Feasibility Randomised-Controlled Trial of Online Stroke Interventions

Sponsor
University of East Anglia (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05461937
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
2
15.2
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Many people have difficulties organising their behaviour and problem-solving (also known as executive function difficulties) after stroke. This can have serious, wide-ranging consequences for wellbeing and ability to regain independence. Currently, access to psychological interventions after stroke varies and there is not enough evidence to recommend a specific intervention for executive function difficulties after stroke. A short intervention was designed to help with executive function difficulties by making it easier to set goals and achieve them after stroke. The intervention is designed for online delivery to make it accessible to as many stroke survivors as possible. The present trial aims to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of a single blinded randomized controlled trial of this online executive function intervention (active intervention) compared to an online stroke psychoeducation intervention (control intervention).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Getting things done after stroke
  • Behavioral: Stroke psychoeducation
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Feasibility Randomised-Controlled Trial of Two Online Psychological Interventions for Stroke Survivors
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 10, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 15, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 15, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 'Getting things done after stroke' - an online executive function intervention

Behavioral: Getting things done after stroke
A two-session, online rehabilitation intervention focussing on cognitive executive functions supplemented with weekly homework tasks.

Active Comparator: Stroke psychoeducation

Behavioral: Stroke psychoeducation
A two-session, online stroke psycho-education intervention supplemented with weekly homework tasks.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Recruitment Rate [Through study completion, approximately 15 months.]

    Rate of participants recruited into the trial amongst all participants screened

  2. Exclusion Rate [Through study completion, an average of 15 months.]

    Rate of participants excluded from participating amongst all participants screened

  3. Attrition Rate [Through study completion, an average of 15 months.]

    Rate of participants and data lost

  4. Follow-up rate [Through study completion, an average of 15 months.]

    Rate of participants included at 1-month follow-up

  5. Time required to collect and analyze data [Through study completion, an average of 15 months.]

    Time required for data collection per participant and final analysis

  6. Questionnaire reminders [Through study completion, an average of 15 months.]

    Number of questionnaire reminders sent and time taken per participant

  7. Support to complete questionnaires [Through study completion, an average of 15 months.]

    Number of participants requiring support to complete questionnaires and time taken per participant

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. The stroke self-efficacy scale (SSES; Jones et al., 2008) [Baseline, post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up.]

    A 13-item measure of confidence for functional performance and aspects of self-management relevant post-stroke. Respondents are asked to rate their confidence that they can do various tasks that may have been difficult after having a stroke using a 4-point scale (0=not at all confident, 3=very confident).

  2. The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS, Tennant et al., 2007) [Baseline, post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up.]

    A 7-item questionnaire covering subjective wellbeing and psychological functioning. Respondents are asked to rate each of the items on a scale of 1 to 5 on the basis of how often they had experienced a symptom over the last 2 weeks (1=none of the time, 2=rarely, 3=some of the time, 4= often, 5=all of the time).

  3. Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-R; Simblett, Ring & Bateman, 2016) [Baseline, post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up.]

    A tool for measuring everyday problems experienced with the dysexecutive syndrome. It consists of 37 items and respondents are asked to rate how often they experience difficulties related to executive functioning (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=sometimes, 3=fairly often, 4=very often).

  4. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [Screening]

    A self-report measure of depression consisting of nine items matching the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria of major depression. Respondents are asked to rate each of the items on a scale of 0 to 3 on the basis of how much a symptom has bothered them over the last 2 weeks (0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day).

  5. The ICECAP-A (ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults; Al-Janabi, Flynn & Coast, 2012) [Baseline, post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up.]

    A measure of capability for the general adult (18+) population for use in economic evaluation. It comprises five attributes (attachment, stability, achievement, enjoyment, and autonomy). Each capability item has four levels of responses.

  6. Feedback survey [Post-intervention.]

    A mixture of open-ended (free text response) and closed (Likert type response) questions to assess trial and intervention acceptability.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosis of stroke

  • ≥ 18 years of age

  • Capacitous consent to participate

  • Access to a computer / tablet, the internet, and an email address

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Another significant mental or physical health condition

  • Current involvement in another research trial

  • Severe depression (over 20 on PHQ-9)

  • Not able to read or understand English

  • Visual, auditory or motor difficulties of a severity that limit the ability to attend to the content of the interventions, read the Participant Information Sheet or complete the consent form and outcome measures

  • Not registered with a GP or unwilling to provide GP information (for reporting suicidal ideation concerns

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of East Anglia Norwich Norfolk United Kingdom NR5 9HB

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of East Anglia

Investigators

  • Study Director: Catherine EL Ford, PhD, University of East Anglia

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Catherine Ford, Clinical Associate Professor in Clinical Psychology, University of East Anglia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05461937
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRAS305848
First Posted:
Jul 18, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 18, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Catherine Ford, Clinical Associate Professor in Clinical Psychology, University of East Anglia
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 18, 2022