PFNA vs Dual Mobility in Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Proximal femoral nail [PFNA] versus dual mobility arthroplasty in treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
compare clinial outcome between two different procdures either using pfna or arthroplasty in the treatment of unstable trochaneric fractures
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: proximal femoral nail 20 patient with trochanteric fractures , unstable type will use proximal femoral nail |
Device: Proximal Femoral Nail
open reduction
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Dual Mobility Arthroplasty 20 patient with trochanteric fractures , unstable type will use dual mobility arthroplasty |
Combination Product: Dual Mobility Arthroplasty
Hip Arthroplasty Surgery
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Hip score [Through study completion, an average of 1 year"]
compare between hip score in first group of pfna versus hip score in second group of THA
- Operation time [During surgery]
compartive operative time between first group of pfna versus second group of THA
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
patients with trochanteric unstable fractures.
-
age 60 or above
-
recent fracture time within 2 weeks time period
-
trochanteric starting point in pfna
-
patients medical condition is stable
Exclusion Criteria:
-
stable trochanteric fractures
-
delayed or neglected fractures
-
unstable patients medical conditions
-
pirformis fossa starting point in pfna
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cairo University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Orthopedic