SELECT - PsA 1: A Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo and to Adalimumab in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to at Least One Non-Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD)

Sponsor
AbbVie (Industry)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03104400
Collaborator
(none)
1,705
345
5
87.3
4.9
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study includes two periods. The main objective of Period 1 is to compare the efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) and 30 mg QD versus placebo and versus adalimumab (Humira®) in participants with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have had an inadequate response to non-biologic DMARDs (DMARD-IR). Period 1 is also designed to compare the efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg QD versus placebo for the prevention of structural progression.

The objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg QD in participants who have completed Period 1.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

The study includes a 35-day screening period, a 56-week blinded period (Period 1), a long-term extension period of up to a total treatment duration of approximately 5 years (Period 2), a 30-day follow-up call or visit, and a 70-day follow-up call.

Period 1 includes 24 weeks of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled treatment followed by 32 weeks of active comparator-controlled upadacitinib; at Week 24 participants assigned to placebo will be switched to upadacitinib according to their randomization assignment.

Participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 2:2:2:1:1 ratio to one of five treatment groups:

  • Group 1: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD

  • Group 2: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD

  • Group 3: Adalimumab 40 mg every other week (EOW)

  • Group 4: Placebo followed by upadacitinib 15 mg QD

  • Group 5: Placebo followed by upadacitinib 30 mg QD

Randomization will be stratified by extent of psoriasis (≥ 3% body surface area [BSA] or < 3% BSA), current use of at least 1 non-biologic DMARD, presence of dactylitis, and presence of enthesitis, except for participants from China and Japan, where randomization for each country will be stratified by extent of psoriasis (≥ 3% BSA or < 3% BSA) only.

Participants who complete the Week 56 visit (end of Period 1) will enter the long-term extension portion of the study, Period 2 (total treatment up to approximately 5 years), and continue study treatment as assigned in Period 1 in a blinded manner until the last subject completes the last visit of Period 1 (Week 56), when study drug assignment in both periods will be unblinded and participants will be dispensed study drug in an open-label fashion until the completion of Period 2.

At Week 16, rescue therapy will be offered to participants classified as non-responders (defined as not achieving at least 20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC) and / or swollen joint count (SJC) at both Week 12 and Week 16). Starting at Week 36, participants who fail to demonstrate at least 20% improvement in either or both TJC and SJC compared to Baseline at 2 consecutive visits will be discontinued from study drug treatment. Additionally, in participants continuing on study drug, starting at the Week 36 visit, initiation of or change in background PsA medication(s) is allowed as per local label.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1705 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo and to Adalimumab in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have a History of Inadequate Response to at Least One Non-Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) - SELECT - PsA 1
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 27, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 26, 2019
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 4, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Upadacitinib 15 mg

Period 1: Participants receive upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day (QD) and matching placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous injection every other week (EOW) for 56 weeks. Period 2: Participants will continue to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily.

Drug: Upadacitinib
Oral tablet
Other Names:
  • ABT 494
  • RINVOQ®
  • Drug: Placebo to Adalimumab
    Administered by subcutaneous injection

    Experimental: Upadacitinib 30 mg

    Period 1: Participants receive upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day and matching placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous injection every other week for 56 weeks. Period 2: Participants will continue to receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily.

    Drug: Upadacitinib
    Oral tablet
    Other Names:
  • ABT 494
  • RINVOQ®
  • Drug: Placebo to Adalimumab
    Administered by subcutaneous injection

    Active Comparator: Adalimumab

    Period 1: Participants receive adalimumab 40 mg by subcutaneous injection every other week and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD for 56 weeks. Period 2: Participants continue to receive adalimumab 40 mg every other week.

    Drug: Adalimumab
    Administered by subcutaneous injection
    Other Names:
  • Humira®
  • Drug: Placebo to Upadacitinib
    Oral tablet

    Placebo Comparator: Placebo / Upadacitinib 15 mg

    Period 1: Participants receive matching placebo to upadacitinib orally once a day for 24 weeks then upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 32 weeks, and matching placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous injection EOW for the entire 56 weeks. Period 2: Participants will continue to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily.

    Drug: Upadacitinib
    Oral tablet
    Other Names:
  • ABT 494
  • RINVOQ®
  • Drug: Placebo to Upadacitinib
    Oral tablet

    Drug: Placebo to Adalimumab
    Administered by subcutaneous injection

    Placebo Comparator: Placebo / Upadacitinib 30 mg

    Period 1: Participants receive matching placebo to upadacitinib orally once a day for 24 weeks then upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 32 weeks, and matching placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous injection EOW for the entire 56 weeks. Period 2: Participants will continue to receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily.

    Drug: Upadacitinib
    Oral tablet
    Other Names:
  • ABT 494
  • RINVOQ®
  • Drug: Placebo to Upadacitinib
    Oral tablet

    Drug: Placebo to Adalimumab
    Administered by subcutaneous injection

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

      Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

      The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

    2. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Investigator Global Assessment (sIGA) of Psoriasis of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline (sIGA 0/1) at Week 16 [Baseline and Week 16]

      The sIGA is a 5 point scale ranging from 0 to 4, based on the investigator's assessment of the average elevation, erythema, and scaling of all psoriatic lesions at the current visit. A lower score indicates less severe psoriasis (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe).

    3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16 [Baseline and Week 16]

      PASI is a composite score based on the percentage of the body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis and the intensity of erythema (reddening), induration (thickening or hardening of the skin), and desquamation (peeling of the skin) of lesions assessed at 4 anatomic sites (head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities). At each location, the percentage of BSA involvement is assigned a score from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and erythema, induration, and desquamation are scored on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very marked). The PASI score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score, and was assessed in participants with Baseline psoriasis BSA involvement ≥ 3%.

    4. Change From Baseline in Modified PsA Total Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score (mTSS) at Week 24 [Baseline and Week 24]

      The Sharp-van der Heijde modified scoring method for PsA measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet, and was assessed by 2 independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 20 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 320 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 20 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 208 (worst). Joints with gross osteolysis or pencil in cup were assigned the maximum score for both erosions and JSN. The total mTSS score is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 528 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement in joint damage.

    5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 24 [Week 24]

      A participant was classified as achieving MDA if 5 of the following 7 criteria were met: Tender joint count (out of 68 joints) ≤ 1 Swollen joint count (out of 66 joints) ≤ 1 PASI score ≤ 1 (score ranges from 0 - 72) or percent BSA involved with psoriasis ≤ 3% Patient's assessment of pain ≤ 1.5 (NRS from 0 to 10) Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity ≤ 2 (NRS from 0 to 10) HAQ-DI score ≤ 0.5 (index score ranges from 0 to 3) Leeds Enthesitis Index ≤ 1 (assesses the presence or absence of enthesitis at 3 bilateral sites, with an overall score range from 0 to 6)

    6. Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 24 [Week 24]

      Resolution of enthesitis is defined as a Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) score = 0. LEI is an enthesitis measure developed specifically for PsA and assesses the presence or absence of tenderness at the following 3 bilateral enthesial sites: medial femoral condyles, lateral epicondyles of the humerus, and Achilles tendon insertions. Tenderness on examination is recorded as either present (coded as 1), absent (coded as 0), or not assessed for each of the 6 sites. The LEI is calculated by taking the sum of the scores from the 6 sites. The LEI ranges from 0 to 6 (worst).

    7. Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 12 - Non-inferiority Versus Adalimumab [Baseline and Week 12]

      Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    8. Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

      The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

    9. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

      The FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire is a self-administered patient questionnaire that consists of 13 questions designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by participants in the previous 7 days, including physical fatigue (e.g., I feel tired), functional fatigue (e.g., trouble finishing things), emotional fatigue (e.g., frustration), and social consequences of fatigue (e.g., limits social activity). Participants respond to the questions on a scale from 0 'not at all' to 4 'very much'. The FACIT Fatigue score is computed by summing the item scores, after reversing those items that are worded in the negative direction. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges from 0 to 52, where higher scores represent less fatigue. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    10. Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 12 - Superiority Versus Adalimumab [Baseline and Week 12]

      Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    11. Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 24 [Week 24]

      Resolution of dactylitis is defined as a Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) score = 0. The Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) is a score based on finger circumference and tenderness, assessed and summed across all dactylitic digits (fingers and toes). The presence of a dactylitic digit is defined as at least one affected AND tender digit with circumference increase over reference digit ≥ 10%. The reference digit circumference is either the contralateral digit (unaffected digit on opposite hand or foot) if available, or from a standard reference table if otherwise. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 [none] to 3 [worst]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and reference digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for each affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis.

    12. Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain - Superiority Versus Adalimumab [Baseline and Week 12]

      Participants were asked to indicate the severity of their arthritis pain within the previous week on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates "no pain" and a score of 10 indicates "worst possible pain." A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    13. Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI - Superiority Versus Adalimumab [Baseline and Week 12]

      The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

    14. Change From Baseline in Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Symptoms (SAPS) Questionnaire at Week 16 [Baseline and Week 16]

      The SAPS is an 11-item self-assessment of psoriasis symptoms that includes questions on: pain, itching, redness, scaling, flaking, bleeding, burning, stinging, tenderness, pain due to skin cracking, and joint pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 10, with 0 being least severe and 10 being most severe. The total score is generated by summing the 11 items and ranges from 0 to 110 (worst). A negative change from Baseline in the total score indicates improvement.

    15. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

      Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    16. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

      Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    17. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2 [Baseline and Week 2]

      Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Clinical diagnosis of PsA with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit and fulfillment of the Classification Criteria for PsA (CASPAR) criteria.

    • Participant has active disease at Baseline defined as >= 3 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) and >= 3 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits.

    • Presence of either at Screening:

    1. = 1 erosion on x-ray as determined by central imaging review or;

    2. high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) > laboratory defined upper limit of normal (ULN).

    • Diagnosis of active plaque psoriasis or documented history of plaque psoriasis.

    • Participant has had an inadequate response (lack of efficacy after a minimum 12 week duration of therapy) to previous or current treatment with at least 1 non-biologic DMARD at maximally tolerated dose (methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), leflunomide (LEF), cyclosporine, apremilast, bucillamin or iguratimod), or participant has an intolerance to or contraindication for DMARDs as defined by the investigator.

    • Participant who is on current treatment with concomitant non-biologic DMARDs at study entry must be on <= 2 non-biologic DMARDs (except the combination of MTX and leflunomide). The following non-biologic DMARDs are allowed: MTX, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, apremilast, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) , bucillamine or iguratimod, and have been ongoing for >= 12 weeks and at stable dose for >= 4 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit. No other DMARDs are permitted during the study.

    1. Participants who need to discontinue DMARDs prior to the Baseline Visit to comply with this inclusion criterion must follow the procedure specified below or at least five times the mean terminal elimination half-life of a drug:
    1. = 8 weeks for LEF if no elimination procedure was followed, or adhere to an elimination procedure (i.e., 11 days with cholestyramine, or 30 days washout with activated charcoal or as per local label);

    2. = 4 weeks for all others.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Prior exposure to any Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib).

    • Current treatment with > 2 non-biologic DMARDs; or use of DMARDs other than methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, apremilast, hydroxychloroquine, bucillamine, or iguratimod; or use of methotrexate in combination with leflunomide.

    • History of fibromyalgia, any arthritis with onset prior to age 17 years, or current diagnosis of inflammatory joint disease other than PsA (including, but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, gout, overlap connective tissue diseases, scleroderma, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus). Prior history of reactive arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis is permitted if documentation of change in diagnosis to PsA or additional diagnosis of PsA is made. Prior history of fibromyalgia is permitted if documentation of change in diagnosis to PsA or documentation that the diagnosis of fibromyalgia was made incorrectly.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Rheum Assoc of North Alabama /ID# 163231 Huntsville Alabama United States 35801
    2 SunValley Arthritis Center, Lt /ID# 161221 Peoria Arizona United States 85381
    3 AZ Arthritis and Rheumotology Research, PLLC /ID# 159981 Phoenix Arizona United States 85032-9306
    4 AZ Arthritis and Rheumotology Research, PLLC /ID# 160033 Phoenix Arizona United States 85032-9306
    5 AZ Arthritis and Rheumotology Research, PLLC /ID# 160036 Phoenix Arizona United States 85032-9306
    6 AZ Arthritis & Rheuma Research /ID# 160037 Phoenix Arizona United States 85032
    7 AZ Arth & Rheum Res /ID# 166381 Tucson Arizona United States 85704
    8 Little Rock Diagnostics Clinic /ID# 165161 Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
    9 Covina Arthritis Clinic /ID# 159891 Covina California United States 91722
    10 St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare /ID# 159980 Fullerton California United States 92835
    11 C.V. Mehta MD, Med Corporation /ID# 161216 Hemet California United States 92543
    12 Care Access Research, Huntingt /ID# 160038 Huntington Beach California United States 92648
    13 Kotha and Kotha /ID# 159823 La Mesa California United States 91942
    14 TriWest Research Associates- La Mesa /ID# 159887 La Mesa California United States 91942
    15 Arthritis & Osteo Medical Ctr /ID# 166760 La Palma California United States 90623-1728
    16 University of California, Los Angeles /ID# 164542 Los Angeles California United States 90095
    17 VA Sacramento Medical Center /ID# 164196 Mather California United States 95655
    18 East Bay Rheumatology Medical /ID# 166382 San Leandro California United States 94578
    19 Inland Rheum Clin Trials Inc. /ID# 159828 Upland California United States 91786
    20 Medvin Clinical Research /ID# 160034 Whittier California United States 90606
    21 Denver Arthritis Clinic /ID# 159873 Denver Colorado United States 80230
    22 Arthritis and Rheum Clin N. CO /ID# 160039 Fort Collins Colorado United States 80528
    23 Colorado Arthritis Associates /ID# 159847 Lakewood Colorado United States 80228
    24 Stamford Therapeutics Consorti /ID# 165131 Stamford Connecticut United States 06905
    25 Clinical Res of West FL, Inc. /ID# 159829 Clearwater Florida United States 33765
    26 International Medical Research - Daytona /ID# 160040 Daytona Beach Florida United States 32117
    27 Omega Research Maitland, LLC /ID# 164193 DeBary Florida United States 32713-2260
    28 Precision Research Org, LLC /ID# 161287 Miami Lakes Florida United States 33016-1501
    29 LeJenue Research Associates /ID# 170965 Miami Florida United States 33126
    30 Medallion Clinical Research Institute, LLC /ID# 161228 Naples Florida United States 34102
    31 Millennium Research /ID# 159822 Ormond Beach Florida United States 32174
    32 Arthritis Center, Inc. /ID# 163465 Palm Harbor Florida United States 34684
    33 Gulf Region Clinical Res Inst /ID# 159851 Pensacola Florida United States 32514
    34 BayCare Medical Group /ID# 159792 Saint Petersburg Florida United States 33705
    35 W. Broward Rheum Assoc Inc. /ID# 161388 Tamarac Florida United States 33321
    36 Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc /ID# 160063 Tampa Florida United States 33606-1246
    37 University of South Florida /ID# 161286 Tampa Florida United States 33612
    38 BayCare Medical Group, Inc. /ID# 159879 Tampa Florida United States 33614-7101
    39 Florida Medical Clinic /ID# 159992 Zephyrhills Florida United States 33542
    40 Institute of Arthritis Researc /ID# 165873 Idaho Falls Idaho United States 83404
    41 Advanced Clinical Research /ID# 159894 Meridian Idaho United States 83642
    42 Great Lakes Clinical Trials /ID# 163435 Chicago Illinois United States 60640
    43 OrthoIllinois /ID# 164546 Rockford Illinois United States 61114-4937
    44 Clinical Investigation Specialists - Skokie /ID# 160062 Skokie Illinois United States 60076
    45 Deerbrook Medical Associates /ID# 159804 Vernon Hills Illinois United States 60061
    46 Graves Gilbert Clinic /ID# 161285 Bowling Green Kentucky United States 42101
    47 Four Rivers Clinical Research /ID# 159982 Paducah Kentucky United States 42001
    48 Ochsner Clinic Foundation-New Orleans /ID# 165672 New Orleans Louisiana United States 70121
    49 Johns Hopkins University /ID# 167665 Baltimore Maryland United States 21224
    50 Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A. /ID# 164013 Cumberland Maryland United States 21502
    51 The Center for Rheumatology & Bone Research /ID# 159874 Wheaton Maryland United States 20902
    52 Tufts Medical Center /ID# 165144 Boston Massachusetts United States 02111
    53 Mansfield Health Center /ID# 159805 Mansfield Massachusetts United States 02048
    54 Clinical Pharmacology Study Gr /ID# 158700 Worcester Massachusetts United States 01605
    55 Univ of Michigan Hospitals /ID# 164014 Ann Arbor Michigan United States 48109
    56 Aa Mrc Llc /Id# 159846 Grand Blanc Michigan United States 48439
    57 Advanced Rheumatology, PC /ID# 159893 Lansing Michigan United States 48910
    58 Beals Institute PC /ID# 163128 Lansing Michigan United States 48917
    59 Shores Rheumatology, PC /ID# 159889 Saint Clair Shores Michigan United States 48081
    60 St. Luke's Hospital of Duluth /ID# 165671 Duluth Minnesota United States 55805
    61 Clayton Medical Associates dba Saint Louis Rheumatology /ID# 159878 Saint Louis Missouri United States 63119-3845
    62 Clinvest Research LLC /ID# 161227 Springfield Missouri United States 65810-2607
    63 Glacier View Research Institut /ID# 167023 Kalispell Montana United States 59901
    64 Westroads Clinical Research /ID# 159979 Omaha Nebraska United States 68114
    65 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center /ID# 161235 Lebanon New Hampshire United States 03756
    66 Arthritis and Osteoporosis Associates /ID# 159802 Freehold New Jersey United States 07728
    67 Atlantic Coast Research /ID# 159799 Toms River New Jersey United States 08755
    68 Ocean Rheumatology, PA /ID# 163898 Toms River New Jersey United States 08755
    69 Arthritis and Osteo Assoc /ID# 159994 Las Cruces New Mexico United States 88011
    70 Santa Fe Rheumatology /ID# 163783 Santa Fe New Mexico United States 87505
    71 NYU Langone Rheum Assoc /ID# 159985 Lake Success New York United States 11554
    72 NYU Langone Medical Center /ID# 163230 New York New York United States 10016-6402
    73 St. Lawrence Health System /ID# 159848 Potsdam New York United States 13676
    74 American Health Research /ID# 164354 Charlotte North Carolina United States 28207
    75 DJL Clinical Research, PLLC /ID# 161390 Charlotte North Carolina United States 28210-8508
    76 M3-Emerging Medical Research, LLC /ID# 161391 Durham North Carolina United States 27704
    77 Physicians East, PA /ID# 159872 Greenville North Carolina United States 27834
    78 Cape Fear Arthritis Care /ID# 161224 Leland North Carolina United States 28451
    79 Shanahan Rheuma & Immuno /ID# 159987 Raleigh North Carolina United States 27617
    80 Trinity Health Med Arts Clinic /ID# 159800 Minot North Dakota United States 58701
    81 MetroHealth Medical Center /ID# 159888 Cleveland Ohio United States 44109
    82 The Ohio State University /ID# 159892 Columbus Ohio United States 43210
    83 Clinical Research Source, Inc. /ID# 164545 Perrysburg Ohio United States 43551
    84 STAT Research, Inc. /ID# 161392 Vandalia Ohio United States 45377-9464
    85 Health Research of Oklahoma /ID# 159880 Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73103-2400
    86 Altoona Ctr Clinical Res /ID# 159852 Duncansville Pennsylvania United States 16635
    87 PA Regional Center /ID# 165670 Wyomissing Pennsylvania United States 19610
    88 Articularis Healthcare Group, Inc d/b/a Low Country Rheumatology /ID# 163464 Summerville South Carolina United States 29486-7887
    89 West Tennessee Research Inst /ID# 159871 Jackson Tennessee United States 38305
    90 Rheumatology Consultants, PLLC /ID# 159796 Knoxville Tennessee United States 37909
    91 Dr. Ramesh Gupta /ID# 160061 Memphis Tennessee United States 38119
    92 Accurate Clinical Management /ID# 159905 Baytown Texas United States 77521
    93 Diagnostic Group Integrated He /ID# 159794 Beaumont Texas United States 77701
    94 Arth and Osteo Clin Brazo Valley /ID# 163436 College Station Texas United States 77845
    95 PCCR Solution /ID# 205723 Colleyville Texas United States 76034
    96 Adriana Pop-Moody MD Clinic PA /ID# 159984 Corpus Christi Texas United States 78404
    97 Metroplex Clinical Research /ID# 159785 Dallas Texas United States 75231
    98 Rheumatic Disease Clin Res Ctr /ID# 161240 Houston Texas United States 77004
    99 Rheumatology Clinic of Houston /ID# 161234 Houston Texas United States 77065
    100 "DMCR-Texas Cent for Drug Dev /ID# 164191 Houston Texas United States 77081
    101 West Texas Clinical Research /ID# 205722 Lubbock Texas United States 79410-1198
    102 P&I Clinical Research /ID# 159826 Lufkin Texas United States 75904-3132
    103 SW Rheumatology Res. LLC /ID# 159993 Mesquite Texas United States 75150
    104 Trinity Universal Research Association /ID# 205721 Plano Texas United States 75024-5283
    105 Arthritis & Osteo Ctr of S. TX /ID# 163784 San Antonio Texas United States 78232
    106 Arthritis Clinic of Central TX /ID# 164049 San Marcos Texas United States 78666
    107 DM Clinical Research /ID# 161735 Tomball Texas United States 77375
    108 Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic /ID# 159786 Waco Texas United States 76710
    109 Arthritis Clinic of N. VA, P.C /ID# 159849 Arlington Virginia United States 22205
    110 Ctr for Arth and Rheum Disease /ID# 159830 Chesapeake Virginia United States 23320
    111 Swedish Medical Center /ID# 159890 Seattle Washington United States 98104
    112 Arthritis Northwest, PLLC /ID# 166380 Spokane Washington United States 99204
    113 West Virginia Research Inst /ID# 159791 South Charleston West Virginia United States 25309
    114 Aurora Rheumatology and Immunotherapy Center /ID# 160043 Franklin Wisconsin United States 53132
    115 Centro Medico Privado/Reuma /ID# 159775 San Miguel de Tucuman Ciuadad Autonoma De Buenos Aires Argentina 4000
    116 Centro Integral de Medicina Respiratoria (CIMER) /ID# 211237 San Miguel de Tucuman Tucuman Argentina 4000
    117 Organizacion Medica de Investigacion (OMI) /ID# 160118 Buenos Aires Argentina 1015
    118 Hospital General de Agudos Ram /ID# 164378 Buenos Aires Argentina 1221
    119 Psoriahue Med Interdisciplinar /ID# 160506 Buenos Aires Argentina 1425
    120 Inst. de Rehab. Psicofisica /ID# 165154 Caba Argentina 1428
    121 Instituto CAICI /ID# 160119 Rosario, Santa FE Argentina 2000
    122 Centro Integral de Medicina Re /ID# 160258 SAN Miguel DE Tucuman, Latam Argentina 4000
    123 Centro de Enfermedades del Hígado y Aparato Digestivo /ID# 165795 Santa Fe Argentina 2000
    124 Emeritus Research Sydney /ID# 166780 Botany New South Wales Australia 2019
    125 The Queen Elizabeth Hospital /ID# 169333 Woodville South Australia Australia 5011
    126 Barwon Rheumatology /ID# 166782 Geelong Victoria Australia 3220
    127 Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital /ID# 167450 Heidelberg West Victoria Australia 3081
    128 Brest Regional Hospital /ID# 164535 Brest Belarus 224027
    129 Healthcare Institution /ID# 164536 Grodno Belarus 230017
    130 First City Clinical Hospital /ID# 164534 Minsk Belarus 220013
    131 Reuma clinic /ID# 164243 Genk Belgium 3600
    132 University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 164503 Banja Luka Republika Srpska Bosnia and Herzegovina 78000
    133 University Clinical Hospital Mostar /ID# 165799 Mostar Bosnia and Herzegovina 88000
    134 Clinical Center University of Sarajevo /ID# 164502 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina 71000
    135 Instituto de Ciencias Farmacêuticas /ID# 163274 Aparecida de Goiania Goias Brazil 74935-530
    136 CIP - Centro Internacional de Pesquisa /ID# 161821 Goiânia Goias Brazil 74110-120
    137 CMiP - Centro Mineiro de Pesquisa Ltda - ME /ID# 161819 Juiz de Fora Minas Gerais Brazil 36010-570
    138 EDUMED Educacao em Saude S/S L /ID# 161816 Curitiba Parana Brazil 80440-080
    139 Instituto de Educação e Pesquisa do Hospital Moinhos de Vento /ID# 161813 Porto Alegre Rio Grande Do Sul Brazil 90035-001
    140 Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre /ID# 161820 Porto Alegre Rio Grande Do Sul Brazil 90035-903
    141 LMK Sevicos Medicos S/S /ID# 161812 Porto Alegre Rio Grande Do Sul Brazil 90480-000
    142 Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - USP /ID# 163273 Ribeirao Preto Sao Paulo Brazil 14049-900
    143 Faculdade de Medicina do ABC /ID# 163491 Santo André Sao Paulo Brazil 09060-870
    144 CEMEC - Centro Multidisciplinar de Estudos Clínicos do ABC /ID# 161810 Santo André Sao Paulo Brazil 09190-510
    145 CPCLIN - Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas /ID# 161818 Sao Paulo Brazil 01244-030
    146 Department of Rheumatology, Mu /ID# 169606 Plovdiv Bulgaria 4003
    147 Excelsior Medical Center /ID# 169609 Sofia Bulgaria 1407
    148 Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Sofia at Military Medical Academy /ID# 169608 Sofia Bulgaria 1606
    149 UMHAT Sv. Ivan Rilski /ID# 202393 Sofia Bulgaria 1612
    150 Medical Centre Synexus Sofia /ID# 202394 Sofia Bulgaria 1784
    151 Medical Centre Synexus Sofia, branch Stara Zagora /ID# 202524 Stara Zagora Bulgaria 6000
    152 Diagnostic Consultative Center /ID# 169607 Varna Bulgaria 9000
    153 Percuro Clinical Research, Ltd /ID# 157823 Victoria British Columbia Canada V8V 3M9
    154 Manitoba Clinic /ID# 157829 Winnipeg Manitoba Canada R3A 1M3
    155 Ciads /Id# 157831 Winnipeg Manitoba Canada R3N 0K6
    156 The Waterside Clinic /ID# 157826 Barrie Ontario Canada L4M 6L2
    157 Groupe de Recherche en Maladies Osseuses Inc /ID# 157824 Sainte-foy Quebec Canada G1V 3M7
    158 Ctr. de Recherche Musculo-Sque /ID# 207069 Trois-rivières Quebec Canada G8Z 1Y2
    159 M y F Estudios Clínicos Ltda. /ID# 168722 Ñuñoa Region Metropolitana De Santiago Chile 7750495
    160 CTR Estudios SpA /ID# 206217 Providencia Chile 7500571
    161 Centro Inter Estud Clin CIEC /ID# 168725 Santiago Chile 8420383
    162 Prosalud Ltda. /ID# 169546 Santiago Chile ZC:7510047
    163 Clinica Dermacross S.A /ID# 168726 Vitacura Santiago Chile 7640881
    164 1st Aff Hosp of Bengbu Medical College /ID# 201021 Bengbu Anhui China 233004
    165 Peking University Third Hospital /ID# 201973 Beijing Beijing China 100191
    166 The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College /ID# 203371 Shantou Guangdong China 515041
    167 Zhuzhou Central Hospital /ID# 200201 Zhuzhou Hunan China 412007
    168 The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Monggolia Univers /ID# 171204 Baotou Inner Mongolia China 014016
    169 The First People's Hospital of Linyi /ID# 201970 Linyi Shandong China 276034
    170 Huashan Hospital of Fudan University /ID# 202191 Shanghai Shanghai China 200040
    171 Shanghai Changhai Hospital /ID# 200202 Shanghai Shanghai China 200433
    172 West China Hospital /ID# 200199 Chengdu Sichuan China 610041
    173 Ningbo First Hospital /ID# 201874 Ningbo Zhejiang China 315010
    174 The Aff Hosp Inner Mongolia /ID# 207787 Huhehaote China 010050
    175 First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University /ID# 201264 Kunming China 650032
    176 Affiliated hospital of nantong university /ID# 208234 Nantong China 226001
    177 The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University /ID# 201875 Soochow China 215006
    178 People's Hospital of Xinjiang /ID# 201592 Urumqi China 830001
    179 Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia CIREEM /ID# 166030 Bogota Cundinamarca Colombia 110231
    180 Fundacion Centro de Investigac /Id# 168201 Antioquia Colombia 050022
    181 Ctr Int de Reum del Caribe SAS /ID# 164051 Barranquilla Colombia 80002
    182 Preventive Care Sas /Id# 163781 Chia Colombia 250001
    183 Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe /ID# 164233 Medellín Colombia
    184 Poliklinika Repromed /ID# 203555 Zagreb Grad Zagreb Croatia 10000
    185 Klinicki bolnicki centar Rijeka /ID# 161159 Rijeka Primorsko-goranska Zupanija Croatia 51000
    186 Medical Center Kuna-Peric /ID# 161160 Zagreb Croatia 10000
    187 Poliklinika Bonifarm /ID# 206662 Zagreb Croatia 10000
    188 Revmatologicka ambulance /ID# 159637 Prague 4 Praha 4 Czechia 140 00
    189 Revmatologicka ambulance /ID# 159671 Prague 4 Praha 4 Czechia 140 00
    190 Revmatologie Bruntal, s.r.o /ID# 159636 Bruntál Czechia 79201
    191 Artroscan s.r.o. /ID# 159634 Ostrava Czechia 722 00
    192 Medical Plus, s.r.o. /ID# 159635 Uherské Hradište Czechia 686 01
    193 Center of Clinical and Basic Research /ID# 163870 Tallinn Harjumaa Estonia 10128
    194 MediTrials /ID# 163706 Tartu Tartumaa Estonia 50406
    195 East Tallinn Central Hospital /ID# 163790 Tallinn Estonia 10138
    196 Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet /ID# 163930 Herne Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 44649
    197 Immanuel-Krankenhaus /ID# 163931 Berlin-buch Germany 13125
    198 University Clinic Carl Gustav /ID# 163926 Dresden Germany 01307
    199 Polikilinik fuer Rheumatologie /ID# 163933 Duesseldorf Germany 40225
    200 Cent fur Innovative Diagnostik /ID# 163927 Frankfurt Germany 60590
    201 Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum II im MVZ Rheumatologie und Autoimmunmedizin /ID# 204421 Hamburg Germany 20095
    202 Dr. med. Jochen Walter FA fuer /ID# 168638 Rendsburg Germany 24768
    203 Med. Universitaetsklinik Inner /ID# 163929 Tuebingen Germany 72076
    204 General Hospital of Athens Laiko /ID# 163476 Athens Attiki Greece 115 27
    205 General Hospital of Athens Laiko /ID# 163478 Athens Attiki Greece 115 27
    206 University General Hospital Attikon /ID# 163477 Athens Attiki Greece 12462
    207 Naval Hospital of Athens /ID# 163486 Athens Greece 11521
    208 University General Hospital of Heraklion PA.G.N.I /ID# 163472 Heraklion Greece 71110
    209 Reg Gen Univ Hosp Larissa /ID# 163496 Larisa Greece 41110
    210 Prince of Wales Hospital /ID# 163506 Hong Kong Hong Kong 999077
    211 Queen Mary Hospital /ID# 162492 Hong Kong Hong Kong 999077
    212 Tuen Mun Hospital /ID# 162493 Tuen Mun Hong Kong 999077
    213 Synexus Magyarorszag Kft. - Gyula DRS /ID# 202209 Gyula Bekes Hungary 5700
    214 Qualiclinic Kft. /ID# 163278 Budapest III Pest Hungary 1036
    215 Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Megyei Korhazak & Egyetemi Oktatok.- Klinikai Kutatasi O. /ID# 202584 Nyíregyháza Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Hungary 4400
    216 Synexus Magyarorszag Kft. - Zalaegerszeg AS /ID# 201884 Zalaegerszeg Zala Hungary 8900
    217 Betegapolo Irgalmas Rend - Budai Irgalmasrendi Korhaz /ID# 170719 Budapest Hungary 1023
    218 Revita Reumatologiai Rendelo /ID# 163277 Budapest Hungary 1027
    219 Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft. /ID# 163279 Budapest Hungary 1036
    220 Synexus Magyarorszag Kft. /ID# 203012 Budapest Hungary 1036
    221 Debreceni Egyetem Kenezy Gyula /ID# 163276 Debrecen Hungary 4031
    222 Vital Medical Center Orvosi-es Fogaszati Kozpont /ID# 163275 Veszprem Hungary 8200
    223 St Vincent's University Hosp /ID# 161073 Dublin Ireland D04 T6F4
    224 Croom Orthopaedic Hospital /ID# 164998 Limerick Ireland V35 F434
    225 Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center /ID# 169845 Tel Aviv-Yafo Tel-Aviv Israel 6423906
    226 The Lady Davis Carmel MC /ID# 170262 Haifa Israel 3436212
    227 Sheba Medical Center /ID# 202532 Ramat Gan Israel 5239424
    228 AOU Federico II /ID# 202411 Naples Campania Italy 80131
    229 Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale/IRCCS c/o Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova /ID# 161090 Reggio Emilia Emilia-Romagna Italy 42123
    230 Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico /ID# 162306 Rome Lazio Italy 00128
    231 Ospedali Riuniti Universita /ID# 161085 Ancona Italy 60023
    232 Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco" /Id# 161084 Catania Italy 95123
    233 Nagoya City University Hospital /ID# 162564 Nagoya-shi Aichi Japan 467-8602
    234 Fukuoka University Hospital /ID# 162086 Fukuoka-shi Fukuoka Japan 814-0180
    235 Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health /ID# 161473 Kitakyushu-shi Fukuoka Japan 807-8556
    236 Mie University Hospital /ID# 162080 Tsu-shi Mie Japan 514-8507
    237 National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center /ID# 162590 Kawachinagano-shi Osaka Japan 586-8521
    238 St.Luke's International Hospital /ID# 162016 Chuo-ku Tokyo Japan 104-8560
    239 Ajou University Hospital /ID# 163891 Suwon-si Gyeonggido Korea, Republic of 16499
    240 Inha University Hospital /ID# 163890 Jung-gu Incheon Gwang Yeogsi Korea, Republic of 22332
    241 M &M Centrs /Id# 161483 Adazi Latvia LV2167
    242 D.Saulites-Kandevicas PP in Cardiology and Rheumatology /ID# 161488 Liepaja Latvia 3401
    243 Clinic ORTO /ID# 161486 Riga Latvia 1005
    244 P. Stradins Clinical Univ Hosp /ID# 164442 Riga Latvia LV-1002
    245 VAKK dr. Kildos Clinic /ID# 167257 Kaunas Lithuania 50128
    246 Klaipeda University Hospital /ID# 167258 Klaipeda Lithuania 92288
    247 Public Institution Republican /ID# 165155 Siauliai Lithuania 76231
    248 Vilnius University Hospital /ID# 165123 Vilnius Lithuania LT-08661
    249 Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun /ID# 161099 Ipoh Perak Malaysia 30450
    250 Hospital Tuanku Ja afar /ID# 161096 Seremban Malaysia 70300
    251 CINTRE, Centro de Investigación y Tratamiento Reumatológico SC /ID# 164006 Mexico City Ciudad De Mexico Mexico 11850
    252 Instituto Jalisciense de Metabolismo SC /ID# 164005 Guadalajara Jalisco Mexico 44670
    253 Invest y Biomed de Chihuahua /ID# 164007 Chihuahua Mexico 31000
    254 Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden /ID# 161575 Leeuwarden Netherlands 8934 AD
    255 Erasmus Medisch Centrum /ID# 161092 Rotterdam Netherlands 3015 CE
    256 Maasstad Ziekenhuis /ID# 160168 Rotterdam Netherlands 3079 DZ
    257 Waikato Hospital /ID# 166415 Hamilton Waikato New Zealand 3204
    258 North Shore Hospital /ID# 169409 Auckland New Zealand 0622
    259 Middlemore Hospital /ID# 166414 Auckland New Zealand 2025
    260 Porter Rheumatology Ltd /ID# 200421 Nelson New Zealand 7010
    261 Timaru Rheumatology Studies /ID# 166413 Timaru New Zealand 7910
    262 Helse Forde /ID# 167853 Forde Sogn Og Fjordane Norway 6812
    263 St. Olavs Hospital HF /ID# 163321 Trondheim Sor-Trondelag Norway 7006
    264 Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. /ID# 204506 Wrocław Dolnoslaskie Poland 50-381
    265 NZOZ Nasz Lekarz /ID# 163774 Toruń Kujawsko-pomorskie Poland 87-100
    266 Salve Medica Sp. z o.o. S.K. /ID# 206300 Lodz Lodzkie Poland 91-211
    267 Malopolskie Centrum Kliniczne /ID# 163777 Cracow Malopolskie Poland 30-149
    268 Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Gdansku /ID# 206299 Gdańsk Pomorskie Poland 80-382
    269 Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Gdyni /ID# 207157 Gdynia Pomorskie Poland 81-537
    270 Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial Katowice /ID# 204510 Katowice Slaskie Poland 40-040
    271 ETYKA-Osrodek Badan Klinicznyc /ID# 163776 Olsztyn Warminsko-mazurskie Poland 10-117
    272 Centrum Kliniczno-Badawcze /ID# 161830 Elblag Poland 82-300
    273 Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne /ID# 206302 Krakow Poland 31-501
    274 Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Poznaniu /ID# 207158 Poznan Poland 60-702
    275 Medycyna Kliniczna /ID# 166288 Warsaw Poland 00-874
    276 Synexus Polska Sp. z.o.o. /ID# 203987 Warsaw Poland 01-192
    277 Reumatika - Centrum Reumatologii NZOZ /ID# 161831 Warsaw Poland 02-691
    278 Instituto Portugues De Reumatologia /ID# 165858 Lisbon Lisboa Portugal 1050-034
    279 Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, EPE /ID# 165861 Lisbon Lisboa Portugal 1349-019
    280 Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova Gaia/Espinho, EPE /ID# 165862 Vila Nova De Gaia Porto Portugal 4434-502
    281 Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, EPE /ID# 165860 Lisboa Portugal 1649-035
    282 Hospital CUF Descobertas /ID# 165866 Lisbon Portugal 1998-018
    283 Hospital Beatriz Angelo /ID# 165865 Loures Portugal 2674-514
    284 Unidade Local De Saude Do Alto Minho /ID# 165863 Viana Do Castelo Portugal 4901-858
    285 Cruz-Santana, Carolina, PR /ID# 163307 Carolina Puerto Rico 00985
    286 Ponce Medical School Foundation /ID# 163920 Ponce Puerto Rico 00716-0377
    287 GCM Medical Group, PSC /ID# 162160 San Juan Puerto Rico 00917
    288 Family Outpatient clinic#4 LLC /ID# 164530 Korolev Moskva Russian Federation 141060
    289 LLC Medical Center /ID# 164529 Novosibirsk Novosibirskaya Oblast Russian Federation 630099
    290 Kazan State Medical University /ID# 164531 Kazan Tatarstan, Respublika Russian Federation 420012
    291 Moscow S.P.Botkin City Clinica /ID# 164533 Moscow Russian Federation 125284
    292 State budgetary institution /ID# 164532 St. Petersburg Russian Federation 192242
    293 Institute for Rheumatology /ID# 166217 Belgrade Beograd Serbia 11000
    294 Institute for Rheumatology /ID# 166223 Belgrade Beograd Serbia 11000
    295 Institute for Rheumatology /ID# 166229 Belgrade Beograd Serbia 11000
    296 Institute for Rheumatology /ID# 166231 Belgrade Beograd Serbia 11000
    297 Military Medical Academy /ID# 166293 Belgrade Beograd Serbia 11000
    298 Singapore General Hospital /ID# 161094 Singapore Central Singapore Singapore 169068
    299 Tan Tock Seng Hospital /ID# 161095 Singapore Singapore 308433
    300 MEDMAN s.r.o. /ID# 165892 Martin Slovakia 036 01
    301 Reumatologická ambulancia Reum.hapi s.r.o. /ID# 166486 Nové Mesto Nad Váhom Slovakia 915 01
    302 Slovak research center Team Member, Thermium s.r.o. /ID# 166489 Pieštany Slovakia 921 01
    303 Univ Medical Ctr Ljubljana /ID# 164212 Ljubljana Slovenia 1000
    304 University Medical Ctr Maribor /ID# 169260 Maribor Slovenia 2000
    305 General Hospital Murska Sobota /ID# 164211 Murska Sobota Slovenia 9000
    306 Greenacres Hospital /ID# 164190 Port Elizabeth Eastern Cape South Africa 6045
    307 Wits Clinical Research Site /ID# 163919 Johannesburg Gauteng South Africa 2193
    308 University of Pretoria /ID# 163852 Pretoria Gauteng South Africa 0001
    309 Jakaranda Hospital /ID# 164242 Pretoria Gauteng South Africa 0002
    310 Arthritis Clinical Research Tr /ID# 163855 Cape Town Western Cape South Africa 7405
    311 Winelands Medical Research Ctr /ID# 163853 Stellenbosch Western Cape South Africa 7600
    312 Hospital Universitario A Coruña - CHUAC /ID# 161129 A Coruña A Coruna Spain 15006
    313 Hospital Campus de la Salud /ID# 170760 Granada Spain 18016
    314 Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal /ID# 161130 Madrid Spain 28034
    315 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre /ID# 163198 Madrid Spain 28041
    316 Kantonsspital St. Gallen /ID# 158131 St. Gallen Sankt Gallen Switzerland 9007
    317 HFR Fribourg - Hopital Canton /ID# 162090 Fribourg Switzerland 1708
    318 China Medical University Hosp /ID# 159402 Taichung City Taichung Taiwan 40447
    319 Chung Shan Medical University /ID# 159403 Taichung Taiwan 404
    320 National Taiwan University Hospital /ID# 160878 Taipei City Taiwan 10002
    321 Taipei Veterans General Hosp /ID# 166222 Taipei City Taiwan 11217
    322 Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Ho /ID# 166221 Taoyuan City Taiwan 33305
    323 Cukurova Universitesi Tip Fakultesi /ID# 162516 Saricam Adana Adana Turkey 01330
    324 Hacettepe Universitesi Tip Fak /ID# 162518 Sihhiye Ankara Turkey 06100
    325 Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training & Research Hospital /ID# 162517 Istanbul Turkey 34147
    326 Marmara Universitesi Pendik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi /ID# 163383 Istanbul Turkey 34899
    327 Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi /ID# 163382 Meram Konya Turkey 42080
    328 Sakarya Universitesi Egitim /ID# 163397 Sakarya Turkey 54100
    329 State Institution L. T. Malaya Therapy National Institution of NAMS of Ukraine /ID# 164170 Kharkiv Kharkivska Oblast Ukraine 61039
    330 Lviv Regional Clinical Hospita /ID# 164178 Lviv Lvivska Oblast Ukraine 79013
    331 Kharkiv Regional Council Regional Clinical Hospital /ID# 210189 Kharkiv Ukraine 61058
    332 NSC Strazhesko Ist Cardiology /ID# 164043 Kiev Ukraine 03680
    333 Med Ctr of Private High Ed Ins /ID# 208527 Kyiv Ukraine 02002
    334 Medical Center of LLC Medbud-Clinic /ID# 208528 Kyiv Ukraine 03037
    335 Kyiv Railway Clinical Hosp No.2 /ID# 208951 Kyiv Ukraine 03049
    336 LLC Revmocentr /ID# 164177 Kyiv Ukraine 04070
    337 MNI KRC Kyiv Regional Clinical Hospital /ID# 210188 Kyiv Ukraine 04107
    338 Odessa National Medical Univ /ID# 164244 Odesa Ukraine 65026
    339 Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. M.I.Pyrogov /ID# 164245 Vinnytsia Ukraine 21018
    340 Whipps Cross Univ Hospital /ID# 161055 London London, City Of United Kingdom E11 1NR
    341 Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Found /ID# 161065 London London, City Of United Kingdom SE1 9RT
    342 Christchurch Hospital /ID# 162702 Christchurch United Kingdom BH23 2JX
    343 UH Coventry & Warwickshire /ID# 162701 Coventry United Kingdom CV2 2DX
    344 Glasgow Royal Infirmary /ID# 162703 Glasgow United Kingdom G4 0SF
    345 Luton & Dunstable University Hospital /ID# 162704 Luton United Kingdom LU4 0DZ

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • AbbVie

    Investigators

    • Study Director: AbbVie Inc., AbbVie

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    AbbVie
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03104400
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • M15-572
    • 2016-004130-24
    First Posted:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 25, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by AbbVie
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details This study is being conducted at 281 sites in 44 countries and was initiated in April 2017. Adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and a history of inadequate response or intolerance to at least one non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) were eligible for enrollment. The study is ongoing; results up to Week 56 are reported.
    Pre-assignment Detail Participants were randomized in a 1:1:2:2:2 ratio to one of five treatment groups. Randomization was stratified by extent of psoriasis (≥ 3% body surface area [BSA] or < 3% BSA), current use of at least 1 non-biologic DMARD, presence of dactylitis, and presence of enthesitis, except for participants from China and Japan, where randomization was stratified by extent of psoriasis (≥ 3% BSA or < 3% BSA) only.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo / Upadacitinib 15 mg Placebo / Upadacitinib 30 mg Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants randomized to receive matching placebo to upadacitinib orally once a day (QD) for 24 weeks followed by upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 32 weeks (Weeks 24 to 56), as well as matching placebo to adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection every other week (EOW) from Weeks 1 to 56. Participants randomized to receive matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD for 24 weeks followed by upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 32 weeks (Weeks 24 to 56), in addition to matching placebo to adalimumab administered by subcutaneous injection EOW from Weeks 1 to 56. Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 40 mg by subcutaneous injection EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD for 56 weeks. Participants randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous injection EOW for 56 weeks. Participants randomized to receive upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous injection EOW for 56 weeks.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 211 212 429 430 423
    Received Study Drug 211 212 429 429 423
    Completed Week 24 190 193 404 408 394
    COMPLETED 177 178 370 379 366
    NOT COMPLETED 34 34 59 51 57

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg Total
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous (SC) injection EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 423 429 429 423 1704
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    50.4
    (12.21)
    51.4
    (12.04)
    51.6
    (12.19)
    49.9
    (12.41)
    50.8
    (12.22)
    Age, Customized (Count of Participants)
    < 65 years
    367
    86.8%
    362
    84.4%
    367
    85.5%
    371
    87.7%
    1467
    86.1%
    65 - < 75 years
    52
    12.3%
    61
    14.2%
    52
    12.1%
    46
    10.9%
    211
    12.4%
    ≥ 75 years
    4
    0.9%
    6
    1.4%
    10
    2.3%
    6
    1.4%
    26
    1.5%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    211
    49.9%
    222
    51.7%
    238
    55.5%
    236
    55.8%
    907
    53.2%
    Male
    212
    50.1%
    207
    48.3%
    191
    44.5%
    187
    44.2%
    797
    46.8%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    66
    15.6%
    65
    15.2%
    59
    13.8%
    53
    12.5%
    243
    14.3%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    357
    84.4%
    364
    84.8%
    370
    86.2%
    370
    87.5%
    1461
    85.7%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    White
    377
    89.1%
    375
    87.4%
    386
    90%
    377
    89.1%
    1515
    88.9%
    Black or African American
    3
    0.7%
    2
    0.5%
    1
    0.2%
    3
    0.7%
    9
    0.5%
    American Indian/Alaska Native
    2
    0.5%
    2
    0.5%
    0
    0%
    2
    0.5%
    6
    0.4%
    Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
    1
    0.2%
    2
    0.5%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.2%
    4
    0.2%
    Asian
    37
    8.7%
    41
    9.6%
    37
    8.6%
    34
    8%
    149
    8.7%
    Multiple
    3
    0.7%
    7
    1.6%
    5
    1.2%
    6
    1.4%
    21
    1.2%
    Extent of Psoriasis (Count of Participants)
    < 3% BSA
    212
    50.1%
    218
    50.8%
    215
    50.1%
    213
    50.4%
    858
    50.4%
    ≥ 3% BSA
    211
    49.9%
    211
    49.2%
    214
    49.9%
    210
    49.6%
    846
    49.6%
    Current Use of at Least 1 Non-Biologic DMARD (Count of Participants)
    Yes
    347
    82%
    347
    80.9%
    353
    82.3%
    346
    81.8%
    1393
    81.7%
    No
    76
    18%
    82
    19.1%
    76
    17.7%
    77
    18.2%
    311
    18.3%
    Presence of Dactylitis (Count of Participants)
    Yes
    126
    29.8%
    127
    29.6%
    136
    31.7%
    127
    30%
    516
    30.3%
    No
    297
    70.2%
    302
    70.4%
    293
    68.3%
    296
    70%
    1188
    69.7%
    Presence of Enthesitis (Count of Participants)
    Yes
    322
    76.1%
    330
    76.9%
    333
    77.6%
    331
    78.3%
    1316
    77.2%
    No
    101
    23.9%
    99
    23.1%
    96
    22.4%
    92
    21.7%
    388
    22.8%
    Duration of Psoriatic Arthritis Symptoms (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    9.3
    (8.58)
    9.1
    (8.78)
    9.2
    (8.63)
    9.3
    (8.28)
    9.2
    (8.56)
    Duration of PsA Diagnosis (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    6.2
    (7.01)
    5.9
    (7.06)
    6.2
    (7.41)
    5.9
    (6.37)
    6.1
    (6.97)
    Tender Joint Count (TJC) (joints) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [joints]
    20.0
    (14.34)
    20.1
    (13.82)
    20.4
    (14.72)
    19.4
    (13.32)
    20.0
    (14.05)
    Swollen Joint Count (SJC) (joints) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [joints]
    11.0
    (8.16)
    11.6
    (8.75)
    11.6
    (9.31)
    10.6
    (7.06)
    11.2
    (8.37)
    Patient's Assessment of Pain (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    6.1
    (2.14)
    6.0
    (2.08)
    6.2
    (2.07)
    5.9
    (2.05)
    6.0
    (2.09)
    Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    6.3
    (2.04)
    6.3
    (2.03)
    6.6
    (2.03)
    6.4
    (2.07)
    6.4
    (2.04)
    Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    6.5
    (1.64)
    6.6
    (1.65)
    6.7
    (1.62)
    6.5
    (1.68)
    6.5
    (1.65)
    Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    1.12
    (0.639)
    1.12
    (0.626)
    1.15
    (0.653)
    1.09
    (0.630)
    1.12
    (0.637)
    High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (mg/L) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/L]
    11.48
    (15.800)
    10.91
    (15.463)
    11.00
    (14.910)
    11.49
    (15.355)
    11.22
    (15.373)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
    Description Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 423 429 429 423
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    36.2
    8.6%
    65.0
    15.2%
    70.6
    16.5%
    78.5
    18.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 34.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    28.2 to 40.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 42.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    36.3 to 48.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
    Description The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 12 was used.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 392 406 404 398
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [units on a scale]
    -0.14
    -0.34
    -0.42
    -0.47
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Squares (LS) Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.28
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.35 to -0.22
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.34
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.40 to -0.27
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Investigator Global Assessment (sIGA) of Psoriasis of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline (sIGA 0/1) at Week 16
    Description The sIGA is a 5 point scale ranging from 0 to 4, based on the investigator's assessment of the average elevation, erythema, and scaling of all psoriatic lesions at the current visit. A lower score indicates less severe psoriasis (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe).
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with a Baseline sIGA score ≥ 2; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 16 or for whom sIGA data were missing at Week 16 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 313 330 322 324
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    10.9
    2.6%
    38.5
    9%
    41.9
    9.8%
    54.0
    12.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 31.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    24.7 to 37.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 43.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    36.7 to 49.6
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16
    Description PASI is a composite score based on the percentage of the body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis and the intensity of erythema (reddening), induration (thickening or hardening of the skin), and desquamation (peeling of the skin) of lesions assessed at 4 anatomic sites (head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities). At each location, the percentage of BSA involvement is assigned a score from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and erythema, induration, and desquamation are scored on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very marked). The PASI score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score, and was assessed in participants with Baseline psoriasis BSA involvement ≥ 3%.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with Baseline psoriasis BSA involvement ≥ 3%; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 16 or for whom PASI data were missing at Week 16 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 211 211 214 210
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    21.3
    5%
    53.1
    12.4%
    62.6
    14.6%
    62.4
    14.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 41.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    32.8 to 49.8
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 41.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    32.5 to 49.6
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Modified PsA Total Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score (mTSS) at Week 24
    Description The Sharp-van der Heijde modified scoring method for PsA measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet, and was assessed by 2 independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 20 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 320 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 20 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 208 (worst). Joints with gross osteolysis or pencil in cup were assigned the maximum score for both erosions and JSN. The total mTSS score is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 528 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement in joint damage.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with available data at Baseline; linear extrapolation was used for participants who discontinued prior to Week 24 or who were rescued prior to Week 24.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 372 384 391 383
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [score on a scale]
    0.25
    0.01
    -0.04
    0.03
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments ANCOVA model including treatment and the stratification factor current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.29
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.44 to -0.14
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0069
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments ANCOVA model including treatment and the stratification factor current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.21
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.36 to -0.06
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 24
    Description A participant was classified as achieving MDA if 5 of the following 7 criteria were met: Tender joint count (out of 68 joints) ≤ 1 Swollen joint count (out of 66 joints) ≤ 1 PASI score ≤ 1 (score ranges from 0 - 72) or percent BSA involved with psoriasis ≤ 3% Patient's assessment of pain ≤ 1.5 (NRS from 0 to 10) Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity ≤ 2 (NRS from 0 to 10) HAQ-DI score ≤ 0.5 (index score ranges from 0 to 3) Leeds Enthesitis Index ≤ 1 (assesses the presence or absence of enthesitis at 3 bilateral sites, with an overall score range from 0 to 6)
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 24 or for whom data were missing at Week 24, or who met the rescue criteria at Week 16 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 423 429 429 423
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    12.3
    2.9%
    33.3
    7.8%
    36.6
    8.5%
    45.4
    10.7%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 24.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    18.8 to 29.8
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 33.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    27.4 to 38.8
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 24
    Description Resolution of enthesitis is defined as a Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) score = 0. LEI is an enthesitis measure developed specifically for PsA and assesses the presence or absence of tenderness at the following 3 bilateral enthesial sites: medial femoral condyles, lateral epicondyles of the humerus, and Achilles tendon insertions. Tenderness on examination is recorded as either present (coded as 1), absent (coded as 0), or not assessed for each of the 6 sites. The LEI is calculated by taking the sum of the scores from the 6 sites. The LEI ranges from 0 to 6 (worst).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with a Baseline LEI > 0; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 24 or for whom data were missing at Week 24, or who met the rescue criteria at Week 16 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 241 265 270 267
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    32.4
    7.7%
    47.2
    11%
    53.7
    12.5%
    57.7
    13.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 21.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    13.0 to 29.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 25.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    16.9 to 33.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 12 - Non-inferiority Versus Adalimumab
    Description Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 423 429 429 423
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    36.2
    8.6%
    65.0
    15.2%
    70.6
    16.5%
    78.5
    18.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Adalimumab 40 mg, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority
    Comments Non-inferiority of each upadacitinib dose versus adalimumab was assessed using Koch's 3-arm approach; non-inferiority was achieved if upadacitinib preserved at least 50% of the placebo-subtracted adalimumab effect. The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Koch 3-Arm Test
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Percent Adalimumab Effect Preservation
    Estimated Value 119.381
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    97.987 to 147.942
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments The percent of adalimumab effect preservation is the point estimate of 3-arm non-inferiority analysis, which is calculated by (Upadacitinib - Placebo) / (Adalimumab - Placebo) * 100.
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Adalimumab 40 mg, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority
    Comments Non-inferiority of each upadacitinib dose versus adalimumab was assessed using Koch's 3-arm approach; non-inferiority was achieved if upadacitinib preserved at least 50% of the placebo-subtracted adalimumab effect. The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Koch 3-Arm Test
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Percent Adalimumab Effect Preservation
    Estimated Value 146.604
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    122.817 to 180.398
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments The percent of adalimumab effect preservation is the point estimate of 3-arm non-inferiority analysis, which is calculated by (Upadacitinib - Placebo) / (Adalimumab - Placebo) * 100.
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12
    Description The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 12 was used.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 394 410 405 398
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [score on a scale]
    3.19
    6.82
    7.86
    8.90
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value 4.67
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.67 to 5.67
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value 5.72
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    4.71 to 6.72
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 12
    Description The FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire is a self-administered patient questionnaire that consists of 13 questions designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by participants in the previous 7 days, including physical fatigue (e.g., I feel tired), functional fatigue (e.g., trouble finishing things), emotional fatigue (e.g., frustration), and social consequences of fatigue (e.g., limits social activity). Participants respond to the questions on a scale from 0 'not at all' to 4 'very much'. The FACIT Fatigue score is computed by summing the item scores, after reversing those items that are worded in the negative direction. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges from 0 to 52, where higher scores represent less fatigue. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 12 was used.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 394 410 404 398
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [score on a scale]
    2.8
    5.7
    6.3
    7.1
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value 3.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    2.4 to 4.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value 4.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.1 to 5.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 12 - Superiority Versus Adalimumab
    Description Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 423 429 429 423
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    36.2
    8.6%
    65.0
    15.2%
    70.6
    16.5%
    78.5
    18.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Adalimumab 40 mg, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0815
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 5.6
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.6 to 11.8
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Adalimumab
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Adalimumab 40 mg, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value 13.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    7.5 to 19.4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Adalimumab
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 24
    Description Resolution of dactylitis is defined as a Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) score = 0. The Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) is a score based on finger circumference and tenderness, assessed and summed across all dactylitic digits (fingers and toes). The presence of a dactylitic digit is defined as at least one affected AND tender digit with circumference increase over reference digit ≥ 10%. The reference digit circumference is either the contralateral digit (unaffected digit on opposite hand or foot) if available, or from a standard reference table if otherwise. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 [none] to 3 [worst]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and reference digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for each affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis.
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with a Baseline LDI > 0; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 24 or for whom data were missing at Week 24, or who met the rescue criteria at Week 16 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 126 127 136 127
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    39.7
    9.4%
    74.0
    17.2%
    76.5
    17.8%
    79.5
    18.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not tested for statistical significance because the hierarchical testing procedures stopped at ACR 20 at Week 12 superiority test of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab 40 mg.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 36.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    25.7 to 47.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not tested for statistical significance because the hierarchical testing procedures stopped at ACR 20 at Week 12 superiority test of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab 40 mg.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 39.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    28.8 to 50.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain - Superiority Versus Adalimumab
    Description Participants were asked to indicate the severity of their arthritis pain within the previous week on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates "no pain" and a score of 10 indicates "worst possible pain." A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 12 was used.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 392 406 404 398
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [units on a scale]
    -0.9
    -2.3
    -2.3
    -2.7
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Adalimumab 40 mg, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8970
    Comments This comparison was not tested for statistical significance because the hierarchical testing procedures stopped at ACR 20 at Week 12 superiority test of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab 40 mg.
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value 0.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.3 to 0.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Adalimumab
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Adalimumab 40 mg, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0028
    Comments This comparison was not tested for statistical significance because the hierarchical testing procedures stopped at ACR 20 at Week 12 superiority test of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab 40 mg.
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.7 to -0.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Adalimumab
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI - Superiority Versus Adalimumab
    Description The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 12 was used.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 392 406 404 398
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [score on a scale]
    -0.14
    -0.34
    -0.42
    -0.47
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Adalimumab 40 mg, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0162
    Comments This comparison was not tested for statistical significance because the hierarchical testing procedures stopped at ACR 20 at Week 12 superiority test of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab 40 mg.
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.08
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.15 to -0.01
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Adalimumab
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Adalimumab 40 mg, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not tested for statistical significance because the hierarchical testing procedures stopped at ACR 20 at Week 12 superiority test of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab 40 mg.
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.14
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.20 to -0.07
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Adalimumab
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Symptoms (SAPS) Questionnaire at Week 16
    Description The SAPS is an 11-item self-assessment of psoriasis symptoms that includes questions on: pain, itching, redness, scaling, flaking, bleeding, burning, stinging, tenderness, pain due to skin cracking, and joint pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 10, with 0 being least severe and 10 being most severe. The total score is generated by summing the 11 items and ranges from 0 to 110 (worst). A negative change from Baseline in the total score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 16 was used.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 388 407 396 395
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [score on a scale]
    -8.2
    -22.7
    -25.3
    -28.1
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not tested for statistical significance because the hierarchical testing procedures stopped at ACR 20 at Week 12 superiority test of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab 40 mg.
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -17.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -19.6 to -14.6
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments The overall type I error rate of the primary and the 14 ranked secondary endpoints was controlled using a two-part sequential graphical multiple testing procedure starting with the primary endpoint using α/2 for each dose followed by a prespecified α transfer path.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not tested for statistical significance because the hierarchical testing procedures stopped at ACR 20 at Week 12 superiority test of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab 40 mg.
    Method Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
    Comments MMRM analysis including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors and Baseline value as covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -19.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -22.3 to -17.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Treatment Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
    Description Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 423 429 429 423
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    13.2
    3.1%
    37.5
    8.7%
    37.5
    8.7%
    51.8
    12.2%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not part of the pre-specified multiplicity testing sequence.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 24.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    18.7 to 29.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not part of the pre-specified multiplicity testing sequence.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 38.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    32.8 to 44.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12
    Description Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 423 429 429 423
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    2.4
    0.6%
    13.8
    3.2%
    15.6
    3.6%
    25.3
    6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not part of the pre-specified multiplicity testing sequence.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 13.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    9.5 to 17.0
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not part of the pre-specified multiplicity testing sequence.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 22.9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    18.5 to 27.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2
    Description Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity Patient global assessment of disease activity Patient assessment of pain Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 2

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 2 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 2 were considered non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Adalimumab 40 mg Upadacitinib 15 mg Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW.
    Measure Participants 423 429 429 423
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    12.1
    2.9%
    30.3
    7.1%
    28.2
    6.6%
    38.3
    9.1%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 15 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not part of the pre-specified multiplicity testing sequence.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 16.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    10.9 to 21.4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Upadacitinib 30 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments This comparison was not part of the pre-specified multiplicity testing sequence.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the main stratification factor of current DMARD use (yes/no).
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Response Rate Difference
    Estimated Value 26.2
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    20.7 to 31.8
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Adverse events are reported for weeks 1 to 24 and weeks 1 to 56 for participants who received upadacitinib or adalimumab.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Placebo: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 15 mg: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 30 mg: Week 1-24 Adalimumab: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 15 mg: Week 1-56 Upadacitinib 30 mg: Week 1-56 Adalimumab: Week 1-56
    Arm/Group Description Participants received matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW for 24 weeks. Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW for 24 weeks. Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally QD and matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW for 24 weeks. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD for 24 weeks. Participants originally randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg received upadacitinib 15 mg for 56 weeks and participants originally randomized to placebo who switched to upadacitinib 15 mg at Week 24 and received upadacitinib 15 mg for 32 weeks. All participants also received matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants originally randomized to upadacitinib 30 mg received upadacitinib 30 mg for 56 weeks and participants originally randomized to placebo who switched to upadacitinib 30 mg at Week 24 and received upadacitinib 30 mg for 32 weeks. All participants also received matching placebo to adalimumab SC EOW. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg SC EOW and matching placebo to upadacitinib orally QD for 56 weeks.
    All Cause Mortality
    Placebo: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 15 mg: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 30 mg: Week 1-24 Adalimumab: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 15 mg: Week 1-56 Upadacitinib 30 mg: Week 1-56 Adalimumab: Week 1-56
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 1/423 (0.2%) 0/429 (0%) 0/423 (0%) 0/429 (0%) 2/617 (0.3%) 1/613 (0.2%) 0/429 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Placebo: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 15 mg: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 30 mg: Week 1-24 Adalimumab: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 15 mg: Week 1-56 Upadacitinib 30 mg: Week 1-56 Adalimumab: Week 1-56
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 13/423 (3.1%) 15/429 (3.5%) 27/423 (6.4%) 17/429 (4%) 40/617 (6.5%) 58/613 (9.5%) 35/429 (8.2%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    IRON DEFICIENCY ANAEMIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    LYMPHOID TISSUE HYPERPLASIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    NORMOCHROMIC NORMOCYTIC ANAEMIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Cardiac disorders
    ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    CARDIAC ARREST 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    CARDIAC FAILURE CONGESTIVE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 2/613 (0.3%) 2 0/429 (0%) 0
    Eye disorders
    CATARACT 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    DIPLOPIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    EYELID PTOSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    ANAL FISTULA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    COLITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    DUODENAL ULCER 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    DUODENAL ULCER HAEMORRHAGE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    DYSPEPSIA 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    ENTERITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    FAECALOMA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    GASTRIC ULCER PERFORATION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    GASTRITIS EROSIVE 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    GASTRODUODENAL HAEMORRHAGE 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    GASTROOESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    HAEMORRHOIDS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    HIATUS HERNIA 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    INTESTINAL POLYP 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    LARGE INTESTINE POLYP 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    VOMITING 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    General disorders
    CHEST PAIN 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    PAIN 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    PYREXIA 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 2/613 (0.3%) 2 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    CHOLELITHIASIS 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Infections and infestations
    ABSCESS LIMB 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    ANAL ABSCESS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    APPENDICITIS 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 3/613 (0.5%) 3 0/429 (0%) 0
    ARTHRITIS BACTERIAL 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    ATYPICAL PNEUMONIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 2/423 (0.5%) 2 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 2/613 (0.3%) 2 0/429 (0%) 0
    BACTERAEMIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    BONE ABSCESS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    BREAST CELLULITIS 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    BRONCHITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 2/613 (0.3%) 2 0/429 (0%) 0
    CELLULITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    DIVERTICULITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    ERYSIPELAS 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    H1N1 INFLUENZA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    HERPES ZOSTER 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    HERPES ZOSTER CUTANEOUS DISSEMINATED 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    INFLUENZA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    LARYNGITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    LUNG INFECTION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    PNEUMOCYSTIS JIROVECII PNEUMONIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    PNEUMONIA 2/423 (0.5%) 2 1/429 (0.2%) 1 3/423 (0.7%) 3 1/429 (0.2%) 1 3/617 (0.5%) 3 4/613 (0.7%) 4 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    PNEUMONIA STREPTOCOCCAL 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    PYELONEPHRITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    SEPSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 2/429 (0.5%) 2 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 2/617 (0.3%) 2 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    STAPHYLOCOCCAL BACTERAEMIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    STAPHYLOCOCCAL SEPSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    SUBCUTANEOUS ABSCESS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    URINARY TRACT INFECTION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    UROSEPSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    VIRAL INFECTION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    ANKLE FRACTURE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    COMMINUTED FRACTURE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    FOOT FRACTURE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    FOREIGN BODY 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    HAND FRACTURE 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    HUMERUS FRACTURE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    JOINT DISLOCATION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    TENDON RUPTURE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    TIBIA FRACTURE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    UPPER LIMB FRACTURE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    WOUND DEHISCENCE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Investigations
    MUSCLE ENZYME INCREASED 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    WEIGHT INCREASED 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    ARTHRALGIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    BACK PAIN 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    CERVICAL SPINAL STENOSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    OSTEOARTHRITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 2/423 (0.5%) 2 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 3/613 (0.5%) 3 3/429 (0.7%) 4
    OSTEONECROSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 2/613 (0.3%) 2 0/429 (0%) 0
    PSORIATIC ARTHROPATHY 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    SPINAL STENOSIS 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    SPONDYLOLISTHESIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    BASAL CELL CARCINOMA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    COLON CANCER METASTATIC 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    LUNG CANCER METASTATIC 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    NEUROENDOCRINE CARCINOMA 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    OVARIAN CANCER 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    UTERINE CANCER 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    UTERINE LEIOMYOMA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    Nervous system disorders
    ALTERED STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    DEMYELINATION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    HEADACHE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    ISCHAEMIC STROKE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    LACUNAR STROKE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    SYNCOPE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    TRANSIENT ISCHAEMIC ATTACK 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Psychiatric disorders
    ANXIETY 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    DEPRESSION 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 2/617 (0.3%) 2 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    NEPHROLITHIASIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    RENAL COLIC 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    URETEROLITHIASIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    FALLOPIAN TUBE CYST 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    HAEMORRHAGIC OVARIAN CYST 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    OVARIAN CYST 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    UTERINE PROLAPSE 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 2 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 2 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    OBSTRUCTIVE AIRWAYS DISORDER 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    PLEURAL EFFUSION 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    PNEUMOTHORAX SPONTANEOUS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    PULMONARY EMBOLISM 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    PULMONARY FIBROSIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    RESPIRATORY DISTRESS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    SLEEP APNOEA SYNDROME 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    TONSILLAR HYPERTROPHY 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    ANGIOEDEMA 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 2 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    DERMATITIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    DERMATITIS CONTACT 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    INGROWING NAIL 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 1/617 (0.2%) 1 0/613 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0
    PSORIASIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 1/613 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0
    PUSTULAR PSORIASIS 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 0/429 (0%) 0 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Vascular disorders
    DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS 1/423 (0.2%) 1 0/429 (0%) 0 0/423 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1 0/617 (0%) 0 0/613 (0%) 0 1/429 (0.2%) 1
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Placebo: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 15 mg: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 30 mg: Week 1-24 Adalimumab: Week 1-24 Upadacitinib 15 mg: Week 1-56 Upadacitinib 30 mg: Week 1-56 Adalimumab: Week 1-56
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 121/423 (28.6%) 159/429 (37.1%) 176/423 (41.6%) 143/429 (33.3%) 305/617 (49.4%) 327/613 (53.3%) 189/429 (44.1%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    DIARRHOEA 10/423 (2.4%) 10 18/429 (4.2%) 19 14/423 (3.3%) 16 9/429 (2.1%) 10 30/617 (4.9%) 32 34/613 (5.5%) 37 19/429 (4.4%) 21
    Infections and infestations
    BRONCHITIS 10/423 (2.4%) 10 14/429 (3.3%) 16 19/423 (4.5%) 22 9/429 (2.1%) 9 40/617 (6.5%) 43 37/613 (6%) 43 13/429 (3%) 14
    NASOPHARYNGITIS 21/423 (5%) 24 21/429 (4.9%) 25 26/423 (6.1%) 29 29/429 (6.8%) 33 54/617 (8.8%) 74 67/613 (10.9%) 79 41/429 (9.6%) 54
    ORAL HERPES 4/423 (0.9%) 4 7/429 (1.6%) 9 19/423 (4.5%) 26 6/429 (1.4%) 7 15/617 (2.4%) 18 31/613 (5.1%) 47 10/429 (2.3%) 14
    UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION 34/423 (8%) 37 45/429 (10.5%) 51 40/423 (9.5%) 45 30/429 (7%) 34 88/617 (14.3%) 121 97/613 (15.8%) 131 52/429 (12.1%) 62
    URINARY TRACT INFECTION 10/423 (2.4%) 10 18/429 (4.2%) 20 16/423 (3.8%) 19 14/429 (3.3%) 15 38/617 (6.2%) 51 41/613 (6.7%) 58 18/429 (4.2%) 21
    Investigations
    ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 12/423 (2.8%) 14 18/429 (4.2%) 22 27/423 (6.4%) 30 32/429 (7.5%) 35 41/617 (6.6%) 58 48/613 (7.8%) 58 40/429 (9.3%) 49
    ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 8/423 (1.9%) 9 13/429 (3%) 15 15/423 (3.5%) 18 22/429 (5.1%) 23 31/617 (5%) 37 37/613 (6%) 43 26/429 (6.1%) 31
    BLOOD CREATINE PHOSPHOKINASE INCREASED 6/423 (1.4%) 7 38/429 (8.9%) 42 42/423 (9.9%) 51 24/429 (5.6%) 24 62/617 (10%) 81 84/613 (13.7%) 116 30/429 (7%) 38
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    PSORIATIC ARTHROPATHY 12/423 (2.8%) 13 4/429 (0.9%) 5 8/423 (1.9%) 8 5/429 (1.2%) 5 21/617 (3.4%) 24 31/613 (5.1%) 31 18/429 (4.2%) 20
    Nervous system disorders
    HEADACHE 10/423 (2.4%) 10 18/429 (4.2%) 24 17/423 (4%) 19 17/429 (4%) 18 30/617 (4.9%) 43 27/613 (4.4%) 34 25/429 (5.8%) 26
    Vascular disorders
    HYPERTENSION 10/423 (2.4%) 10 17/429 (4%) 19 12/423 (2.8%) 12 7/429 (1.6%) 7 36/617 (5.8%) 41 25/613 (4.1%) 27 14/429 (3.3%) 14

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Global Medical Services
    Organization AbbVie
    Phone 800-633-9110
    Email abbvieclinicaltrials@abbvie.com
    Responsible Party:
    AbbVie
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03104400
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • M15-572
    • 2016-004130-24
    First Posted:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 25, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2021