Trial to Determine Which of Two Surgical Techniques Works Better to Correct Vaginal Bulging

Sponsor
Urogynecology Associates, Indiana (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT00988975
Collaborator
(none)
120
2
2
39
60
1.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Women with vaginal bulging who are undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at Clarian Health are eligible to enroll in this study. Two different methods of correcting rectocele at the time of sacrocolpopexy will be compared for surgical outcome, surgical complications, and patient satisfaction with intercourse and bowel function. One of the surgical methods uses an additional graft material and one surgical method does not. It is hypothesized that the method which uses an additional graft material to strengthen the patient's tissues will have a better outcome.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Insertion of pelvicol graft
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Care Provider)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Does Pelvicol Graft in the Posterior Compartment Offer Any Benefit to Surgical Outcomes During Laparoscopic Sacral Colpoperineopexy?
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2009
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2012
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Pelvicol graft

Procedure: Insertion of pelvicol graft
Pelvicol graft

No Intervention: No graft material

No graft material

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Anatomic success of rectocele repair [6 months]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. change in patient symptomatology post-operatively [6 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • women with stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Exclusion Criteria:
  • concomitant colo-rectal procedure

  • allergy to pork

  • any contraindication to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Clarian North Carmel Indiana United States 46032
2 Clarian Methodist Indianapolis Indiana United States 46202

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Urogynecology Associates, Indiana

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00988975
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 09-046
First Posted:
Oct 2, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Oct 2, 2009
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2009
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 2, 2009