Group Drum-Based Music Therapy Intervention for Parkinson's Disease/Huntington's Disease

Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05157074
Collaborator
(none)
18
1
2
5
3.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Participants in this study (18-89 years) with Parkinson's disease or Huntington's disease receive drum classes twice a week for 12 weeks (24 lessons). All participants also participate in study visits for assessments before the beginning of the study, at the 6 week mark, at the 12 week mark and at the 18 week mark so that the investigators can assess the short and long term effects of drum classes on hand dexterity, upper extremity function and well-being.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Group Drumming Music Therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

There has been evidence that rhythm-based music therapy interventions may improve motor outcomes for patients with Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease, as well as quality of life for both patients and the patients' caregivers. DRUM-PD, a pilot study investigating the impact of West African drumming on quality of life, symptoms, motor findings, cognition, and mood in Parkinson's disease, found trends toward improvement in walking from baseline to 12 weeks and improved quality of life for patients who completed the 6 week drumming intervention. Building on this research, the investigators plan to evaluate the impact of a 12-week, twice weekly rhythm-based music therapy intervention called The Armstrong Rhythm Cycle℠, implemented by a board-certified music therapist. The investigators hypothesize that participation in 24 bi-weekly, hour-long music therapy drumming sessions will result in improved motor functioning for patients and better quality of life for patients and the patients' caregivers as compared to baseline before the intervention.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
18 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Participants were assigned based on diagnosis, into two intervention groups 1) patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease and their study partners, 2) patients diagnosed with Huntington's disease.Participants were assigned based on diagnosis, into two intervention groups 1) patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease and their study partners, 2) patients diagnosed with Huntington's disease.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Drum-PD/HD: The Impact of Group Drum-Based Music Therapy Intervention on Quality of Life and Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease and Huntington's Disease
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 9, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 10, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 10, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Parkinson's Disease (PD) Group

Participants with PD and their caregivers receive group drum classes twice a week for 12 weeks (24 lessons).

Behavioral: Group Drumming Music Therapy
All 24 Armstrong Rhythm Cycle™ sessions is conducted in a circle to ensure maximum line of sight for each participant. A variety of diverse percussion instruments ranging from hand drums, stick drums, shakers, and rhythm sticks are available as well as adaptive measures to address limited physical functioning. Instrument choice is dependent on ease of use for the level of the physical ability, skill development needs, and personal choice. Participants are informed that they are free to use the same instrument for the duration of each session or to switch instruments at any time. Utilizing the five components of The Armstrong Rhythm Method, this protocol guides participants through three phases to achieve rhythmic skill development and group cohesion for their therapeutic benefit.

Experimental: Huntington's Disease (HD) Group

Participants with HD and their caregivers receive group drum classes twice a week for 12 weeks (24 lessons).

Behavioral: Group Drumming Music Therapy
All 24 Armstrong Rhythm Cycle™ sessions is conducted in a circle to ensure maximum line of sight for each participant. A variety of diverse percussion instruments ranging from hand drums, stick drums, shakers, and rhythm sticks are available as well as adaptive measures to address limited physical functioning. Instrument choice is dependent on ease of use for the level of the physical ability, skill development needs, and personal choice. Participants are informed that they are free to use the same instrument for the duration of each session or to switch instruments at any time. Utilizing the five components of The Armstrong Rhythm Method, this protocol guides participants through three phases to achieve rhythmic skill development and group cohesion for their therapeutic benefit.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Changes in score on anxiety level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For anxiety domain, unpleasant thoughts and/or feelings related to fear (e.g., fearfulness, feelings of panic), helplessness, worry and hyperarousal (e.g., tension, nervousness, restlessness) are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) *High scores indicate worse (undesirable) self-reported health.

  2. Changes in score on depression level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For depression domain, experience of loss and feelings of hopelessness, negative mood (e.g., sadness, guilt), decrease in positive affect (e.g., loss of interest), information-processing deficits (e.g., problems in decision-making), negative views of the self (e.g., self-criticism, worthlessness), and negative social cognition (e.g., loneliness) are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) *High scores indicate worse (undesirable) self-reported health.

  3. Changes in score on upper extremity performance level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For upper extremity domain, one's ability to carry out various activities involving digital, manual and reach-related functions, ranging from fine motor to self-care (activities of daily living) are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) *High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.

  4. Changes in score on lower extremity performance level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For lower extremity domain, one's ability to carry out various activities involving the trunk region and increasing degrees of bodily movement, ambulation, balance, or endurance are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) *High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.

  5. Changes in score on ability to participate in social roles and activities as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For the ability to participate in social roles and activities domain, degree of involvement in one's usual social roles, activities and responsibilities, including work, family, friends, and leisure are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) *High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.

  6. Changes in score on satisfaction with social roles and activities as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For the satisfaction with social roles and activities domain, satisfaction with involvement in one's usual social roles, activities and responsibilities, including work, family, friends, and leisure are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) *High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.

  7. Changes in score on positive affect and well-being level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For positive affect and well-being domain, aspects of a person's life that relate to a sense of well-being, life satisfaction or an overall sense of purpose and meaning are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) *High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.

  8. Changes in score on burden level as assessed by the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) (study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The Zarit Burden Interview, a popular caregiver self-report measure used by many aging agencies, originated as a 29-item questionnaire. The 29-item instrument is included in Zarit et al., 1980. The revised version contains 22 items. This study used 22 items. It is scored as either (0) never, (1) rarely, (2) sometimes, (3) quite frequently, or (4) nearly always. Items are then summed and total scores are interpreted as follows: 0 to 21 little or no burden, 21 to 40 mild to moderate burden, 41 to 60 moderate to severe burden, and 61 to 88 severe burden.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Changes in score on cognitive impairment level as assessed by the MoCA (patients) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a rapid cognitive screening test that assesses cognitive performance in multiple domains including visuo-spatial and executive functions, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, and orientation. Scores on the MoCA range from 0 to 30: > 26 = normal 18-25 = mild cognitive impairment 10-17 = moderate cognitive impairment <10 = severe cognitive impairment.

  2. Change in score on depression level as assessed by the BDI-II (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    Beck-Depression inventory (BDI-II) measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression. Each of the 21 items corresponding to a symptom of depression is summed to give a single score for the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). There is a four-point scale for each item ranging from 0 to 3. On two items (16 and 18) there are seven options to indicate either an increase or decrease of appetite and sleep. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe.

  3. Changes in score on the daily living level as assessed by Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) (patients) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) assesses how often people affected by Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living including relationships, social situations and communication. It also assesses the impact of Parkinson's on specific dimensions of functioning and wellbeing 5 point ordinal scoring system (lower scores reflect better QoL) 0 = never = occasionally = sometimes = often = always

  4. Changes in score on patient health level as assessed by the short form (SF)-36 (patients and study partner) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

  5. Changes in score on apathy level as assessed by Apathy Evaluation Scale (patients) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The Apathy Evaluation Scale addresses characteristics of goal-directed behavior that reflect apathy including behavioral, cognitive, and emotional indicators (18 items). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (not at all true, slightly true, somewhat true, very true). Score range: 18-72 (higher scores reflect more apathy)

  6. Changes in score on non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living level as assessed by the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (Part 1) (patients) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The MDS-UPDRS was developed to evaluate various aspects of Parkinson's disease including non-motor and motor experiences of daily living and motor complications. It includes a motor evaluation and characterizes the extent and burden of disease across various populations. Part 1 includes a total of 13 items. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (normal, slight, mild, moderate, severe).

  7. Changes in score on motor aspects of experiences of daily living level as assessed by the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (Part 2) (patients) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The MDS-UPDRS was developed to evaluate various aspects of Parkinson's disease including non-motor and motor experiences of daily living and motor complications. It includes a motor evaluation and characterizes the extent and burden of disease across various populations. Part 2 includes a total of 13 items. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (normal, slight, mild, moderate, severe).

  8. Changes in score on motor examination level as assessed by the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (Part 3) (patients) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The MDS-UPDRS was developed to evaluate various aspects of Parkinson's disease including non-motor and motor experiences of daily living and motor complications. It includes a motor evaluation and characterizes the extent and burden of disease across various populations. Part 3 includes a total of 18 items as well as dyskinesia related and Hoehn and Yahr stage items. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (normal, slight, mild, moderate, severe).

  9. Changes in score on motor complications level as assessed by the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (Part 4) (patients) [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The MDS-UPDRS was developed to evaluate various aspects of Parkinson's disease including non-motor and motor experiences of daily living and motor complications. It includes a motor evaluation and characterizes the extent and burden of disease across various populations. Part 4 includes a total of 6 items. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (normal, slight, mild, moderate, severe).

  10. Changes in score on activities of daily living level as assessed by the Schwab and England scale [Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks]

    The Schwab and England ADL (Activities of Daily Living) scale is a method of assessing the capabilities of people with impaired mobility. The scale uses percentages to represent how much effort and dependence on others people need to complete daily chores. The rating may be given by a professional or by the person being tested. 0% (fully dependent) to 100% completely independent)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Huntington's Disease (HD)

  • Ability to give written consent

  • Age 18-90

  • Clinical diagnosis of probable of clinically established Parkinson disease; or Huntington disease confirmed by genetic testing (greater than or equal to 36 CAG repeats)

  • Ability to move hands, wrists and arms safely for instrument play

  • Presence of study partner who is available for all drum lessons and study assessments

Study Partners:
  • Ability to give written consent

  • Ability to give written consent

  • Age 18-90

  • Ability to move hands, wrists and arms safely for instrument play

Exclusion Criteria:
  • PD: Hoehn & Yahr Stage 5 disease; Schwab & England score 40% or lower

  • HD: Total Functional Capacity scores between 5 and 13 inclusive

  • Co-morbid diagnosis (broken bones, sprains, severe arthritis, conditions involving paresis) in the judgement of the patient's treating physician that may preclude participant's full ability to participate in the intervention group.

  • MoCA scores <17

  • Active psychosis or other condition affecting the participants' ability to safely cooperate with study procedures

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland United States 21205

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Johns Hopkins University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexander Pantelyat, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Johns Hopkins University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05157074
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB00147450
First Posted:
Dec 14, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Dec 14, 2021
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Johns Hopkins University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 14, 2021