Effects of Neuronavigated Theta Burst Stimulation in Therapy of Post-stroke Aphasia

Sponsor
Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05303649
Collaborator
(none)
45
1
3
40.6
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Aphasia is an impairment in the ability to express and/or understand language, commonly observed after stroke to the language dominant (left) hemisphere. Despite natural tendency to spontaneous functional recovery in the first months post stroke and language improvement due to application of behavioral speech and language therapy (SLT), many aphasic patients do not achieve satisfactory level of verbal communication. The aim of the planned study is to explore the potential of the noninvasive repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as a therapeutic tool for aphasia in addition to traditional behavioral therapy. In case of aphasia, studies on therapeutic effectiveness of rTMS aim to increase the activity of the language-dominant left cerebral hemisphere, which may be achieved in an indirect manner by inhibiting the activity of the opposite (right) hemisphere or in a direct manner by increasing the excitability of preserved language areas in the left hemisphere. In our study, we plan to administer the newest form of rTMS called Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), which is safer than the conventional rTMS, even when used in the perilesional area. Computer-based neuronavigation system will be implemented to precisely localize stimulation targets, control administration of stimuli during rTMS sessions, and evaluate differences between participants regarding deviations from established stimulation points. 45 patients (all right-handed, polish native speakers, aged 18-75 years, diagnosed with non-fluent aphasia) will be enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups: 1) a group with excitatory intermittent TBS of the left hemisphere (iTBS group), 2) a group with inhibitory continuous TBS of the right hemisphere (cTBS group), 3) a group with sham TBS (sTBS group as a control group). Specific forms of stimulation will be carried out for three consecutive weeks (Monday to Friday; a total of 15 stimulation sessions). Immediately after each session of the stimulation, patients will undergo individual SLT. Assessment of language functioning will be carried out three times: before and after the therapy period, and 3 months after its completion. Results of the study will broaden knowledge about hemispherical mechanisms of language and speech recovery after stroke and provide insight into possibilities of their modulation for the purpose of post-stroke rehabilitation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation: excitatory iTBS
  • Device: Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation: inhibitory cTBS
  • Behavioral: Individual speech-language therapy (SLT)
  • Device: Sham TBS simulating left hemispheric iTBS
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
45 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effects of Neuronavigated Theta Burst Stimulation in Therapy of Post-stroke Aphasia
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 15, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intermittent TBS (iTBS) of the left hemisphere plus behavioral aphasia therapy

15 sessions of 200-second of iTBS over the pars triangularis of Broca's area in the left hemisphere (BA 45), preceding 45-minutes of behavioral aphasia therapy.

Device: Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation: excitatory iTBS
600 pulses (3 pulses at 50 Hz given every 200 milliseconds in 2-second trains at 10-second intervals, delivered at 80% of active motor threshold) generated by Magstim Super Rapid2 stimulator equipped with a figure-of-eight coil applied over BA 45 Device: Magstim Co., Wales, UK.
Other Names:
  • Magstim Super Rapid2
  • Behavioral: Individual speech-language therapy (SLT)
    45 minutes training tailored to every patient's deficits, abilities and needs. Exercises used during each therapeutic session include: expressions tasks (naming and sentence building), complex utterances comprehension tasks, reading and writing exercises. Training is administered using paper-and-pencil tasks and computerized aphasia therapy program AfaSystem (Harpo sp.zoo, Poznań, Poland).

    Experimental: Continuous TBS (cTBS) of the right hemisphere plus behavioral aphasia therapy

    15 sessions of 40 seconds of cTBS over the pars triangularis of the right inferior frontal gyrus (BA 45 homologue), preceding 45-minutes of behavioral aphasia therapy.

    Device: Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation: inhibitory cTBS
    600 pulses (3 pulses at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz, delivered at 80% of active motor threshold) generated by Magstim Super Rapid2 stimulator equipped with a figure-of-eight coil applied over BA 45 homologue Device: Magstim Co., Wales, UK.
    Other Names:
  • Magstim Super Rapid2
  • Behavioral: Individual speech-language therapy (SLT)
    45 minutes training tailored to every patient's deficits, abilities and needs. Exercises used during each therapeutic session include: expressions tasks (naming and sentence building), complex utterances comprehension tasks, reading and writing exercises. Training is administered using paper-and-pencil tasks and computerized aphasia therapy program AfaSystem (Harpo sp.zoo, Poznań, Poland).

    Sham Comparator: Sham TBS (sTBS) of the left hemisphere plus behavioral aphasia therapy

    15 sessions of sham TBS over the pars triangularis of Broca's area in the left hemisphere (BA 45), preceding 45-minutes of behavioral aphasia therapy.

    Behavioral: Individual speech-language therapy (SLT)
    45 minutes training tailored to every patient's deficits, abilities and needs. Exercises used during each therapeutic session include: expressions tasks (naming and sentence building), complex utterances comprehension tasks, reading and writing exercises. Training is administered using paper-and-pencil tasks and computerized aphasia therapy program AfaSystem (Harpo sp.zoo, Poznań, Poland).

    Device: Sham TBS simulating left hemispheric iTBS
    Sham TMS coil positioned exactly like an active TMS coil resulting in a very good approximation of the auditory effects Device: Magstim Co., Wales, UK.
    Other Names:
  • Magstim Super Rapid2
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change from pre-treatment assessment in the performance on a picture naming task [Pre-treatment assessment (within 2 days before starting the intervention), post-treatment assessment (within 2 days of completing the 15 days intervention)]

      Total number of correctly named items (assessed: accuracy and speed of naming) from a set of 250 visually presented objects (200 noun names and 50 verb names; stimuli included in the set are diversified with regard to the articulation difficulty of corresponding words and their usage frequency in everyday speech).

    2. Change from pre-treatment in the performance on the picture naming task at 3 months post-therapy (follow up assessment) [Pre-treatment and 3 months follow-up (post-treatment) assessment]

      Total number of correctly named items from a set of 250 visually presented objects.

    3. Change from post-treatment in the performance on the picture naming task at 3 months post-therapy [Post-treatment and 3 months follow-up assessment]

      Total number of correctly named items from a set of 250 visually presented objects.

    4. Change from pre-treatment assessment in the performance on a scene description task of three visually presented scenes [Pre-treatment assessment, post-treatment assessment (within 2 days of completing the 15 days intervention)]

      (assessed: length and correctness of utterances).

    5. Change from pre-treatment in the scene description task at 3 months post-therapy [Pre-treatment and 3 months follow-up]

      Oral description of three visually presented scenes (assessed: length and correctness of utterances).

    6. Change from post-treatment in the scene description task at 3 months post-therapy [Post-treatment and 3 months follow-up]

      Oral description of three visually presented scenes (assessed: length and correctness of utterances).

    7. Change from pre-treatment on the semantic fluency task [Pre-treatment and post-treatment (within 2 days of completing the 15 days intervention)]

      Producing within a minute as many words as possible from 3 semantic categories: animals, fruit, clothes; assessed: total number of correctly generated items.

    8. Change from pre-treatment on the semantic fluency task at 3 months post-therapy [Pre-treatment and 3 months follow-up]

      Total number of correctly generated items such as animals, fruits, clothes.

    9. Change from post-treatment on the semantic fluency task at 3 months post-therapy [Post-treatment and 3 months follow-up]

      Total number of correctly generated items such as animals, fruits, clothes.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Modified Communication Effectiveness Index (CETI) [Pre-treatment, post-treatment (within 2 days of completing the 15 day intervention) and on 3-month follow-up]

      A questionnaire to complete by researcher and family member/caregiver. Contains descriptions of ten communication situations, patients' performance in each of them is assessed on a Likert-type scale (from 0 to 7). Higher score means better functional communication.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. The Polish version of short form of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) [Screening appointment (pre-enrollment assessment)]

      Assesses the linguistic skills of adults with aphasia. This provides information for the diagnosis of the type of aphasia. Includes the six-point Goodglass and Kaplan's Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS; 0-5 points - lower score means more severe language impairment).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • First-ever left middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke (brain damage localization confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, MRI)

    • 3 or more months from the onset of stroke

    • Non-fluent aphasia (confirmed in the BDAE test) with functional communication difficulties ranging from mild to significant (grades from 2 to 4 in ASRS), marked difficulties in naming, and relatively preserved everyday speech comprehension

    • Native Polish speaker

    • Right-handedness prior to stroke

    • Signing of the informed consent for the participation in the study.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Psychiatric and/or neurological comorbidity (e. g. dementia, depressive disorder, alcohol dependence)

    • Diagnose of epilepsy or epileptic changes in EEG, also frequent losses of consciousness of unclear etiology which might suggest epileptic seizures

    • History of any neurosurgical procedure around the head area

    • 1.5 T MRI examination contraindications (metal elements in the body, e. g. implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, deep brain stimulation devices; claustrophobia)

    • Regular intake of medication that could affect cortical excitability (e. g. antiepileptic or antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, benzodiazepines) or medication influencing neuroplastic processes (e. g. dopamine)

    • Significant cognitive impairment limiting patient's cooperation during assessment and behavioral aphasia therapy

    • Visual deficits significantly hindering the perception of therapeutic tasks presented visually on a computer's screen

    • New neurological episode (e. g. another brain stroke) or somatic illness (e. g. COVID-19) during the cycle of the therapy, requiring its interruption.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology Warsaw Masovian Voivodeship Poland

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Katarzyna E Polanowska, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Katarzyna Polanowska, Principal Investigator, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05303649
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IPiN_KP01
    First Posted:
    Mar 31, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 13, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Katarzyna Polanowska, Principal Investigator, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 13, 2022