SIRIUS: Sirolimus in Cutaneous Sarcoidosis

Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05458492
Collaborator
(none)
10
1
58

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the presence of epithelioid granulomas without caseous necrosis in the organs involved. Sarcoidosis cutaneous lesions can be severe. There is no recommendation for the treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis. A recent study highlights the potential efficacy of mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of sarcoidosis granulomas. The hypothesis is that sirolimus could be effective for sarcoidosis treatment, especially for cutaneous lesions.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate sirolimus efficacy on cutaneous sarcoidosis of the face.

The main evaluation criteria is the percentage of patients with a significant clinical response (relative decrease in "facial SASI" ≥ 25%) at week 16 of treatment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cutaneous Sarcoidosis With Moderate to Severe Involvement of the Face : Multicenter Open-label Study of Oral Sirolimus Efficacy and Tolerance
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Sirolimus Arm

Sirolimus, tablets 2 mg/day with dose adjustment of 1 to 3 mg/day for residual concentrations between 4 and 10 ng/mL 1 dose daily for 16 weeks

Drug: Sirolimus
Sirolimus, tablets 2 mg/day with dose adjustment of 1 to 3 mg/day for residual concentrations between 4 and 10 ng/mL 1 dose daily for 16 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patients with a significant clinical response [at week 16]

    Significant clinical response will be defined as a relative decrease in "facial SASI" ≥ 25% compared to baseline. Facial SASI score evaluates 4 features for each of 4 facial quadrants and the nose: erythema, induration, and desquamation, each ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe), and an area score ranging from 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%). The maximal range of modified Facial SASI scores is 0 to 72.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patients with a good clinical response [at week 16]

    A good clinical response will be defined as a relative decrease of "facial SASI" ≥ 50%. Facial SASI score evaluates 4 features for each of 4 facial quadrants and the nose: erythema, induration, and desquamation, each ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe), and an area score ranging from 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%). The maximal range of modified Facial SASI scores is 0 to 72.

  2. Percentage of patients with complete clinical response [at week 16]

    Complete clinical response will be defined as "facial SASI" = 0. Facial SASI score evaluates 4 features for each of 4 facial quadrants and the nose: erythema, induration, and desquamation, each ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe), and an area score ranging from 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%). The maximal range of modified Facial SASI scores is 0 to 72.

  3. Percentage of patients with an improvement of their quality of dermatological life [at week 16]

    An improvement will be defined as a decrease of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire> 25%. DLQI goes from 0 to 30. A lower score indicated a good quality of Life, and a higher score a worse quality of life.

  4. Comparison of face facial photographs with good brightness compared to baseline [at week 16]

    Qualitative clinical aspects of skin sarcoidosis lesions will be compared between baseline and Week 16, as an illustrative proof in addition to quantitative skin score assessment (Facial SASI)

  5. Sarcoidosis activity score evaluated for other organs evaluted using Extra-Pulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) [at week 16]

    Sarcoidosis activity for all organs will be evaluted using Extra-Pulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) (from 0 (normal) to 6(severe impairment))

  6. Sarcoidosis activity score evaluated for other organs evaluted using Extra-Pulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) [at 12 months]

    Sarcoidosis activity for all organs will be evaluted using Extra-Pulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) (from 0 (normal) to 6(severe impairment))

  7. Sarcoidosis activity score evaluated for other organs using Score Sarcoidosis disease activity index (SDAI score) [at 16 weeks]

    Sarcoidosis activity for all organs will be evaluted using Score Sarcoidosis disease activity index (SDAI score) : it goes from 0 to 167 (the higher the score, the greater the disease activity).

  8. Sarcoidosis activity score evaluated for other organs using Score Sarcoidosis disease activity index (SDAI score) [at 12 months]

    Sarcoidosis activity for all organs will be evaluted using Score Sarcoidosis disease activity index (SDAI score) : it goes from 0 to 167 (the higher the score, the greater the disease activity).

  9. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis activity [at week 16]

    Pulmonary Sarcoidosis activity will be assessed using Abbreviated CT score to quantify disease activity in pulmonary sarcoidosis (aCTAS score) to assess pulmonary involvement. It goes from 0 to 4 (the higher the score, the greater the pulmonary disease activity).

  10. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis activity [at 12 months]

    Pulmonary Sarcoidosis activity will be assessed using Abbreviated CT score to quantify disease activity in pulmonary sarcoidosis (aCTAS score) to assess pulmonary involvement. It goes from 0 to 4 (the higher the score, the greater the pulmonary disease activity).

  11. Pulmonary sarcoidosis functionnal evaluation assessed using Functional respiratory explorations by vital capacity [at week 16]

    Pulmonary sarcoidosis functionnal evaluation will be assessed using Functional respiratory explorations by vital capacity

  12. Pulmonary sarcoidosis functionnal evaluation assessed using Functional respiratory explorations by vital capacity [at 12 months]

    Pulmonary sarcoidosis functionnal evaluation will be assessed using Functional respiratory explorations by vital capacity

  13. Pulmonary sarcoidosis functionnal evaluation assessed by walking perimeter [at week 16]

    Pulmonary sarcoidosis functionnal evaluation will be assessed by walking perimeter (in meters)

  14. Pulmonary sarcoidosis functionnal evaluation assessed by walking perimeter [at 12 months]

    Pulmonary sarcoidosis functionnal evaluation will be assessed by walking perimeter (in meters)

  15. Percentage of patients with adverse events [up to 16 weeks]

  16. Evaluate CD68, phospho-mTOR and phospho-p70S6K expression on skin biopsies [at 16 weeks]

    Immunohistochemical assessment will be assessed using optical microscopy

  17. Transcriptomic analysis of skin [at 16 weeks]

    It will be assessed using microarray (Affymetrix)

  18. Circulating monocytes [at 16 weeks]

    It will be assessed using microarray (Affymetrix)

  19. Percentage of patients with a complete or near-complete response based on PGA (PGA = 0 or 1) of the skin. [at 16 weeks]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 74 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age ≥ 18 years old <75 years old (men and women)

  • Cutaneous sarcoidosis of the face (diagnosed according to the following criteria : compatible clinical appearance showing erythemato-purple, brownish or yellowish macules or papules or nodules and compatible histological appearance with a facial or extra facial skin biopsy confirming the diagnosis of sarcoidosis showing epithelioid and giganto-cellular granuloma without caseous necrosis) moderate to severe defined by: "Facial SASI" Score (Sarcoidosis Area and Severity Index) ≥ 2 and PGA (Physician's Global Assessment,0 to 10 scale) ≥ 5

  • Health insurance plan coverage

  • Patients who never had a systemic treatment or who had at least one classical systemic treatment failure for sarcoidosis treatment

  • For women of childbearing age (unless post-menopausal or sterile), pregnancy test with βHCG negative. Effective contraception should be used during sirolimus treatment and for 12 weeks after stopping sirolimus

  • Patients who have signed a written consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Severe hepatic failure (Cytolysis (ALAT)> 3N and / or Cholestase (PAL)> 3N)

  • Allergy or intolerance to sirolimus or at one of its excipients

  • Allergy to peanut or soybeans

  • Patient with a pulmonary or hepatic graft

  • General corticotherapy or immunosuppressive treatment (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin) in the month before the inclusion

  • Intra-lesional corticotherapy for less than 3 months

  • Biotherapy (anti-TNFa, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL17A) within 3 months preceding the inclusion

  • Thalidomide or other -imide treatment for less than 3 months

  • Cyclins treatment for less than 1 month

  • Topical corticosteroids or topical tacrolimus for less than 1 week

  • Sarcoidosis involvement of at least one organ requiring systemic treatment other than sirolimus (oral corticosteroid or systemic immunosuppressive treatment)

  • Cholesterolemia> 300 mg/ dl or triglyceridemia> 400 mg/dl

  • Administration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers such as rifampicin, ketoconazole, voriconazole, telithromycin , diltiazem, verapamil, erythromycin, clarythromycin, ciclosporin

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

  • Active infection including tuberculosis disease

  • Non-controlled arterial hypertension (TAS> 150 mmHg and / or TAD> 100 mmHg)

  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship, patients deprived of freedom, under safeguarding of justice, receiving psychiatric care, under the constraint, admitted in a health or social institution for purposes other than those of research

  • Patient with cancer (except cutaneous basal cell carcinoma or in situ cervical cancer)

  • Risk of patient bad compliance

  • Grapefruit or grapefruit juice consumption during the treatment duration

  • Patients with fructose intolerance, galactose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption, insufficiency in sucrase-isomaltase or Lapp lactase

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05458492
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • APHP180156
First Posted:
Jul 14, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 14, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 14, 2022