Marginal Bone Changes of CAD/CAM Implant Supported Screw-retained and Screw-mented Metal Frameworks
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
compare CAD/CAM implant supported screw-retained metal frameworks based on actual versus screw-mented ones based on virtual implant position regarding marginal bone changes.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
patients with at least three missing teeth will be recruited and randomly assigned into two parallel groups. both groups will receive three implants based on planned implant positions and then one group will receive screw retained CAD CAM restoration with conventional impression technique while the second group will receive screw-mented CAD CAM restoration based on planned implant positions.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: screwmented metal frameworks based on virtual implant position. this group will receive a CAD CAM restoration based on virtually planned implant position. |
Procedure: screwmented metal frameworks
Intervention group: in which the edentulous area will be restored with 3-implant, screwmented CAD/CAM frameworks constructed based on planned implant positions
|
Active Comparator: screw-retained metal frameworks based on actual implant position. this group will receive screw retained CAD CAM restoration based on actual implant position using conventional open tray impression. |
Procedure: screwmented metal frameworks
Intervention group: in which the edentulous area will be restored with 3-implant, screwmented CAD/CAM frameworks constructed based on planned implant positions
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- marginal bone changes. [6 months]
Using long cone paralleling technique , RINN XCP and Digora (digital periapical radiographs for standardization. the bone loss is measured in mm
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Patient satisfaction [6 months]
Patient satisfaction questionnaire using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale, from 0-100, where 0 is the worst meaning that patient is not satisfied and 100 is the highest satisfaction meaning the patient is totally satisfied
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Kennedy class I, II Or IV cases.
-
Opposing completely dentulous, fully or partially restored dentition.
-
Good oral hygiene.
-
The patient should have bone for implants, minimum bone height 10 mm and minimum bone diameter should be 6 mm.
-
Adequate inter arch space for restoration 15mm or more.
-
Adult patients age ≥18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
-
any medical disorder that could complicate surgical phase or affect osteointegration. Radiation chemotherapy.
-
smokers more than 10/daily.
-
Uncooperative patients.
-
Patients with Para-functional habits
-
Patients with severe periodontal diseases.
-
Patients with limited mouth opening.
-
Presence of intraoral pathological lesions.
-
Diabetic (HbA1c >7.5%).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Faculty of Dentistry | Cairo | Manial | Egypt | 11555 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cairo University
Investigators
- Study Chair: Azza Hussein, PhD, Professor of Prosthodontics
- Study Director: Mohamed ElKhashab, PhD, Lecturer of prosthodontics
- Study Director: Iman Radi, PhD, Professor of Prosthodontics
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 101120