A Study of Enzalutamide Versus Bicalutamide in Castrate Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01288911
Collaborator
Medivation LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc. (Industry)
375
88
2
79.6
4.3
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of oral enzalutamide compared to bicalutamide in castrate men with metastatic prostate cancer who have progressed while on Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Hormone (LHRH) agonist/antagonist or after receiving a bilateral orchiectomy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

An open-label period was added to the main protocol. Following unblinding at the end of the double-blind period and demonstration of a statistically significant advantage of enzalutamide over bicalutamide as assessed by the primary endpoint, all ongoing enzalutamide treated participants and ongoing or previous bicalutamide treated participants that met entry criteria were offered open-label enzalutamide at the discretion of the participant and study investigators.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
375 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II, Efficacy and Safety Study of MDV3100 Versus Bicalutamide in Castrate Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 22, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 19, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 8, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Enzalutamide

Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.

Drug: enzalutamide
capsules
Other Names:
  • MDV3100
  • Active Comparator: Bicalutamide

    Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.

    Drug: bicalutamide
    tablets
    Other Names:
  • Casodex
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment [From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      PFS is the time from randomization to the date of the first progression event detected. A progression event was defined as objective evidence of radiographic disease progression based on the assessments by the ICR, skeletal-related event, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy or death by any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions on bone scan (≥ 2 new bone lesions) confirmed by the next bone scan. A skeletal-related event was any radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression or change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. The initiation of new antineoplastic therapy included any new therapy for the treatment of disease progression after the study drug administration started.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. PFS Based on Investigator Assessment [From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the date of the first progression event detected. A progression event was defined as objective evidence of radiographic disease progression based on the assessments by investigators, skeletal-related event, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy or death by any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions on bone scan (≥ 2 new bone lesions) confirmed by the next bone scan. A skeletal-related event was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression or change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. The initiation of new antineoplastic therapy included any new therapy for the treatment of disease progression after the study drug administration started.

    2. Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response by Week 13 [Baseline to Week 13]

      The PSA response by Week 13 was defined as the percentage change from Baseline to the smallest PSA value after Baseline (i.e., a decrease of 100% represents the largest possible decrease to a value below the lower limit of quantification) and on or before day 99 (i.e., upper boundary of the Week 13 visit window). For participants with no decrease in PSA post-baseline by Week 13, the PSA response by Week 13 was the smallest increase in PSA up to day 99. For participants with no post-baseline PSA values up to day 99, the PSA response by Week 13 was set to missing. PSA was analyzed at a central laboratory.

    3. Best PSA Response [Baseline to the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      The best PSA response was defined as the percentage change from Baseline to the smallest PSA value after Baseline including PSA results from samples taken after the study drug was stopped. For participants with no decrease in PSA post-baseline, the best PSA response was the smallest increase in PSA. For participants with no post-baseline PSA values, the PSA response was set to missing. PSA was analyzed at a central laboratory.

    4. Time to PSA Progression [From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      Time to PSA progression was calculated as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of first observation of PSA progression. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir (or above the baseline value for participants who did not have a decline in PSA post-baseline values), and confirmed by a second consecutive PSA assessment at least 3 weeks later. For participants with no documented PSA progression, the time to PSA progression was censored on the date the last PSA sample was taken.

    5. Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL [From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a decline in PSA to a result of 4 ng/mL or below was recorded. In participants without PSA results ≤ 4 ng/mL, the time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants with a PSA result ≤ 4 ng/mL at Baseline, participants with no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization

    6. Time to ≥ 30% PSA Decline From Baseline [From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      The time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 30% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.

    7. Time to ≥ 50% PSA Decline From Baseline [From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      The time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 50% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.

    8. Time to ≥ 90% PSA Decline From Baseline [From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      The time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 90% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.

    9. Radiographic PFS Based on ICR Assessment [From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      Radiographic PFS was calculated as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date of radiographic disease progression. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions (a minimum of 2 new bone lesions as compared to previous scan) on bone scan and confirmed by the next bone scan.

    10. Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response [From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.]

      Response assessments were reported by ICR for target lesions in soft tissues and non-target lesions in soft tissues based on CT and/or MRI according to RECIST version 1.1. Objective response was defined as the number of participants achieving either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) based on participant's best overall response assessed at the end of the treatment.

    11. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events [From initiation of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or the 30-day safety follow-up visit, whichever was last (Median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in enzalutamide arm and 5.8 in bicalutamide arm, 12.6 in the total arm).]

      A serious adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Resulted in death Was life threatening Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity Resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect Required inpatient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization Other medically important events. Treatment-related indicates adverse events assessed by the Investigator as probably or possibly related to study treatment. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened after starting administration of study drug through end of the study (i.e., the treatment-emergent period).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without neuroendocrine differentiation or small cell features

    • Ongoing androgen deprivation therapy with a Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Hormone (LHRH) agonist or antagonist at a stable dose and schedule within 4 weeks of randomization or bilateral orchiectomy (i.e., surgical or medical castration)

    • Metastatic disease documented by one of the following:

    • At least two bone lesions on bone scan, or

    • Soft tissue disease documented by computed tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or

    • Unequivocal pelvic adenopathy short axis > 2.0 cm in diameter by CT/MRI

    • Progressive disease at study entry defined as one or more of the following three criteria occurring in the setting of castrate levels of testosterone:

    • Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression defined by a minimum of three rising PSA levels with an interval of ≥ 1 week between each determination. The PSA value should be ≥ 2 µg/L (2 ng/mL);

    • Soft tissue disease progression defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1;

    • Bone disease progression defined by two or more new lesions on bone scan

    • Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic from prostate cancer (i.e. the score on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Question #3 must be < 4); no use of opiate analgesics for prostate cancer-related pain currently or anytime within 4 weeks prior to randomization

    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, including subjects with decreased performance status not attributed to progressive and symptomatic prostate cancer

    • Estimated life expectancy of ≥ 12 months

    • Able to swallow the study drug and comply with study requirements

    • A male subject and his female spouse/partner who is of childbearing potential must use two acceptable methods of birth control (one of which must include a condom as a barrier method of contraception) starting at Screening and continuing throughout the study period, and for 3 months after final study drug administration. Two acceptable forms of birth control include:

    1. Condom (barrier method of contraception), AND

    2. In addition to a condom, one of the following acceptable forms of contraception is required:

    • Established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception.

    • Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS).

    • Barrier methods of contraception: Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository.

    • Tubal ligation for at least 6 months prior to Screening

    • Vasectomy or other surgical castration at least 6 months prior to Screening

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer

    • Severe concurrent disease, infection, or comorbidity that would make the subject inappropriate for enrollment

    • Known or suspected brain and/or skull metastasis or active epidural disease

    • History of another malignancy within the previous 5 years other than curatively treated non-melanomatous skin cancer

    • Current or prior treatment with estrogens and/or drugs with anti-androgenic properties such as spironolactone > 50 mg/day, or progestational agents for the treatment of prostate cancer within 6 months prior to randomization

    • Current or prior use of ketoconazole for the treatment of prostate cancer

    • Use of antiandrogens within 6 weeks prior to randomization

    • Documented prior disease progression while receiving antiandrogens. Disease progression defined as PSA progression, radiographic progression and/or clinical deterioration.

    • Current or prior treatment with 5-α reductase inhibitors or anabolic steroids within 6 months prior to randomization

    • Prior use of systemic glucocorticoids (the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone) within 3 months prior to randomization or expectation of their use during the study

    • Radiation therapy to bone lesions or prostatic bed within 4 weeks prior to randomization

    • Major surgery within 2 months prior to randomization

    • History of seizure including febrile seizure or any condition that may predispose to seizure (e.g., prior stroke, brain arteriovenous malformation, head trauma with loss of consciousness requiring hospitalization). Also, current or prior treatment with anti-epileptic medications for the treatment of seizures or history of loss of consciousness or transient ischemic attack within 12 months prior to randomization

    • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease including myocardial infarction within past six months or uncontrolled angina within past three months

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Site US1934 Homewood Alabama United States 35209
    2 Site US1527 Anchorage Alaska United States 99503
    3 Site US3026 Tucson Arizona United States 85715
    4 Site US2977 Highland California United States 92346
    5 Site US3630 San Diego California United States 92123
    6 Site US2935 Denver Colorado United States 80211
    7 Site US2945 Middlebury Connecticut United States 06762
    8 Site US2014 Melrose Park Illinois United States 60160
    9 Site US2067 Springfield Illinois United States 62703
    10 Site US2027 Jeffersonville Indiana United States 47130
    11 Site US1838 West Des Moines Iowa United States 50266
    12 Site US62 Kansas City Kansas United States 66160-7233
    13 Site US2976 Baltimore Maryland United States 21201
    14 Site US3182 Bethesda Maryland United States 20889-5600
    15 Site US2975 Ann Arbor Michigan United States 48109
    16 Site US892 Grand Rapids Michigan United States 49546
    17 Site US20 Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55455
    18 Site US3078 Billings Montana United States 59101
    19 Site US2968 Lawrenceville New Jersey United States 08648
    20 Site US3025 Poughkeepsie New York United States 12601
    21 Site US1675 Rochester New York United States 14642
    22 Site US2934 Staten Island New York United States 10304
    23 Site US81 Chapel Hill North Carolina United States 27599
    24 Site US2104 Greensboro North Carolina United States 27403
    25 Site US44 Cincinnati Ohio United States 45267
    26 Site US2185 Columbus Ohio United States 43221
    27 Site US1598 Bala-Cynwyd Pennsylvania United States 19004
    28 Site US1680 Lancaster Pennsylvania United States 17604
    29 Site US2926 Myrtle Beach South Carolina United States 29572
    30 Site US1657 Nashville Tennessee United States 37209
    31 Site US464 Houston Texas United States 77030
    32 Site US2978 San Antonio Texas United States 78229
    33 Site US1653 Virginia Beach Virginia United States 23462
    34 Site US1580 Burien Washington United States 98166
    35 Site US1709 Wenatchee Washington United States 98801
    36 Site US51 Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53226
    37 Site BE3015 Brussels Belgium 1090
    38 Site BE1322 Gent Belgium 9000
    39 Site BE3018 Kortrijk Belgium 8500
    40 Site BE3288 Leuven Belgium 3000
    41 Site BE3289 Liege Belgium
    42 Site BE3013 Turnhout Belgium 2300
    43 Site CA3104 Calgary Alberta Canada T2V 1P9
    44 Site CA3242 Abbotsford British Columbia Canada V2S 3N5
    45 Site CA2646 Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 2V7
    46 Site CA166 Toronto Ontario Canada M4N 3M5
    47 Site CA3084 Toronto Ontario Canada M5G 2M9
    48 Site CA2984 Granby Quebec Canada J2G 8Z9
    49 Site CA170 Montreal Quebec Canada H3G 1A4
    50 Site DK3354 Aalborg Denmark 9000
    51 Site DK3356 Aarhus Denmark 8200
    52 Site DK1857 Copenhagen Denmark 2200
    53 Site DK1263 Herlev Denmark 2730
    54 Site FR1091 Creteil France 94010
    55 Site FR3009 Lille France 59037
    56 Site FR442 Lyon Cedex 3 France 69437
    57 Site FR3002 Paris Cedex 10 France 75020
    58 Site FR3003 Poitiers Cedex France 86000
    59 Site FR3000 Rennes Cedex France 35033
    60 Site FR3007 Rouen France 76031
    61 Site FR3005 Suresnes Cedex France 92151
    62 Site DE4000 Nuertingen Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany 72622
    63 Site DE2989 Aachen Germany 51074
    64 Site DE3287 Bergisch Gladbach Germany D-51465
    65 Site DE2993 Bonn Germany 53105
    66 Site DE2995 Bonn Germany 53111
    67 Site DE2994 Bonn Germany 53117
    68 Site DE2990 Hamburg Germany 22081
    69 Site DE3270 Hannover Germany 30625
    70 Site DE2992 Reutlingen Germany 72764
    71 Site DE3286 Waldshut-Tiengen Germany 29761
    72 Site DE2988 Wuppertal Germany 42103
    73 Site RO3042 Bucharest RO Romania 022328
    74 Site RO3039 Bucharest RO Romania 050659
    75 Site RO3035 Bucharest Romania 041345
    76 Site GB3029 Bristol UK United Kingdom BS2 8HW
    77 Site GB3027 London UK United Kingdom SE19RT
    78 Site GB3030 London UK United Kingdom SW17 0QT
    79 Site GB3028 Cardiff Wales United Kingdom CF14 4XW
    80 Site GB3244 Belfast United Kingdom BT9 7AB
    81 Site GB2702 Cambridge United Kingdom CB2 0QQ
    82 Site GB3166 Glasgow United Kingdom G12 0YN
    83 Site GB1862 Leicher United Kingdom LE5 4PW
    84 Site GB3163 London United Kingdom NW1 2PG
    85 Site GB2624 Manchester United Kingdom M20 4BX
    86 Site GB3355 Merseyside United Kingdom CH63 4JY
    87 Site GB3245 Northwood, Middlesex United Kingdom HA6 2RN
    88 Site GB3290 Preston United Kingdom PR2 9HT

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Astellas Pharma Inc
    • Medivation LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Principal Investigator, Carolina Urologic Research Center
    • Study Director: Associate Medical Science Director, Astellas Pharma Global Development

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Astellas Pharma Inc
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01288911
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 9785-CL-0222
    • 2010-021868-15
    First Posted:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 27, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Astellas Pharma Inc
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were enrolled at 84 sites in a total of 8 countries.
    Pre-assignment Detail Participants were stratified by whether bilateral orchiectomy or receipt of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist/antagonist therapy started before or after the diagnosis of metastases and by site.
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Period Title: Double-blind Period
    STARTED 184 191
    Received Treatment 183 189
    COMPLETED 42 9
    NOT COMPLETED 142 182
    Period Title: Double-blind Period
    STARTED 42 9
    Received Treatment 42 9
    COMPLETED 0 0
    NOT COMPLETED 42 9

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide Total
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 184 191 375
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    70.3
    (9.22)
    71.1
    (8.89)
    70.7
    (9.05)
    Age, Customized (participants) [Number]
    < 65 years
    45
    24.5%
    47
    24.6%
    92
    24.5%
    65-75 years
    85
    46.2%
    80
    41.9%
    165
    44%
    > 75 years
    54
    29.3%
    64
    33.5%
    118
    31.5%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Male
    184
    100%
    191
    100%
    375
    100%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    White
    172
    93.5%
    176
    92.1%
    348
    92.8%
    Black or African American
    8
    4.3%
    10
    5.2%
    18
    4.8%
    Asian
    3
    1.6%
    2
    1%
    5
    1.3%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    1
    0.5%
    1
    0.5%
    2
    0.5%
    Other
    0
    0%
    2
    1%
    2
    0.5%
    Ethnicity (Count of Participants)
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    184
    100%
    187
    97.9%
    371
    98.9%
    Hispanic or Latino
    0
    0%
    4
    2.1%
    4
    1.1%
    LHRH agonist/antagonist initiation or bilateral orchiectomy relative to diagnosis of metastasis (Count of Participants)
    Before diagnosis of metastasis
    87
    47.3%
    76
    39.8%
    163
    43.5%
    After diagnosis of metastasis
    97
    52.7%
    115
    60.2%
    212
    56.5%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment
    Description PFS is the time from randomization to the date of the first progression event detected. A progression event was defined as objective evidence of radiographic disease progression based on the assessments by the ICR, skeletal-related event, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy or death by any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions on bone scan (≥ 2 new bone lesions) confirmed by the next bone scan. A skeletal-related event was any radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression or change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. The initiation of new antineoplastic therapy included any new therapy for the treatment of disease progression after the study drug administration started.
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set (all randomized participants)
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    15.7
    5.8
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments PFS based on ICR Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide. The (unstratified) log-rank test with an overall significance level of 0.05 (two-sided) was used to compare the PFS of enzalutamide to bicalutamide. The (unstratified) Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of enzalutamide to bicalutamide, calculate the corresponding two-sided 95% confidence intervals and test the hypothesis that the hazard ratio is equal to 1.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.44
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.34 to 0.57
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Estimated by use of Cox proportional hazards model.
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS Based on Investigator Assessment
    Description PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the date of the first progression event detected. A progression event was defined as objective evidence of radiographic disease progression based on the assessments by investigators, skeletal-related event, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy or death by any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions on bone scan (≥ 2 new bone lesions) confirmed by the next bone scan. A skeletal-related event was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression or change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. The initiation of new antineoplastic therapy included any new therapy for the treatment of disease progression after the study drug administration started.
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    15.3
    5.7
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments PFS on based investigator assessment Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.42
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.33 to 0.55
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Estimated by use of Cox proportional hazards model.
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response by Week 13
    Description The PSA response by Week 13 was defined as the percentage change from Baseline to the smallest PSA value after Baseline (i.e., a decrease of 100% represents the largest possible decrease to a value below the lower limit of quantification) and on or before day 99 (i.e., upper boundary of the Week 13 visit window). For participants with no decrease in PSA post-baseline by Week 13, the PSA response by Week 13 was the smallest increase in PSA up to day 99. For participants with no post-baseline PSA values up to day 99, the PSA response by Week 13 was set to missing. PSA was analyzed at a central laboratory.
    Time Frame Baseline to Week 13

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set with available PSA data
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 171 163
    Median (Full Range) [percent change]
    -89.03
    0.36
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments PSA Response Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon rank sum test
    Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Best PSA Response
    Description The best PSA response was defined as the percentage change from Baseline to the smallest PSA value after Baseline including PSA results from samples taken after the study drug was stopped. For participants with no decrease in PSA post-baseline, the best PSA response was the smallest increase in PSA. For participants with no post-baseline PSA values, the PSA response was set to missing. PSA was analyzed at a central laboratory.
    Time Frame Baseline to the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set with available PSA data
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 174 168
    Median (Full Range) [percent change]
    -92.96
    0.18
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments Best PSA Response Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon rank sum test
    Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to PSA Progression
    Description Time to PSA progression was calculated as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of first observation of PSA progression. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir (or above the baseline value for participants who did not have a decline in PSA post-baseline values), and confirmed by a second consecutive PSA assessment at least 3 weeks later. For participants with no documented PSA progression, the time to PSA progression was censored on the date the last PSA sample was taken.
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    19.4
    5.8
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments Time to PSA progression Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.28
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.20 to 0.39
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Estimated by use of Cox proportional hazards model.
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL
    Description Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a decline in PSA to a result of 4 ng/mL or below was recorded. In participants without PSA results ≤ 4 ng/mL, the time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants with a PSA result ≤ 4 ng/mL at Baseline, participants with no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    3.0
    NA
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments Time to PSA Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 5.07
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.18 to 8.09
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Estimated by use of Cox proportional hazards model.
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to ≥ 30% PSA Decline From Baseline
    Description The time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 30% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    2.8
    NA
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments Time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from baseline Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 5.55
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.96 to 7.79
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Estimated by use of Cox proportional hazards model.
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to ≥ 50% PSA Decline From Baseline
    Description The time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 50% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    2.8
    NA
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments Time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from baseline Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 7.01
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    4.83 to 10.16
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Estimated by use of Cox proportional hazards model.
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to ≥ 90% PSA Decline From Baseline
    Description The time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 90% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    5.4
    NA
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments Time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from baseline Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 13.91
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    7.23 to 26.79
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Estimated by use of Cox proportional hazards model.
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Radiographic PFS Based on ICR Assessment
    Description Radiographic PFS was calculated as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date of radiographic disease progression. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions (a minimum of 2 new bone lesions as compared to previous scan) on bone scan and confirmed by the next bone scan.
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    NA
    16.4
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
    Comments Radiographic PFS based on ICR Enzalutamide Vs. Bicalutamide.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.51
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.36 to 0.74
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Estimated by use of Cox proportional hazards model.
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response
    Description Response assessments were reported by ICR for target lesions in soft tissues and non-target lesions in soft tissues based on CT and/or MRI according to RECIST version 1.1. Objective response was defined as the number of participants achieving either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) based on participant's best overall response assessed at the end of the treatment.
    Time Frame From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
    Measure Participants 184 191
    Number [percentage of participants]
    15.8
    8.6%
    2.6
    1.4%
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
    Description A serious adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Resulted in death Was life threatening Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity Resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect Required inpatient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization Other medically important events. Treatment-related indicates adverse events assessed by the Investigator as probably or possibly related to study treatment. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened after starting administration of study drug through end of the study (i.e., the treatment-emergent period).
    Time Frame From initiation of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or the 30-day safety follow-up visit, whichever was last (Median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in enzalutamide arm and 5.8 in bicalutamide arm, 12.6 in the total arm).

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety Analysis Set (all participants who had initiated at least 1 dose of study drug)
    Arm/Group Title Enzalutamide Bicalutamide Total Enzalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received enzalutamide in the double-blind and/or open-label period (including participants who switched from bicalutamide to enzalutamide).
    Measure Participants 183 189 192
    TEAEs
    94.5
    51.4%
    94.2
    49.3%
    94.8
    25.3%
    Related TEAEs
    66.7
    36.3%
    49.7
    26%
    67.2
    17.9%
    Deaths
    5.5
    3%
    1.6
    0.8%
    5.7
    1.5%
    Serious TEAEs
    33.3
    18.1%
    23.8
    12.5%
    36.5
    9.7%
    Drug regimen-related serious TEAEs
    6.6
    3.6%
    3.2
    1.7%
    6.8
    1.8%
    TEAEs leading to discontinuation
    29.5
    16%
    23.8
    12.5%
    31.3
    8.3%
    Drug regimen-related TEAEs leading to discon.
    7.7
    4.2%
    5.3
    2.8%
    7.8
    2.1%
    TEAEs leading to study drug interruption
    10.4
    5.7%
    7.9
    4.1%
    10.4
    2.8%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From initiation of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or the 30-day safety follow-up visit, whichever occurred last. Median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm in the double-blind period. In the open-label period, the median duration of treatment was 21.6 months in participants who previously received enzalutamide and 20.9 months in participants who previously received bicalutamide.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description The total number of deaths (all causes) includes deaths reported after the time frame above.
    Arm/Group Title Double-blind Period: Enzalutamide Double-blind Period: Bicalutamide Open-label Period: Enzalutamide/Enzalutamide Open-label Period: Bicalutamide/Enzalutamide
    Arm/Group Description Participants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily in the double-blind period until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily in the double-blind period until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy. Participants received enzalutamide in the double-blind period and received enzalutamide in the open-label period as well. Participants received bicalutamide in the double-blind period and switched over to enzalutamide in the open-label period.
    All Cause Mortality
    Double-blind Period: Enzalutamide Double-blind Period: Bicalutamide Open-label Period: Enzalutamide/Enzalutamide Open-label Period: Bicalutamide/Enzalutamide
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 11/141 (7.8%) 7/180 (3.9%) 0/42 (0%) 1/9 (11.1%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Double-blind Period: Enzalutamide Double-blind Period: Bicalutamide Open-label Period: Enzalutamide/Enzalutamide Open-label Period: Bicalutamide/Enzalutamide
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 49/141 (34.8%) 43/180 (23.9%) 18/42 (42.9%) 4/9 (44.4%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 5/141 (3.5%) 5 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Febrile bone marrow aplasia 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pancytopenia 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute myocardial infarction 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Angina pectoris 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Aortic valve stenosis 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Arteriosclerosis coronary artery 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Atrial fibrillation 2/141 (1.4%) 2 1/180 (0.6%) 1 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Atrioventricular block 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Atrioventricular block complete 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Bradycardia 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Cardiac failure congestive 3/141 (2.1%) 3 3/180 (1.7%) 3 2/42 (4.8%) 2 0/9 (0%) 0
    Cardiogenic shock 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Coronary artery disease 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Mitral valve incompetence 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Myocardial infarction 4/141 (2.8%) 4 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Sick sinus syndrome 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Sinus tachycardia 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Supraventricular tachycardia 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Ventricular extrasystoles 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Ventricular fibrillation 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Ventricular tachyarrhythmia 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
    Arteriovenous malformation 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain 2/141 (1.4%) 2 2/180 (1.1%) 2 2/42 (4.8%) 2 0/9 (0%) 0
    Constipation 2/141 (1.4%) 2 2/180 (1.1%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Diarrhoea 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Diverticulum 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Haematemesis 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Haematochezia 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Rectal haemorrhage 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Salivary gland calculus 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Vomiting 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    General disorders
    Asthenia 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Fatigue 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    General physical health deterioration 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 2/42 (4.8%) 2 0/9 (0%) 0
    Generalised oedema 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Non-cardiac chest pain 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pain 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pyrexia 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Systemic inflammatory response syndrome 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholelithiasis 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Infections and infestations
    Abscess of salivary gland 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Arthritis bacterial 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Bacteraemia 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Cellulitis 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Cystitis 1/141 (0.7%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Diverticulitis 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Gastroenteritis 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Gastroenteritis viral 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Infection 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways disease 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pneumonia 1/141 (0.7%) 1 2/180 (1.1%) 2 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Urosepsis 2/141 (1.4%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Ankle fracture 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Craniocerebral injury 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Fall 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Hip fracture 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Rib fracture 2/141 (1.4%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Investigations
    Alanine aminotransferase increased 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Arteriogram coronary 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Aspartate aminotransferase increased 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Blood creatinine increased 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status worsened 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Liver function test abnormal 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 2/42 (4.8%) 2 0/9 (0%) 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Dehydration 2/141 (1.4%) 2 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hyperkalaemia 0/141 (0%) 0 2/180 (1.1%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hyponatraemia 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Back pain 1/141 (0.7%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Bone pain 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Joint lock 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Lumbar spinal stenosis 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Muscular weakness 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Musculoskeletal chest pain 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Osteoarthritis 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pain in extremity 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pathological fracture 5/141 (3.5%) 6 2/180 (1.1%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Spinal column stenosis 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Adenocarcinoma of colon 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Basal cell carcinoma 1/141 (0.7%) 4 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Basosquamous carcinoma of skin 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Bladder cancer 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Bowen's disease 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Brain neoplasm malignant 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Cancer pain 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Colon cancer 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Gastric cancer 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Gastrointestinal tract adenoma 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Lung adenocarcinoma 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Lung neoplasm malignant 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Malignant neoplasm of conjunctiva 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Malignant neoplasm progression 2/141 (1.4%) 2 1/180 (0.6%) 1 3/42 (7.1%) 3 0/9 (0%) 0
    Metastases to central nervous system 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Metastases to lung 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Metastases to spine 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Metastatic pain 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Myelodysplastic syndrome 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Neuroendocrine carcinoma 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Paraneoplastic syndrome 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Penile cancer 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Skin cancer 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Squamous cell carcinoma 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Squamous cell carcinoma of skin 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 2/42 (4.8%) 3 0/9 (0%) 0
    Superficial spreading melanoma stage unspecified 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Ureteric cancer 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Convulsion 2/141 (1.4%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Epiduritis 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hypoglycaemic seizure 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Incoherent 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Lacunar infarction 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Paraplegia 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Presyncope 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Spinal cord compression 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Syncope 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Transient ischaemic attack 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 2 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Tremor 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Acute prerenal failure 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Bladder obstruction 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Bladder outlet obstruction 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Dysuria 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Haematuria 2/141 (1.4%) 2 1/180 (0.6%) 1 2/42 (4.8%) 4 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hydronephrosis 0/141 (0%) 0 2/180 (1.1%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Obstructive uropathy 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Postrenal failure 0/141 (0%) 0 2/180 (1.1%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Renal colic 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Renal failure 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Renal failure acute 2/141 (1.4%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Renal impairment 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Stress urinary incontinence 1/141 (0.7%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Ureteric dilatation 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Urethral obstruction 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Urinary retention 0/141 (0%) 0 2/180 (1.1%) 2 2/42 (4.8%) 2 0/9 (0%) 0
    Urinary tract obstruction 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Prostatic obstruction 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Acute respiratory failure 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Dyspnoea 2/141 (1.4%) 2 1/180 (0.6%) 1 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hypoxia 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pleural effusion 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pleuritic pain 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pneumonia aspiration 2/141 (1.4%) 2 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pneumothorax 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pulmonary fibrosis 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Transurethral prostatectomy 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    Vascular disorders
    Aortic stenosis 2/141 (1.4%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hypotension 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Orthostatic hypotension 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Peripheral artery stenosis 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Venous thrombosis limb 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 0/9 (0%) 0
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Double-blind Period: Enzalutamide Double-blind Period: Bicalutamide Open-label Period: Enzalutamide/Enzalutamide Open-label Period: Bicalutamide/Enzalutamide
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 123/141 (87.2%) 149/180 (82.8%) 42/42 (100%) 9/9 (100%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 10/141 (7.1%) 10 5/180 (2.8%) 7 4/42 (9.5%) 4 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Cardiac disorders
    Angina pectoris 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Palpitations 2/141 (1.4%) 2 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Eye disorders
    Cataract 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Glaucoma 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Ocular hyperaemia 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain 6/141 (4.3%) 6 7/180 (3.9%) 7 3/42 (7.1%) 4 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Constipation 19/141 (13.5%) 21 24/180 (13.3%) 25 5/42 (11.9%) 7 0/9 (0%) 0
    Diarrhoea 16/141 (11.3%) 18 15/180 (8.3%) 18 5/42 (11.9%) 6 2/9 (22.2%) 2
    Dyspepsia 5/141 (3.5%) 6 4/180 (2.2%) 4 1/42 (2.4%) 1 2/9 (22.2%) 2
    Haemorrhoids 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Nausea 18/141 (12.8%) 22 33/180 (18.3%) 36 10/42 (23.8%) 11 0/9 (0%) 0
    Rectal haemorrhage 4/141 (2.8%) 4 1/180 (0.6%) 1 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Vomiting 5/141 (3.5%) 5 9/180 (5%) 10 1/42 (2.4%) 1 0/9 (0%) 0
    General disorders
    Asthenia 8/141 (5.7%) 10 7/180 (3.9%) 7 2/42 (4.8%) 2 0/9 (0%) 0
    Fatigue 35/141 (24.8%) 40 38/180 (21.1%) 45 18/42 (42.9%) 24 3/9 (33.3%) 3
    Oedema peripheral 10/141 (7.1%) 10 13/180 (7.2%) 13 5/42 (11.9%) 5 0/9 (0%) 0
    Pain 1/141 (0.7%) 1 8/180 (4.4%) 8 2/42 (4.8%) 2 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis 1/141 (0.7%) 1 2/180 (1.1%) 2 3/42 (7.1%) 4 0/9 (0%) 0
    Influenza 3/141 (2.1%) 4 4/180 (2.2%) 4 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Nasopharyngitis 11/141 (7.8%) 13 7/180 (3.9%) 8 7/42 (16.7%) 9 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Osteomyelitis 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Scrotal infection 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Urinary tract infection 7/141 (5%) 8 3/180 (1.7%) 3 4/42 (9.5%) 4 0/9 (0%) 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Arthropod bite 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 3/42 (7.1%) 3 0/9 (0%) 0
    Fall 9/141 (6.4%) 11 6/180 (3.3%) 7 4/42 (9.5%) 6 2/9 (22.2%) 2
    Rib fracture 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 2/42 (4.8%) 2 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Investigations
    Blood alkaline phosphatase increased 3/141 (2.1%) 4 5/180 (2.8%) 6 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Blood urea increased 0/141 (0%) 0 3/180 (1.7%) 3 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Haematocrit decreased 1/141 (0.7%) 1 2/180 (1.1%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Haemoglobin decreased 3/141 (2.1%) 4 5/180 (2.8%) 5 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Neutrophil count increased 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Prostatic specific antigen increased 4/141 (2.8%) 4 2/180 (1.1%) 2 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Red blood cell count increased 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Weight decreased 16/141 (11.3%) 19 15/180 (8.3%) 15 5/42 (11.9%) 6 0/9 (0%) 0
    White blood cell count increased 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite 16/141 (11.3%) 19 13/180 (7.2%) 13 2/42 (4.8%) 3 0/9 (0%) 0
    Diabetes mellitus 0/141 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Hypercholesterolaemia 3/141 (2.1%) 3 1/180 (0.6%) 1 3/42 (7.1%) 3 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hyperglycaemia 2/141 (1.4%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 3/42 (7.1%) 4 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hyperkalaemia 1/141 (0.7%) 1 2/180 (1.1%) 2 2/42 (4.8%) 2 1/9 (11.1%) 2
    Hypokalaemia 2/141 (1.4%) 2 3/180 (1.7%) 3 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 16/141 (11.3%) 22 27/180 (15%) 39 9/42 (21.4%) 11 5/9 (55.6%) 6
    Back pain 29/141 (20.6%) 39 34/180 (18.9%) 40 11/42 (26.2%) 15 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Bone pain 10/141 (7.1%) 13 12/180 (6.7%) 15 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Flank pain 5/141 (3.5%) 5 2/180 (1.1%) 2 3/42 (7.1%) 3 0/9 (0%) 0
    Gouty arthritis 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Musculoskeletal chest pain 6/141 (4.3%) 8 4/180 (2.2%) 4 3/42 (7.1%) 3 0/9 (0%) 0
    Musculoskeletal pain 8/141 (5.7%) 9 17/180 (9.4%) 23 5/42 (11.9%) 5 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Myalgia 9/141 (6.4%) 10 5/180 (2.8%) 5 1/42 (2.4%) 2 0/9 (0%) 0
    Neck pain 2/141 (1.4%) 3 2/180 (1.1%) 2 4/42 (9.5%) 4 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Osteoarthritis 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 4/42 (9.5%) 6 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Osteonecrosis of jaw 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Pain in extremity 16/141 (11.3%) 22 9/180 (5%) 12 5/42 (11.9%) 8 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Nervous system disorders
    Amnesia 4/141 (2.8%) 5 0/180 (0%) 0 2/42 (4.8%) 2 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Dizziness 12/141 (8.5%) 15 15/180 (8.3%) 16 6/42 (14.3%) 6 2/9 (22.2%) 2
    Headache 11/141 (7.8%) 14 6/180 (3.3%) 6 8/42 (19%) 10 3/9 (33.3%) 4
    Lethargy 5/141 (3.5%) 6 4/180 (2.2%) 4 3/42 (7.1%) 3 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Parkinson's disease 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Poor quality sleep 0/141 (0%) 0 2/180 (1.1%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 2
    Syncope 0/141 (0%) 0 2/180 (1.1%) 2 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Psychiatric disorders
    Depressed mood 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 2
    Insomnia 9/141 (6.4%) 9 8/180 (4.4%) 8 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Dysuria 5/141 (3.5%) 5 4/180 (2.2%) 4 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Haematuria 3/141 (2.1%) 5 6/180 (3.3%) 7 5/42 (11.9%) 5 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hypertonic bladder 2/141 (1.4%) 2 1/180 (0.6%) 1 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 2
    Pollakiuria 7/141 (5%) 7 6/180 (3.3%) 6 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Renal failure chronic 2/141 (1.4%) 2 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Renal pain 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 3/42 (7.1%) 3 0/9 (0%) 0
    Urinary retention 4/141 (2.8%) 4 5/180 (2.8%) 7 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Gynaecomastia 4/141 (2.8%) 4 2/180 (1.1%) 2 6/42 (14.3%) 6 0/9 (0%) 0
    Testicular pain 5/141 (3.5%) 5 0/180 (0%) 0 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Bronchitis chronic 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1/141 (0.7%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Cough 5/141 (3.5%) 6 8/180 (4.4%) 8 2/42 (4.8%) 2 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Dyspnoea 7/141 (5%) 8 9/180 (5%) 10 4/42 (9.5%) 8 0/9 (0%) 0
    Nasal congestion 2/141 (1.4%) 3 1/180 (0.6%) 1 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 2
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Skin lesion 1/141 (0.7%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Jaw operation 0/141 (0%) 0 0/180 (0%) 0 0/42 (0%) 0 1/9 (11.1%) 1
    Vascular disorders
    Hot flush 15/141 (10.6%) 16 17/180 (9.4%) 17 12/42 (28.6%) 12 4/9 (44.4%) 5
    Hypertension 18/141 (12.8%) 29 14/180 (7.8%) 16 13/42 (31%) 16 0/9 (0%) 0
    Hypotension 1/141 (0.7%) 1 2/180 (1.1%) 2 1/42 (2.4%) 1 1/9 (11.1%) 1

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Institute and/or Principal Investigator may publish trial data generated at their specific study site after Sponsor publication of the multi-center data. Sponsor must receive a site's manuscript prior to publication for review and comment as specified in the Investigator Agreement.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Executive Medical Director
    Organization Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. (APGD)
    Phone
    Email Astellas.resultsdisclosure@astellas.com
    Responsible Party:
    Astellas Pharma Inc
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01288911
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 9785-CL-0222
    • 2010-021868-15
    First Posted:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 27, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2022