Combined Upper-airway and Breathing Control Therapies for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03189173
Collaborator
Monash University (Other), American Heart Association (Other), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (NIH), Heart Foundation of Australia (Other)
40
2
1
57.8
20
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The current study combines two treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), oral appliances and supplemental inspired oxygen. The following aims will be tested:

Aim 1. To determine whether supplemental inspired oxygen further reduces OSA severity (apnea-hypopnea index) in patients using an oral appliance.

Aim 2. To determine whether baseline OSA phenotypes can predict the efficacy of oral appliances versus supplemental oxygen versus both treatments in combination. We will test whether responders to oral appliances have distinct pathophysiological characteristics compared with oxygen responders.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Oral appliance
  • Drug: Oxygen
  • Other: Oral appliance plus oxygen
  • Other: No treatment
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Pre-specified primary analysis for Aim 1 is the change in AHI with combination treatment versus oral appliance alone (%reduction versus placebo; including hypopnea events without desaturation/arousals).

Aim 2 seeks to identify subgroups of patients that have the greatest reduction in AHI (responders) with each treatment (post-hoc). We will use baseline physiological measures of the four traits causing OSA (collapsibility, responsiveness, loop gain, arousal threshold) to determine which characteristics predict responses to each intervention (leave-one-out support vector machine modeling). Clinical measures of the same traits will be estimated from the placebo night to confirm that responses can be predicted with clinically-available data. We will also test whether responders to oral appliances have a greater response to oxygen than oral appliance non-responders (and vice-versa), to address whether responders to both treatments are similar or different.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Subjects will receive mandibular advancement, supplemental oxygen, mandibular advancement plus supplemental oxygen, and no treatment in randomized order. On nights without supplemental oxygen, subjects will be administered sham (air, single blinded). Oral appliance use will not be masked.Subjects will receive mandibular advancement, supplemental oxygen, mandibular advancement plus supplemental oxygen, and no treatment in randomized order. On nights without supplemental oxygen, subjects will be administered sham (air, single blinded). Oral appliance use will not be masked.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Masking Description:
Supplemental oxygen versus air assignment nights will be blinded to participants, but will be known by the investigator. Oral appliances will be "open label".
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Combined Upper-airway and Breathing Control Therapies for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 6, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: All patients

Patients will receive all four interventions in randomized order. Note: Data will not be analyzed separately for the 16 cross-over combinations of intervention order: Interventions: Oral appliance | Oral appliance plus oxygen | Oxygen | No treatment

Device: Oral appliance
An oral appliance (dental mouthpiece) will be used to improve upper airway patency. Patients who do not have their own custom dental oral appliance (various brands, commonly Herbst/Somnomed) will be provided with a device (BluePro, BlueSom) for the duration of the study. Patients will also be administered sham (room air) at 4 L/min via nasal cannula.
Other Names:
  • Mandibular advancement device
  • Drug: Oxygen
    Supplemental oxygen will be delivered at 4 L/min via nasal cannula to improve ventilatory control stability.
    Other Names:
  • Supplemental inspired oxygen
  • Other: Oral appliance plus oxygen
    Both treatments will be administered simultaneously.
    Other Names:
  • Combination therapy
  • Other: No treatment
    Subjects will not wear an oral appliance, and will be administered sham (room air) at 4 L/min via nasal cannula.
    Other Names:
  • Sham
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in apnea hypopnea index (AHI), percent of baseline. [Single night]

      Primary test is difference between combination therapy and oral appliance

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in frequency of arousals, percent of baseline. [Single night]

      Primary test is difference between combination therapy and oral appliance

    2. Patient reported sleep quality (better/same/worse) [Single night]

      Primary test is difference between combination therapy and oral appliance

    3. Morning minus evening systolic blood pressure [Single night]

      Primary test is difference between combination therapy and oral appliance

    4. Morning minus evening diastolic blood pressure [Single night]

      Primary test is difference between combination therapy and oral appliance

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    21 Years to 79 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Diagnosed OSA or suspected OSA based on snoring
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Severe co-morbidities (cardiovascular, renal, lung disease, neurological), including:

    Congestive heart failure, Neurological conditions that may affect sleep or breathing (e.g. neuromuscular diseases e.g. myasthenia gravis; neurodegenerative diseases e.g. Alzheimer's/Parkinson's)

    • Medications that will substantially affect respiration, including opioids, barbiturates, theophylline, doxapram, acetazolamide, pseudoephedrine

    • Claustrophobia

    • Insomnia and other non-respiratory sleep disorders

    • Inability to sleep supine

    • Contraindications to oral appliances, including insufficient teeth to support the device, periodontal problems inducing tooth mobility, active temporomandibular joint disorder

    • Allergy to lidocaine or oxymetazoline HCl

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts United States 02115
    2 Sleep and Circadian Medicine Laboratory, BASE Facility, Monash University Notting Hill Victoria Australia 3168

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Monash University
    • American Heart Association
    • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
    • Heart Foundation of Australia

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Scott A Sands, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Principal Investigator: Bradley A Edwards, PhD, Monash University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Scott Aaron Sands, Associate Physiologist / Instructor in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03189173
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2017P001037
    • 15SDG25890059
    • R01HL128658
    First Posted:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 2, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by Scott Aaron Sands, Associate Physiologist / Instructor in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 2, 2022