HENIVOT2: Helmet NIV vs. CPAP vs. High-flow Nasal Oxygen in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Sponsor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05089695
Collaborator
Societa Italiana Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva (Other), Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (Other)
1,200
1
3
30.1
39.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Multicenter, open label, three-arm randomized trial to assess the effect of helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. helmet continuous positive airway pressure vs. high-flow nasal oxygen on the rate of endotracheal intubation of patients with acute moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Noninvasive respiratory support
N/A

Detailed Description

The optimal initial management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is uncertain. Helmet noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen appear as the most promising techniques in this setting. Recently, the first head-to-head randomized trial compared first-line continuous treatment with helmet pressure support ventilation with specific settings (PEEP=12 cmH2O pressure and pressure support=10-12 cmH2O) vs. high-flow nasal oxygen alone in patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. Results showed no significant inter-group difference in the days free of respiratory support at 28 days, but lower intubation rate and increased 28-day invasive ventilation-free days in the helmet group. Use of helmet noninvasive ventilation is less frequent than use of helmet continuous positive airway pressure, which is simpler to use.

The investigators designed an open-label, multicentre randomized trial to assess the effect of helmet pressure support ventilation and continuous airway pressure as compared to high-flow nasal oxygen on the intubation rate of patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure in the intensive care unit.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. High-flow Nasal Oxygen as First-line Treatment of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (HENIVOT2). An Open-label, Multicentre Randomized Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Helmet Noninvasive ventilation (NIV)

Patients in helmet noninvasive ventilation group will receive continuous helmet pressure support ventilation for at least 16 hours/day in the first 2 calendar days. Dedicated helmets for noninvasive ventilation will be applied and size will be chosen according to patient's neck circumference. Each patient will be connected to a mechanical ventilator ventilator through a bitube circuit with no humidification. The ventilator will be set in PSV-NIV mode, with the following suggested settings [34-38]: initial pressure support=12 cmH2O and adequate to permit a peak inspiratory flow of 100 l/min; positive end-expiratory pressure=12 cmH2O. FiO2 will be titrated to obtain an SpO2≥92% and ≤98%. Inspiratory flow trigger = 2 l/min or according to the practice of each institution; fastest pressurization time; expiratory trigger: 10-50% of the maximum inspiratory flow, eventually modified to avoid double triggering; maximum inspiratory time 1.2 second.

Device: Noninvasive respiratory support
Treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Experimental: Helmet continuous airway pressure (CPAP)

Patients in CPAP group will receive continuous helmet CPAP for at least 16 hours/day in the first 2 calendar days. Continuous CPAP without interruptions will be strongly encouraged in the first 48 hours of treatment. Dedicated helmets for noninvasive ventilation will be applied and size will be chosen according to patient's neck circumference. Treatment will be delivered through a high-flow generator. The following settings will be applied: Continuous air flow>45 l/min. Bi-tube circuit with no humidification, Y-piece with heat and moisture exchanger, or active heating and humidification with humidification chamber temperature set at 31 °C, 34 °C or 37 °C according to patients' comfort. Expiratory positive end-expiratory pressure valve set to achieve PEEP=12 cmH2O. FiO2 will be titrated to obtain an SpO2≥92% and ≤98%.

Device: Noninvasive respiratory support
Treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Active Comparator: High-flow nasal oxygen

Initial set flow will be 50-60 l/min and flows will be decreased. in case of intolerance and/or according to patients' requirements: flows≥30 L/min will be mandatory in all enrolled patients. Humidification chamber will be set at 31 °C, 34 °C or 37 °C according to patient's comfort. FiO2 will be titrated to obtain an SpO2≥92% and ≤98%. Weaning the patient from high-flow will be considered only after 48 hours from enrolment and will be discouraged until the patients is considered for ICU discharge.

Device: Noninvasive respiratory support
Treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of Endotracheal intubation [28 days]

    The proportion of patients requiring endotracheal intubation according to predefined criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Days free of invasive mechanical ventilation at day 28 [28 days]

    The number of days in which patients do not receive mechanical ventilation within 28 days from randomization

  2. Days free of invasive mechanical ventilation at day 60 [60 days]

    The number of days in which patients do not receive mechanical ventilation within 60 days from randomization

  3. Days free of invasive mechanical ventilation at day 90 [90 days]

    The number of days in which patients do not receive mechanical ventilation within 60 days from randomization

  4. Rate of In-intensive care unit mortality [90 days]

    All-cause mortality, assessed at the discharge from the intensive care unit

  5. Rate of In-hospital care unit mortality [90 days]

    All-cause mortality, assessed at the discharge from the hospital

  6. Rate of 90-day mortality [90 days]

    All-cause 90-day mortality

  7. 90-day ICU free days [90 days]

    The days not spent in the intensive care unit by the patient on a 90-day basis

  8. 90-day hospital free days [90 days]

    The days not spent in the hospital by the patient on a 90-day basis

  9. Incidence of pneumonia [90 days]

    Incidence of pneumonia, diagnosed after the treatment start and during the ICU stay

  10. Incidence of shock [90 days]

    Incidence of shock, diagnosed after treatment start and during the ICU stay

  11. Incidence of barotrauma [90 days]

    Incidence of barotrauma, defined as pneumothorax o pneumomediastinum after treatment start and during the ICU stay

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Safety endpoint-causes of endotracheal intubation [28 days]

    Among patients meeting the primary endpoint, the cause of noninvasive treatment failure (as defined by the predefined intubation criteria)

  2. Safety endpoint-time to treatment failure [28 days]

    In patients meeting the primary endpoint, the time (hours) from randomization to intubation

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Acute symptoms of respiratory failure PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 200; PaCO2≤45mmHg; Absence of history of chronic respiratory failure or moderate to severe cardiac insufficiency (NYHA>2 or left ventricular ejection fraction<50%); Informed consent

Patients that have already received NIV, CPAP continuously for more than 24 hours before the screening visit will be excluded.

Other Exclusion Criteria:
  • Pregnancy;

  • Exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;

  • Hypercapnia (PaCO2>45 mmHg) with or without respiratory acidosis;

  • More than 2 organ failures, including the lung.

  • Documented pneumothorax;

  • Clinical diagnosis of Cardiogenic pulmonary edema;

  • Haemodynamic instability (Systolic blood pressure<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure<65mmHg) and/or lactic acidosis (lactate>5 mmol/L) and/or clinically diagnosed Shock requiring administration of vasoactive agents (norepinephrine>0.1 mcg/Kg/min);

  • Metabolic Acidosis (pH <7.30 with normal- or hypo-carbia);

  • Chronic kidney failure requiring dialysis before ICU admission;

  • Chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring long-term oxygen therapy;

  • Altered neurological status that requires immediate intubation and/or making the patient uncooperative;

  • Urgent need for endotracheal intubation, according to the decision of the attending physician;

  • Do not intubate order;

  • Decision of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy;

  • Thoracic or abdominal surgery in the previous 7 days;

  • Any condition that makes the patient very likely to require endotracheal intubation due to a reason different from respiratory failure;

  • Recent head surgery or anatomy that prevent the application of helmet or HFNC to patient's face.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Gemelli Rome Italy

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
  • Societa Italiana Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva
  • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Domenico Luca Grieco, MD, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS
  • Study Chair: Massimo Antonelli, MD, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05089695
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HENIVOT2
First Posted:
Oct 22, 2021
Last Update Posted:
May 3, 2022
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 3, 2022