Comparing Two Different Rehabilitation Protochols on Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair

Sponsor
Hacettepe University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03533088
Collaborator
(none)
54
1
2
19.1
2.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Rotator cuff (RC) repair is one of the most common treatment approch to relief the pain and improve the shoulder function on patients with rotator cuff rupture. Despite the improved surgical techniques and decreased failure rate, there are still complications after the surgey like shoulder persistant shoulder pain, stiffness even re-tear. Therefore, rehabilitation after the RC repair procedure is crucial for the success of the treatment. However, there is no concencus between the post-operative rehabilitation protochol. The aim of this study is to compare two different rehabilitation protochols on patients with RC repair.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Hospitalized rehabilitation
  • Other: Home-based rehabilitation
N/A

Detailed Description

Rotator cuff (RC) repair is one of the most common treatment approch to relief the pain and improve the shoulder function on patients with rotator cuff rupture. Despite the improved surgical techniques and decreased failure rate, there are still complications after the surgey like shoulder persistant shoulder pain, stiffness even re-tear. Therefore, rehabilitation after the RC repair procedure is crucial for the success of the treatment. However, there is no concencus between the post-operative rehabilitation protochol. The aim of this study is to compare two different rehabilitation protochols in terms of shoulder range of motion, self-reported shoulder function and pain on patients with RC repair.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
54 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomised control trialRandomised control trial
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparing Two Different Rehabilitation Protochols on Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 15, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 15, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Hospitalized rehabilitation

Patients in this group will recieve rehabilitation program twice in a week at our clinic after the surgical procedure until post-operative 12 weeks.

Other: Hospitalized rehabilitation
Patients will recive a rehabilitation prgram at the clinic twice in a week until the post-operative 12. weeks

Experimental: Home-based rehabilitation

Patients in his groups will performed home-based rehabilitation in the early stages of the post-op period. They will com to our clinic once in a two weeks and the recieve the exercise program to perform at home until the 6. weeks of the post-operative period. After the 6. week they will come to our clinic once in a week until the post-operative 12. week.

Other: Home-based rehabilitation
Patients will recive a home program once in a two weeks until the 6. weeks of post-operative period. Then will start to recieve a rehabilitation program ar the clinic once in a week auntil the 12. week of the post-operative period.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. scapular kinematics [6 months]

    3-Dimensional scapular kinematics will be assessed

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. gleno-humeral range of motion [6 months]

    patients' shoulder range of motions will be assessed

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Having a Rotator Cuff repair surgery

  • Having post-op rehabilitation program at our clinic until post-op 3 months

  • No previous surgery in the shoulder joint

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Additional pathology other then RC tear

  • Refusing to participate to the study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hacettepe Univercity, Faculty of Physical Theraphy and Rehablitation Altındağ Ankara Turkey 06600

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hacettepe University

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Taha Yıdız, Msc, İnvestigator

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Irem Duzgun, Doç. Dr. İrem Düzgün, Hacettepe University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03533088
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1233412334
First Posted:
May 22, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Aug 25, 2021
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Irem Duzgun, Doç. Dr. İrem Düzgün, Hacettepe University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 25, 2021