ARCUS: Anterior Prolapse Repair With and Without Graft Augmentation

Sponsor
NorthShore University HealthSystem (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04085952
Collaborator
(none)
114
2
132

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a randomized control trial comparing anterior colporrhaphy with augmentation with dermal allograft (ARCUS) to anterior colporrhaphy with a suture-based repair (native tissue). Patients were randomized to one treatment and then were followed post-operatively for 7-10 years. Prior to surgery patients had a POPQ vaginal prolapse exam and completed a quality of life questionaire (PFDI). They had a repeat POPQ exam and quality of life questionaires at their post-op operative visits. We compare recurrent prolapse rates between these 2 groups.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: dermal graft (ARCUS repliform) for anterior colporrhaphy
  • Procedure: suture based anterior colporrhaphy
N/A

Detailed Description

Objective: To determine whether dermal allograft (ARCUS) reduces anterior prolapse recurrence at 1 and 7-10 years post-operatively. Our central question is whether we can reduce the rate of rate of anterior compartment prolapse recurrence after surgical repair, is the recurrence rate reduced with allograft use, and does this benefit hold up over time?

Methods: Patient will be randomized by computer generated block randomization to native tissue (suture based) anterior colporrhaphy or colporrhaphy with graft (ARCUS) usage. Neither patients nor surgeons will be blinded due to the nature of the surgery. Patients will be followed for 7-10 years post-operatively. Participants will complete a POPQ exam and the PFDI (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory) questionnaire pre-operatively. Patients will return for a POPQ exam at 1 year post-operatively and complete the PFDI (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory) and PISQ (Sexual Function for Women with: POP, Urinary Incontinence and/or Fecal Incontinence) questionnaires. Patients will be asked to return to the office for a research visit 7-10 years post-operatively for a POPQ exam and to complete quality of life questionnaires including PFDI 20 (Pelvic floor distress inventory), PISQ-R (Sexual Function for Women with: POP, Urinary Incontinence and/or Fecal Incontinence, Revised), and PGI (Patient global assessment of improvement).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
114 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparing Anterior Prolapse Repair With and Without Allograft Use: A Randomized Control Trial With Long Term Follow-Up
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2005
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: anterior colporrhaphy with dermal graft

Patients randomized to this arm underwent anterior colporrhaphy with dermal graft augmentation (ARUCS) during their surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Procedure: dermal graft (ARCUS repliform) for anterior colporrhaphy
At the time of surgery patients were randomized to anterior colporrhaphy with dermal graft augmentation

Active Comparator: anterior colporrhaphy suture based

Patients randomized to this arm underwent anterior colporrhaphy with suture based repair (native tissue) during their surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. This is and was the most common practice for anterior colporrhaphy.

Procedure: suture based anterior colporrhaphy
At the time of surgery patients were randomized to anterior colporrhaphy with a suture based repair

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. 1-Year Recurrent prolapse- anatomic [1 year post-operative]

    Failure of prolapse surgery as measured by changes in POPQ measurements, Aa and Ba to -1 or greater

  2. 7-10 Years Recurrent prolapse-anatomic [7-10 years post-operative]

    Failure of prolapse surgery as measured by changes in POPQ measurements, Aa and Ba to -1 or greater

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. 1 Year composite score [1 year post-operative]

    Failure of prolapse surgery as measured as a composite outcome including anatomic failure measured by changes to Aa and Ba points to -1 or greater, "yes" to PFDI question #3, and retreatment with pessary or surgery for anterior compartment prolapse

  2. 7-10 years composite score [7-10 years post-operative]

    Failure of prolapse surgery as measured as a composite outcome including anatomic failure measured by changes to Aa and Ba points to -1 or greater, "yes" to PFDI question #3, and retreatment with pessary or surgery for anterior compartment prolapse

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes

Inclusion Criteria: Any patient planning to undergo surgery for anterior compartment prolapse, English speaking.

-

Exclusion Criteria: Any patient who does not speak English due to standardized English language based questionaires, and patients without anterior compartment prolapse.

-

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • NorthShore University HealthSystem

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Sand, MD, North Shore Research Institute

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
NorthShore University HealthSystem
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04085952
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • EH04-302
First Posted:
Sep 11, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Sep 11, 2019
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by NorthShore University HealthSystem
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 11, 2019