Study of Outpatient Management for Promontofixation by Laparoscopy

Sponsor
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03573752
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
38.6
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Laparoscopic promontofixation is becoming increasingly common and is currently the standard surgical procedure for pelvic prolapse, with few complications including exposure and mesh infection.

The research hypothesis is that laparoscopic promontofixation is a relatively painless procedure and can be performed on an outpatient basis without increasing the number of postoperative complications and impairing patients' quality of life.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the number of rehospitalizations after management of promontofixation by laparoscopy on an outpatient basis.

To evaluate the feasibility of a postoperative H8 exit after laparoscopic promontofixation.

Each patient will complete a questionnaire on the experience of management, both in terms of pain management, anxiety and overall satisfaction.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: outpatient management for promontofixation by laparoscopy
  • Other: questionnaire
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Study of Outpatient Management for Promontofixation by Laparoscopy
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 26, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 14, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 14, 2021

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of rehospitalizations occurring between outpatient discharge and postoperative follow-up consultation [35 to 70 Days after the intervention]

    Rate of rehospitalizations occurring between outpatient discharge and postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Exit rate at postoperative H8 according to post-anesthesia discharge scoring system score according to Chung. [Hour 8 after the intervention]

    This score considers six criteria: vital signs, ambulation, nausea/vomiting, pain, bleeding and voiding. Each criterion is given a score ranging from 0 to 2. Only patients who achieve a score of 9 or more are considered ready for discharge.

  2. Quality of life assessed by the Euroqol EQ-5D index (EuroQol five dimension scale) [Day 0, 3, 7 and 30 after the intervention]

    The EQ-5D questionnaire is made up for two components; health state description and evaluation. In description part, health status is measured in terms of five dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension using three-level (3L) scale; having no problems, having some or moderate problems, being unable to do/having extreme problems. The respondents are asked to choose the statement which best describes their health status of surveyed day. In evaluation part, the respondents evaluate their overall health status using the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The patient is asked to mark health status on the day of the interview on a 20 cm vertical scale with end points of 0 and 100. There are notes at the both ends of the scale that the bottom rate (0) corresponds to "the worst health you can imagine", and the highest rate (100) corresponds to "the best health you can imagine".

  3. Assess the satisfaction of the patients by answering a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire [Day 30 after the intervention]

    Assess the satisfaction of the patients by answering a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. It includes a satisfaction scale ranging from 0 to 10 and 2 closed-response questions, with the possibility of adding a free comment.

  4. Assess the postoperative anxiety by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) form Y-A. [Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 7 and 30 after the intervention]

    Assess the postoperative anxiety by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) form Y-A. This form has 20 items for assessing state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

  5. Assess postoperative pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the consumption of analgesics. [8 hours after surgery (Day 0)/ At 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. (Day 1, 2 and 3)/ At 8 a.m. (Day 4, 5, 6, 7 and 30)]

    Assess postoperative pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the consumption of analgesics. This scale consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as "no pain at all" and "pain as bad as it could be". The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between "no pain at all" and the mark then defines the subject's pain.

  6. Rates of postoperative complications [35 to 70 Days after the intervention]

    Rates of postoperative complications

  7. Number of emergency consultations before scheduled postoperative follow-up consultation [35 to 70 Days after the intervention]

    Number of emergency consultations before scheduled postoperative follow-up consultation

  8. Difference in actual costs and cost-effectiveness between conventional and outpatient care [35 to 70 Days after the intervention]

    Collection of the PMSI (medical information system program) of the made act and the cost of the hospital stay in ambulatory for a laparoscopic promontofixation.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Woman with promontofixation indication by laparoscopy for prolapse cure

  • Patient's desire for outpatient management

  • Age ≥18 years and <70 years

  • Absence of a major medical or surgical history that would prolong hospitalization (ASA 1 or 2, absence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome)

  • Subject affiliated to a social security scheme

  • Subject having signed an informed consent

  • Availability of a caregiver, responsible and valid (for the first 48 hours after the potential early exit) at home

  • Geographical distance less than one hour from a suitable care facility

  • Access to a telephone or a means of transport if necessary

  • Patient compliance

  • Oral and written comprehension of pre- and post-operative instructions

  • Correct housing condition

  • Subject having been informed of the results of the prior medical examination

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Laparoscopic contraindication

  • Comorbidity needs of medical supervision most of 24h

  • TVT-O procedure during the same surgery

  • Mental handicap affecting autonomy

  • Comprehension difficulties to understand the protocol

  • No social protection

  • Subject with curatorship or guardianship

  • Morbid obesity

  • Alcohol or drugs addiction

  • Excessive anxiety

  • Impossibility to give the subject enlightened information (subject in emergency situation...)

  • Pregnant woman (positive urinary pregnancy test for women of childbearing age)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Service de gynécologie, Centre Médico Chirurgical Obstétrical, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg Schiltigheim France 67303

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03573752
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 6796
First Posted:
Jun 29, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Aug 18, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 18, 2022