Refractive Outcomes After Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome

Sponsor
Medical University of Lublin (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04783909
Collaborator
(none)
80
19.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To evaluate the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in PEX syndrome and determine which of the commonly used IOL formulas (SRK/T, Barrett Universal II and Hill-RBF) is the best in predicting postoperative refractive outcomes in PEX.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery

Detailed Description

The primary outcome measure was to compare refractive outcomes (MAE, MedAE, percentage of eyes within certain range of prediction error) in PEX and control eyes. The secondary outcome measure was to determine whether any of IOL power prediction formulas (SRK/T, Barrett Universal II and Hill-RBF) is more precise for these challenging eyes.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
80 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 30, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
PEX

42 eyes with PEX syndrome and coexisting cataract

Procedure: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery
All surgeries were performed using Infinity (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) under topical anaesthesia by one surgeon through 2.2 mm incision in the upper corneal limbus. The hydroimplantation of IOL to the capsular bag was performed in all cases.

Control

38 eyes with cataract only

Procedure: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery
All surgeries were performed using Infinity (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) under topical anaesthesia by one surgeon through 2.2 mm incision in the upper corneal limbus. The hydroimplantation of IOL to the capsular bag was performed in all cases.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. To compare refractive outcomes in PEX and control eyes. [3 months]

    To measure MAE, MedAE, percentage of eyes within certain range of prediction error after cataract surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. To determine whether any of IOL power prediction formulas is more precise for these challenging eyes. [3 months]

    To measure the effects of IOL power calculation formulas - SRK/T, Barrett Universal II and Hill-RBF - on postoperative refraction

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • senile cataract with/without PEX
Exclusion Criteria:
  • corneal pathology

  • glaucoma,

  • corneal astigmatism greater than 2.0 diopters (D),

  • previous eye surgery or subjects with decreased vision due to other reasons than cataract (e.g., exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), proliferative diabetic retinopathy, inflammatory eye diseases),

  • intraoperative complications,

  • postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) worse than 20/40,

  • axial length below 21 mm and above 25 mm,

  • dense cataracts or poor fixation requiring ultrasound biometry

  • eyes with manifest iridophacodonesis and those in which a capsular tension ring was inserted

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical University of Lublin

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Tomasz Żarnowski, MD, PhD, Professor, Medical University in Lublin

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Medical University of Lublin
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04783909
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • KE-0254/241/2014
First Posted:
Mar 5, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Mar 5, 2021
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Medical University of Lublin
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 5, 2021