PRP-HA Versus HA in Knee Osteoarthritis

Sponsor
Singapore General Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05076526
Collaborator
(none)
132
2
12

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent chronic condition which most commonly affects the knee. The pathogenesis of OA involves initial mechanical stress resulting in cartilage lesions, leading to inflammatory processes causing joint degradation. Numerous pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies have been employed, including hyaluronic acid (HA) supplementations to alleviate the joint damage from mechanical load by acting as a shock absorber which provides lubrication, and intra-articular corticosteroid injections to reduce inflammation. However, HA is unable to facilitate cartilage regeneration and corticosteroids has numerous undesirable side effects which render them unsustainable treatment options.

Recently, many studies worldwide have demonstrated that platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) stimulates cartilage repair by actively secreting growth factors which activate cell proliferation and differentiation thereby promoting tissue regeneration. However, there has been varying results across various RCTs due to the heterogeneity of studies, with inconclusive recommendations on the treatment regimen for PRP-HA. Currently, PRP treatment is also not formally recognized as a treatment modality for knee OA in many countries, including Singapore.

This randomised controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of Cellular Matrix (CM) PRP-HA versus HA (Synolis VA) intra-articular injections in knee OA through quantifying the improvement in long-term treatment outcomes such as pain, stiffness, and functional impairment, potentially improving the quality of life for many patients with knee OA.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Biological: Hyaluronic acid (Synolis VA)
  • Biological: Cellular Matrix platelet-rich-plasma with hyaluronic acid (CM PRP-HA)
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

In vitro experimentations have also established the efficacy of PRP, where chondrocytes stimulated with PRP has shown to increase proteoglycan and collagen synthesis which bears similar biochemical qualities to that of hyaline cartilage. PRP has also shown to provide more critical growth factors (including PDGF, TGF-beta, IGF, EGF, VEGF, FGF) than conventional culture media, increasing the synthesis of major cellular proteins and collagen in the extracellular component of intervertebral disc cells, potentially enhancing the functional properties of joint cartilages.

Presently, cellular matrix (CM) remains as the only device which allows for the combination of PRP and HA to be delivered to patients within a single intra-articular injection. However, there are insufficient large-scale studies to reliably evaluate the efficacy of PRP-HA on knee OA and formulate a universal recommendation on its treatment regimen. There are also no RCTs conducted on our local population to explore the effects of CM-PRP-HA on knee OA.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
132 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This is a single-blinded randomised controlled trial.This is a single-blinded randomised controlled trial.
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cellular Matrix Combination of Platelet Rich Plasma With Hyaluronic Acid (CM-PRP-HA) Versus Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: HA

Patients will receive 2 intra-articular injections of 2mL Synolis VA (20 mg/mL HA and 40 mg/mL sorbitol), with an interval of 1 month between both injections.

Biological: Hyaluronic acid (Synolis VA)
Synolis VA harbours the following characteristics: NaHA (Sodium hyaluronate): 20mg/mL, biofermantative and pharmaceutical grade origin. Sorbitol: 40mg/mL Molecular weight of 2MDa, sterilized in moist heat

Experimental: PRP-HA

Patients will receive 2 intra-articular injections of 5mL CM-PRP-HA combination (3mL of autologous PRP, 2mL of 16mg/mL HA), with an interval of 1 month between both injections.

Biological: Cellular Matrix platelet-rich-plasma with hyaluronic acid (CM PRP-HA)
The CM-PRP-HA tube is under vacuum containing the following: 2mL of hyaluronic acid gel in phosphate buffer (Sodium chloride, Dipotassium hydrogenphosphate, Potassium dihydrogenphosphate, Potassium chloride and water for injection). Not crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid (40mg per tube) is obtained from fermentation 3g of inert cell-selector gel 0.6mL of anticoagulant (sodium citrate 4%)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score [Baseline]

    WOMAC score comprises pain score, stiffness score and functional impairment score. Pain scores range from 0 to 20, stiffness scores range from 0 to 8, functional impairment scores range from 0 to 68. Total WOMAC score, which is an addition of the above 3 components, range from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes

  2. Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score from baseline at 1 month [1 month after last injection]

    WOMAC score comprises pain score, stiffness score and functional impairment score. Pain scores range from 0 to 20, stiffness scores range from 0 to 8, functional impairment scores range from 0 to 68. Total WOMAC score, which is an addition of the above 3 components, range from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes

  3. Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score from baseline at 3 months [3 months after last injection]

    WOMAC score comprises pain score, stiffness score and functional impairment score. Pain scores range from 0 to 20, stiffness scores range from 0 to 8, functional impairment scores range from 0 to 68. Total WOMAC score, which is an addition of the above 3 components, range from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes

  4. Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score from baseline at 6 months [6 months after last injection]

    WOMAC score comprises pain score, stiffness score and functional impairment score. Pain scores range from 0 to 20, stiffness scores range from 0 to 8, functional impairment scores range from 0 to 68. Total WOMAC score, which is an addition of the above 3 components, range from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
30 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients of age 30 years and above

  • Radiographical diagnosis of knee OA - ie narrowing of joint space, presence of osteophytes, possible sclerosis and subchondral cysts

  • History of chronic pain in knee or knee swelling for at least 3 months

  • Ability of patients to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Concurrent complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments e.g. acupuncture

  • Inflammatory diseases / infection / fracture / trauma

  • Malignancies

  • Pregnant or lactating females

  • Consistent use of NSAIDs within 48 hours of procedure

  • Corticosteroid injection at treatment site within 1 month

  • Systemic use of corticosteroids within 2 weeks

  • Tobacco use

  • (For patients receiving PRP-HA injection only): Hemoglobin <10 g/dL and platelets <150,000/mm3

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Singapore General Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Kenon Chua Ser, Orthopaedic Surgery Registrar, Singapore General Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05076526
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • In progress
First Posted:
Oct 13, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Oct 13, 2021
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Kenon Chua Ser, Orthopaedic Surgery Registrar, Singapore General Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 13, 2021