RectoVerso: STARR Trans-anal Resection Versus Vaginal Rectocele Repair Using Elevate: Effects on Defecatory Function

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT01257659
Collaborator
(none)
4
6
2
44
0.7
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the function results between two methods for surgically repairing rectoceles: vaginal versus endo-anal surgery. Our working hypothesis is that the relatively new type of endo-anal surgery will result in better voiding function compared to the traditional vaginal surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: STARR rectocele repair
  • Procedure: Elevate mesh rectocele repair
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
4 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
STARR Type Trans-anal Resection Versus Vaginal Rectocele Repair Using a Posterier Elevate Prothesis: a Randomized, Multicentric, Prospective Study on Defecatory Function
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: STARR arm

In this group of patients, the STARR transanal stapling system is used to treat the rectocele.

Procedure: STARR rectocele repair
The STARR transanal stapling system is used to repair a rectocele.

Active Comparator: Elevate arm

In this group of patients, a posterior Elevate mesh is placed transvaginally to treat the rectocele.

Procedure: Elevate mesh rectocele repair
A posterior Elevate mesh is placed transvaginally to repair a rectocele.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. presence/absence of a 50% drop in the ODS score [12 months]

    presence/absence of a 50% drop in the ODS score: constipation score defined by Altomare et al, 2008.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. presence/absence of prolapse recurrence [6 weeks]

    presence/absence of prolapse recurrence: determined by prolapse staging

  2. Frequency of laxative use [6 weeks]

  3. Intervention time (min) [1 day]

  4. Questionnaire PFDI 20 [6 weeks]

  5. Questionnaire PFIQ 7 [6 weeks]

  6. Questionnaire SF 36 [6 weeks]

  7. Questionnaire PISQ-12 [6 weeks]

  8. presence/absence of prolapse recurrence [6 months]

    presence/absence of prolapse recurrence: determined by prolapse staging

  9. presence/absence of prolapse recurrence [12 months]

    presence/absence of prolapse recurrence: determined by prolapse staging

  10. presence/absence of prolapse recurrence [36 months]

    presence/absence of prolapse recurrence: determined by prolapse staging

  11. Frequency of laxative use [6 months]

  12. Frequency of laxative use [12 months]

  13. Frequency of laxative use [36 months]

  14. Questionnaire PFDI 20 [6 months]

  15. Questionnaire PFDI 20 [12 months]

  16. Questionnaire PFDI 20 [36 months]

  17. Questionnaire PFIQ 7 [6 months]

  18. Questionnaire PFIQ 7 [12 months]

  19. Questionnaire PFIQ 7 [36 months]

  20. Questionnaire SF 36 [6 months]

  21. Questionnaire SF 36 [12 months]

  22. Questionnaire SF 36 [36 months]

  23. Questionnaire PISQ-12 [6 months]

  24. Questionnaire PISQ-12 [12 months]

  25. Questionnaire PISQ-12 [36 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patient is not under any type of guardianship

  • patient has a rectocele > 3 cm during defecography

  • patient has persistent defecatory troubles depite medical treatment (laxatives for at least 1 month) and an ODS score > 10

  • patient recieved information and signed the consent form

Exclusion Criteria:
  • patient cannot read French

  • patient has an asymptomatic rectocele

  • patient with an enterocele at rest upon defecography, with opacification of the small bowel

  • patient with non-rehabilitated anorectal asynchrony (anism)

  • patient with anal incontinence, Wexner score > 7

  • patient has a rectal lesion

  • patient has previously had rectal surgery including a colorectal anastomosis

  • patient has previously had a surgery involving disection of the rectovaginal wall, except for myorraphy of relever muscles

  • patient has previously had pelvic radiotherapy

  • anal sphincter insufficiency detected by rectomanometry

  • megarectum detected by rectomanometry and defecography

  • granule transit anomaly: > 70h

  • exteriorized rectal prolapse

  • rectovaginal fistule

  • intestinal inflammatory disease

  • anal stenosis

  • anal or rectal tumor

  • patient refuses to participate or refuses to sign consent

  • patient is enrolled in another study

  • contra indication for general or localized anesthesia

  • patient does not have social security coverage

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes Nîmes Gard France 30029
2 Hôpital de la Conception Marseille France
3 Clinique Beau Soleil Montpellier France
4 Clinique Adassa Strasbourg France
5 Hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France
6 Hôpital Purpan, CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Renaud de Tayrac, MD PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01257659
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PHRC-I/2010/RdeT-01
  • 2010-A00665-34
First Posted:
Dec 10, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Nov 1, 2015
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2015
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 1, 2015