Shoulder Rehabilitation Using a Mobile App Following Breast Reconstruction
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Breast cancer is the most common cancer for Canadian women. Of the women who will have a mastectomy each year in Canada, one in five will elect to have breast reconstruction. However, the significant benefits for body-image, self-esteem, sexuality, and quality of life are tempered by post-treatment shoulder dysfunction for many. As a means to decrease shoulder morbidities in breast cancer survivors (BCS), this study will introduce a mobile application (app)-based shoulder rehabilitation program as an option to improve functional outcomes of the shoulder, for those who have had breast reconstruction.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The percentage of Canadian women surviving at least 5 years beyond initial diagnosis is currently approaching 90% and many of these women are choosing to have breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Potential sequelae from both mastectomy and all types of breast reconstruction surgeries can result in various functional limitations. The most common adverse effect from breast cancer surgery is shoulder morbidity, having both short and long-term consequences for survivors, and evidence suggests women who undergo breast reconstruction are at even higher risk of developing shoulder problems. Shoulder/arm pain, reductions in strength, and limitations in range of motion (ROM) are some of the common physical issues plaguing BCS, often for years after the initial treatment. Fibrosis of the direct area of the target tissue is a common finding post radiation therapy, specifically of the anterior chest/ pectoralis and axilla regions in BCS and most noticeable starting six months post-surgically.
The researchers' interest in the feasibility of a shoulder rehabilitation mobile app for post-surgical BCS is to improve access to rehabilitation (including education, exercises and remote support with a physical therapist, PT) for these women, allowing for better functional outcomes which could translate into decreased reliance on medical care, improved quality of life (QoL), and ability to participate in life roles.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Education Group The Education Group will be provided with standard education by the physiotherapist at the hospital prior to surgery and will be advised to continue with their normal activities of daily living (ADL). They will have access to the "standard education and resources" tabs on the mobile app. Shoulder specific exercises tab on the app will be available to them upon their completion of the study (eight weeks post-intervention). |
Other: Education via a Mobile App
This group will have access to "Education and Resources" tab that includes customary information given at a pre-op appointment plus some additional related education and resources.
|
| Experimental: Education plus Exercise Group The Exercise plus Education Group will be provided with standard education by the physiotherapist at the hospital prior to surgery. Participants in this group will have access to the "education and resources" tabs on the app. |
Other: Education and Exercise via a Mobile App
This group will have access to "Education and Resources" tab that includes customary information given at a pre-op appointment plus some additional related education and resources. The app will also be used to help guide participants through an eight-week shoulder exercise program, together with physical therapy remote support.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) [At start of the study, at 4 weeks into the study and again at the end of the study (8 weeks into the study).]
ROM measurements of both shoulders (flexion, extension, abduction, internal and external rotation) will be taken post-operatively, via the downloaded app on each participant's phone, and by visual examination of the research assistant (registered, licensed PT) during the virtual assessment via Zoom. These ROM measures, taken at the beginning of the intervention (week one), mid-intervention (week four), and end of intervention (week eight) will be used as a guide for exercise progression throughout the intervention. The measurements will also be used in our data analysis to understand changes in shoulder ROM from the beginning of the intervention to the end of intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH) [At start of the study, at 4 weeks into the study and again at the end of the study (8 weeks into the study).]
The Quick DASH is an 11-item questionnaire measuring perceived upper extremity functional ability as well as symptoms on a 5-point scale from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (unable) (Budtz, 2018). The Quick DASH is quick and easy to administer and to score, and has been used to measure shoulder function in the BCS population in previous studies (Chan et al., 2020; Duymaz et al., 2019; Lang et al., 2020). Data from this questionnaire will be used to better understand changes in upper extremity functional ability and symptoms from the start to end of intervention.
- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) [At start of the study, at 4 weeks into the study and again at the end of the study (8 weeks into the study).]
The VAS is a tool measuring intensity of symptoms from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Each participant will be asked to rate their current shoulder pain on the continuum of this tool and this rating will be used to understand the level of shoulder pain of each participant on the day of assessment. Pain levels from start of intervention, to mid-intervention (at four weeks), to end of intervention (at eight weeks), will be analyzed using continuous ordinal regression or normal-distribution methods (t-test, linear regression) depending on the data collected, and to best understand significance of changes in pain levels from beginning to end of the intervention (Heller et al., 2016). Because of its simplicity and ease of use, it can be administered broadly across a wide variety of populations and can be presented in multiple ways, targeting certain populations of interest (Wewers et al., 1990).
- Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) [At start of the study, at 4 weeks into the study and again at the end of the study (8 weeks into the study).]
The FAS is a 10-item questionnaire, that measures fatigue symptoms on a 5-point scale from "Never" (1) to "Always" (5). Although the development and use of most fatigue scales, including the FAS, have been disease specific, most often they have been developed to assess fatigue in people with cancer (Hjollund, 2007). The FAS will be analyzed similarly to the VAS to best understand significance of changes in fatigue levels from beginning to end of intervention.
- Short Form 36 (SF-36) [At start of the study, at 4 weeks into the study and again at the end of the study (8 weeks into the study).]
The SF-36 is a 36-question survey aimed at measuring quality of life (QoL). This tool has been well researched and highly used in all populations, including healthy and disease specific populations (Ware et al., 1992), as well as in research (Ware et al., 1992; Lins et al., 2016). Reliability of the SF-36 is good for several diagnoses, including adult survivors of childhood cancer (Reulen, 2006). As the SF-36 measures both physical and mental health, research suggests its use in combination with other outcome measures when assessing overall QoL (Lins et al., 2016), hence the inclusion of other outcome measures as described above.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
minimum 18 years of age
-
scheduled for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction (implant type only)
-
6 weeks or less from time of surgery
-
must have mobile phone capable of app download
-
need desk top or laptop computer for Zoom meetings
-
medically stable
-
able to be informed and consent in English
Exclusion Criteria:
-
ongoing or current health-related issues that would interfere with the ability to complete the program (i.e. metastatic cancer, severe cardiovascular disease)
-
lack of access to a mobile phone and laptop or desk top computer for Zoom meetings
-
inability to comprehend the English language
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Saskatchewan | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | Canada | S7N2Z4 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Saskatchewan
- Royal University Hospital Foundation
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Soo Kim, PhD, University of Saskatchewan
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Blackburn NE, Mc Veigh JG, Mc Caughan E, Wilson IM. The musculoskeletal consequences of breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi muscle for women following mastectomy for breast cancer: A critical review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12664. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12664. Epub 2017 Feb 10. Review.
- Blackburn NE, Mc Veigh JG, Mc Caughan EM, Kennedy RD, McIntosh SA, Wilson IM. The musculoskeletal consequences of latissmus dorsi breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy for breast cancer. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0202859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202859. eCollection 2018.
- Budtz CR, Andersen JH, de Vos Andersen NB, Christiansen DH. Responsiveness and minimal important change for the quick-DASH in patients with shoulder disorders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 10;16(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1052-2.
- Canadian Cancer Statistics 2019. Toronto, ON. (2019). Retrieved November 30, 2020 from http://www.cancer.ca/~/media/cancer.ca/CW/cancer information/cancer 101/Canadian cancer statistics/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics 2019-EN.pdf?la=en.
- Chan KS, Zeng D, Leung JHT, Ooi BSY, Kong KT, Yeo YH, Goo JTT, Chia CLK. Measuring upper limb function and patient reported outcomes after major breast cancer surgery: a pilot study in an Asian cohort. BMC Surg. 2020 May 19;20(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00773-0.
- Ditsch N, Bauerfeind I, Vodermaier A, Tripp C, Löhrs B, Toth B, Himsl I, Graeser M, Harbeck N, Lenhard M. A retrospective investigation of women's experience with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Mar;287(3):555-61. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2590-1. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
- Duymaz T, İyigün ZE, İlgün AS, Ordu Ç, Üçüncü M, Alço G, Öztürk A, Elbüken F, Aktepe F, Özmen V. The Effect of Mini-Latissimus Dorsi Flap (MLDF) Reconstruction on Shoulder Function in Breast Cancer Patients. Eur J Breast Health. 2019 Jul 1;15(3):158-162. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4727. eCollection 2019 Jul.
- Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R. How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 27. Review.
- Hjollund NH, Andersen JH, Bech P. Assessment of fatigue in chronic disease: a bibliographic study of fatigue measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Feb 27;5:12. Review.
- Kärki A, Simonen R, Mälkiä E, Selfe J. Impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions 6 and 12 months after breast cancer operation. J Rehabil Med. 2005 May;37(3):180-8.
- Lang, A. (2020). Towards Improving Clinical Evaluation of the Shoulder: Defining Upper Limb Biomechanics of Breast Cancer Survivors During Functional Evaluation Tasks (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Saskatchewan.
- Lee, S. (2021). Breast cancer statistics. Canadian Cancer Society. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-types/breast/statistics
- Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016 Oct 4;4:2050312116671725. eCollection 2016. Review.
- Nesvold IL, Fosså SD, Holm I, Naume B, Dahl AA. Arm/shoulder problems in breast cancer survivors are associated with reduced health and poorer physical quality of life. Acta Oncol. 2010 Apr;49(3):347-53. doi: 10.3109/02841860903302905.
- Plastic surgery statistics. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2020). Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics
- Reulen RC, Zeegers MP, Jenkinson C, Lancashire ER, Winter DL, Jenney ME, Hawkins MM. The use of the SF-36 questionnaire in adult survivors of childhood cancer: evaluation of data quality, score reliability, and scaling assumptions. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 5;4:77.
- Riekki R, Harvima IT, Jukkola A, Risteli J, Oikarinen A. The production of collagen and the activity of mast-cell chymase increase in human skin after irradiation therapy. Exp Dermatol. 2004 Jun;13(6):364-71.
- Verbelen H, Tjalma W, Meirte J, Gebruers N. Long-term morbidity after a negative sentinel node in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Sep;28(5):e13077. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13077. Epub 2019 May 3.
- Zhong T, Hu J, Bagher S, Vo A, O'Neill AC, Butler K, Novak CB, Hofer SOP, Metcalfe KA. A Comparison of Psychological Response, Body Image, Sexuality, and Quality of Life between Immediate and Delayed Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Long-Term Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):772-780. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002536.
- Bio2738