PRFCRF: The Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency Combined With Continuous Radiofrequency for the Trigeminal Neuralgia

Sponsor
Beijing Tiantan Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04174443
Collaborator
(none)
146
1
2
35.9
4.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Trigeminal neuralgia is a very painful condition, and radiofrequency therapy is reserved for patients who are resistant or intolerant to pharmacological therapy. Continuous radiofrequency and pulsed radiofrequency both have advantages and disadvantages. Recently, studies have found that pulsed radiofrequency combined with low-temperature (<65 °C) continuous radiofrequency increases the efficacy of the treatment, without leading to a significant increase in complications caused by nerve lesions. However, these reports have some limitations. The investigators plan to conduct a randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacy of applying high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency, with and without low-temperature continuous radiofrequency, to the gasserian ganglion for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. The primary outcome will be the effectiveness of the treatment after 12 months which is the percentage of participants with a modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score between I-III.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: High-voltage pulsed radiofrequency
  • Procedure: Low-temperature continuous radiofrequency
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
146 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Efficacy and Safety of the Application of Pulsed Radiofrequency, Combined With Low-temperature Continuous Radiofrequency, to the Gasserian Ganglion for the Treatment of Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 2, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Pulsed radiofrequency + Continuous radiofrequency

Procedure: High-voltage pulsed radiofrequency
2 Hz of pulsed radiofrequency will be administered at a voltage of 70 V, temperature of 42 °C, pulse width of 20 ms, and treatment time of 600 s.

Procedure: Low-temperature continuous radiofrequency
Low-temperature continuous radiofrequency will be performed at 60 °C, with a treatment time of 270 s.

Active Comparator: Pulsed radiofrequency

Procedure: High-voltage pulsed radiofrequency
2 Hz of pulsed radiofrequency will be administered at a voltage of 70 V, temperature of 42 °C, pulse width of 20 ms, and treatment time of 600 s.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The percentage of participants with a modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score of I-III [Twelve months after the procedure]

    The modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (I: No pain, off medications; II: Occasional pain, off medications; IIIa: No pain, continued use of medications; IIIb: Pain persists, but adequately controlled with medications; IV: Pain not adequately controlled with medications; V: No relief) will be used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. Twelve months after the procedure, participants with Barrow Neurological Institute scores of I-III will be defined as having received effective treatment. The primary outcome will be the effectiveness of the treatment after 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. The modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score [On day 1; at 1 and 2 weeks; and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedure]

    The modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (I: No pain, off medications; II: Occasional pain, off medications; IIIa: No pain, continued use of medications; IIIb: Pain persists, but adequately controlled with medications; IV: Pain not adequately controlled with medications; V: No relief) will be used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment.

  2. Numeric rating scale [On day 1; at 1 and 2 weeks; and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedure]

    Pain was assessed after surgery by a numerical rating scale (0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most severe pain imaginable).

  3. Dose of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine [On day 1; at 1 and 2 weeks; and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedure]

    Dose of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine per day (mg/day)

  4. Patient satisfaction scores on the 5-point Likert scale [After 1, 6 and 12 months following the procedure]

    1: poor, 2: fair, 3: good, 4: very good, 5: excellent

  5. The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF [After 1, 6 and 12 months following the procedure]

    Quality of life will be measured using the World Health Organisation QoL-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire. The WHOQOL-BREF is a abbreviated version of the WHOQOL-100 assessment. WHOQOL-BREF is a self-report questionnaire that contains 26 items and addresses 4 QOL domains: physical health (7 items), psychological health (6 items), social relationships (3 items) and environment (8 items). Two other items measure overall QOL and general health. Each domain's mean score can range between 4 and 20 and a higher score indicates a higher quality of life. The mean score of items within each domain is used to calculate the domain score. A transformation method converts domain scores to a 0-100 scale.

  6. Numbness [On day 1; at 1 and 2 weeks; and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedure]

    The Barrow Neurological Institute facial numbness scores (I: No facial numbness; II: Mild facial numbness, not bothersome; III: Facial Numbness, somewhat bothersome; IV: Facial numbness, very bothersome) will be used to evaluate the facial numbness.

  7. Number of participants with anesthesia dolorosa [Within 12 months of the procedure]

    The participant's facial sensation decreased, accompanied by pain

  8. Number of participants with masticator weakness [Within 12 months of the procedure]

    Occlusal dysfunction or a lower degree of masseter muscle fullness on one side when biting hard.

  9. Number of participants with corneal anesthesia [Within 12 months of the procedure]

    When touching the sclera with a cotton swab hair does not cause the eyelids to close quickly.

  10. Number of participants with keratitis [Within 12 months of the procedure]

    Eye dryness and pain, photophobia, lacrimation, excess mucus and other conditions diagnosed as keratitis by an ophthalmologist

  11. Number of participants with adverse reactions [Within two weeks of the procedure]

    Nausea, vomiting, and facial hematoma during and after the procedure; headache, dizziness, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurring within two weeks of the procedure.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition criteria.

  • Aged 18-75 years (inclusive), no sex limitation.

  • Suffering from severe trigeminal neuralgia that cannot be alleviated effectively using conservative medical therapy such as carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine.

  • Numeric rating scale score≥7 before the procedure.

  • Agreed to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Secondary trigeminal neuralgia such as trigeminal neuralgia attributed to a space-occupying lesion or multiple sclerosis.

  • Infection at the puncture site.

  • A history of psychiatric disease.

  • Disorder indicated in the results of routine blood tests, hepatic function, renal function, coagulation function, electrocardiogram, or chest X-ray.

  • Serious systemic diseases such as uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, and cardiac dysfunction (II-III of the New York Heart Association classification).

  • A history of abuse of narcotics.

  • A history of receiving continuous radiofrequency to the gasserian ganglion or peripheral branches; glycerol rhizolysis; balloon compression; gamma knife; or any other neuroablative treatments.

  • A history of receiving microvascular decompression.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Beijing Tiantan Hospital Beijing Beijing China 100070

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fang Luo, MD, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Fang Luo, Director of Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04174443
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • KY-2019-266-01
First Posted:
Nov 22, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Dec 15, 2021
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Fang Luo, Director of Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 15, 2021