AGAPO: Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals

Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03693872
Collaborator
(none)
42
7
2
46
6
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

There is currently no consensus on the adequate concomitant treatment to apomorphine pump in Parkinson's disease (PD). In practice, some centers withdraw all dopaminergic agonists when initiating apomorphine pump therapy, whereas others combine the two. To date, there has been no study led to determine the best strategy for efficiently treating motor and nonmotor symptoms, as well as improving patients' quality of life (QoL). This preliminary study, entitled AGAPO, aims at identifying significant differences in patients' evolution (nonmotor symptoms and quality of life), over a course of 6 months, depending on the two strategies adopted in French centers (apomorphine pump with or without dopaminergic agonists), through the Non Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS, Chaudhuri et al, 2017).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

The recruitment period will be 24 months. The duration of the study will be 6 months for each patient due to adjustments of apomorphine pump parameters and oral medication as well time needed for motor and nonmotor changes to develop and influence QoL.

This study will be done without any modification of the planned treatment plan for each patient included. The treatments are administered in accordance with their marketing authorization and according to the usual practices of each center. No additional visits are expected.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
42 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Interventional to minimal risks and constraints, non randomized, openInterventional to minimal risks and constraints, non randomized, open
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
open
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals
Actual Study Start Date :
May 15, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 15, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 15, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Apomorphine

Withdrawal of dopaminergic agonists at pump initiation

Drug: Apomorphine
Apomorphine (5 mg/ml), supplied as solution for infusion in a 10 ml glass ampoule Hourly flow rate adjusted during the whole duration of the study to obtain the best effect in each patient
Other Names:
  • APO
  • Other: Dopaminergic Agonist + Apomorphine

    Continuation of dopaminergic agonists at pump initiation

    Drug: Dopaminergic Agonist + Apomorphine
    Apomorphine (5 mg/ml), supplied as solution for infusion in a 10 ml glass ampoule Hourly flow rate adjusted during the whole duration of the study to obtain the best effect in each patient and associated with dopaminergic agonists
    Other Names:
  • AGAPO
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Difference in the Non Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease, through 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular, sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, gastro-intestinal tract, urinary, sexual function, and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). Item scores are calculated as the product of severity and frequency; the total score is obtained by summing the item scores. The NMSS total score ranges from 0 to 360 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms (reduced score).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ39) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39): the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) is a commonly used measure of self-appraisal in PD. It is a measure of health status and quality of life, by assessing difficulties in 8 dimensions of daily living: mobility (10 items), activities of daily living (6 items), emotional well-being (6 items), stigma (4 items), social support (3 items), cognition (4 items), communication (3 items) and bodily discomfort (3 items). The frequency of each event is determined by selecting one of 5 options: never (scored 0) / occasionally (scored 1) / sometimes (2) / often (3) / always (4). Each dimension total score range from 0 to 100, with lower scores reflecting better quality of life.

    2. Change in the Neurologist Global Impression of change (CGI) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Change in the Neurologist (clinician) Global Impression of change (CGI) provides a brief, stand-alone assessment of the clinician's view of the patient's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication. It ranges from severely impaired to dramatically improved.

    3. Change in non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (MDS-UPDRS I) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part I include 13 items (6 semistructured interview items and 7 self-reported items) scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.

    4. Change in apathy assessed on the long version of Lille Apathy Rating Scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up (LARS) [6 months]

      The Lille apathy rating scale (LARS) is a measure of apathy through nine domains (each corresponding to a clinical manifestation of apathy: everyday productivity, interests, taking the initiative, novelty seeking, motivation - Voluntary actions, emotional responses, concern, social life & self-awareness) and 33 queries. The interview is structured, with a precise scoring mode for each reply (-2 to 2); when an item does not apply to the patient or the reply cannot be classified, it is scored "0" (for non-applicable and/or non-classifiable) The scale's overall score ranges from -36 to +36, with highest scores reflecting apathy severity. 4 factorial sub-scores (intellectual curiosity, emotion, action initiation and self-awareness) are calculated from sub-scale scores.

    5. Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-YA) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      Present feelings

    6. Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-YB) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      General feelings

    7. Change in behavioral symptoms assessed by Ardouin Scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      Changes from baseline in hyper and hypo dopaminergic symptoms scores will be assessed through the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease (ASBPD). It is designed for assessing mood and behavior with a view to quantifying changes related to Parkinson's disease, to dopaminergic medication, and to non-motor fluctuations. Its 21 items address nonmotor symptoms and are grouped into four dimensions: general psychological assessment, apathy, nonmotor fluctuations and hyperdopaminergic behaviors, with a 5-point rating scale ranging from 0 (Absent) to 4 (Severe). A score ≥ 2 is considered as a warning sign.

    8. Change in emotional function assessed by the short form of the TEIQue between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow upscale [6 months]

      The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) aims at evaluating emotional intelligence through a self-report inventory that measure global trait emotional intelligence (trait EI) through a 30-item questionnaire. The trait EI is about perceptions and not about abilities, competencies or skills ; high scores are not necessarily adaptive (good) and low scores are not necessarily maladaptive (bad).

    9. Change in emotional function assessed by the short form of the BEQ scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire (BEQ) is a self-report measure of three emotional expressivity facets related to emotional expressivity: expressivity of negative and positive emotions, and strength of expression impulse. Each of the 16 items is answered on a 7-point Likert-type ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The 3 facets can be kept as separate scores or combined to form an overall Emotional Expressivity score.

    10. Change in motor aspects of experiences of daily in "on" and "off" medication (MDS-UPDRS II) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part II include 13 self-reported items) scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.

    11. Change in motor examination during "on" periods (MDS-UPDRS III) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part III include 18 items scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.

    12. Change in motor complications with MDS-UPDRS IV between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part IV include 6 items assessed in a semistructured interview, scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.

    13. Change in motor examination with the Schwab and England scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Schwab & England activities of daily living evaluates patients' autonomy through a percentage ranging from 0% (=Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden.) to 100% ( = Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal). Unaware of any difficulty.

    14. Change in motor examination with the Hoehn & Yarr scale [6 months]

      The severity of PD is assessed through the Modified Hoehn & Yahr rating scale, consisting of 10levels comprised between 0 (best), 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 (worst).

    15. Change in cognitive function assessed by the MoCA scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

      The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a short tool (one-page 30-point test administered in approximately 10 minutes) to evaluate a multitude of cognitive domains (visuospatial / executive functioning, object naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, orientation). MoCA scores range between 0 and 30; a score ≥ 26 is considered to be normal.

    16. Change of dose for treatments assessed by levodopa (L-DOPA) équivalents between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up [6 months]

    17. Frequency, type and severity of therapy-related adverse events [6 months]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Adults aged = or > 18 years,

    • Idiopathic PD (According to British Brain Bank Criteria) without any other known or suspected cause of symptoms,

    • Indicated for apomorphine pump therapy and according to the centers' practice, treatment with apomorphine pump association with dopamine agonists or apomorphine pump therapy alone

    • Presence of fluctuations for > 3 years,

    • Patients covered with social insurance.

    • Written informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Neurological (other than Parkinson's disease) or severe psychiatric history (depression, schizophrenia, addiction, bipolar disorder, anxiety and depressive disorders);

    • Severe neurocognitive disorders (DSM-V)

    • History of use of apomorphine pump treatment or deep brain stimulation or lesional surgery for PD or intrajejunal L-Dopa;

    • History or current drug or alcohol abuse or dependencies;

    • History of impulse control disorders;

    • Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), persons deprived of their liberty;

    • Inability to understand the information given on the study, to express informed consent.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 CHU La Timone Marseille France
    2 Hôpital Gui de Chauliac Montpellier France 34295
    3 CH Caremeau Nîmes France 30029
    4 CHU La Pitié Salpêtrière Paris France 75013
    5 CHU de Reims- hôpital Maison Blanche Reims France 51100
    6 CHU de Rennes Rennes France 35033
    7 CHU Charles Nicolle Rouen France 76000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Rennes University Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Marc VERIN, PH, Rennes University Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Rennes University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03693872
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 35RC18_9721_AGAPO
    First Posted:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 6, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Rennes University Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 6, 2021