Duffaut CH Avignon France 84000
5 Besançon CHU Besançon France 25030
6 Bordeaux CHU Bordeaux France 33604
7 Cote de Nacre CHU Caen France 14033
8 Clermont-Ferrand CHU Clermont-Ferrand France 63000
9 Dunkerque CH Dunkerque France 59140
10 Grenoble CHU Grenoble France 38043
11 Le Mans CH Le Mans France 72037
12 Lens CH Lens France 62307
13 St-Vincent Hospital Lille France 59020
14 Limoges CHRU Limoges France 87042
15 Meaux CH Meaux France 77104
16 Archet 1 Hospital Nice France 06202
17 Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP Paris France 75475
18 Pontchaillou Hospital Rennes France 35033
19 Roubaix CH Roubaix France 59100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Lille Catholic University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Laurent Pascal, MD, GHICL

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Lille Catholic University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03643042
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RC-P0071
First Posted:
Aug 22, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Apr 12, 2022
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Lille Catholic University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 12, 2022