Treatment Prior to Injection and Biopsy of the Vulva
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will compare pre-treatment with ice prior to injection of local anesthetic for vulvar biopsy to no pre-treatment and evaluate pain levels and patient satisfaction with the procedure.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
To diagnose skin conditions of the vulva and determine appropriate treatment, a biopsy is often taken as an outpatient procedure. Prior to biopsy, the skin is cleansed and injected with a numbing solution. These injections can be quite painful in this sensitive area.
Ice has been used as topical anesthesia in a number of sites, including the cornea, the skin, and particularly in the mouth prior to anesthetic injections. However, there is no evidence for using ice anesthesia prior to injections of the vulvar tissues.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of using ice as pre-treatment prior to the injection of local anesthetic for vulvar biopsy.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ice Pre-treatment Participants will hold an exam glove filled with ice to intended biopsy area for 30 seconds prior to preparation and local anesthetic injection. |
Other: Ice Pre-treatment
Topical application of ice prior to local anesthetic injection.
|
Placebo Comparator: Room Temperature Water Pre-Treatment Participants will hold an exam glove filled with room temperature water to intended biopsy area for 30 seconds prior to preparation and local anesthetic injection. |
Other: Room Temperature Water Pre-treatment
Topical application of room-temperature water prior to local anesthetic injection.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Post-injection Pain Score [Immediately after local anesthetic injection]
Patient's self-reported visual analogue pain scale (100 millimeter) after injection of local anesthetic. Range from 0 to 100 mm, with 0 being least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Post-procedure satisfaction score [Immediately after procedure]
Patient's self-reported visual analogue scale (100 millimeter) for satisfaction with the procedure. Range form 0mm to 100mm with 0 being the least satisfied and 100 being the most satisfied.
- Post-procedure anxiety score [Immediately after procedure]
Patient's self-reported visual analogue scale (100 millimeter) score for anxiety level about having another vulvar biopsy in the future. Range from 0mm to 100mm, with 0 being the least anxious and 100 being the most anxious about a future procedure.
- Post-procedure pain control score [Immediately after procedure]
Patient's self-reported visual analogue scale (100 millimeter) for satisfaction with pain control during procedure. Range from 0mm to 100mm with 0 being the least satisfied with pain control and 100mm being the most satisfied with pain control.
- Post-biopsy pain score [Immediately after procedure.]
Patient's self-reports visual analogue pain scale (100 millimeter) score immediately after biopsy. Range from 0mm to 100mm, with 0 being the the least pain and 100 being the most pain.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Female
-
18 years of age or older
-
Undergoing vulva biopsy during clinic visit
-
Willing and able to comply with study protocol
-
Able to understand and provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Missouri Ob/Gyn Associated | Columbia | Missouri | United States | 65202 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Missouri-Columbia
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Courtney Barnes, MD, University of Missouri-Columbia
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Bhadauria US, Dasar PL, Sandesh N, Mishra P, Godha S. Effect of injection site pre-cooling on pain perception in patients attending a dental camp at Life Line Express: a split mouth interventional study. Clujul Med. 2017;90(2):220-225. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-694. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
- Chan HH, Lam LK, Wong DS, Wei WI. Role of skin cooling in improving patient tolerability of Q-switched Alexandrite (QS Alex) laser in nevus of Ota treatment. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32(2):148-51.
- Davoudi A, Rismanchian M, Akhavan A, Nosouhian S, Bajoghli F, Haghighat A, Arbabzadeh F, Samimi P, Fiez A, Shadmehr E, Tabari K, Jahadi S. A brief review on the efficacy of different possible and nonpharmacological techniques in eliminating discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):13-6. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.167846. Review.
- Dixit S, Lowe P, Fischer G, Lim A. Ice anaesthesia in procedural dermatology. Australas J Dermatol. 2013 Nov;54(4):273-6. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12057. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
- Ghaderi F, Banakar S, Rostami S. Effect of pre-cooling injection site on pain perception in pediatric dentistry: "A randomized clinical trial". Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Nov;10(6):790-4.
- Goel S, Chang B, Bhan K, El-Hindy N, Kolli S. "Cryoanalgesic preparation" before local anaesthetic injection for lid surgery. Orbit. 2006 Jun;25(2):107-10.
- Kuwahara RT, Skinner RB. Emla versus ice as a topical anesthetic. Dermatol Surg. 2001 May;27(5):495-6.
- Lathwal G, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Efficacy of Different Precooling Agents and Topical Anesthetics on the Pain Perception during Intraoral Injection: A Comparative Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 May-Aug;8(2):119-22. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1296. Epub 2015 Aug 11. Review.
- Leff DR, Nortley M, Dang V, Bhutiani RP. The effect of local cooling on pain perception during infiltration of local anaesthetic agents, a prospective randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2007 Jul;62(7):677-82.
- Lindsell LB, Miller DM, Brown JL. Use of topical ice for local anesthesia for intravitreal injections. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;132(8):1010-1. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1397.
- 2010101