Prevalence Studies After Triple Drug Therapy for Lymphatic Filariasis

Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03352206
Collaborator
Case Western Reserve University (Other), Ministere de la Sante Publique et de la Population, Haiti (Other), Indonesia University (Other), Papua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research (Other)
20,092
5
24.4
4018.4
164.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study will assess the impact of 2-drug (DA) or 3-drug (IDA) regimens on lymphatic filariasis infection parameters in communities. Parameters measured will include: circulating filarial antigenemia (CFA) assessed with the Filariasis Test Strip (FTS), antifilarial antibodies tested with plasma and microfilaremia (assessed by night blood smears and microscopy).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: 2 drug dose - DA
  • Drug: 3 drug dose - IDA

Detailed Description

Results from clinical trials in Papua New Guinea and Cote d'Ivoire have shown that a single dose of three drugs (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole [IDA]) was superior to standard two drug therapy (diethylcarbamazine and albendazole [DA]) in clearing W. bancrofti microfilaremia (MF) (King et al. unpublished data).1 Recently, large safety studies that treated more than 23,000 participants across four countries were conducted to determine if IDA was safe for use in mass drug administration (MDA) (DOLF Project, unpublished data). Currently, there is no information about what community indicators of infection look like following shorter IDA programs. It is possible that current WHO guidelines for stopping MDA need to be modified for MDA programs that use IDA. Observing the levels of infection indicators in a community following treatment with IDA will provide important information to the GPELF if IDA is recommended for use in MDA programs. There is an opportunity to study communities that were treated with IDA during the "Community Based Safety Study of 2-drug (Diethylcarbamazine and Albendazole) versus 3-drug (Ivermectin, Diethylcarbamazine and Albendazole) Therapy for Lymphatic Filariasis". Communities in this study were randomly assigned to receive IDA or DA treatment. A large percentage of individuals in these communities participated in the study thereby approximating a mass distribution of the treatments. By surveying these communities 12 months following their initial treatment the investigators will be able to better understand and compare the impact of MDA with IDA or DA on LF infection parameters at the level of communities.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
20092 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
Community Studies to Monitor the Impact of Triple Drug Therapy Relative to Double Drug Therapy on Lymphatic Filariasis Infection Indicators
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 18, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
2-Drug Treated Communities

Communities who were treated with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (DA) mass drug administration during the safety study entitled "Community Based Safety Study of 2-drug (DA) versus 3-drug (IDA) Therapy for Lymphatic Filariasis."

Drug: 2 drug dose - DA
Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration (MDA) with the currently used standard of care combination drug therapy of diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (DA)
Other Names:
  • DA
  • 3-Drug Treated Communities

    Communities who were treated with ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (IDA) mass drug administration during the safety study entitled "Community Based Safety Study of 2-drug (DA) versus 3-drug (IDA) Therapy for Lymphatic Filariasis."

    Drug: 3 drug dose - IDA
    Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration (MDA) with triple drug therapy of ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole (IDA)
    Other Names:
  • IDA
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of participants with circulating filarial antigenemia (CFA) as measured by the Filaria Test Strip [One sample collected about 12 months after exposure to treatment]

      To assess the impact of DA vs. IDA mass drug administration in community settings participants will be tested using the filaria test strip (FTS) which detects circulating filarial antigen.

    2. Number of participants with IgG4 antifilarial antibodies in plasma [One sample collected about 12 months after exposure to treatment]

      To assess the impact of DA vs. IDA mass drug administration in community settings participant's dried blood spot specimens will be tested using a commercially available antibody test.

    3. Number of participants with microfilaremia as measured with night blood smear testing [One sample collected about 12 months after exposure to treatment]

      To assess the impact of DA vs. IDA mass drug administration in community settings participants with positive FTS will be tested for presence of microfilaria detected by thick blood smear using 60 microliters (ul) from finger prick blood collected at night.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Community prevalence of microfilaremia as measured with night blood smear [One comparison about 12 months after exposure to treatment]

      Community prevalence of microfilaremia will be compared between the two cohorts to identify any difference of the impact of mass drug administration with IDA or DA

    2. Community prevalence of circulating filarial antigen as measured with filarial test strip [One comparison about 12 months after exposure to treatment]

      Community prevalence of circulating filarial antigen will be compared between the two cohorts to identify any difference of the impact of mass drug administration with IDA or DA

    3. Prevalence of STH (hookworm, ascaris, trichuris and strongyloides) as measured by Kato-katz or PCR [One comparison about 12 months after exposure to treatment]

      Some sites will include stool sample collections to compare the impact of MDA with IDA or DA on soil transmitted helminth (STH) infection parameters in communities. Stool samples will be analyzed using Kath-katz method, as well as PCR.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    5 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age ≥ 5 years (males and females)

    • Able to provide informed consent, or parental/guardian consent for young children, and assent for older children

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent or (for minors) lacking parental/guardian consent to participate in the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Ministry of Health and Medical Services Suva Fiji
    2 Ministere de la Sante Publique et de la Population Port-au-Prince Haiti
    3 Vector Control Research Centre Puducherry India 605006
    4 Universitas Indonesia Jakarta Indonesia
    5 Papua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research Madang Papua New Guinea

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Washington University School of Medicine
    • Case Western Reserve University
    • Ministere de la Sante Publique et de la Population, Haiti
    • Indonesia University
    • Papua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Gary Weil, MD, Washington University School of Medicine

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Washington University School of Medicine
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03352206
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 201710040
    First Posted:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 31, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Washington University School of Medicine
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Dec 31, 2020