COBRRA: Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03266783
Collaborator
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Other), Canadian Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research (CanVECTOR) Network (Other)
2,760
17
2
71.6
162.4
2.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Apixaban and rivaroxaban have been compared to standard therapy for treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and are both approved by Health Canada. No safety or efficacy data is available from direct head-to-head comparison of these two anticoagulants. Lawsuits in the United States over bleeding events, patient perceptions, and concerns with medication adherence are additional factors highlighting the importance of a comparison trial. This multi-center, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point (PROBE) trial aims to compare the safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

VTE is the third leading cause of mortality by cardiovascular disease. Standard treatment for acute VTE uses a combination of parenteral Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) and oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for 3 months, and carries significant bleeding risk. The major and/or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) event rate is reported between 8.1-9.7% during initial treatment. This treatment is burdensome owing to subcutaneous injections, drug interactions, and laboratory monitoring. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are simpler to use and do not require laboratory monitoring.

Rivaroxaban and apixaban are two DOACs targeting Factor Xa. Each DOAC was separately proven effective and safe when compared to standard treatment. Comparison of the bleeding rates between studies would favour use of apixaban over rivaroxaban; however, trial limitations and lack of direct comparison between these two agents makes it impossible to draw firm conclusions. This represents a dilemma in clinical practice because the absence of convincing differences in safety has led to genuine uncertainty about which DOAC has the best risk-to-benefit ratio.

To address these limitations, a head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to determine the safety (i.e. bleeding risk) of twice daily apixaban over once daily rivaroxaban during the first 3 months of acute VTE treatment. Eligibility criteria will be less stringent than the COBRRA pilot study and reflect real-world patients. Cost-effective analysis of apixaban twice daily compared to rivaroxaban once daily will also be performed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
2760 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 13, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Apixaban group

10 mg PO BID for 1 week, then 5 mg PO BID for 3 months of treatment

Drug: Apixaban
Refer to Apixaban group
Other Names:
  • Eliquis
  • Active Comparator: Rivaroxaban group

    15 mg PO BID for 3 weeks, then 20 mg PO OD for 3 months of treatment

    Drug: Rivaroxaban
    Refer to Rivaroxaban group
    Other Names:
  • Xarelto
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The rate of adjudicated clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) events [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

      CRB events are defined as the composite of major bleeding (MB) events and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Adjudicated Major Bleeding events [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    2. Adjudicated Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding events [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    3. Adjudicated recurrent VTE events [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    4. Adjudicated VTE-related deaths [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    5. All-cause mortality [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    6. Medication adherence [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    7. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    8. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    9. Impact of verbal consent on patient participation in comparison with participants from sites using written informed consent [For the duration of the study: 3 months]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Confirmed newly diagnosed symptomatic acute VTE (proximal power extremity DVT or segmental or greater PE)

    • Age ≥ 18 years old

    • Informed consent obtained

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Have received > 72 hours of therapeutic anticoagulation

    • Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min calculated with the Cockcroft-Gault formula

    • Any contraindication for anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban as determined by the treating physician such as, but not limited to:

    • active bleeding,

    • active malignancy, defined as a) diagnosed with cancer within the past 6 months; or b) recurrent, regionally advanced or metastatic disease; or c) currently receiving treatment or have received any treatment for cancer during the 6 months prior to randomization; or d) a hematologic malignancy not in complete remission,

    • weight > 120 kg,

    • liver disease (Child-Pugh Class B or C),

    • use of contraindicated medications

    • another indication for long-term anticoagulation (e.g. atrial fibrillation)

    • pregnant (note below) or breastfeeding (Note: as reported by the patient or a pregnancy test will be ordered at the discretion of the treating physician for women of childbearing potential as per standard of care)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
    2 Alberta Health Sciences Edmonton Alberta Canada
    3 St. Paul's Hospital Vancouver British Columbia Canada
    4 QEII Health Science Centre Halifax Nova Scotia Canada B3H 2Y9
    5 Hamilton General Hospital Hamilton Ontario Canada
    6 Juravinski Hospital Hamilton Ontario Canada
    7 St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Hamilton Ontario Canada
    8 Kingston General Hospital Kingston Ontario Canada
    9 London Health Sciences Center London Ontario Canada N6A 5W9
    10 The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus Ottawa Ontario Canada K1H 8L6
    11 UHN - Toronto General Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5G 2C4
    12 Hôpital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada
    13 St. Mary's Hospital Montreal Quebec Canada
    14 Jewish General Hospital Montréal Quebec Canada H3T 1E2
    15 McGill University Health Center Montréal Quebec Canada H4A 3J1
    16 CHU de Québec-Université Laval Quebec city Quebec Canada
    17 University of Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
    • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
    • Canadian Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research (CanVECTOR) Network

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Lana Castellucci, MD, FRCPC, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03266783
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • COBRRA
    First Posted:
    Aug 30, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 15, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 15, 2022