Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Stress Among Black Gender Minority Women

Sponsor
Emory University (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05436106
Collaborator
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) (NIH)
40
1
18

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The research objectives of this study are to first, develop a culturally informed community-based intervention with guidance from community members (via focus groups and theater testing) to reduce the effect of chronic stigma exposure on psychological distress symptoms (PTS and depressive symptoms) among Black gender minority (GM) women. Second, the research team will conduct a proof-of-concept trial to determine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the resulting intervention.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Adaptive Intervention Approach
N/A

Detailed Description

The proposed research builds on our previous work with Black GM women and addresses research gaps. The researchers propose to develop and examine the feasibility of an intervention to improve psychological distress symptom management related to chronic stigma exposure among Black GM women. A hybrid delivery model is proposed where a) weekly group sessions will be co-led by a community member with expertise in working with Black GM women and a public health nurse, b) supplemental educational content will be available for individual consumption via an online portal or application (and tracked via participant click counts), and c) additional social resources will be available through the online portal or app. We will use an adaptive intervention approach with 6-12 module-based sessions selected on the basis of post-session assessments of acceptability and satisfaction. The investigators will use standard qualitative and mixed-method approaches (focus groups, key informant interviews with the community advisory board, and a quantitative survey) and iterative design to develop/adapt, refine, and evaluate a culturally-informed intervention for Black GM women experiencing chronic stigma and psychological distress. Black GM women, aged 18 years and older, will be recruited from Southern states in the United States and Washington, D.C. for virtual participation in the study.

Participants will be recruited via convenience sampling using multiple strategies including passively by distributing flyers to LGBTQ+ organizations and clinics, universities, and community colleges; LGBTQ+ and GM group social media platforms; peer referral, and word of mouth; and actively through collaborations with the Casa Ruby case management team and providers at Emory Healthcare and Grady Health Gender Center.

Investigators will use standard qualitative and mixed-method approaches (focus groups, key informant interviews with the community advisory board, and a quantitative survey) and iterative design to develop/adopt, refine, and evaluate a culturally-informed intervention for Black GM women experiencing chronic stigma and psychological distress. The research team will conduct 4 focus groups of 5 people to address Aim 1. Focus group sessions will last no longer than 2 hours and will be virtual via Zoom.

The research team will conduct a proof-of-concept study to establish the feasibility, including recruitment, retention, and outcome measurement of the developed intervention. Researchers will collect quantitative assessment data on internet-accessible devices via self-administered surveys collected at the time point (T)1; baseline enrollment, T2; Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), T3. immediately post-intervention (within 2-weeks of study completion), and T4. 3-months post-intervention. Study staff will schedule virtual data collection appointments for each participant followed by a review of pertinent survey responses and a virtual debrief with the participant to assess for adverse reactions to the surveys or endorsement of suicidal ideation (SI). Each data collection appointment should last no longer than 1.5 hours including the debriefing with a study staff member. Any adverse reactions or SI will be documented and escalated as necessary per the standard operating procedures.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress Symptoms Among Black Gender Minority Women Experiencing Chronic Stigma
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: intervention educational content

a) weekly group sessions will be co-led by a community member with expertise in working with Black GM women and a public health nurse, b) supplemental educational content will be available for individual consumption via an online portal or application (and tracked via participant click counts), and c) additional social resources will be available through the online portal or app.

Behavioral: Adaptive Intervention Approach
This in an adaptive intervention: the intervention and duration may change based on responses from participants; weekly group sessions will be co-led by a community member with expertise in working with Black GM women and a public health nurse, supplemental educational content will be available for individual consumption via an online portal or application (and tracked via participant click counts), and additional social resources will be available through the online portal or app.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Intervention Retention Rate [Throughout the intervention (up to 12 weeks)]

    number screened per month; number enrolled per month and per source; rate of eligibility ≥40%); (≥50% retention rate; reasons for dropouts; acute crisis or avoidance behaviors; incentive structure);

  2. Average time delay from screening to enrollment and average time to enroll enough participants to form cohorts [From screening to Baseline]

    The average time it takes for participants to be screened and complete enrollment depending on the study cohorts

  3. Overall attendance/adherence [2 weeks post-intervention]

    Session attendance ≥67%; online engagement with educational material via click counts

  4. Changes in the intervention fidelity [Throughout the intervention (up to 12 weeks)]

    Fidelity rates within and between interventionists; range from 0-3, with 2 or higher indicative of high fidelity per domain via the Seeking Safety Adherence Scale (SASS). Tailoring of the SASS will be based on the format used to deliver the intervention content and the focus of the content. For example, the original scale has the following items that may not be appropriate for the created intervention: "Focused on how the topic related to substance use; Gave handouts and made use of them during the session." Thus, these items may be removed or modified to align with content delivery and subject matter. The SASS will be used to periodically assess the fidelity of intervention delivery among each interventionist. Mean scores will be compared between interventionists and scores below 80% will require remediation in the form of individual training with the PI and the interventionist.

  5. Changes in the proportion of acceptability [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    assessment acceptability will be assessed by calculating the proportion of planned assessments that are completed and satisfaction ratings ≥75%; duration of assessment visits; reasons for dropouts);

  6. Changes in the Intervention acceptability [Throughout the intervention (up to 2 weeks post-intervention)]

    intervention acceptability (acceptability ≥75%; qualitative assessments; reasons for dropouts; preference/satisfaction ratings ≥75% via Client satisfaction questionnaire); Client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8; Cronbach's alpha .93; 8-item; 4-point Likert) will be administered at the end of every intervention session to address individual session utility and at T3 for overall satisfaction

  7. Accessibility of the intervention [Throughout the intervention (up to 2 weeks post-intervention)]

    intervention accessibility (qualitative assessments; reasons for dropouts and adherence; technological literacy; ability to access reliable internet). There is no scale for this instrument.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in PTSD symptoms [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment) , 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    Psychological distress symptom severity will be measured using the PCL-5 which is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. The PCL-5 has a variety of purposes, including monitoring symptoms, and changes during and after treatment, screening individuals for PTSD, and making a provisional PTSD diagnosis. Evidence for the PCL for the diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV suggests that a 5-10-point change represents reliable change (i.e., change not due to chance) and a 10-20-point change represents a clinically significant change. Therefore, it was recommended to use 5 points as a minimum threshold for determining whether the improvements are clinically meaningful using the PCL for DSM-IV.

  2. Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    The BDI-II consists of 21 items assessing symptoms of depression experienced during the past 2 weeks. Each item contains four statements reflecting varying degrees of symptom severity. Respondents are instructed to circle the number (ranging from zero to three, indicating increasing severity) that corresponds with the statement that best describes them. Ratings are summed to calculate a total BDI-II score, which can range from 0 to 63. (BDI-II total score, alpha-0.90; cognitive factor, alpha .81; Somatic factor, alpha .87) Scoring the Beck Depression Inventory: Low (1-10)-Normal ups and downs; (11-16)-Mild mood disturbance Mild mood disturbance (17-20) Borderline clinical depression; (21-30)=Moderate depression Significant (31-40)-Severe depression; over 40-extreme depression

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Changes in the transgender community connection scale (TCC) [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    Participants will answer questions about community connectedness. Response options: 5-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree.

  2. Changes in the multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    Participants will answer 12 items about their feelings regarding certain statements. Options range from 1-Very strongly disagree to 7-very strongly agree.

  3. Changes in the coping strategies inventory short form (CSI-SF) [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    Questions ask to categorize the degree of avoidant and approach coping behaviors used. 5-point Likert

  4. Changes in the coping self-efficacy scale (CSE) [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    Participants will be asked about their confidence or certainty that they can do 26 questions. Cannot do all=0 1,2,3,4,5=Moderately certain can do 6,7,8,9,10=at certain can do

  5. Changes in the self-efficacy to manage chronic disease scale (SECMCD) [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    Several questions will be asked about experiences related to "who the participant is". These questions include both how the participant describes herself and how others might describe them. There is no specific score for this instrument.

  6. Changes in sleep [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    Sleep will be measured using the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses subjective sleep quality over the previous month. Responses yield seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, and other sleep related issues. The sum of the seven component scores yields a global sleep quality score.

  7. Changes in the quality of life [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    The quality of life will be measured using the health-related quality of life questionnaire (HRQOL) to assess general and recent days of physical health, mental health, and activity limitation in the past month. Unhealthy days are an estimate of the overall number of days during the previous 30 days when the respondent felt that either his or her physical or mental health was not good. To obtain this estimate, responses to questions 2 and 3 are combined to calculate a summary index of overall unhealthy days, with a logical maximum of 30 unhealthy days.

  8. Changes in the disability/social functioning scale [Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

    The disability/social functioning scale will be measured using the behavior and symptom identification scale (BASIS-24)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • 18 years or older

  • gender is woman/transgender feminine/female

  • assigned male sex at birth

  • the race is Black or mixed-race to include Black

  • speak/read English

  • report current subthreshold or more severe symptoms of psychological distress, as determined by having a score of 25 or greater on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) or a score of 17 or greater on the Beck's Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Enrolled in mental health treatment or a controlled consequential environment (e.g. mental health transitional living environment)

  • the presence of a psychotic or bipolar disorder not currently controlled with medication, as determined by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Modules C and K

  • People with uncontrolled psychotic or bipolar disorders

  • Previous participation in phase 1 of the study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Emory University
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Athena DF Sherman, PhD, PHN, RN, Emory University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Athena DF Sherman, Assistant Professor, Emory University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05436106
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • STUDY00003101
  • 1K23NR020208-01
First Posted:
Jun 28, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jun 28, 2022
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Athena DF Sherman, Assistant Professor, Emory University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 28, 2022