Administration of Surfactant Through an Instillation Device Infasurf® (Calfactant) in Neonates- A Pilot Study

Sponsor
ONY (Industry)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04056741
Collaborator
(none)
55
4
1
22.8
13.8
0.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A pilot study to explore and determine feasibility and safety of the administration of surfactant through a new supraglottic device in patients from 500 to 5000 grams with RDS.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Combination Product: surfactant airway device
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Surfactant therapy can be life-saving for newborn infants with respiratory distress due to surfactant insufficiency, also known as respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). All commercially available surfactants for clinical use are approved for administration through an endotracheal tube. Placement of an endotracheal tube, a procedure called intubation, is stressful for the infant and associated with significant adverse effects. The proposed supraglottic instillation device allows infants to benefit from surfactant therapy while avoiding the negative effects of intubation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
55 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Pilot StudyPilot Study
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Supraglottic Instillation Device for Administration of Surfactant in Neonates- A Pilot Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 7, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 31, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Surfactant administered via supraglottic administration device

Patients in this group will have Calfactant at 3ml/kg administered via the supraglottic administration device.

Combination Product: surfactant airway device
Infants who meet eligibility criteria and have a signed consent form by their parent or guardian will be enrolled in the study. Once enrolled, the surfactant airway device placement and surfactant administration will occur as detailed in the protocol. The infant will be monitored. If the infant meets instillation failure criteria, the procedure will be repeated shortly after the initial procedure. A maximum of two (2) doses will be given during the initial procedure. If the infant meets re-dosing criteria, (s)he may receive up to two (2) additional doses through the surfactant airway device (initial procedure with 1-2 doses and up to two additional doses). If at any time the infant reaches treatment failure criteria, the infant would be intubated and receive a site-specific surfactant through an endotracheal tube. Study outcome data will be followed until discharge from the NICU.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Instillation failures [First 10 minutes after surfactant instillation.]

    Instillation failure is defined as a lack of clinical response

  2. Treatment failure [First 3 days of life]

    "Treatment failure" defined as requiring intubation and liquid surfactant instillation with or without mechanical ventilation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Clinical response [3 days]

    Duration of oxygen therapy

  2. Clinical response [3 days]

    duration of non-invasive respiratory therapy

  3. Clinical response [3 days]

    number of rescue surfactant doses

  4. Clinical response [3 days]

    incidence of pulmonary air leak

  5. Clinical response [3 days]

    pulmonary hemorrhage

  6. Clinical response [defined as need for oxygen at 36 weeks post menstrual age]

    chronic lung disease

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
24 Weeks and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Gestational age at the time of enrollment ≥ 24 0/7 weeks

  • Weight at the time of enrollment 500- 5000 grams

  • Age ≤ 24 hours old

  • Require non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. continuous positive airway pressure, high flow nasal cannula or non-invasive ventilation)

  • Require FiO2 ≤ 40%

  • Clinical diagnosis of RDS

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Prior surfactant administration

  • Prior mechanical ventilation

  • Major congenital anomaly

  • Abnormality of the airway

  • Respiratory distress secondary to an etiology other than RDS (suspected pulmonary hypoplasia, pneumothorax, meconium aspiration syndrome, pneumonia, septic or hypovolemia shock, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy)

  • Apgar score < 5 at 5 minutes of age

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns San Diego California United States 92123
2 Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Saint Petersburg Florida United States 33701
3 Sisters of Charity Hospital Buffalo New York United States 14214
4 Jackson-Madison County General Hospital Jackson Tennessee United States 38301

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • ONY

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kari Roberts, MD, Kari Roberts, MD - University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
ONY
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04056741
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ProVia-01
First Posted:
Aug 14, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Oct 23, 2020
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2020
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Keywords provided by ONY
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 23, 2020