Cost-effectiveness of Forced Aerobic Exercise for Stroke Rehabilitation

Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03819764
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
51.7
1.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether aerobic exercise improves the participant's ability to recover function in the arm and leg affected by the participant's stroke. The investigators are also calculating the cost effectiveness of the rehabilitation interventions.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Aerobic Exercise
  • Behavioral: Upper Extremity Repetitive Task Practice
N/A

Detailed Description

The aims of the study are to determine the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of combining aerobic exercise training with upper extremity motor task practice to improve motor recovery following stroke. It is hypothesized that the neurophysiologic impact of aerobic exercise may augment motor recovery associated with motor task practice. To test this hypothesize, 60 individuals with chronic stroke will be recruited to participate in this randomized clinical trial. Following screening and informed consent, all participants will undergo an exercise stress test to determine response to maximal exertion. Following the stress test, baseline clinical assessments will be obtained to quantify upper extremity function, gait, endurance, and self-reported quality of life. Additionally, variables to determine degree of disability will be obtained. Individuals will be randomized to one of two interventions: 45 min of forced-rate aerobic exercise paired with 45 min of upper limb repetitive task practice or two back-to-back 45-minute sessions of upper limb repetitive task practice. The interventions will occur 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Outcomes assessing motor function and disability will be repeated at mid-treatment, end of treatment, and at 4 weeks, 6-months and 12-months following end of treatment.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cost-effectiveness and Efficacy of a Combined Intervention to Facilitate Motor Recovery Following Stroke
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 11, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Aerobic Exercise & Repetitive Task Practice

Participants will perform the following: 45 minutes of cycling 45 minutes of upper extremity repetitive arm exercises

Behavioral: Aerobic Exercise
Cycling on a recumbent stationary bike with a specialized motor that forces the individual to cycle approximately 30-35% faster than your self-selected speed

Behavioral: Upper Extremity Repetitive Task Practice
Repetitive arm exercises

Active Comparator: Upper Extremity Repetitive Task Practice Only

Participants will perform the following: 1. 90 minutes of upper extremity repetitive arm exercises

Behavioral: Upper Extremity Repetitive Task Practice
Repetitive arm exercises

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [Baseline]

    This is a 33 item assessment of post-stroke upper extremity impairment. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-66, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  2. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [midpoint (4 weeks from Baseline)]

    This is a 33 item assessment of post-stroke upper extremity impairment. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-66, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  3. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    This is a 33 item assessment of post-stroke upper extremity impairment. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-66, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  4. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [end of treatment +4 weeks (12 weeks from Baseline)]

    This is a 33 item assessment of post-stroke upper extremity impairment. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-66, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  5. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [end of treatment +6 months (8 months from Baseline)]

    This is a 33 item assessment of post-stroke upper extremity impairment. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-66, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  6. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)]

    This is a 33 item assessment of post-stroke upper extremity impairment. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-66, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  7. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) [Baseline]

    This is an assessment of post-stroke upper extremity function. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-57, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  8. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    This is an assessment of post-stroke upper extremity function. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-57, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  9. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) [end of treatment +4 weeks (12 weeks from Baseline)]

    This is an assessment of post-stroke upper extremity function. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-57, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  10. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) [end of treatment +6 months (8 months from Baseline)]

    This is an assessment of post-stroke upper extremity function. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-57, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  11. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) [end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)]

    This is an assessment of post-stroke upper extremity function. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-57, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) [Baseline]

    This consists of 2 strength tasks and 15 timed tasks of both the affected upper extremity and the unaffected upper extremity. Total Functional Ability Score is reported, scores range from 0-75, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  2. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    This consists of 2 strength tasks and 15 timed tasks of both the affected upper extremity and the unaffected upper extremity. Total Functional Ability Score is reported, scores range from 0-75, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  3. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) [Baseline]

    This is a self-reported questionnaire evaluating quality of life. Normalized Hand Function is reported, scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  4. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    This is a self-reported questionnaire evaluating quality of life. Normalized Hand Function is reported, scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  5. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) [end of treatment +6 months (8 months from Baseline)]

    This is a self-reported questionnaire evaluating quality of life. Normalized Hand Function is reported, scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  6. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) [end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)]

    This is a self-reported questionnaire evaluating quality of life. Normalized Hand Function is reported, scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  7. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) [Baseline]

    A self-reported questionnaire evaluating physical, mental, and social health. T-scores are reported separately for Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Physical Function, and Pain Interference. A score of 40 is one standard deviation lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one standard deviation higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). Thus a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending upon the concept being measured.

  8. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    A self-reported questionnaire evaluating physical, mental, and social health. T-scores are reported separately for Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Physical Function, and Pain Interference. A score of 40 is one standard deviation lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one standard deviation higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). Thus a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending upon the concept being measured.

  9. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) [end of treatment +6 months (8 months from Baseline)]

    A self-reported questionnaire evaluating physical, mental, and social health. T-scores are reported separately for Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Physical Function, and Pain Interference. A score of 40 is one standard deviation lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one standard deviation higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). Thus a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending upon the concept being measured.

  10. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) [end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)]

    A self-reported questionnaire evaluating physical, mental, and social health. T-scores are reported separately for Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Physical Function, and Pain Interference. A score of 40 is one standard deviation lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one standard deviation higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). Thus a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending upon the concept being measured.

  11. Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) [Baseline]

    This is a 20 item assessment of depressive symptomology. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating higher risk of depression.

  12. Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    This is a 20 item assessment of depressive symptomology. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating higher risk of depression.

  13. Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) [end of treatment +6 months (8 months from Baseline)]

    This is a 20 item assessment of depressive symptomology. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating higher risk of depression.

  14. Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) [end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)]

    This is a 20 item assessment of depressive symptomology. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating higher risk of depression.

  15. Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [Baseline]

    Total distance (feet) traveled over a 6 minute period.

  16. Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [end of treatment (8 weeks)]

    Total distance (feet) traveled over a 6 minute period.

  17. Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [end of treatment +4 weeks (12 weeks from Baseline)]

    Total distance (feet) traveled over a 6 minute period.

  18. Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [end of treatment +6 months (8 months from Baseline)]

    Total distance (feet) traveled over a 6 minute period.

  19. Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)]

    Total distance (feet) traveled over a 6 minute period.

  20. Modified Rankin Scale [Baseline]

    0-6 scale to determine degree of disability in individuals with a disabling condition. A score of 0 indicates no symptoms, 1 indicates no significant disability despite symptoms, 2 indicates slight disability, 3 indicates moderate disability, 4 indicates moderately severe level of disability, 5 indicates severe disability, and 6 indicates death.

  21. Modified Rankin Scale [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    0-6 scale to determine degree of disability in individuals with a disabling condition. A score of 0 indicates no symptoms, 1 indicates no significant disability despite symptoms, 2 indicates slight disability, 3 indicates moderate disability, 4 indicates moderately severe level of disability, 5 indicates severe disability, and 6 indicates death.

  22. Modified Rankin Scale [end of treatment +6 months (8 months from Baseline)]

    0-6 scale to determine degree of disability in individuals with a disabling condition. A score of 0 indicates no symptoms, 1 indicates no significant disability despite symptoms, 2 indicates slight disability, 3 indicates moderate disability, 4 indicates moderately severe level of disability, 5 indicates severe disability, and 6 indicates death.

  23. Modified Rankin Scale [end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)]

    0-6 scale to determine degree of disability in individuals with a disabling condition. A score of 0 indicates no symptoms, 1 indicates no significant disability despite symptoms, 2 indicates slight disability, 3 indicates moderate disability, 4 indicates moderately severe level of disability, 5 indicates severe disability, and 6 indicates death.

  24. Right Step Length [Baseline]

    Mean right step length (cm) across two 2-minute walking trials

  25. Right Step Length [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean right step length (cm) across two 2-minute walking trials

  26. Left Step Length [Baseline]

    Mean left step length (cm) across two 2-minute walking trials

  27. Left Step Length [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean left step length (cm) across two 2-minute walking trials

  28. Right Step Width [Baseline]

    Mean right step width (cm) across two 2-minute walking trials

  29. Right Step Width [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean right step width (cm) across two 2-minute walking trials

  30. Left Step Width [Baseline]

    Mean left step width (cm) across two 2-minute walking trials

  31. Left Step Width [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean left step width (cm) across two 2-minute walking trials

  32. Right Stance Time [Baseline]

    Mean time (in seconds) spent in stance phase on the right lower extremity across two 2-minute walking trials

  33. Right Stance Time [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean time (in seconds) spent in stance phase on the right lower extremity across two 2-minute walking trials

  34. Left Stance Time [Baseline]

    Mean time (in seconds) spent in stance phase on the left lower extremity across two 2-minute walking trials

  35. Left Stance Time [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean time (in seconds) spent in stance phase on the left lower extremity across two 2-minute walking trials

  36. Right Swing Time [Baseline]

    Mean time (in seconds) spent in swing phase on the right lower extremity across two 2-minute walking trials

  37. Right Swing Time [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean time (in seconds) spent in swing phase on the right lower extremity across two 2-minute walking trials

  38. Left Swing Time [Baseline]

    Mean time (in seconds) spent in swing phase on the left lower extremity across two 2-minute walking trials

  39. Left Swing Time [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean time (in seconds) spent in swing phase on the left lower extremity across two 2-minute walking trials

  40. Walking Speed [Baseline]

    Mean m/s across two 2-minute walking trials

  41. Walking Speed [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean m/s across two 2-minute walking trials

  42. Walking Cadence [Baseline]

    Mean steps/minute across two 2-minute walking trials

  43. Walking Cadence [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean steps/minute across two 2-minute walking trials

  44. Left Knee Range of Motion [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of left knee flexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  45. Left Knee Range of Motion [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of left knee flexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  46. Right Knee Range of Motion [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of right knee flexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  47. Right Knee Range of Motion [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of right knee flexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  48. Left Ankle Range of Motion [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of left ankle dorsiflexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  49. Left Ankle Range of Motion [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of left ankle dorsiflexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  50. Right Ankle Range of Motion [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of right ankle dorsiflexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  51. Right Ankle Range of Motion [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of right ankle dorsiflexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  52. Left Hip Range of Motion (sagittal plane) [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of left hip flexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  53. Left Hip Range of Motion (sagittal plane) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of left hip flexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  54. Right Hip Range of Motion (sagittal plane) [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of right hip flexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  55. Right Hip Range of Motion (sagittal plane) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of right hip flexion across two 2-minute walking trials

  56. Left Hip Range of Motion (coronal plane) [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of left hip abduction across two 2-minute walking trials

  57. Left Hip Range of Motion (coronal plane) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of left hip abduction across two 2-minute walking trials

  58. Right Hip Range of Motion (coronal plane) [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of right hip abduction across two 2-minute walking trials

  59. Right Hip Range of Motion (coronal plane) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of right hip abduction across two 2-minute walking trials

  60. Left Hip Range of Motion (transverse plane) [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of left hip external rotation across two 2-minute walking trials

  61. Left Hip Range of Motion (transverse plane) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of left hip external rotation across two 2-minute walking trials

  62. Right Hip Range of Motion (transverse plane) [Baseline]

    Mean peak degree of right hip external rotation across two 2-minute walking trials

  63. Right Hip Range of Motion (transverse plane) [end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline)]

    Mean peak degree of right hip external rotation across two 2-minute walking trials

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. ≥ 6 months following single ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed with neuroimaging,

  2. Fugl-Meyer motor score 19-55 in the involved upper extremity,

  3. Ambulatory ≥ 20 meters with no more than contact guard assistance, and

  4. 18-85 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. hospitalization for myocardial infarction, heart failure or heart surgery within 3 months,

  2. cardiac arrhythmia,

  3. hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,

  4. severe aortic stenosis,

  5. pulmonary embolus,

  6. significant contractures,

  7. anti-spasticity injection within 3 months of enrollment and

  8. other contraindication to exercise

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Cleveland Clinic Main Campus Cleveland Ohio United States 44195

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • The Cleveland Clinic

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan Linder, DPT, The Cleveland Clinic

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Susan Linder, Project Scientist, Principle Investigator, The Cleveland Clinic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03819764
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 18-734
First Posted:
Jan 29, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Jul 20, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Susan Linder, Project Scientist, Principle Investigator, The Cleveland Clinic
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 20, 2022