PRoVENT-COP: PRactice of VENTilation in Patients With ARDS Due to COVID-19 vs Pneumonia

Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05650957
Collaborator
Carlos III Health Institute (Other), Hospital Interzonal de Agudos San Martin de La Plata (Other), University of Sao Paulo (Other), Hospital Sirio-Libanes Ensino e Pesquina (Other), National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland (Other)
7,145
6
6
1190.8
197

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare epidemiology, management of invasive ventilation and outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 ARDS and ARDS from another pulmonary infection. The investigators will use individual patient data from four recently published large observational COVID-9 studies, including the 'Practice of VENTilation in COVID-19 patients' (PRoVENT-COVID) study, the 'Epidemiology of COVID-19 patients in the ICU' (EPICCoV) study, the 'SATI-COVID-19 - Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 on Mechanical Ventilation in Argentina: a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study' and the CIBERESUCICOVID - Personalized Risk and Prognosis Factors and Follow-up at One Year of the Patients Hospitalized in the Spanish Intensive Care Units Infected with COVID -19' study. The investigators will use the individual patient data from ARDS patients with another pulmonary infection from the 'LUNG -SAFE - Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE' study and the 'ERICC - Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care' study.

Detailed Description

Early on in the pandemic, it was frequently proposed that ARDS caused by COVID-19 and ARDS caused by another cause were distinct in a number of ways. COVID-19 related ARDS phenotypes have been suggested, based on differences in respiratory system compliance (Crs) and the severity of the hypoxemia. Other reports have even suggested that lung-protective ventilation strategies for patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19 should differ from those used before the pandemic.

The use of low tidal volumes (VT) and prone positioning, which have been shown to be useful in reducing death in patients with ARDS prior to the pandemic, were also shown to be effective in patients with COVID-19 related ARDS, according to several reports. In the discussion of how to ventilate patients with COVID-19 related ARDS, the disagreement over other ventilatory settings, such as the best positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the use of recruitment manoeuvres, remains remarkably lively.

To compare epidemiology, management of invasive ventilation and outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 ARDS and ARDS from another pulmonary infection, the investigators will use individual patient data from PRoVENT-COVID, EPICCoV, SATI-COVID-19, CIBERESUCICOVID, LUNG-SAFE and ERICC.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
7145 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
PRactice of VENTilation in Patients With ARDS Due to COVID-19 Versus ARDS Due to Other Pulmonary Infections (PRoVENT-COP)
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Non-COVID-19 ARDS

To be included in this analysis the cause for ARDS was a pulmonary infection other than COVID-19 and meeting all aspects of the Berlin definition.

COVID-19 ARDS

To be included in this analysis the cause for ARDS was COVID-19 and meeting all aspects of the Berlin definition.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Characteristics of invasive ventilation [Day 1]

    A combination of key ventilation characteristics, including tidal volume (VT); positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); fraction inspired oxygen (FiO2); peak pressure (Ppeak) and plateau pressure (Pplat); respiratory rate (RR); driving pressure (ΔP); respiratory system compliance (CRS) and mechanical power of ventilation (MP).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Ventilator-free days [28 days]

    Liberated of invasive ventilation and alive

  2. Incidence of ICU mortality [90 days]

    Incidence of ICU mortality at day 28 and at day 90

  3. Incidence of in-hospital mortality [90 days]

    Incidence of in-hospital mortality at day 28 and at day 90

  4. ICU length of stay [90 days]

    ICU length of stay at day 28 and at day 90

  5. Hospital length of stay [90 days]

    Hospital length of stay at day 28 and at day 90

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Cause for ARDS is COVID -19 (confirmed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or presence of typical abnormalities on chest computer tomography (CT) and/or X-ray) or a pulmonary infection from another origen

  2. Meeting a Berlin criteria for ARDS

  3. Invasive ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Age < 18 years

  2. Any form of non-invasive ventilation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos'General Jose de San Martin' La Plata Argentina
2 Hospital Sirio-Libanes São Paulo Brazil
3 Univeristy of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
4 University of Galway Galway Ireland
5 Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) Amsterdam Netherlands
6 Carlos III health institute Madrid Spain

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Carlos III Health Institute
  • Hospital Interzonal de Agudos San Martin de La Plata
  • University of Sao Paulo
  • Hospital Sirio-Libanes Ensino e Pesquina
  • National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

Investigators

  • Study Chair: David MP van Meenen, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Prof. Dr. Marcus J. Schultz, Prof. Dr., Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05650957
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AUMC
First Posted:
Dec 14, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Feb 1, 2023
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Prof. Dr. Marcus J. Schultz, Prof. Dr., Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 1, 2023