POEM: Endoscopic Peroral Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study intends to investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia in a single center setting in Europe.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This pilot study intends to investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia in a single center setting in Europe.
16 patients are enrolled to evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy. Main outcome measurement is the eckhardt symptom score 3 month after therapy.
Primary outcome:
-eckhardt symptom score 3 month after therapy.
Secondary outcomes:
-
Lower esophageal sphincter pressure at 3 month after therapy.
-
Reflux symptoms at 3 month after therapy.
For this prospective study, inclusion criteria are achalasia, as diagnosed by established methods (contrast fluoroscopy, manometry, esophagal-gastro-duodenoscopy) and age greater than 18 years. Previous therapy, such as esophageal surgery or previous myotomy are exclusion criterion.
A forward-viewing upper endoscope is used with a transparent distal cap attachment. Carbon dioxide gas is necessary for insufflation during the procedures. An endoscopic knife is used to access the submucosa, dissect the submucosal tunnel and also to divide circular muscle bundles over a length of approximately 10cm, extending 2-3cm onto the cardia. An electric generator is used with spray coagulation mode. A coagulating forceps is used for hemostasis as needed. Closure of the mucosal entry site is performed using standard endoscopic clips.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Patients with achalasia who are designed to either get balloon dilatation or have botulinum toxin injection, or to have surgical intervention (Heller myotomy)for treatment |
Other: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy
A forward-viewing upper endoscope is used with a transparent distal cap attachment. Carbon dioxide gas is necessary for insufflation during the procedures. An endoscopic knife is used to access the submucosa, dissect the submucosal tunnel and also to divide circular muscle bundles over a length of approximately 10cm, extending 2-3cm onto the cardia. An electric generator is used with spray coagulation mode. A coagulating forceps is used for hemostasis as needed. Closure of the mucosal entry site is performed using standard endoscopic clips
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Treatment Success Defined as Symptom Relief 3 Months After Treatment Based on an Eckhardt Score ≤ 3 [3 months after treatment]
eckhardt score is a score to evaluate achalasia discomfort in patients. Patients are being interrogated for dysphagia, regurgitation, and retrosternal pain , correlated with the time frame of occurrence. "with every meal" giving 3 points," daily" (2 points), "sometimes" (1 Point) or "no" (0 Points), as well as weight loss,(>10 kg= 3 points, 5-10 kg=2 points, 0-5 kg=1 point, None=0 points. Scale range is from 0 Points (no achalasia) up to 12 points for the worst achalasia symptoms.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- mmHg of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter 3 Months After POEM Procedure [manometry at 3 month after therapy]
esophageal manometry is done 3 months after POEM procedure to evaluate resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure
- Number of Participants With Reflux Symptoms [during procedure, and 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2 and 5 years after treatment]
Number of Participants with Reflux Symptoms during procedure, and 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2 and 5 years after treatment
- Number of Participants With Procedure-related Adverse Events [procedure to 3 months post procedure]
procedure-related adverse events per protocol
- Medication 3 Months After POEM [3 months]
proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use at 3 months after POEM procedure
- Duration Time Procedure [procedure]
duration time of POEM procedures in minutes
- Days Duration Hospitalization [days of hospitalization for POEM procedure, an average of 4 days]
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 4 days
- cm Myotomy Length [POEM procedure]
myotomy length in cm
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Treatment Success 3 Months After Treatment [3 months after treatment]
eckhardt score is a score to evaluate achalasia discomfort in patients. Patients are being interrogated for dysphagia, regurgitation, and retrosternal pain , correlated with the time frame of occurrence. "with every meal" giving 3 points," daily" (2 points), "sometimes" (1 Point) or "no" (0 Points), as well as weight loss,(>10 kg= 3 points, 5-10 kg=2 points, 0-5 kg=1 point, None=0 points. Scale range is from 0 Points (no achalasia) up to 12 points for the worst achalasia symptoms. Post-myotomy eckhardt score ≤ 3 n individuals has been reached in 15 individuals.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
-
Patient with symptomatic achalasia and pre-op barium swallow, manometry and esophagal-gastro-duodenoscopy which are consistent with the diagnosis
-
persons of age > 18 years with medical indication for surgical myotomy or Endoscopic balloon dilatation
-
Signed written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria:
-
Patients with previous surgery of the stomach or esophagus
-
Patients with known coagulopathy
-
Previous achalasia-treatment with surgery
-
Patients with liver cirrhosis and/or esophageal varices
-
Active esophagitis
-
Eosinophilic esophagitis
-
Barrett's esophagus
-
Pregnancy
-
Stricture of the esophagus
-
Malignant or premalignant esophageal lesion
-
Candida esophagitis
-
Hiatal hernia > 2cm
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik für Interdisziplinäre Endoskopie | Hamburg | Germany | 20246 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Roesch, Prof. Dr., Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- UKE Hamburg Endoscopy PV3725
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Patients with symptomatic achalasia |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 16 patients were included as per protocol, no patient was lost during follow-up over a 2 year period |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM Treatment: Endoscopic Myotomy of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 16 |
COMPLETED | 16 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot study, first 16 patients who received POEM for treatment of achalasia |
Overall Participants | 16 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
13
81.3%
|
>=65 years |
3
18.8%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
45
(16.22)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
4
25%
|
Male |
12
75%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
Germany |
16
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | mmHg of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter 3 Months After POEM Procedure |
---|---|
Description | esophageal manometry is done 3 months after POEM procedure to evaluate resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure |
Time Frame | manometry at 3 month after therapy |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pilot study group to evaluate feasibility and safety of POEM procedure before initiating studies evaluating long-term efficacy.Patients with primary achalasia, diagnosed by established methods(contrast fluoroscopy, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)) and age greater than 18 years were included. |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment |
Measure Participants | 16 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg] |
11.8
(9.016200316)
|
Title | Number of Participants With Reflux Symptoms |
---|---|
Description | Number of Participants with Reflux Symptoms during procedure, and 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2 and 5 years after treatment |
Time Frame | during procedure, and 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2 and 5 years after treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment |
Measure Participants | 16 |
Number [participants] |
1
6.3%
|
Title | Treatment Success Defined as Symptom Relief 3 Months After Treatment Based on an Eckhardt Score ≤ 3 |
---|---|
Description | eckhardt score is a score to evaluate achalasia discomfort in patients. Patients are being interrogated for dysphagia, regurgitation, and retrosternal pain , correlated with the time frame of occurrence. "with every meal" giving 3 points," daily" (2 points), "sometimes" (1 Point) or "no" (0 Points), as well as weight loss,(>10 kg= 3 points, 5-10 kg=2 points, 0-5 kg=1 point, None=0 points. Scale range is from 0 Points (no achalasia) up to 12 points for the worst achalasia symptoms. |
Time Frame | 3 months after treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pilot study group to evaluate feasibility and safety of POEM procedure before initiating studies evaluating long-term efficacy.Patients with primary achalasia, diagnosed by established methods(contrast fluoroscopy, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)) and age greater than 18 years were included. |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment |
Measure Participants | 16 |
symptom relief 3 months after treatment |
1.4
(2.217355783)
|
eckhardt score baseline |
8.8
(1.28)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | POEM Patients |
---|---|---|
Comments | this pilot study was created ro evaluate sample size for the following multicenter study, based on manometric outcomes. Mean values between baseline and follow-up were compared using Student ' s t -test for paired samples. P values less then 0.05, two-sided, were considered significant.R 2.13.1(R Development Core Team (2011). Subgroups (partial vs. complete myotomy) were compared using an analysis of variance test adjusted for initial values. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | -7.44 | |
Confidence Interval |
() 95% to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Deviation Value: 2.66 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Number of Participants With Procedure-related Adverse Events |
---|---|
Description | procedure-related adverse events per protocol |
Time Frame | procedure to 3 months post procedure |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment |
Measure Participants | 16 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
2
12.5%
|
Title | Medication 3 Months After POEM |
---|---|
Description | proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use at 3 months after POEM procedure |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment |
Measure Participants | 16 |
Number [participants] |
1
6.3%
|
Title | Duration Time Procedure |
---|---|
Description | duration time of POEM procedures in minutes |
Time Frame | procedure |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pilot study group to evaluate feasibility and safety of POEM procedure before initiating studies evaluating long-term efficacy.Patients with primary achalasia, diagnosed by established methods(contrast fluoroscopy, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)) and age greater than 18 years were included. |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment |
Measure Participants | 16 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [minutes] |
114
(37.48238475)
|
Title | Days Duration Hospitalization |
---|---|
Description | participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 4 days |
Time Frame | days of hospitalization for POEM procedure, an average of 4 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pilot study group to evaluate feasibility and safety of POEM procedure before initiating studies evaluating long-term efficacy.Patients with primary achalasia, diagnosed by established methods(contrast fluoroscopy, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)) and age greater than 18 years were included. |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment |
Measure Participants | 16 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [days] |
4.5625
(0.892094913)
|
Title | cm Myotomy Length |
---|---|
Description | myotomy length in cm |
Time Frame | POEM procedure |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pilot study group to evaluate feasibility and safety of POEM procedure before initiating studies evaluating long-term efficacy.Patients with primary achalasia, diagnosed by established methods(contrast fluoroscopy, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)) and age greater than 18 years were included. |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment |
Measure Participants | 16 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [cm] |
12
(2.704933764)
|
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Treatment Success 3 Months After Treatment |
---|---|
Description | eckhardt score is a score to evaluate achalasia discomfort in patients. Patients are being interrogated for dysphagia, regurgitation, and retrosternal pain , correlated with the time frame of occurrence. "with every meal" giving 3 points," daily" (2 points), "sometimes" (1 Point) or "no" (0 Points), as well as weight loss,(>10 kg= 3 points, 5-10 kg=2 points, 0-5 kg=1 point, None=0 points. Scale range is from 0 Points (no achalasia) up to 12 points for the worst achalasia symptoms. Post-myotomy eckhardt score ≤ 3 n individuals has been reached in 15 individuals. |
Time Frame | 3 months after treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pilot study group to evaluate feasibility and safety of POEM procedure before initiating studies evaluating long-term efficacy.Patients with primary achalasia, diagnosed by established methods(contrast fluoroscopy, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)) and age greater than 18 years were included. |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | pilot study, first 16 patients who received POEM for treatment of achalasia |
Measure Participants | 16 |
Number [percentage of treated patients] |
94
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 2 days after POEM | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | 1 cm superficial ulcer (Forrest III) at the cardia | |
Arm/Group Title | POEM Patients | |
Arm/Group Description | pilot group of achalasia patients who received POEM treatment | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
POEM Patients | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
POEM Patients | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/16 (12.5%) | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
1 cm superficial ulcer (Forrest III) | 1/16 (6.3%) | 1 |
ulcer in the distal esophagus | 1/16 (6.3%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
POEM Patients | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/16 (6.3%) | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
treatment failure | 1/16 (6.3%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Prof. Dr. Thomas Rösch, Principal Investigator |
---|---|
Organization | University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf |
Phone | +49 40 7410 50098 |
t.roesch@uke.de |
- UKE Hamburg Endoscopy PV3725