CLIP-H: Continuous Interscalene Block vs Liposomal Bupivacaine After Proximal Humerus Fracture Surgery

Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05084573
Collaborator
(none)
92
1
2
31.9
2.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous interscalene block (CISB) using standard bupivacaine versus a single interscalene injection of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) on pain control following surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine
  • Drug: Standard bupivacaine
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Restricted range of motion following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fractures is a potential complication that severely limits functional outcomes . It must therefore be avoided by adequate pain control in order to allow for early mobilisation in addition to physiotherapy.

Interscalene block (ISB) is one of the most effective and widely used regional analgesic options shoulder surgeries. ISB can be delivered as a single injection or by continuous infusion via an indwelling catheter. While continuous interscalene block (CISB) offers a longer duration of analgesia as compared to a single injection of the same anaesthetic, it carries an inherent risk of catheter malposition, dislodgement, and infection.

As compared to standard bupivacaine (SB), liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a formulation designed to prolong the duration of analgesia up to 72 hours via a single injection. While this could avoid the need for an indwelling catheter, results of studies comparing LB to CISB have been inconsistent.

The purpose of this is non-inferiority trial is to compare the effectiveness of a single injection of LB versus CISB with SB on pain control following ORIF of proximal humerus fractures. The study hypothesis is that LB is not unacceptably worse than CISB with regard to pain control in the first two postoperative days.

Patients providing informed consent will be screened for eligibility. All eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a double-blind manner (participant and investigator) and a 1:1 ratio to receive either LB or CISB.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
92 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients will be allocated to receive either continuous interscalene nerve block (CISB) using standard bupivacaine OR a single interscalene injection of liposomal bupivacaine (LB).Patients will be allocated to receive either continuous interscalene nerve block (CISB) using standard bupivacaine OR a single interscalene injection of liposomal bupivacaine (LB).
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Masking Description:
Subjects, investigators, and all parties involved in patient management or data collection will be blinded throughout the study period.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Continuous Standard Bupivacaine Interscalene Block Versus Single Injection Liposomal Bupivacaine Following Surgical Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Liposomal bupivacaine

Patients will receive a single bolus interscalene injection of 10mL 1.33% LB followed by placement of indwelling (sham) catheter in the interscalene region. Upon arrival in the recovery room, a nurse will connect the catheter to a fixed-rate portable elastometric pump (Easypump®, B Braun, Germany) filled with 300mL normal saline (NS) at a default fixed rate of infusion of 5mL/hr. The syringe, catheter, pump and clamp will be covered by opaque black bags to conceal the milky appearance of LB. The catheter will be removed on postoperative day 2.

Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine
Single bolus injection 10mL 1.33% LB
Other Names:
  • Exparel
  • Active Comparator: Standard bupivacaine CISB

    Patients will receive a single bolus interscalene injection of 10mL 0.25% SB followed by placement of indwelling (sham) catheter in the interscalene region. Upon arrival in the recovery room, a nurse will connect the catheter to a fixed-rate portable elastometric pump (Easypump®, B Braun, Germany) filled with 300mL 0.2% SB at a default fixed rate of infusion of 5mL/hr. The syringe, catheter, pump and clamp will be covered by opaque black bags to conceal the drug appearance. The catheter will be removed on postoperative day 2.

    Drug: Standard bupivacaine
    Single bolus 10mL 0.25% SB + continuous 300mL 0.2% SB @5mL/hr
    Other Names:
  • Marcaine
  • Sensorcaine
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Pain on movement as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [At each post-op day 1-7]

      Numerical rating scale (NRS) during attempted passive forward shoulder flexion to 90 degrees; 0 points (no pain) to 11 points (worst pain imaginable).

    2. Pain at rest as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [At each post-op day 1-7]

      Numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest; 0 points (no pain) to 11 points (worst pain imaginable).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Intraoperative opioid consumption [Intraoperative]

      Intraoperative IV remifentanil consumption (mcg/kg/min)

    2. Incidence of ISB related complications [Intraoperative to post-op day 3]

      Complications related to interscalene block

    3. PCA morphine consumption [From immediately post-operation to post-op day 2]

      Amount of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumed (mg)

    4. Number of patients with side effects effects of PCA using morphine [From immediately post-operation to post-op day 2]

      Side effects related to opioid use (Nausea/Vomiting, Dizziness, Constipation)

    5. Rescue morphine consumption [From immediately post-operation to post-op day 2]

      Additional opioid used in addition to PCA morphine

    6. Total length of stay [Through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Duration of hospital stay (days)

    7. Analgesic consumption after discharge [From post-op day 3 to day 7]

      Total analgesic consumption (dihydrocodeine) after hospital discharge (pill count)

    8. Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) [Immediate post-operation to post-op day 3]

      Patient-reported measure of pain, side effects, and satisfaction of post-operative analgesia; 7 questions rated from 0 (worst outcome) to 4 (best outcome)

    9. Presence of chronic pain at follow-up [At 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months post-op]

      Presence of chronic pain by self-report

    10. Presence of neuropathic pain at follow-up [At post-op 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      Presence of neuropathic pain by physical examination and neuropathic pain questionnaire, a 10-item mixed self-report/observer rated physical exam measure ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10, with a score of 4 or greater diagnostic of neuropathic pain

    11. Region-specific physical functioning and symptoms [At post-op 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      Physical function and symptoms measured by Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), an 11-item patient-reported measure with a total score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).

    12. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) [At post-op 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), a patient-reported outcome measure of HRQOL comprised of a mental component (MCS) and physical component (PCS), each with a final score ranging from 0 (worst outcome) to 100 (best outcome).

    13. Patient satisfaction as measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire General Satisfaction Subscale [At post-op 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      Patient satisfaction with healthcare provision as measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire General Satisfaction subscale (PSQ18-GS), a two-item subscale with a final score ranging from 0 (lowest satisfaction) to 10 (highest satisfaction)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • ASA I-III

    • Age between 18 and 80

    • Isolated Proximal humeral fracture (AO Types 31.A1-3 and B1-3 or Neer 2/3 part or greater tuberosity fracture equivalent)

    • Locking Plate fixation

    • Split deltoid minimal invasive approach

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Revision surgery

    • Impaired cognitive function (Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMT score) < 8)

    • 4 part fractures

    • Poor surgical reduction quality

    • Unable to attend rehabilitation

    • Preexisting shoulder problems

    • Fracture fixation stability unable to tolerate early passive motion exercise

    • Use of implants other than a locking plate for fracture fixation

    • Activity of daily living is dependent on others

    • Polytrauma

    • Use of deltopectoral approach

    • Patient unable to follow post-operative rehabilitation protocol with early mobilization

    • Allergy to amide local anaesthetics, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids

    • Respiratory Disease with limited respiratory reserve

    • Cardiac Disease: Any degree of Heart Block, Heart Failure

    • Neurological: Any Seizure Disorder

    • Psychiatric illnesses affecting pain perception e.g. severe depression and anxiety disorder

    • Alcohol or substance abuse

    • Chronic Pain, other than chronic knee pain

    • Daily use of strong opioids (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, ketobemidone, methadone, nicomorphine, oxycodone, or meperidine)

    • Impaired Renal Function (defined as preoperative eGFR < 30ml /min /1.73 m2)

    • Impaired Hepatic Function

    • Pregnancy

    • Inability to use PCA

    • Patient refusal to ISB

    • Patient refusal to study

    • Patients do not understand Cantonese

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • The University of Hong Kong

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Chi Wing Chan, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
    • Principal Investigator: Christian Xinshuo Fang, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Dr. Chan Chi-Wing, Honorary Clinical Associate Professor, The University of Hong Kong
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05084573
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • UW 20-247
    First Posted:
    Oct 20, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 20, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Dr. Chan Chi-Wing, Honorary Clinical Associate Professor, The University of Hong Kong
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 20, 2021