Study of Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Older Than 65 Years With Sequential Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) Followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) Versus Alternating Velcade/Melphalan/Prednisone (MPV) With Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone

Sponsor
PETHEMA Foundation (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01237249
Collaborator
Janssen-Cilag Ltd. (Industry), Celgene (Industry), TFS Trial Form Support (Industry)
250
63
2
62.9
4
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a national, multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative study designed to compare, first, the TTP of the two treatment schemes proposed (MPV followed by Rd or MPV alternating with Rd) in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years. This comparison will be performing in terms of both efficacy and safety. Up to 120 patients will be included in each treatment arm and evaluated at scheduled visits in up to 3 study periods: Pre-treatment, Treatment and Follow-up.

Primary outcome measure:
  • To evaluate the efficacy in terms of time to progression (TTP) at 18 months of MPV and Rd used as either in a sequential or alternating approach in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years.

  • To evaluate the toxicity (safety and tolerability) of the sequential versus the alternating use of MPV and Rd.

Secondary outcome measure:
  • To evaluate the response, duration of response, progression free survival (PFS), time to next therapy (TNT) and overall survival (OS) in the two different groups of patients.

  • To identify, within the group of patients treated with the alternating scheme, the biological characteristics (including a comprehensive genomic analysis) of those patients resistant to one or the other, and patients refractory to both treatments

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

The Pre-treatment period includes Screening visit. After providing written informed consent form to participate in the study, patients will be evaluated for eligibility during a screening period of 14 days (Days -14 to -1). If patients meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized at the moment of entry in the trial in a 1:1 allocation to receive either MPV followed by Rd (Treatment Group A) or MPV alternating with Rd (Treatment Group B).

Patients in the Treatment Group A will receive nine cycles of MPV consisting on one 6-weeks cycle of Velcade (Bortezomib) as an intravenous bolus twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29 and 32) followed by a 10 day rest period (day 33 to 42), in combination with oral Melphalan, once daily on days 1 to 4 and oral Prednisone, once daily on days 1 to 4, followed by eight 4-weeks cycles of Velcade (Bortezomib) as an intravenous bolus on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 followed by a 6 day rest period (days 23 to 28), in combination with Melphalan and Prednisone per os once daily on days 1 to 4, followed by a 24-day rest period (days 5 to 28). After the nine MPV cycles, patients will receive nine cycles of Rd consisting on 4-weeks cycles, including Revlimid (lenalidomide), once daily on days 1-21 followed by a 7 day rest period (days 22 to 28) plus oral dexamethasone, once weekly on days 1,8,15 and 22, followed by a 6 day rest period (days 23 to 28).

Patients in the Treatment Group B will receive the same schedule of therapy, but the MPV cycles will be alternated with Rd cycles. In this treatment Group B, patients will be again randomized to start receiving either MPV or Rd as first cycle of therapy. Overall, patients will receive an identical number of cycles, nine cycles of MPV and nine of Rd. Patients randomized to Treatment Group A relapsing/progressing or with major toxicities under treatment with MPV will be crossover to receive Rd, but only after study coordinator approval.

During the Treatment Period, patients will be evaluated at day 1 of each cycle. After completion of the Treatment Period, all patients will be evaluated every 2 months thereafter.

Safety will be assessed by the monitoring of adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs measurements, and haematology and clinical chemistry test. Response to treatment will be based on EBMT an IMWG criteria. Response to treatment will be evaluated at day 1 of each induction cycle, and every 2 months during thereafter.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
250 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A National, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Phase IIb Study of Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Older Than 65 Years With Sequential Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) Followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) Versus Alternating Velcade/Melphalan/Prednisone (MPV) With Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd).
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: MPV followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd)

Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd)

Drug: Melphalan

Drug: Prednisone

Drug: Velcade

Experimental: Alternating MPV with Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone

Alternating Velcade/Melphalan/Prednisone (MPV) with Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd)

Drug: Revlimid

Drug: Dexamethasone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. To evaluate the efficacy in terms of time to progression (TTP) at 18 months of MPV and Rd used as either in a sequential or alternating approach in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years. [18 months]

  2. To evaluate the toxicity (safety and tolerability) of the sequential versus the alternating use of MPV and Rd,in terms of adverse events presented in both groups of patients [6 months]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. To evaluate the response in both groups of patients [1 year]

  2. To identify, within the group of patients treated with the alternating scheme, the biological characteristics (including a comprehensive genomic analysis) of those patients resistant to one or the other, and patients refractory to both treatments [2 years]

  3. Duration of response in two groups of patients [2 years]

  4. Progression free survival (PFS) in two different groups of patients [18 months]

  5. Time to next therapy (TNT) [2 years]

  6. Overall survival (OS) in the two different groups of patients [5 years]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Written informed consent obtained before starting any study-specific procedure.

  2. Symptomatic elderly MM newly diagnosed by EBMT criteria older than 65 years.

  3. Performance status (ECOG) ≤ 2.

  4. Have pre-treatment clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria within 14 days of randomization:

  • platelet count ≥ 75x109/L

  • haemoglobin ≥ 8g/dL

  • absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.0x109/L

  • Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL and alkaline phosphatise ≤ 2.5 x ULN AST, ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN

  • Serum creatinine ≤2,5 mg/dl

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Patient previously received treatment with Velcade or Revlimid.

  2. Patient previously received treatment for Multiple Myeloma.

  3. Patient has ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy within 14 days before enrolment.

  4. Patient has hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron, mannitol or lenalidomide.

  5. Patient has received other investigational drugs with 28 days before enrolment.

  6. Patient had a myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrolment or has New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities.

  7. Patient currently is enrolled in another clinical research study and/or is receiving an investigational agent for any reason.

  8. Radiation therapy within 30 days before randomization, at least patient has had antialgic radiation. Radiation therapy will be afterwards permitted during the treatment period if it is indicated due to the presence of plasmacytomas

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 H. Son Llatzer Palma de Mallorca Baleares Spain
2 Hospital Principe de Asturias Alcalá de Henares Madrid Spain
3 Clínica Universitaria de Navarra Pamplona Navarra Spain
4 Fundación Hospital Alcorcón Alcorcón Spain
5 Hospital de Badalona Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona Spain
6 H. Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona Barcelona Spain
7 Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
8 Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
9 Hospital del Mar Barcelona Spain
10 ICO - Duran i Reynals, Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona Spain
11 Hospital de Cruces Bilbao Spain
12 Hospital General de Castellón Castellón Spain
13 Hospital General Ciudad Real Spain
14 Hospital Virgen de la Luz Cuenca Spain
15 Complejo Hospitalario de Cáceres Cáceres Spain
16 Hospital Puerta del Mar Cádiz Spain
17 Hospital Donostia Donostia Spain
18 Hospital Francesc Borja Gandía Spain
19 ICO - Josep Trueta Girona Spain
20 Hospital General de Guadalajara Guadalajara Spain
21 H. de Jerez Jerez de la Frontera Spain
22 Complejo Hospitalario León Leon Spain
23 Clínica Puerta de Hierro Madrid Spain
24 Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid Madrid Spain
25 Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid Spain
26 Hospital de Fuenlabrada Madrid Spain
27 Hospital de la Princesa Madrid Spain
28 Hospital de Madrid, S.A.- Norte Hospital General Madrid Spain
29 Hospital del Tajo Madrid Spain
30 Hospital Infanta Leonor Madrid Spain
31 Hospital Infanta Sofia Madrid Spain
32 Hospital la Paz Madrid Spain
33 Hospital Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain
34 Hospital Severo Ochoa Madrid Spain
35 Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
36 MD Anderson Madrid Spain
37 Althaia Manresa Spain
38 Hospital General Univeristario Morales Messeguer Murcia Spain
39 Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca Murcia Spain
40 Complejo Hospital Costa del Sol Málaga Spain
41 Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme Málaga Spain
42 Hospital de la Diputación de Navarra Navarra Spain
43 Hospital de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín Palma de Gran Canaria Spain
44 Complejo Asistencial Son Dureta Palma de Mallorca Spain
45 Hospital Virgen del Camino Pamplona Spain
46 Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí Sabadell Spain
47 Hospital Clínico de Salamanca Salamanca Spain
48 Hoaspital Marqués de Valdecilla Santander Spain
49 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago Santiago de Compostela Spain
50 Hospital General de Segovia Segovia Spain
51 Complejo Hospitalario Regional Virgen del Rocío Sevilla Spain
52 Hospital Joan XXIII Tarragona Spain
53 Hospital Universitario de Canarias Tenerife Spain
54 Hospital Nuestra Señora del Prado Toledo Spain
55 Hospital Virgen de la Salud Toledo Spain
56 Hospital Arnau de Vilanova Valencia Spain
57 Hospital Clínico de Valencia. Valencia Spain
58 Hospital La Fe Valencia Spain
59 Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset Valencia Spain
60 Hospital Txagorritxu Vitoria Spain
61 Hospital Virgen de la Concha Zamora Spain
62 Hospital Clinico Lozano Blesa Zaragoza Spain
63 Miguel Servet Zaragoza Spain

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • PETHEMA Foundation
  • Janssen-Cilag Ltd.
  • Celgene
  • TFS Trial Form Support

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
PETHEMA Foundation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01237249
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • GEM2010MAS65
First Posted:
Nov 9, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Jan 18, 2017
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2017
Keywords provided by PETHEMA Foundation
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 18, 2017