Comparison of Lotrafilcon B Lenses With Different Packaging Solutions

Sponsor
Alcon Research (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02699684
Collaborator
(none)
82
2
5.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate AIR OPTIX® plus HYDRAGLYDE® (AOHG) contact lenses compared to AIR OPTIX® AQUA (AOA) contact lenses in overall lens fit.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41
  • Device: Lotrafilcon B contact lenses
  • Device: Hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution
  • Device: Saline solution for rinsing contact lenses
  • Device: Saline solution for rinsing contact lens case
N/A

Detailed Description

Subjects must not wear any contact lenses prior to the visit on Day 1 (Insertion) for Period 1 or Day 1 (Insertion) for Period 2.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
82 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
One Month Clinical Comparison of Two Lotrafilcon B Spherical Lenses With Different Packaging Solutions
Actual Study Start Date :
May 12, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 20, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 20, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: AOHG, then AOA

Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41 worn first, followed by lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn second. Both products worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 30 days and removed nightly for care using a hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution.

Device: Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41
Lotrafilcon B contact lenses packaged with copolymer 845 and EOBO-41
Other Names:
  • AIR OPTIX® plus HYDRAGLYDE®
  • AOHG
  • Device: Lotrafilcon B contact lenses
    Lotrafilcon B contact lenses packaged with copolymer 845
    Other Names:
  • AIR OPTIX® AQUA
  • AOA
  • Device: Hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution
    Commercially-available hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution for cleaning, disinfecting, and storing silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses
    Other Names:
  • AOSEPT® PLUS
  • CLEAR CARE® PLUS
  • Device: Saline solution for rinsing contact lenses
    Commercially-available saline solution used as needed
    Other Names:
  • Minims®
  • Device: Saline solution for rinsing contact lens case
    Commercially-available solution used as needed
    Other Names:
  • LENS PLUS® OCUPURE™
  • Other: AOA, then AOHG

    Lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn first, followed by lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41 worn second. Both products worn bilaterally for 30 days and removed nightly for care using a hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution.

    Device: Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41
    Lotrafilcon B contact lenses packaged with copolymer 845 and EOBO-41
    Other Names:
  • AIR OPTIX® plus HYDRAGLYDE®
  • AOHG
  • Device: Lotrafilcon B contact lenses
    Lotrafilcon B contact lenses packaged with copolymer 845
    Other Names:
  • AIR OPTIX® AQUA
  • AOA
  • Device: Hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution
    Commercially-available hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution for cleaning, disinfecting, and storing silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses
    Other Names:
  • AOSEPT® PLUS
  • CLEAR CARE® PLUS
  • Device: Saline solution for rinsing contact lenses
    Commercially-available saline solution used as needed
    Other Names:
  • Minims®
  • Device: Saline solution for rinsing contact lens case
    Commercially-available solution used as needed
    Other Names:
  • LENS PLUS® OCUPURE™
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Subjects Satisfying the "no Re-fit" Criteria in Both Eyes [Day 30, each product]

      Overall lens fit was graded by the Investigator on a 5-point scale: -2 (unacceptably tight); -1 (acceptably tight); 0 (optimal fit); +1 (acceptable loose); +2 (unacceptable loose). 'No re-fit' criteria was satisfied if an acceptable or optimal overall lens fit, that was also within one grade of the habitual lens fit value, was achieved.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Mean Ex Vivo Total Cholesterol Uptake After 30 Days of Wear [Day 30, each product]

      The contact lens was removed from the eye. Cholesterol deposits were extracted and measured in micrograms (μg) per lens. Lower deposits indicate increased lens performance. Only one eye (right eye) contributed to the analysis.

    2. Change From Insertion in Minimum Protected Area (MPA) [Hour 0 (Lens Insertion) to Hour 12 on Day 1]

      MPA (the minimum area of the contact lens surface (expressed in %) protected by the tear film between two natural blinks) was assessed by the Investigator during the interblink period using the Tearscope® lighting system. Higher values indicate a more stable tear film in front of the lens. This Outcome Measure was pre-specified for AOHG only. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Must sign Informed Consent Document;

    • Manifest cylinder less than or equal to 0.75 Diopter (D) in each eye;

    • Successful current wearer (during the past 2 months for a minimum of 5 days per week and 8 hours per day) of AOA contact lenses within the protocol-specified power range;

    • Willing to answer text messages on a daily basis during the study;

    • Willing to discontinue artificial tears and rewetting drops on the days of study visits;

    • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Habitual lens wear in an extended wear modality (routinely sleeping in lenses overnight for 1 night per week);

    • Any anterior segment infection, inflammation, disease or abnormality that contraindicates contact lens wear (within 7 days of enrollment, or current);

    • History of herpetic keratitis, corneal surgery or irregular cornea;

    • Any use of systemic or ocular medications for which contact lens wear could be contraindicated;

    • Monocular (only 1 eye with functional vision) or fit with only 1 lens;

    • Pregnant or lactating;

    • Participation in any clinical study within 30 days of Visit 1;

    • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Alcon Research

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Clinical Trial Manager, EMEA, Alcon, A Novartis Division

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Alcon Research
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02699684
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CLE270-P001
    First Posted:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 2, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2017

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Subjects were recruited from 1 study center located in the United Kingdom (UK).
    Pre-assignment Detail Of the 82 enrolled, 6 subjects were exited as screen failures prior to randomization. One subject withdrew consent after randomization, but before exposure to product. This reporting group includes all randomized and exposed subjects (75).
    Arm/Group Title AOHG, Then AOA AOA, Then AOHG
    Arm/Group Description Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41 worn first, followed by lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn second. Both products worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 30 days and removed nightly for care using a hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution. Lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn first, followed by lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41 worn second. Both products worn bilaterally for 30 days and removed nightly for care using a hydrogen peroxide-based lens care solution.
    Period Title: Period 1, First 30 Days of Wear
    STARTED 37 38
    COMPLETED 37 38
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0
    Period Title: Period 1, First 30 Days of Wear
    STARTED 37 38
    COMPLETED 36 38
    NOT COMPLETED 1 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Overall
    Arm/Group Description Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41 and lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn bilaterally during Period 1 and Period 2 in a crossover assignment, as randomized.
    Overall Participants 75
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    35.7
    (10.30)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    51
    68%
    Male
    24
    32%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Subjects Satisfying the "no Re-fit" Criteria in Both Eyes
    Description Overall lens fit was graded by the Investigator on a 5-point scale: -2 (unacceptably tight); -1 (acceptably tight); 0 (optimal fit); +1 (acceptable loose); +2 (unacceptable loose). 'No re-fit' criteria was satisfied if an acceptable or optimal overall lens fit, that was also within one grade of the habitual lens fit value, was achieved.
    Time Frame Day 30, each product

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis Set. Number Analyzed is the number of subjects with non-missing response.
    Arm/Group Title AOHG Contact Lenses AOA Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41 worn bilaterally for 30 days in Period 1 or 2, as randomized Lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn bilaterally for 30 days in Period 1 or 2, as randomized
    Measure Participants 75 74
    Number [percentage of subjects]
    93.3
    94.6
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Ex Vivo Total Cholesterol Uptake After 30 Days of Wear
    Description The contact lens was removed from the eye. Cholesterol deposits were extracted and measured in micrograms (μg) per lens. Lower deposits indicate increased lens performance. Only one eye (right eye) contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame Day 30, each product

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis Set. Only the right (OD) lenses were collected from a subset of subjects.
    Arm/Group Title AOHG Contact Lenses AOA Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41 worn bilaterally for 30 days in Period 1 or 2, as randomized Lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn bilaterally for 30 days in Period 1 or 2, as randomized
    Measure Participants 32 32
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [μg]
    0.44
    (0.231)
    0.27
    (0.173)
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Insertion in Minimum Protected Area (MPA)
    Description MPA (the minimum area of the contact lens surface (expressed in %) protected by the tear film between two natural blinks) was assessed by the Investigator during the interblink period using the Tearscope® lighting system. Higher values indicate a more stable tear film in front of the lens. This Outcome Measure was pre-specified for AOHG only. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame Hour 0 (Lens Insertion) to Hour 12 on Day 1

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis Set. Number Analyzed is the number of eyes with non-missing response.
    Arm/Group Title AOHG Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Lotrafilcon B contact lenses with EOBO-41 worn bilaterally for 30 days in Period 1 or 2, as randomized
    Measure Participants 45
    Measure Eyes 90
    Insertion (Hour 0)
    86.839
    (24.775)
    Change from Insertion (Hour 12 - Hour 0)
    4.396
    (23.060)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Adverse events (AEs) were collected from time of consent for the duration of a subject's participation in the study (up to 74 days). AEs are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the medical device.
    Arm/Group Title Pretreatment AOHG Contact Lenses AOA Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description All subjects who consented to participate in the study prior to initiation of study treatment All subjects exposed to AOHG contact lenses All subjects exposed to AOA contact lenses
    All Cause Mortality
    Pretreatment AOHG Contact Lenses AOA Contact Lenses
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/82 (0%) 0/75 (0%) 0/75 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Pretreatment AOHG Contact Lenses AOA Contact Lenses
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/82 (0%) 1/75 (1.3%) 0/75 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Food Poisoning 0/82 (0%) 1/75 (1.3%) 0/75 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Pretreatment AOHG Contact Lenses AOA Contact Lenses
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/82 (0%) 0/75 (0%) 0/75 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Sponsor reserves the right of prior review of any publication or presentation of information related to the study.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Sr. Global Brand Medical Affairs Lead, GCRA
    Organization Alcon, A Novartis Division
    Phone 1-888-451-3937
    Email alcon.medinfo@alcon.com
    Responsible Party:
    Alcon Research
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02699684
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CLE270-P001
    First Posted:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 2, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2017