Trial to Determine Which of Two Surgical Techniques Works Better to Correct Vaginal Bulging
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Women with vaginal bulging who are undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at Clarian Health are eligible to enroll in this study. Two different methods of correcting rectocele at the time of sacrocolpopexy will be compared for surgical outcome, surgical complications, and patient satisfaction with intercourse and bowel function. One of the surgical methods uses an additional graft material and one surgical method does not. It is hypothesized that the method which uses an additional graft material to strengthen the patient's tissues will have a better outcome.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Pelvicol graft
|
Procedure: Insertion of pelvicol graft
Pelvicol graft
|
No Intervention: No graft material No graft material |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Anatomic success of rectocele repair [6 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- change in patient symptomatology post-operatively [6 months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- women with stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Exclusion Criteria:
-
concomitant colo-rectal procedure
-
allergy to pork
-
any contraindication to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Clarian North | Carmel | Indiana | United States | 46032 |
2 | Clarian Methodist | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46202 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Urogynecology Associates, Indiana
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 09-046