Open Retropubic Versus Laparoscopic Colposuspension (Burch Operation) Techniques for Female Stress or Mixed Urinary Incontinence; A Ten-year Experience in a Tertiary Center

Sponsor
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05452811
Collaborator
(none)
150
1
5.5
27.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To evaluate postoperative course, efficacy, and complication rates of Open Burch Colposuspension and Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension techniques in stress or mixed urinary incontinence at a single training and research hospital over the last 10 years in Istanbul, Turkey.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Burch colposuspension

Detailed Description

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in all Burch Colposuspension cases performed between January 2001 and May 2022 at Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Center. All patients' data were reviewed from the electronic medical records and analyzed who underwent Burch colposuspension surgery either with an open or laparoscopic approach. The primary outcome was surgical success, whereas secondary outcomes were perioperative and postoperative data including surgical type (open or laparoscopic), operating time, duration of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, complications during surgery, and additional interventional procedure types.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
150 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
Open Retropubic Versus Laparoscopic Colposuspension (Burch Operation) Techniques for Female Stress or Mixed Urinary Incontinence; A Ten-year Experience in a Tertiary Center
Actual Study Start Date :
May 15, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 15, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Open Burch Colposuspension

The retropubic space was entered through a laparotomy Pfannenstiel incision, and two permanent sutures were placed on each side lateral to the urethra, one set at the level of the mid urethra and the other set at the level of the bladder neck.

Procedure: Burch colposuspension
Anti-incontinence surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension

After a pneumo peritoneum was established entrance to the retropubic space began with a transverse incision of the anterior peritoneum using sharp dissection and electrocautery. The space was developed using blunt and sharp dissection to identify clearly the retropubic anatomy, including the pubic symphysis, bladder neck, and Cooper's ligaments. The bladder neck was identified and the paraurethral tissue was exposed. A no. 0 permanent suture then was introduced through the 10-mm port and was grasped with a laparoscopic needle driver. With the surgeon's hand in the vagina to elevate the paraurethral tissue, two figure-of-eight sutures incorporating full-thickness vagina excluding epithelium were placed on each side, one set lateral to the mid urethra and the other set lateral to the bladder neck. Each of these sutures then was passed through the ipsilateral Cooper's ligament and was secured with a series of extracorporeal knots using an endoscopic knot pusher.

Procedure: Burch colposuspension
Anti-incontinence surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Surgical success [12 months after intervention]

    Provided by the patient's feeling of the "Absence of a bulge in the vagina"

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. estimated blood loss [intraoperative]

    Blood loss during surgery ( taking blood count-WBC)

  2. complications [up to 6 weeks]

    Complications occurring in between during surgery and 6.th week of surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
30 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients having SUI or mixed urinary incontinence whom conservative therapy (Kegel's pelvic floor exercises, bladder training, electrical stimulation, or medication) failed

  • SUI had been proven by urodynamic assessments.

  • patients who had urethral hypermobility supported by a Q-type test with a cotton swab angle greater than 300

  • patients having a residual urinary volume of less than 100 mL were included.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • history of anti-incontinence surgery

  • pelvic inflammatory diseases

  • urinary retention

  • SUI with intrinsic sphincter deficiency

  • neurogenic bladder

  • suspected malignancy

  • urge incontinence

  • chronic cystitis

  • urinary tract infection

  • prescription of anticoagulant or antipsychotic treatment

  • coagulation disorders

  • physically and medically unsuitable for colposuspension surgery

  • pregnancy and loss to follow-up.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital İstanbul Turkey 34307

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Ozan Karadeniz, Principal investigator, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05452811
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • KanuniSSSEAH
First Posted:
Jul 11, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Aug 25, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Ozan Karadeniz, Principal investigator, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 25, 2022