Regular vs. Clear Liquid Diet for Mild to Moderate Acute Pancreatitis

Sponsor
University of Southern California (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04932785
Collaborator
(none)
150
1
2
23.4
6.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Acute pancreatitis is among the most common gastroenterology diagnosis in the United States, and represents a large economic burden to the United States health system. While recent guidelines agree early feeding shortens length of stay, these guidelines fail to provide recommendations on optimal diet to start leaving diet type to clinician discretion. Therefore, the aim is to assess the comparative efficacy of full calorie regular diet (RD) versus clear liquid diet (CLD) on length of hospital stay (LOHS) for mild to moderate acute pancreatitis (AP). The study population will target mild to moderate acute pancreatitis patients who can tolerate eating in a single institution. The primary end point will focus on LOHS, and secondary end points will include Pancreatic Activity Scoring System, side effects and readmission.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Regular diet
  • Other: Clear Liquid Diet
N/A

Detailed Description

Purpose: To assess the comparative efficacy of initial full calorie regular diet (RD) versus clear liquid diet (CLD) on length of hospital stay (LOHS) for mild to moderate acute pancreatitis (AP).

Study Design:

Patients presenting to the Los Angeles County Hospital with mild to moderate acute pancreatitis are eligible and are the focus population of this study. Diagnosis and severity classification will be according to the Revised Atlanta classification and Modified Marshal Score. Patients will require fulfillment of 2 of 3 criteria: amylase or lipase greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal, classic epigastric abdominal pain, or unequivocal imaging consistent with acute pancreatitis.

Patients within the inclusion and exclusion parameters will be randomized to RD vs. CLD within 16 hours of diagnosis of pancreatitis. Randomization will be performed using a random sequence algorithm with concealed allocation. The provision of diet in the emergency department prior to randomization will be recorded but not impact randomization strategy.

Following randomization, the diet of RD vs. CLD will begin as soon as patient expresses an appetite and willingness to eat. The patients will be assessed within 24 hours for hunger and interest in initiating oral feeding which accords with the 2018 recommendations of the American Gastroenterology Association for the management of acute pancreatitis.

The diet algorithm will be randomization to a 1:1 of full regular diet versus clear liquid diet per the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California nutrition department. This nutritional composition is confirmed by the in-house dietician and nutrition department. Regular diet will reflect the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Dietary guidelines for 2015-202013 and meets recommendations of the International Consensus Guidelines for Nutrition Therapy for Pancreatitis. Fat content is modest in both groups; it is set at 20-35% of caloric intake for regular diet and 15-20% for clear liquid diet. Patients with diabetes mellitus will received modified versions of the regular or clear diet to reflect American Diabetes Association (ADA) requirements. This will be the standard of care composition provided to all patients at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center with diabetes deemed by their providers to have a diet modified for diabetes (ADA) diet.

A complete history and physical exam will be taken at time of admission within 24 hours during time of enrollment. Then at 48 hours, 72 hours, and every day until discharge, the patient will have a targeted history including oral tolerance, pain and pain medication requirement, and baseline and changes in Pancreatic Activity Scoring System (PASS). The percent of completed diet per meal will also be recorded. At one week, patients will be contacted for symptom relapse check up by phone and at thirty days, the electronic record will be reviewed to capture possible readmissions. While patients and the study team will be unblinded following discharge, a blinded coordinator will use the length of stay function to capture the primary endpoint which is length of hospitalization.

Pain and pain medications are automatically documented in the Electronic Medical Record(EMR) for monitoring and quantification. A Wong-Baker Pain (FACES) scale is the current validated pain score used by nursing staff. Pain is recorded on a pain scale from 0-10 that matches prior landmark and contemporary studies of acute pancreatitis. Quantification of pain medication by both acetaminophen and morphine equivalents will be recorded in data collection sheets.

If patients have oral intolerance or ileus, their diet will be managed at the discretion of their treating physicians and recorded by the study team. It will be recommended that diets remain consistent and titrated in quantity per physician and patient preference; however, if there is a physician preference to change to a different diet type this will be recorded and the patient will be included in the intention to treat analysis

For severe pancreatitis that develops following enrollment, nutritional management (whether nasal jejunal tube or total parenteral nutrition) will be managed per the primary team and patients will similarly be included in the intention to treat analysis.

Gallstone pancreatitis will be diagnosed by findings of elevated or fluctuating liver enzyme tests and biliary imaging abnormalities including cholelithiasis or ductal dilation. For patients with gallstone pancreatitis who will undergo same admission cholecystectomy, patients will have diet prescribed per assigned randomization but will be made nothing by mouth (NPO) at the discretion of the surgical team in anticipation of the operation. Integration of surgery into the hospitalization may impact length of stay. Therefore, randomization will be stratified by presence of gallstone versus non-gallstone pancreatitis.

Additionally, the study protocol will not impact other strategies/treatments to manage pancreatitis. For example, alcohol counseling will be provided to those whose pancreatitis is related to heavy alcohol use regardless of randomization or the study.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
150 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
To Assess the Comparative Efficacy of Full Calorie Regular Diet (RD) Versus Clear Liquid Diet (CLD) on Length of Hospital Stay (LOHS) for Mild to Moderate Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 18, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Regular Diet

Patient randomized to regular diet will begin with a regular diet.

Other: Regular diet
Regular diet

Active Comparator: Clear Liquid Diet

Patient randomized to clear liquid diet will begin with a clear liquid diet.

Other: Clear Liquid Diet
Clear Liquid Diet

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Length of Hospitalization Stay [From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months]

    Length of Hospitalization Stay will be measured as defined as from time of admission to time of discharge for regular diet vs. clear liquid diet

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Oral Intolerance [From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months]

    Proportion who cannot tolerate assigned diet requiring cessation or change due to worsened nausea, vomiting and pain

  2. Intensive Care Unit admission and interventions [From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months]

    Intensive Care Unit admission and intervention including intubation and vasopressors

  3. Local complications [From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months]

    Local complications including pancreatic necrosis, abscess, or pseudocysts

  4. Development of severe pancreatitis [From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months]

    Development of severe pancreatitis as defined by the Revised Atlanta Classification (persistent single or multiple organ failure at >48 hours)

  5. Development of severe pancreatitis [From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months]

    Development of severe pancreatitis as defined by the Modified Marshall Score (Score 0-4, with 4 being most severe and worse outcome)

  6. Change in Pancreatic Activity Scoring System Score [From date of randomization until the date of discharge at 24, 48, 72 hours and at discharge, assessed up to 24 months]

    Change in Pancreatic Activity Scoring System Score, from 0 to >250 (max score, where a max score is worse)

  7. Calorie and fat intake [From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months]

    Calorie and fat intake per group based on percent finished meal documented by nursing staff at 24, 48, and 72 hours.

  8. 30 day hospital readmission [From date of discharge to 30 days after discharge]

    Hospital readmission within 30 days

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. 18 years of age

  2. Presentation with acute pancreatitis as defined by two of three criterion per the Revised Atlanta Criteria guidelines: (a) Amylase or lipase > 3x the upper limit of normal, b) Classical abdominal pain, c) Ultrasound or computed tomography of unequivocal pancreatitis. Such radiographic findings include swelling, edema, or heterogeneity of the gland or peripancreatic fluid or stranding

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women

  2. Incarcerated patients

  3. Patients < 18 years of age

  4. Patient unable or unwilling to give informed consent

  5. Patients transferred from another hospital

  6. The possibility of poor oral intake for reasons other than acute pancreatitis (e.g. intubation, failure to pass an indicated swallow study for aspiration risk, anorexia secondary to active malignancy, etc)

  7. Surgical intervention for infected pancreatic necrosis or pancreatic hemorrhage

  8. Chronic pancreatitis based on radiographic evidence

  9. Severe pancreatitis based on Revised Atlanta Criteria. Under Revised Atlanta Criteria, patients will be excluded if they have a composite Modified Marshall >2

  10. Etiologies of hypertriglyceridemia, trauma and autoimmune pancreatitis will be excluded

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 LAC+USC Medical Center Los Angeles California United States 90033

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Southern California

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James Buxbaum, MD, Principal Investigator

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
James Buxbaum, Chief of Gastroenterology Los Angeles County + University of Southern California, University of Southern California
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04932785
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HS-20-00375
First Posted:
Jun 21, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Dec 15, 2021
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 15, 2021