Early Palliative Care in Advanced Lung and Gastrointestinal Malignancies
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two types of care - standard oncology care and standard oncology care with early palliative care (started soon after diagnosis) to see which is better for improving the experience of patients and families with advanced lung and non-colorectal GI cancer. The study will use questionnaires to measure patients' and caregivers' quality of life, mood, coping and understanding of their illness.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Subjects and their caregiver will complete a baseline questionnaire and then be randomized to a study group.
Subjects who are randomized to Standard Oncology Care will follow up with their treating oncologist. They will consult with the palliative care team at their request or at the request of the treating oncologist. They will complete questionnaires at 12 weeks and 24 weeks after enrollment.
Subjects who are randomized to the Standard Oncology Care with Early Palliative Care will meet with a palliative care clinician at their next medical oncology visit or infusion visit. They will meet with the palliative care clinician at least every three weeks. They will complete questionnaires at 12 and 24 weeks after enrollment.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Early Palliative Care Subjects receive standard of care with early palliative care. |
Other: early palliative care
patient assigned to the intervention will receive early palliative care along with standard oncology care.
|
No Intervention: Standard of Care Subjects receives standard of care |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (Quality of Life Measure) [12 weeks]
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General is a quality of life measure with higher scores indicating better quality of life (range 0-108). We are examining the adjusted mean difference from baseline to 12 weeks in this study
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (Quality of Life Measure) [24 weeks]
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General is a quality of life measure with higher scores indicating better quality of life (range 0-108). We are examining the adjusted mean difference from baseline to 24 weeks.
- Rate of Clinically Significant Depression Symptoms Based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [Week-12 and Week-24]
The hospital anxiety and depression scale examines symptoms of depression and anxiety. We compared rates of clinically significant depression symptoms (using a cut off of 8 on the depression subscale score) between study arms at week-12 and week-24.
- Number and Percentage of Participants Who Reported Goal of Their Cancer Treatment is to Cure Their Cancer [Week12 and Week 24]
We used the response to an item on Perception of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire to compare rates of accurate prognostic understanding between study arms. Participants reported their primary goal of their current cancer treatment: 1) to cure my cancer; 2) to lesson my suffering as much as possible; 3) for me and/or my family to be able to keep hoping; 4) to make sure I have done everything; 5) to extend my life as long as possible; 6) to help cancer research. Participants' responses were dichotomized as 1) to cure my cancer vs. all other.
- Family Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured by the SF-36 [Week-12 and Week-24]
The Medical Health Outcomes Survey- Short Form (SF-36) is a measure of QOL. The SF-36 measures eight domains of health-related quality of life: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitation due to emotional health, and mental health. The response choices are scored and summed to yield two physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary measures with ranges from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. We compared family caregiver PCS and MCS scores between the two study arms at week-12 and week-24 adjusting for baseline scores.
- Family Caregiver Psychological Distress (Based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) [Week 12 and Week 24]
We used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale to measure overall psychological distress in family caregivers. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale contains two subscales measuring depression and anxiety respectively. When examined continuously, this scale reflects degree of psychological distress with higher scores indicating more psychological distress (range 0-42). We compared overall psychological distress (HADS-total) among family caregivers between the two study arms
- Number and Percentage of Family Caregivers Who Reported the Goal of Treatment is to Cure Cancer [12 and 24 weeks]
We used the response to an item on Perception of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire to compare rates of accurate prognostic understanding between study arms. Family caregivers reported their primary goal of the current cancer treatment: 1) to cure my cancer; 2) to lesson my suffering as much as possible; 3) for me and/or my family to be able to keep hoping; 4) to make sure I have done everything; 5) to extend my life as long as possible; 6) to help cancer research. Family caregivers' responses were dichotomized as 1) to cure my cancer vs. all other.
- Coping (Brief Cope) [Up to week-24]
compare mean change in approach oriented coping from baseline to week-24. Approach oriented coping scale is composed of active coping, positive reframing, and acceptance subscales. Scores range from 0-8 with higher scores indicate higher approach-oriented coping
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Confirmed metastatic lung cancer (NSCLC, small cell lung cancer, and mesothelioma)or non-colorectal GI cancer (esophageal, gastric and hepatobiliary) not being treated with curative intent
-
Informed of metastatic disease within the previous 8 weeks
-
No prior therapy for metastatic disease
-
Able to read questions in English or willing to complete questionnaires with the assistance of an interpreter
-
Relative or friend of patient who will likely accompany the patient to clinic visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant psychiatric or other co-morbid disease
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02114 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jennifer Temel, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 10-434
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard of Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects receive standard of care with early palliative care. early palliative care: patient assigned to the intervention will receive early palliative care along with standard oncology care. | Subjects receives standard of care |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 175 | 175 |
12 Week Outcomes | 148 | 153 |
COMPLETED | 118 | 124 |
NOT COMPLETED | 57 | 51 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard of Care | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects receive standard of care with early palliative care. early palliative care: patient assigned to the intervention will receive early palliative care along with standard oncology care. | Subjects receives standard of care | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 175 | 175 | 350 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
65.64
(11.26)
|
64.03
(10.46)
|
64.85
(10.88)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
84
48%
|
77
44%
|
161
46%
|
Male |
91
52%
|
98
56%
|
189
54%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
7
4%
|
2
1.1%
|
9
2.6%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
168
96%
|
173
98.9%
|
341
97.4%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
4
2.3%
|
0
0%
|
4
1.1%
|
Asian |
5
2.9%
|
3
1.7%
|
8
2.3%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
6
3.4%
|
4
2.3%
|
10
2.9%
|
White |
156
89.1%
|
167
95.4%
|
323
92.3%
|
More than one race |
2
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.6%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
2
1.1%
|
1
0.6%
|
3
0.9%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (Quality of Life Measure) |
---|---|
Description | The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General is a quality of life measure with higher scores indicating better quality of life (range 0-108). We are examining the adjusted mean difference from baseline to 12 weeks in this study |
Time Frame | 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard of Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects receive standard of care with early palliative care. early palliative care: patient assigned to the intervention will receive early palliative care along with standard oncology care. | Subjects receives standard of care |
Measure Participants | 148 | 153 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [units on a scale] |
81.10
|
77.70
|
Title | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (Quality of Life Measure) |
---|---|
Description | The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General is a quality of life measure with higher scores indicating better quality of life (range 0-108). We are examining the adjusted mean difference from baseline to 24 weeks. |
Time Frame | 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The analysis focuses on participants who completed week-24 questionnaires (N = 118 in the early palliative care arm, and N = 124 in the standard of care arm) |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard of Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects receive standard of care with early palliative care. early palliative care: patient assigned to the intervention will receive early palliative care along with standard oncology care. | Subjects receives standard of care |
Measure Participants | 118 | 124 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [units on a scale] |
81.26
|
75.90
|
Title | Rate of Clinically Significant Depression Symptoms Based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale |
---|---|
Description | The hospital anxiety and depression scale examines symptoms of depression and anxiety. We compared rates of clinically significant depression symptoms (using a cut off of 8 on the depression subscale score) between study arms at week-12 and week-24. |
Time Frame | Week-12 and Week-24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The two rows examine outcomes at two different time points week-12 and week-24. Please note the number of participants included in week-12 and week-24 analyses reflect the participants who completed the hospital anxiety and depression scale at these time points (study completers), which explains the discrepancy with the flow chart. |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard Oncology Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 138 | 141 |
Week-12 |
29
16.6%
|
32
18.3%
|
Week-24 |
24
13.7%
|
32
18.3%
|
Title | Number and Percentage of Participants Who Reported Goal of Their Cancer Treatment is to Cure Their Cancer |
---|---|
Description | We used the response to an item on Perception of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire to compare rates of accurate prognostic understanding between study arms. Participants reported their primary goal of their current cancer treatment: 1) to cure my cancer; 2) to lesson my suffering as much as possible; 3) for me and/or my family to be able to keep hoping; 4) to make sure I have done everything; 5) to extend my life as long as possible; 6) to help cancer research. Participants' responses were dichotomized as 1) to cure my cancer vs. all other. |
Time Frame | Week12 and Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The different rows reflect analyses at week-12 and week-24. Please note the number of participants included in week-12 and week-24 analyses reflect the participants who completed the Perception of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire at these time points (study completers), which explains the discrepancy with the flow chart. |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard Oncology Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 143 | 145 |
Goal Cure Week-12 |
41
23.4%
|
50
28.6%
|
Goal Cure Week-24 |
37
21.1%
|
32
18.3%
|
Title | Family Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured by the SF-36 |
---|---|
Description | The Medical Health Outcomes Survey- Short Form (SF-36) is a measure of QOL. The SF-36 measures eight domains of health-related quality of life: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitation due to emotional health, and mental health. The response choices are scored and summed to yield two physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary measures with ranges from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. We compared family caregiver PCS and MCS scores between the two study arms at week-12 and week-24 adjusting for baseline scores. |
Time Frame | Week-12 and Week-24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Adjusted Means controlling for baseline scores. The different rows reflect Week-12 and Week-24 outcomes on SF-36 PCS and MCS domains. The number of participants included in week-12 and week-24 analyses reflect the participants who completed the SF-36 at these time points, which explains the discrepancy with the flow chart. |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard Oncology Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 110 | 119 |
SF36 PCS Week-12 |
52.94
|
51.40
|
SF36 MCS Week-12 |
47.00
|
45.92
|
SF36 PCS Week-24 |
52.71
|
53.22
|
SF36 MCS Week-24 |
46.21
|
45.59
|
Title | Family Caregiver Psychological Distress (Based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) |
---|---|
Description | We used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale to measure overall psychological distress in family caregivers. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale contains two subscales measuring depression and anxiety respectively. When examined continuously, this scale reflects degree of psychological distress with higher scores indicating more psychological distress (range 0-42). We compared overall psychological distress (HADS-total) among family caregivers between the two study arms |
Time Frame | Week 12 and Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Looking at the HADS-total score at week-12 and week-24. Please note the number of participants included in week-12 and week-24 analyses reflect the participants who completed the hospital anxiety and depression scale at these time points (study completers), which explains the discrepancy with the flow chart. |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard Oncology Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 110 | 119 |
HADS-Total Week-12 |
9.02
|
10.48
|
HADS-Total Week-24 |
9.82
|
10.72
|
Title | Number and Percentage of Family Caregivers Who Reported the Goal of Treatment is to Cure Cancer |
---|---|
Description | We used the response to an item on Perception of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire to compare rates of accurate prognostic understanding between study arms. Family caregivers reported their primary goal of the current cancer treatment: 1) to cure my cancer; 2) to lesson my suffering as much as possible; 3) for me and/or my family to be able to keep hoping; 4) to make sure I have done everything; 5) to extend my life as long as possible; 6) to help cancer research. Family caregivers' responses were dichotomized as 1) to cure my cancer vs. all other. |
Time Frame | 12 and 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Proportion of caregiver goal is cure at week-12 and week-24. Please note the number of participants reflect those who completed the Perception of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire at week-12 and week-24, which explains the discrepancy with the participants flow. |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard Oncology Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 106 | 113 |
Goal Cure Week-12 |
34
19.4%
|
40
22.9%
|
Goal Cure Week-24 |
19
10.9%
|
29
16.6%
|
Title | Coping (Brief Cope) |
---|---|
Description | compare mean change in approach oriented coping from baseline to week-24. Approach oriented coping scale is composed of active coping, positive reframing, and acceptance subscales. Scores range from 0-8 with higher scores indicate higher approach-oriented coping |
Time Frame | Up to week-24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard Oncology Care |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 118 | 124 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [units on a scale] |
0.21
|
-0.88
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 6 months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | no AE from this non-medication/treatment study | |||
Arm/Group Title | Early Palliative Care | Standard of Care | ||
Arm/Group Description | Subjects receive standard of care with early palliative care. early palliative care: patient assigned to the intervention will receive early palliative care along with standard oncology care. | Subjects receives standard of care | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Early Palliative Care | Standard of Care | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 27/175 (15.4%) | 32/175 (18.3%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Early Palliative Care | Standard of Care | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/175 (0%) | 0/175 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Early Palliative Care | Standard of Care | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/175 (0%) | 0/175 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Jennifer Temel MD |
---|---|
Organization | MGH |
Phone | 617-724-4000 |
jtemel@partners.org |
- 10-434