AgilGinkgo: Modulation of Attention in Event Related Potential (ERPs) as a Marker of Early Cognitive Decline by Ginkgo Biloba

Sponsor
Jean-François Démonet (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT04121728
Collaborator
University of Lausanne Hospitals (Other)
32
1
2
32.7
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to simultaneously establish the metrological characteristics of the new executive function markers (decision making and multiple flow management) derived from repeated ERP variations and to identify their ability to test whether a short treatment using Ginkgo biloba versus placebo extracts can modify the cognitive performance and functional capacity of patients in the very early stages of age-related cognitive decline. This trial, using subjects as their own control (cross-over) in repeated measurements will establish the reproducibility characteristics of the measurements and intra-individual variations of ERP over time in this population

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Ginkgo biloba extract
  • Drug: Placebo
N/A

Detailed Description

This study is a single-center, randomized clinical trial testing the effects of Ginkgo biloba extracts versus placebo on event related potential ERP registration measurements in Electroencephalography (EEG) during neuropsychological tasks. The Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test allows the study of behavioral and neurofunctional correlates using several different techniques for online recording of brain activity. This test measures the engagement of focused attention and the loading of information into working memory, as opposed to the disengagement of attention.

The study will be carried out in a randomized cross-over design, with "Ginkgo" vs. Placebo", or inversely, for 170 days each (approximately 6 months), separated by an 8-weeks wash-out period. A follow-up visit will be held 3 months after the last treatment of the study.

The cross-over design uses each patient as its own control, which allows an easy comparison between the 2 groups "Placebo" vs. "Ginkgo" by limiting inter-patient variations. In addition, by doubling the number of patients per treatment compared to a classic study design in 2 groups, cross-over reduces the number of patients to be recruited, which facilitates recruitment on a single site.

The study requires the recruitment of thirty-two (32) informative participants with cognitive complaints.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
32 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
randomized double-blind crossover designrandomized double-blind crossover design
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), e.g Placebo and Ginkgo Biloba, is located and dispensed by Central Pharmacy. Only pharmacists are not blinded but they are neither involved in the conduct of the study not the analysis of the results
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Modulation of Attention Explored in ERPs as a Marker of Early Cognitive Decline: Concept Validation on the Effect of Ginkgo Biloba Extracts. Randomized, Double-blind, Cross-over, Placebo-controlled Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 9, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Group Ginkgo-Placebo

Cross-over design: In Group Ginkgo-Placebo participants are allocated first to the IMP Symfona® during 6 months and after 2 months of wash-out period are allocated to the placebo for 6 months.

Drug: Ginkgo biloba extract
Symfona® commercial standardized Ginkgo biloba extracts are used in this study, at a rate of 2 capsules of 120 mg per day for 170 days.
Other Names:
  • Symfona®
  • Drug: Placebo
    The placebo is presented in the form of capsules of identical mass, color and shape to those of the study product. It is composed of lactose, the excipients present in Symfona® 120 mg and colorants. The dosage is identical to that of the investigational product.
    Other Names:
  • Placebo caps
  • Other: Group Placebo-Ginkgo

    Cross-over design:In Group Placebo-Ginkgo participants are allocated first to the placebo during 6 months and after 2 months of wash-out period are allocated the IMP Symfona® for 6 months.

    Drug: Ginkgo biloba extract
    Symfona® commercial standardized Ginkgo biloba extracts are used in this study, at a rate of 2 capsules of 120 mg per day for 170 days.
    Other Names:
  • Symfona®
  • Drug: Placebo
    The placebo is presented in the form of capsules of identical mass, color and shape to those of the study product. It is composed of lactose, the excipients present in Symfona® 120 mg and colorants. The dosage is identical to that of the investigational product.
    Other Names:
  • Placebo caps
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Reproducibility of contingent negative variation (CNV) event-related potential (ERP) component amplitude (microV) during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      Reproducibility of CNV will be assessed by interclass correlation coefficient (ICC)

    2. Intra-individual variability of contingent negative variation (CNV) event-related potential (ERP) component amplitude (microV) during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      Intra-individual variability of CNV will be assessed by Interclass Coefficient Correlation (ICC)

    3. Reproducibility of P300/P300' event-related potential (ERP) component amplitude (microV) during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      Reproducibility of P300/P300' will be assessed by Interclass Coefficient Correlation (ICC)

    4. Intra-individual variability of P300/P300' event-related potential (ERP) component amplitude (microV) during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      Intra-individual variability of P300/P300' will be assessed by Interclass Coefficient Correlation (ICC)

    5. Change in cognitive performance as assessed by variation in amplitude (mivroV) of the CNV component measured during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test after 6 months of Ginkgo biloba treatment [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      the statistical model of repeated measurements of variance analysis will be used

    6. Change in cognitive performance as assessed by variation in amplitude (mivroV) of the P300/P300' component measured during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test after 6 months of Ginkgo biloba treatment [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      the statistical model of repeated measurements of variance analysis will be used

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in cognitive performance as assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) test after 6 months of Ginkgo biloba treatment [6 months]

      the statistical model of repeated measurements of variance analysis will be used

    2. Change in scores of categorical semantic verbal fluency after 6 months of Ginkgo biloba treatment [6 months]

      the statistical model of repeated measurements of variance analysis will be used

    3. Change in scores of verbal fluency letter instruction after 6 months of Ginkgo biloba treatment [6 months]

      the statistical model of repeated measurements of variance analysis will be used

    4. Change in anxiety and depression as assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD-A/D) after 6 months of Ginkgo biloba treatment [6 months]

      the statistical model of repeated measurements of variance analysis will be used

    5. Change in reaction time (ms) during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test after 6 months of Ginkgo biloba treatment [6 months]

      the statistical model of repeated measurements of variance analysis will be used

    6. Magnitude of repetition effects (Test-retest Reliability, TTR) on the contingent negative variation (CNV) event-related potential (ERP) component during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test. [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      Combination of an analysis of variance (ANOVA) in repeated measurements and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) in correlation analysis will be used to assess respectively differences (microV) between measurement sessions and the existence of shared associations (correlation coefficient).

    7. Magnitude of repetition effects (Test-retest Reliability, TTR) on P300/P300' event-related potential (ERP) component during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test. [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      Combination of an analysis of variance (ANOVA) in repeated measurements and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) in correlation analysis will be used to assess respectively differences (microV) between measurement sessions and the existence of shared associations (correlation coefficient).

    8. Association (correlation coefficient) between a transversal measurement of VPN event-related potential (ERP) component during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test and the conventional verbal fluency scores. [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      a mixed linear model approach will be applied to assess prediction

    9. Association (correlation coefficient) between a transversal measurement of P300/P300' event-related potential (ERP) component during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test and the conventional verbal fluency scores. [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      a mixed linear model approach will be applied to assess prediction

    10. Association (correlation coefficient) between a transversal measurement of VPN event-related potential (ERP) component during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test and evolution of its own value during the participant's follow-up [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      a mixed linear model approach will be applied to assess prediction

    11. Association (correlation coefficient) between a transversal measurement of P300/P300' event-related potential (ERP) component during the Hold-Release (HR) neuropsychological test and evolution of its own value during the participant's follow-up [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      a mixed linear model approach will be applied to assess prediction

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Predictive metrological characteristics of ERP modulation in term of its ability to detect a more sensitive cognitive variation than usual method [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      a mixed linear model approach will be applied to assess prediction

    2. Predictive metrological characteristics of ERP modulation in term of its ability to detect a slope break during cognitive decline [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      a mixed linear model approach will be applied to assess prediction

    3. Predictive metrological characteristics of ERP modulation in term of its ability to detect a change in the thickness measurement of the retinal nerve layer measured by "optical coherence tomography" (OCT) [through study completion, an average of 14 months]

      a mixed linear model approach will be applied to assess prediction

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    60 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes

    Inclusion Criteria

    • Signed consent form

    • men and women

    • 60 to 80 years old

    • Cognitive Complaint Questionnaire (CQC) Score > 4

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Montreal Cognitive Evaluation Score (MoCA) <26

    • Overall Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score > 0.5

    • Scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): HADS-A (Anxiety) > 8 and/or HADS-D (Depression) > 8

    • Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or dementia

    • Contraindication to MRI

    • Atrophy of any region of the brain as seen in the T1 volumetric MRI sequence

    • Any uncontrolled somatic or psychiatric condition

    • Bleeding disorders, and/or taking medications that increase the risk of bleeding,

    • Hypersensitivity to Ginkgo biloba or any of its excipients

    • Lactose intolerance

    • Treatment with barbiturates and/or neuroleptics

    • Ongoing treatment with Ginkgo biloba derivatives (a period of 2 months without treatment before inclusion is required

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Centre Leenaards de la mémoire Lausanne Switzerland 1007

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Jean-François Démonet
    • University of Lausanne Hospitals

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jean-François Démonet, Prof, Universitary Lausanne Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Jean-François Démonet, Professor, MD.PhD, University of Lausanne Hospitals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04121728
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2018-02134 BASEC
    First Posted:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2019
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Jean-François Démonet, Professor, MD.PhD, University of Lausanne Hospitals
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 10, 2019