Does Spinal Anesthesia for Prolapse Surgery With Lead to Urinary Retention?

Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02547155
Collaborator
(none)
68
1
2
33.1
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the risk of being unable to urinate shortly after surgery, also called acute post-operative urinary retention (POUR) between spinal and general anesthesia in women who undergo outpatient pelvic organ prolapse with stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Spinal anesthesia
  • Procedure: General anesthesia
N/A

Detailed Description

A randomized trial to compare urinary retention rates between spinal and general anesthesia in women who undergo outpatient pelvic organ prolapse surgery with concomitant incontinence surgery.

Randomization

Randomization will be done in the pre-operative area, on the day of surgery. Computer generated randomization will be done in blocks of 4. Sealed numbered envelopes will be opened prior to surgery and the subject will then be assigned to spinal or general anesthesia. Patient randomization on day of surgery was discussed with anesthesia and it thought that randomizing on the same day would be safe.

Preoperatively

Subjects will be asked to complete a validated questionnaire, the Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) prior to surgery, at their preoperative visit.

Anesthesia

Subjects randomized to general anesthesia will receive propofol induction, in combination with a muscle relaxant and inhalational gas per anesthesia standard of care at the investigators' institution.

Subjects randomized to spinal anesthesia will receive Bupivacaine 0.75%, 8-12 mg dose depending on estimated duration of surgery and anesthesiologist decision. In addition to spinal anesthesia, these subjects will possibly have concurrent administration of fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol so that they are mildy sedated or sleeping.

Voiding Trial

A voiding trial will be performed in the PACU once the subjects are able to stand and ambulate to the bathroom. Voiding trial will consist of removing the vaginal packing and back filling the bladder with 300cc of saline or less if subject has urgency or a smaller bladder capacity. A voiding trial is considered successful if the subject voids at least 2/3 of the total volume instilled and has a bladder scan showing less than 1/3 remaining. If a subject is unable to void after an hour, an additional hour will be permitted. However, after 2 hours from when the bladder was backfilled the subject is still unable to void, the Foley will be replaced and the subjects will be discharged home with a Foley leg bag and leg bag teaching.

An office nurse will call the subject and schedule an office nurse visit to remove the Foley between post-operative day number 5 to 7. If the subject goes home with a Foley this will be considered acute POUR.

Follow Up

Subjects will receive a phone call from either a nurse or fellow, between 48 to 72 hours post-operatively to make sure they are having no symptoms of urinary retention, are doing well and are not having any complications. A telephone survey will be administered during this follow up phone call using a validated questionnaire, the QoR-15. They will have received a copy of this survey to refer to at the time of their hospital discharge.

Subjects who were admitted to the hospital will have the same follow up, including a phone call 48 to 72 hours after their surgery, including the validated questionnaire, the QoR-15.

In addition, subjects will have a 6 week follow up visit in the clinic and will be asked to complete the QoR-15.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
68 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Does Spinal Anesthesia for Prolapse Surgery With Concomitant Sling Procedures Lead to an Increase in Urinary Retention Compared to General Anesthesia?
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2015
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2017
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Spinal anesthesia

Subjects randomized to spinal anesthesia will receive Bupivacaine 0.75%, 8-12.5 mg dose depending on estimated duration of surgery and anesthesiologist decision. In addition to spinal anesthesia, these subjects will possibly have concurrent administration of fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol so that they are mildy sedated or sleeping.

Procedure: Spinal anesthesia
8-12.5 mg of bupivacaine will be administered for spinal anesthesia

Active Comparator: General anesthesia

Subjects randomized to general anesthesia will receive propofol induction, in combination with a muscle relaxant and inhalational gas per anesthesia standard of care at our institution

Procedure: General anesthesia
propofol induction, in combination with a muscle relaxant and inhalational gas

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of postoperative urinary retention [within the first week after surgery]

    bladder emptying completeness after surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
40 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Women over the age of 40

  2. Women scheduled for pelvic organ prolapse surgery as well as concomitant incontinence sling surgery

  3. Post-void residual <150 cc prior to surgery

  4. Surgery length of at least 1 hour

  5. BMI <40

  6. ASA class 1-2

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Contraindications to surgery

  2. Contraindications to outpatient surgery, and requiring inpatient stay for medical comorbidities. The decision for a required inpatient stay will be decided prior to surgery based on the recommendations of the patient's primary care physician or specialist, such as cardiology or pulmonology.

  3. BMI >40

  4. ASA class 3 or 4 that would be a contraindiction to both spinal or general anesthesia

  5. Evidence of voiding dysfunction or urinary retention on pre-operative urodynamics, including PVR >150, or dyssynergic sphincter dyssynergia

  6. Neurological diseases that can interfere with spinal anesthesia

  7. Anticoagulation therapy within a week of surgery

  8. History of back surgery that would prevent successful spinal anesthesia

  9. History of back deformity, such as scoliosis that would prevent successful spinal anesthesia

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Cleveland Clinic Florida Weston Florida United States 33331

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • The Cleveland Clinic

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura Martin, DO, Clevland Clinic Florida

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Laura Martin, Urogynecology Fellow in the Department of Gynecology, The Cleveland Clinic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02547155
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • FLA 15-019
First Posted:
Sep 11, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Apr 20, 2017
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 20, 2017