Value of Robotic Rectopexy for the Treatment of Complex Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized double blind controlled study is to assess the value of robotics for the treatment of complex pelvic floor dysfunction. The main aim is to compare perioperative and functional outcomes to the laparoscopic approach.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common pathology. The management can be medical or surgical, depending on the location or the severity of the disease.
Since the large use of laparoscopy for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction, interesting and encouraging results have been published.
However, so far, a laparoscopic approach has some technical disadvantages like a poor ergonomy, a 2 dimensional vision, an unstable camera and the use of straight instruments. To overcome these natural limitations, robotics has been gaining increasing acceptance in general surgery.
Several groups have reported their encouraging experience with robotic rectopexy. Yet, these studies were not randomized or double blinded.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of robotics for complex pelvic floor dysfunction and to compare the outcomes to the laparoscopic approach.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Robotic Use of daVinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, CA) for the treatment of complex pelvic floor dysfunction |
Procedure: Minimally invasive rectopexy
Use of a minimally invasive approach (robotic or laparoscopy) to perform a rectopexy
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Laparoscopy Use of standard laparoscopy for the treatment of complex pelvic floor dysfunction |
Procedure: Minimally invasive rectopexy
Use of a minimally invasive approach (robotic or laparoscopy) to perform a rectopexy
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Perioperative outcomes [up to 30 days]
Including: blood loss, operative time, conversion rate, quality of dissection, pain, complications, hospital stay.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Functional results [At 12 months]
Constipation score Incontinence score Quality of life score Sexuality score
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
women
-
proven pelvic floor dysfunction
-
informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Age <18 years old
-
Patient unable to communicate or to understand the study
-
Patient refusing to participate to the study
-
contraindication to laparoscopy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University Hospital of Geneva, Department of Surgery | Geneva | Switzerland | 1211 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Nicolas C. Buchs
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nicolas C Buchs, MD, University Hospital, Geneva
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CER-11-047