Clincosm LogoSign in Get a demo

App-Based Mindfulness Meditation for People of Color Who Experience Race-Related Stress

Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05027113
Collaborator
(none)
155
Enrollment
1
Location
2
Arms
25.6
Anticipated Duration (Months)
6.1
Patients Per Site Per Month

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In the United States, people of color (POC) are disproportionally affected by stressors related to race/ethnicity compared with their non-Latinx White (NLW). Considering POC exposed to race-related stress are at high risk of developing a mental health disorder, there is a clear need for treatments that allow individuals to cope effectively with these stressors.

Among many evidence-based treatments available, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) may be particularly well suited to help POC cope. MBIs are hypothesized to be effective via increases in mindfulness and self-compassion, as well as reductions in experiential avoidance, rumination, and emotion suppression. Despite their effectiveness, MBIs rarely reach POC. As such, innovative strategies such as self-directed app-based intervention may reduce the treatment gap.

Considering the lack of research examining the effectiveness of MBIs among POC, especially those who experience elevated levels of race-related stress, this study will employ a randomized control trial (RCT) approach to examine whether receiving an app-based MBI engages the hypothesized mechanisms of change (i.e., mindfulness, self-compassion, experiential avoidance, rumination, emotion suppression) among POC. Similarly, the study will test whether the intervention leads to decreases in the negative mental health outcomes more often associated with exposure to race-related stress (i.e., stress, anxiety, depression). Acceptability, adherence, and satisfaction also will be analyzed to explore whether a non-culturally adapted MBI is still relevant for POC who face race-related stress. Results from this trial will contribute to the nascent data on MBI acceptability and effectiveness with POC. To the investigators' knowledge, this study will also be the first to include a sample of POC recruited based on elevated levels of race-related stress, a high-risk population that is not commonly targeted in MBI research.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Mindfulness meditation
 N/A

Detailed Description

In the United States, people of color (POC) are disproportionally affected by stressors related to race/ethnicity compared with their non-Latinx White (NLW) counterparts, with approximately 70% of POC reporting having experienced some form of discrimination in their lives and 60% reporting facing day-to-day discriminatory treatment. Race-related stress is the psychological distress associated with appraising a situation as disturbing or burdensome because of negative racial bias. Race-related stressors have multiple forms, such as direct interpersonal discrimination (i.e., perceived differential and unfair treatment among individuals), vicarious discrimination (i.e., observing members of one's race/ethnicity being victimized), institutional practices (i.e., laws and policies that limit access to services and opportunities), and cultural traditions (i.e., beliefs and practices that reinforce the idea of NLW's superiority over POC).

When differential or unfair treatment is perceived, it triggers physiological (e.g., cardiovascular reactivity, dysregulated HPA axis activity), cognitive-affective (e.g., rumination, emotion suppression), and behavioral (e.g., avoidance, aggression) responses that prepare the individual to confront the situation. Although this acute stress response may be beneficial in the short term, the chronic and unpredictable nature of race-related stressors often depletes an individual's psychological resources and increases their vulnerability to developing mental health disorders. Metanalytic work supports this stress-response model among POC, showing that exposure to race-related stress is a consistent predictor of increases in mental health problems, including overall stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms.

Among many EBTs available, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) may be particularly well suited to achieve these goals. Mindfulness is a psychological trait associated with staying in the present moment with one's experience (i.e., physical sensations, thoughts, emotions, behaviors), endorsing a nonjudgmental and curious attitude, and cultivating acceptance and self-compassion. Self-compassion refers to an attitude of openness to one's own suffering without avoiding it, cultivating the desire to alleviate it without self-judgment. In MBIs, participants cultivate these two qualities through meditations -exercises aimed to gain awareness of one's experience with an accepting and compassionate attitude. Metanalyses show participants in MBIs exhibit increases in both mindfulness and self-compassion traits. Multiple metanalyses have also shown that increases in mindfulness and self-compassion are two of the mechanisms by which MBIs lead to decreases in overall stress, anxiety, and depression.

Furthermore, mindfulness meditation could be particularly effective to help POC cope with race-related stress by reducing experiential avoidance. Experiential avoidance is the inability to remain in contact with distressing physical sensations, thoughts, and emotions, even when doing so causes harm in the long term. POC exposed to race-related stressors often develop emotional (e.g., unwillingness to experience sadness after being discriminated against) and behavioral avoidance (e.g., avoiding places where discrimination is likely to occur) that maintain mental health symptoms. As such, mindfulness meditation with its emphasis on bringing awareness to all experiences regardless of their negative valance may serve as an "exposure" strategy that reduces avoidance, leading to decreases in psychological distress.

Considering that rumination (i.e., the passive and repetitive focus on the causes and consequences of one's distress) and emotion suppression (i.e., the active reduction of emotionally expressive behavior when emotionally aroused) are maladaptive emotion regulation strategies often used by POC exposed to race-related stressors, researchers and clinicians have hypothesized that MBIs may be particularly well suited for this population. Research suggests that by cultivating acceptance of and nonjudgmental engagement with thoughts, mindfulness meditation disrupts ruminative tendencies. This hypothesis is consistent with multiple metanalyses showing that the reduction in rumination is a mediator leading to decreases in mental health problems, including stress, anxiety, and depression in MBI programs. In the case of emotion suppression, mindfulness meditation may help individuals identify, describe, and healthy engage with emotions triggered by race-related stressors rather than suppress them, leading to decreases in mental health symptoms. At least one MBI trial has shown that emotion suppression is a significant mediator behind decreases in anxiety and depression among POC. Targeting emotion suppression may be particularly relevant, considering cultural norms and practices among some POC groups (e.g., Asian, Latinx) that encourage down-regulating emotion expression to promote group harmony.

Despite the significant mental health need among individuals who experience discrimination and the existence of promising interventions such as MBIs, POC face numerous barriers to care, including limited access to providers, financial and transportation constraints, as well as stigma. As such, it is not surprising that POC are less likely to seek or receive mental health services compared with their NLW counterparts. Although no single approach will eliminate all barriers driving mental health disparities, the use of technology to provide care could reduce this treatment gap.

Digital interventions have the potential to address the shortage of mental health professionals, mitigate logistic barriers to service utilization, decrease costs associated with EBT implementation, and engage individuals in care who may not seek services otherwise. Among many technological resources available, smartphones represent a promising vehicle for the provision of mental health services. The feasibility of this approach is supported by extensive ownership of mobile devices in the United States. For instance, approximately 81% of Americans have a smartphone, with POC having similar ownership rates as NLW. Compared with NLW, POC are also more likely to be "smartphone dependent" -meaning they rely on these devices to access the internet in the absence of broadband connection at home. Furthermore, POC are also more likely to use their smartphones to seek information about their health than their NLW counterparts. As such, app-based interventions using smartphones may be well-positioned to reach those affected by the digital divide observed in low-income households as these interventions capitalize on already available technology owned by POC.

In addition to their feasibility, there is a growing body of evidence supporting the efficacy of app-based mental health interventions. Although somewhat limited, existing data with POC samples are promising. In the case of app-based MBI, multiple metanalyses show that these interventions are effective in reducing overall stress, anxiety, and depression as well as increasing mindfulness and self-compassion. To the investigators' knowledge, experiential avoidance, rumination, and emotion suppression have not been examined as potential clinical targets in app-based MBIs.

Research Questions and Hypotheses

Aim 1 The purpose of this study is to examine whether this MBI engages relevant mechanisms of change for POC exposed to race-related stress. Based on previous metanalytic studies on mindfulness and self-compassion, the investigators hypothesize that POC who receive the intervention will experience significant increases in both variables compared with POC in the control group. Considering previous studies showing the crucial role of experiential avoidance and emotion suppression, the investigators hypothesize that POC who receive the intervention will experience significant decreases in these three variables compared with POC in the control group.

Aim 2 An additional goal of this study is to test whether POC who receive this MBI experience reductions in mental health symptoms often associated with experiencing race-related stress. Based on previous metanalytic studies, the investigators hypothesize that POC who receive the intervention will experience significant decreases in overall stress, anxiety, and depression compared with POC in the control group.

Aim 3 Related to previous aims, this study will examine whether decreases in the main outcomes of interest (i.e., stress, anxiety, depression) occur via hypothesized mechanisms of change (i.e., mindfulness, self-compassion, experiential avoidance, rumination, emotion suppression). Based on previous metanalytic studies, the investigators hypothesize that the five mechanisms of change examined will be significant mediators leading to decreases in the main outcomes of interest.

Aim 4 This study will also examine app-based MBI acceptability (i.e., extent to which the intervention is agreeable or satisfactory), adherence (i.e., actual use of the intervention), and satisfaction (i.e., positive attitude toward the intervention received) in this high-risk POC population. Considering researchers' and clinicians' concerns regarding potential cultural mismatches between POC's backgrounds and MBIs, the investigators will use both quantitative and qualitative data sources to examine treatment acceptability descriptively. Based on previous studies showing poor treatment engagement in self-directed app-based interventions, the investigators will describe treatment adherence with both behavioral markers and qualitative data. Finally, treatment satisfaction will also be measured using quantitative and qualitative methods. Given that these analyses are descriptive, the investigators do not have specific hypotheses.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
155 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Individuals who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized to either the intervention group (n = 40) or a wait-list control group (n = 40),Individuals who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized to either the intervention group (n = 40) or a wait-list control group (n = 40),
Masking:
Triple (Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Participants will be aware of whether they were randomized to the intervention group or the wait-list control group. The intervention is self-guided and automated through the use of a smartphone app. As such, masking is not an issue. The principal investigator will not be involved with randomization. Assessments are self-administered via online questionnaires. As such, masking is not relevant in terms of outcomes assessors.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
App-Based Mindfulness Meditation for People of Color Who Experience Race-Related Stress: A Randomized Control Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 13, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Mind-Us

Use of the 10% Happier app to complete at least one meditation daily -with the possibility of exceeding this goal by choosing additional meditations- for 4 weeks. Participants will be asked to complete "The Basics" and "The Basics II" courses to familiarize themselves with the principles of mindfulness meditation. Each audio-recorded session begins with a short video providing psychoeducation around mindfulness meditation and teaching specific techniques (e.g., using the breath as an anchor, redirecting attention, noting thoughts and emotions). For the last two weeks of the program, participants will be invited to complete the "Essential Advice" course. This additional course is composed of 14 sessions ranging in length from 15 to 18 minutes.

Behavioral: Mindfulness meditation
Participants use the meditation app 10% Happier to practice mindfulness meditation (see detailed description in arm/group section)
Other Names:
  • Mind-Us

    		•
    No Intervention: Assessments First

    Wait-list control group. Individuals in this group will complete baseline, mid-, and post-treatment assessments before receiving the intervention (i.e., 4 weeks after randomization).

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in stress [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) measures stress. Participants rate items on a scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very Often) with higher scores indicating more stress. The PSS has shown good reliability (α = .84 - .86) and validity, and it is commonly used in MBI research.

    2. Change in anxiety [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) measures anxiety symptoms. Participants rate items on a scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly Every Day) with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms. The GAD-7 has shown good internal consistency (α = .89 - .90) and validity in POC samples.

    3. Change in depression [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) measures depressive symptoms. Participants rate items on a scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly Every Day) with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.The PHQ-8 omits an item assessing suicidal ideation and self-harm included in the original PHQ-9, which makes it more adequate for self-guided digital intervention research. Furthermore, metanalytic work suggests that the PHQ-8 is practically equivalent to the original measure. The PHQ-8 has good reliability (α = .86 - .89) and has shown validity across different racial/ethnic groups.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in mindfulness [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 15-item Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) measures mindfulness trait. Participants rate items using a scale ranging from 1 (Almost Always 1) to 6 (Almost Never) with higher scores indicating more mindfulness. The MAAS has shown good internal consistency (α = .80 - .87) during its development.

    2. Change in self-Compassion [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 12-item Self-Compassion Scale, Short Form (SCS-SF) measures self-compassion trait. Participants rate items using a scale ranging from 1 (Almost Never) to 5 (Almost Always) with higher scores indicating more self-compassion. The SCS-SF has shown good internal consistency (α = .86) and validity in a sample with significant POC representation.

    3. Change in experiential avoidance [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 15-item Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) measures experiential avoidance. Participants rate their responses in a scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree) with higher scores indicating higher experiential avoidance. The BAEQ has shown good internal consistency (α = .80 - .86) and construct validity.

    4. Change in rumination [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 5-item Brooding subscale of the short version of the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS-SF) measures rumination. Participants rate their responses in a scale ranging from 1 (Almost Never) to 4 (Almost Always) with higher scores indicating more rumination. The RRS-SF Brooding subscale has shown adequate internal consistency (α = .79) and validity in studies with POC samples that experience discrimination.

    5. Change in emotion suppression [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 4-item Expressive Suppression of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) measures emotion suppression. Participants rate their responses on a scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree) with higher scores indicating more emotion suppression. The Expressive Suppression subscale of the ERQ has shown an adequate reliability (α = .68 - .76) and validity in samples with significant POC representation.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Change in acceptability and appropriateness of the intervention [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 16-item Attitudes towards Psychological Online Interventions (APOI) measures experiences with digital interventions. Participants rate items on a scale ranging from 1 (Totally Agree) to 5 (Totally Disagree) with higher scores indicating more perceived acceptability and appropriateness. The APOI has shown good reliability (α = .83) and validity in previous studies.

    2. Change in treatment adherence [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      Number of meditations completed, total time meditated in minutes, and number of days with at least one meditation with will be used as behavioral measures of treatment adherence. This information is tracked by the app.

    3. Change in treatment satisfaction [Through study completion, 1-2 months]

      The 7-item Satisfaction with Therapy (ST) subscale of the Satisfaction with Therapy and Therapist Scale-Revised (STTS-R) measures treatment satisfaction. Participants rate items on a scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) with higher scores showing more treatment satisfaction. The ST subscale has shown excellent reliability (α = .92) and validity in a digital intervention study with a racially/ethnically diverse sample.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:

    Individuals interested in participating in this study will complete an online screening questionnaire using Qualtrics, a platform that is smartphone compatible. For study inclusion, participants are required to:

    1. Identify as a member of a people of color (POC) group

    2. Report experiencing elevated levels of race-related stress (i.e., a score of 55 in the IRRS-B or a score of 12 in the MDM)

    3. Speak and read English,

    4. Not receive psychological services currently

    5. Not have practiced mindfulness meditation for more than two hours in the month prior to study commencement

    6. Own a smartphone with access to the internet

    7. Be willing to install the MBI app and accept daily notifications and text reminders

    8. Be at least 18 years old

    Screening Measures:

    Race-Related Stress. The 22-item Index of Race-Related Stress-Brief (IRRS-B) measures multiple sources of race-related stress, including Individual, Institutional, and Cultural. Participants rate items on a scale ranging from 0 (This Never Happened to Me) to 4 (This Event Happened and I was Extremely Upset), with higher scores indicating more race-related stress. The IRRS-B was developed with a POC sample (i.e., Blacks), showing adequate reliability (α = .78) for both Cultural and Individual subscales and acceptable reliability (α = .69) for the Institutional subscale. For study inclusion, participants need to obtain a score of 55, which represents elevated race-related stress.

    Perceived Discrimination. The 8-item Multicultural Discrimination Module (MDM) measures perceived discrimination. Participants rate items on a scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often) with higher scores indicating more levels of perceived discrimination. The MDM was developed using a U.S. population-based sample (approximately 40% POC) and has shown good internal consistency (α = .81 - .88) in a previous study. For study inclusion, participants need to obtain a score of 12, which represents the 75th percentile of the population distribution.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • NA

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles California United States 90095

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of California, Los Angeles

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Giovanni Ramos, MA, University of California, Los Angeles

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Giovanni Ramos, MA, CPhil, Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05027113
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 21-005750
    First Posted:
    Aug 30, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 14, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Giovanni Ramos, MA, CPhil, Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
    Race-Related Stress
    Mental Health
    Mindfulness
    Meditation
    App
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:
    Stress, Psychological

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 14, 2022