Clinical Investigation of the Vision-R800 Device.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Randomized, bilateral, cross-over dispensing study of a standard and VR800 refraction and associated spectacle lenses.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: R-Refraction
|
Device: Vision R-800 Phoropter
Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses
Device: Standard Phoropter
Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses
|
Active Comparator: S-Refraction
|
Device: Vision R-800 Phoropter
Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses
Device: Standard Phoropter
Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Subjective Questionnaire Response [at Visit 5 (final visit), up to 5 weeks]
Patient questions of refraction preference for quickness, efficiency, comfort, and stress
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
current adaptated progressive addition lens wearer, if bifocal lens required
-
wearable pair of glasses < 2 years old
-
wear glasses at least 6 hours per day
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Eye Disease with an impact on visual acuity or binocular vision abnormalities (by self-report)
-
Formal training in optometry, vision science or in the eyecare field
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indiana University Clinical Optics Research Lab | Bloomington | Indiana | United States | 47405 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Pete Kollbaum, OD, PhD
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- Kollbaum003
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | R-Refraction Then S-Refraction | S-Refraction Then R-Refraction |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Vision R-800 Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses Standard Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses | Vision R-800 Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses Standard Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 58 | 61 |
Visit 2 | 58 | 61 |
Visit 3 | 58 | 53 |
Visit 4 | 43 | 47 |
COMPLETED | 42 | 46 |
NOT COMPLETED | 16 | 15 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | R-Refraction Then S-Refraction | S-Refraction Then R-Refraction | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Vision R-800 Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses Standard Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses | Vision R-800 Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses Standard Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 58 | 61 | 119 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
6
10.3%
|
8
13.1%
|
14
11.8%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
49
84.5%
|
49
80.3%
|
98
82.4%
|
>=65 years |
3
5.2%
|
4
6.6%
|
7
5.9%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
41.19
(17.57)
|
38.28
(18.81)
|
39.77
(18.14)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
47
81%
|
43
70.5%
|
90
75.6%
|
Male |
11
19%
|
18
29.5%
|
29
24.4%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
5
8.6%
|
1
1.6%
|
6
5%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
52
89.7%
|
60
98.4%
|
112
94.1%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1
1.7%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.8%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
7
12.1%
|
8
13.1%
|
15
12.6%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
1
1.7%
|
2
3.3%
|
3
2.5%
|
White |
48
82.8%
|
47
77%
|
95
79.8%
|
More than one race |
2
3.4%
|
4
6.6%
|
6
5%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
58
100%
|
61
100%
|
119
100%
|
Subject Classification (Count of Participants) | |||
Count : Young Adults |
27
46.6%
|
33
54.1%
|
60
50.4%
|
Count : Presbyopes |
31
53.4%
|
28
45.9%
|
59
49.6%
|
Subject Classification: Mean Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Young Adults |
23.89
(7.27)
|
22.06
(5.52)
|
22.88
(6.38)
|
Presbyopes |
56.26
(6.07)
|
57.39
(7.06)
|
56.80
(6.52)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Subjective Questionnaire Response |
---|---|
Description | Patient questions of refraction preference for quickness, efficiency, comfort, and stress |
Time Frame | at Visit 5 (final visit), up to 5 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | R-Refraction Then S-Refraction | S-Refraction Then R-Refraction |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Vision R-800 Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses Standard Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses | Vision R-800 Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses Standard Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses |
Measure Participants | 42 | 46 |
Prefer VR800 |
22
37.9%
|
32
52.5%
|
Prefer Standard |
5
8.6%
|
3
4.9%
|
No Preference |
15
25.9%
|
11
18%
|
Prefer VR800 |
25
43.1%
|
26
42.6%
|
Prefer Standard |
4
6.9%
|
4
6.6%
|
No Preference |
13
22.4%
|
16
26.2%
|
Prefer VR800 |
26
44.8%
|
21
34.4%
|
Prefer Standard |
5
8.6%
|
6
9.8%
|
No Preference |
11
19%
|
19
31.1%
|
Prefer VR800 |
16
27.6%
|
19
31.1%
|
Prefer Standard |
7
12.1%
|
10
16.4%
|
No Preference |
19
32.8%
|
17
27.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | R-Refraction Then S-Refraction, S-Refraction Then R-Refraction |
---|---|---|
Comments | Added the number of participants from each study arm who preferred each refraction type and then converted it to the proportions | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | Difference between independent proportions | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Other Statistical Analysis | For each outcome, we compared the proportion of participants from both study arms who preferred the VR800 refraction to the proportion of participants who preferred the Standard refraction using a 2-sample test for equality of proportions. |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 5 weeks for each participant | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | R-Refraction | S-Refraction | ||
Arm/Group Description | Vision R-800 Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the Vision R-800 Phoropter with resulting glasses | Standard Phoropter: Refraction utilizing the standard phoropter with resulting glasses | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
R-Refraction | S-Refraction | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/119 (0%) | 0/119 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
R-Refraction | S-Refraction | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/119 (0%) | 0/119 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
R-Refraction | S-Refraction | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/119 (0%) | 0/119 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Dawn Meyer |
---|---|
Organization | Indiana University |
Phone | 812-855-0559 |
meyerd@indiana.edu |
- Kollbaum003