OPORP: Limb Health and Socket Pressure in Response to Powered Ankle Protheses

Sponsor
Indiana University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05112679
Collaborator
University of Notre Dame (Other), United States Department of Defense (U.S. Fed)
13
1
2
14.6
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

this project seeks to understand and quantify the effects of powered transtibial prostheses on socket loading and direct measures of residual limb health so as to inform the optimization of prosthesis fit.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: PROPRIO FOOT® by Ossur
  • Device: Empower ankle by Ottobock
N/A

Detailed Description

Some estimates suggest that by 2050, as many as 3.6 million people in the United States will be living with limb loss, and at least 60% of them will have had at least a foot removed For military personnel, combat-related amputations remain one of the most common major disabling war-related injuries from modern armed conflict. Technological advancements in active prosthetic devices for individuals with transtibial amputation offer the potential for superior function in key areas that could lead to higher rates of RTD and improved quality of life. Currently intended primarily for individuals with a K-level of 3 or 4, active transtibial prostheses that provide controlled plantar/dorsiflexion in either swing (microprocessor-controlled prostheses) or late stance (prostheses with powered propulsion) are likely to become the gold standard in the future as technology continues to improve Indeed, users of these types of prostheses have higher mobility than those using any of the other four categories of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms for unlimited community ambulators. Note that a major insurer has recently declared microprocessor-controlled ankle-foot prostheses medically necessary for members whose functional level is 3 or above.The PROPRIO FOOT® by Ossur, is a microprocessor-controlled prosthesis that regulates the angle of ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase. This added ankle control of these devices reduces the risk of falls by increasing toe clearance supports more natural standing posture on slopes and improves stair and slope ascent/descent capability by adapting to the change in terrain.On stairs, the PROPRIO FOOT® has been shown to improve affected leg knee kinematics (increased knee flexion) and kinetics (increased knee moment) instance. These improvements also contributed to higher interlimb symmetry reduced energetic cost of slope ascent and higher Amputee Mobility Predictor with a Prosthesis (AMPPRO) scores . Although the ankle of the PROPRIO FOOT® can be controlled in swing, the device does not have adequate power to provide an active propulsion instance. The Empower ankle by Ottobock is a powered prosthesis that provides active propulsion in late stance to mimic the positive work performed by the ankle plantar flexors in push-off. The Empower has been shown to improve affected leg kinematics (increased ankle range of motion and reduced knee flexion) on smooth flat ground ramp ascent and gravel]. In terms of kinetics, the Empower likewise results in increased ankle power on level ground stairs and ramps . Active prostheses like the PROPRIO FOOT® and Empower ankle offer great potential to more completely restore the locomotor capabilities of individuals with transtibial amputation, perhaps enhancing RTD for military personnel. As with all prosthetic components, though, these active devices are of little use if they induce pain and/or injury at the residual limb to the degree that the user will simply not wear them. The investigators will examine how optimal fit of lower limb prostheses can impact individuals comfort and/or reduce irritation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
13 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Limb Health and Socket Pressure in Response to Powered Ankle Prostheses
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 15, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Proprio Foot

microprocessor-controlled prosthesis that regulates the angle of ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase

Device: PROPRIO FOOT® by Ossur
Active prostheses like the PROPRIO FOOT® offer great potential to more completely restore the locomotor capabilities of individuals with transtibial amputation, perhaps enhancing RTD for military personnel. The investigators will examine factors of socket loading and direct measures of residual limb health so as to inform the optimization of prosthesis fit. The testing will consist of walking on a treadmill and the use of a 3D motion capture camera to track movement and angles of the participant's upper and lower extremities. Ascending and descending on stairs and ramps with the device will be completed. Participants will also have laser speckle imaging to measure blood flow to skin and transepidermal water loss measurement to check skin health.

Active Comparator: Empower Ankle

a powered prosthesis that provides active propulsion in late stance to mimic the positive work performed by the ankle plantar-flexors in push-off. The Empower has been shown to improve affected leg kinematics (increased ankle range of motion and reduced knee flexion) on smooth flat ground, ramp ascent, and gravel

Device: Empower ankle by Ottobock
Active prostheses -such as the Empower ankle offer great potential to more completely restore the locomotor capabilities of individuals with transtibial amputation, perhaps enhancing RTD for military personnel. The investigators will examine factors of socket loading and direct measures of residual limb health so as to inform the optimization of prosthesis fit. The testing will consist of walking on a treadmill and the use of a 3D motion capture camera to track movement and angles of the participant's upper and lower extremities. Ascending and descending on stairs and ramps with the device will be completed. Participants will also have laser speckle imaging to measure blood flow to skin and trans epidermal water loss measurement to check skin health.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Effects of use of a powered transtibial prosthesis on socket pressure [4 weeks]

    effects of a powered transtibial prosthesis on the socket pressure for level-ground walking, stair ascent/descent, and ramp ascent/descent in comparison to a microprocessor-controlled prosthesis and a passive prosthesis

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in residual limb health [4 weeks]

    Changes measured by comfort score assessments, change in skin perfusion as measured with laser speckle imaging. The higher the comfort score the more satisfied the patient is.

  2. Change in transepidermal water loss [4 weeks]

    water loss change is measured via the TEWL device- the reduction in the score denotes improvement in water loss

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Ages 18 and above

  • Weight ≤ 280 lb

  • Ambulate at a K3 level or higher-level determined from patient EHR

  • At least 3 months post-amputation per physician discretion

  • Residual limb length greater than 4.5 inches

  • Use of a passive prosthesis

  • Unilateral transtibial amputees

  • Must be able to ambulate without any assistive devices

  • Subjects must be able to follow directions and give informed consent on their own

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Conditions and/or co-morbidities that would prevent wearing a prosthetic socket, affect gait, or influence function of the contralateral limb

  • Other amputees

  • Cognitive deficits or mental health problems that would limit ability to consent and participate fully in the study protocol

  • Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant in the near future

  • Individuals diagnosed with renal failure

  • Participants unwilling to wear a cloth face covering for the duration of each visit

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital Indianapolis Indiana United States 46228

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Indiana University
  • University of Notre Dame
  • United States Department of Defense

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sashwati Roy, PhD, Indiana University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sashwati Roy, Professor of Surgery, Indiana University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05112679
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 12350
First Posted:
Nov 9, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Feb 23, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 23, 2022