G-CSF+DAC+BUCY vs G-CSF+DAC+BF Conditioning Regimen for High-risk MDS Undergoing Allo-HSCT

Sponsor
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05453552
Collaborator
Peking University People's Hospital (Other), Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital (Other), Guangzhou First People's Hospital (Other), Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (Other), First People's Hospital of Chenzhou (Other), The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Other)
242
1
2
29
8.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Allo-HSCT is the most effective way to cure high-risk MDS patients. At present, the best conditioning regimen for high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. In this prospective study, the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+DAC+BUCY and G-CSF+DAC+BF conditioning regimens in high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT are evaluated.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor(G-CSF)
  • Drug: Decitabine (DAC)
  • Drug: Busulfan
  • Drug: Fludarabine (FLU)
  • Drug: Cyclophosphamide (CY)
  • Drug: Busulfan (BU)
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

Allo-HSCT is the most effective way to cure high-risk MDS patients. At present, the best conditioning regimen for high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. A previous study by the investigators has showed that G-CSF +DAC+BUCY conditioning regimen could reduce the relapse and improve the survival compared with BUCY conditioning regimen, while the two conditioning regimens both have high non-relapse mortality (NRM). Several retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that BF conditioning regimen has a lower NRM compared with BUCY conditioning regimen, while the relapse and survival are similar in patients undergoing BF and BUCY conditioning regimens. Based on the above, the investigators design the prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+DAC+BUCY and G-CSF+DAC+BF conditioning regimens in high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
242 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
G-CSF+DAC+BUCY vs. G-CSF+DAC+BF Conditioning Regimen for Patients With High-risk MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: G-CSF+DAC+BF

For patients with high-risk MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BF conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3, Fludarabine (FLU) 30mg/m2/ day on days -7 to -3.

Drug: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor(G-CSF)
G-CSF was administered at 5 ug/kg/day on days-17 to -10. When white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF.

Drug: Decitabine (DAC)
Decitabine was administered at 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10.

Drug: Fludarabine (FLU)
Fludarabine was administered at 30 mg/m2/day on days -7 to -3.

Drug: Busulfan (BU)
Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3 in G-CSF+DAC +BF group.

Active Comparator: G-CSF+DAC+BUCY

For patients with high-risk MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony -Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3, -2.

Drug: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor(G-CSF)
G-CSF was administered at 5 ug/kg/day on days-17 to -10. When white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF.

Drug: Decitabine (DAC)
Decitabine was administered at 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10.

Drug: Busulfan
Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4 in G-CSF+DAC+BUCY group.

Drug: Cyclophosphamide (CY)
Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3,-2.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) [1 year]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall survival (OS) [1 year]

  2. Disease-free survival (DFS) [1 year]

  3. Cumulative incidence of relapse [1 year]

  4. Adverse effects [within 100 days post-transplantation]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Had a diagnosis of RAEB-1 or RAEB-2 with IPSS-R >3

  • Age 18 to 65 years old

  • ECOG performance status of 0-2

  • HCT-CI of 0-2

  • Were willing to undergo allo-HSCT

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Therapy-related MDS

  • Previous allo-HSCT

  • Uncontrolled infections

  • Liver or renal dysfunction

  • Severe concomitant conditions not suitable for the trial

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China 510515

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
  • Peking University People's Hospital
  • Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital
  • Guangzhou First People's Hospital
  • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
  • First People's Hospital of Chenzhou
  • The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Qifa Liu, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Qifa Liu, Professor, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05453552
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • DAC-BUCY vs DAC-BF-HR MDS-2022
First Posted:
Jul 12, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 12, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 12, 2022