Unfractionated Heparin in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The majority of ICU patients with COVID-19 show profound activation of coagulation, potentially resulting in thromboembolic events. In the treatment of these thromboembolic events it seemed that very high dosages of unfractionated heparin were necessary to achieve therapeutic values of aPTT and anti-Xa levels. The aim of this study is to explore whether heparin dosages are higher in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients, to determine the correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa values and to explore possible causes for non-correlating aPTT and anti-Xa, including CRP and AT plasma levels.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
CoVID-19 is a viral disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus that may affect many organ systems. Patients with severe disease almost invariably have profound pulmonary inflammation and may require mechanical ventilation and prolonged ICU admission. Mortality in ICU patients may be up to 50%. In the majority of patients with CoVID-19 in the ICU, profound activation of coagulation is present as reflected by d-dimer levels up to 20.000 mg/L or higher. Patients with proven pulmonary thrombosis are commonly treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Typically, it seemed that very high dosages of UFH were necessary to achieve therapeutic values of aPTT and anti-Xa levels in COVID-19 patients. Though, the question remains whether dosages given in COVID-19 patients were indeed extravagant compared to non-COVID-19 patients and what potential causes of these high dosages might be. Earlier research already implied that APTT, which is a primarily used parameter to dose UFH, is not accurate and rather anti-Xa levels should be used. Other potential reasons for the high doses are that COVID-19 patients show signs of heparin resistance, possible due to high inflammation parameters. As overdosing of heparin can lead to serious bleeding complications, more understanding on heparin dosage, e.g. parameters to rely on and potential influencing factors, in COVID-19 patients is needed. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether heparin dosages are higher in COVID-19 patients compared to non COVID-19 patients. The secondary objective is to determine the correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa values and to explore possible causes for non-correlating aPTT and anti-Xa, including CRP and AT plasma levels.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Covid-19 patients Adult patients treated with unfractionated heparin aiming at aPTT 60-80 sec and/or anti-Xa level 0.3-0.7 iE/ml. All patients have Covid-19 proven by PCR or nose- or airway swab. Patients admitted to the ICU from the 15th of March 2020 until January 2022. |
Drug: Unfractionated heparin
Patients are treated with unfractionated heparin aiming at aPTT 60-80 sec and/or anti-Xa levels of 0.3-0.7 iE/ml
|
| non-COVID-19 patients Adult patients treated with unfractionated heparin aiming at aPTT 60-80 sec and/or anti-Xa level 0.3-0.7 iE/ml. Patients admitted to the ICU between the 1st of January 2014 and the 1st of January 2020 are included. |
Drug: Unfractionated heparin
Patients are treated with unfractionated heparin aiming at aPTT 60-80 sec and/or anti-Xa levels of 0.3-0.7 iE/ml
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Heparin dosage [Until end of heparin therapy or ICU discharge, whatever comes first.]
To determine whether heparin dosages are higher in COVID-19 patients compared to non COVID-19 patients.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa values [Until end of heparin therapy or ICU discharge, whatever comes first.]
To explore possible causes for non-correlating aPTT and Anti-Xa levels
- Correlation between non-correlating aPTT and Anti-Xa levels and CRP [Until end of heparin therapy or ICU discharge, whatever comes first.]
To explore possible causes for non-correlating aPTT and Anti-Xa levels
- Correlation between non-correlating aPTT and Anti-Xa levels and AT plasma levels [Until end of heparin therapy or ICU discharge, whatever comes first.]
To explore possible causes for non-correlating aPTT and Anti-Xa levels
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Covid-19 group:
-
Covid-19 disease proven by PCR of nose- or airway sample
-
Age ≥ 18 years
-
Admitted to the ICU from the 15th of March 2020 until 1st of January 2022
-
Treated with unfractionated heparin aiming at aPTT 60-80 sec and/or anti-Xa level 0.3-0.7 iE/ml
Inclusion Criteria non-Covid-19 group:
-
Age ≥ 18 years
-
Admitted to the ICU between the 1st of January 2014 and 1st of January 2020
-
Treated with unfractionated heparin aiming at aPTT 60-80 sec and/or anti-Xa level 0.3-0.7 iE/ml
Exclusion Criteria:
- Treatment with anticoagulants other than UFH or fibrinolytics
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leiden University Medical Centre | Leiden | Zuid-holland | Netherlands | 2333ZA |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Leiden University Medical Center
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Arachchillage DRJ, Kamani F, Deplano S, Banya W, Laffan M. Should we abandon the APTT for monitoring unfractionated heparin? Thromb Res. 2017 Sep;157:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
- Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, Falanga A, Levi M, Clark C, Iba T, Cattaneo M. Type and dose of heparin in Covid-19: Reply. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Aug;18(8):2063-2064. doi: 10.1111/jth.14870. Epub 2020 May 11.
- White D, MacDonald S, Bull T, Hayman M, de Monteverde-Robb R, Sapsford D, Lavinio A, Varley J, Johnston A, Besser M, Thomas W. Heparin resistance in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Aug;50(2):287-291. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02145-0. Erratum in: J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jun 22;:.
- Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhang L, Yu Z, Fang M, Yu T, Wang Y, Pan S, Zou X, Yuan S, Shang Y. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. Epub 2020 Feb 24. Erratum in: Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):e26.
- CoCo 2022-020