Evaluation Of Clinical Results And Imaging Of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Orthopure Xt

Sponsor
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06091488
Collaborator
(none)
10
1
1
31.7
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate subjective and objective clinical outcomes and imaging data of subjects undergoing reconstruction or revision of LCA reconstruction using OrthoPure XT

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Orthopure
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation Of Clinical Results And Imaging Of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Orthopure Xt
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 12, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Experimental

Patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury, in which the patient's own autologous tendons cannot be used, will be treated with the ligamentous reconstruction device.

Other: Orthopure
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee in the patient.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. International Knee Documentation Committee [At baseline (day 0)]

    The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30)

  2. International Knee Documentation Committee [After 2 months]

    The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30)

  3. International Knee Documentation Committee [After 6 months]

    The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30)

  4. International Knee Documentation Committee [After 24 months]

    The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30)

  5. Lysholm Knee Score [At baseline (day 0)]

    The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100. Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64).

  6. Lysholm Knee Score [After 2 months]

    The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100. Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64).

  7. Lysholm Knee Score [After 6 months]

    The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100. Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64).

  8. Lysholm Knee Score [After 24 months]

    The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100. Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64).

  9. Visual Analogue Scale [At baseline (day 0)]

    is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

  10. Visual Analogue Scale [After 2 months]

    is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

  11. Visual Analogue Scale [After 6 months]

    is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

  12. Visual Analogue Scale [After 24 months]

    is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

  13. Tegner Score [At baseline (day 0)]

    allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports

  14. Tegner Score [After 2 months]

    allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports

  15. Tegner Score [After 6 months]

    allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports

  16. Tegner Score [After 24 months]

    allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports

  17. continuity of the graft [After 24 months]

    assess the continuity of the graft with magnetic resonance imaging

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients between the ages of 18 and 65 at the time of ACL reconstruction surgery;

  • Patients aged 35 to 65 at the time of primary ACL reconstruction surgery;

  • Male and female sex;

  • First injury of the ACL with impossibility of use of autograft (patellar tendinopathy, quadriceps tendinopathy, goose leg tendinopathy) or refusal to use allograft (Bank tendon);

  • Recurrence of ACL injury with impossibility of use of autograft (prior use/tendinopathy of the patellar, previous use/tendinopathy of the quadriceps, previous use/tendinopathy of the goose leg) or refusal to use allograft (tendon of Bank);

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients who do not consent to be included in the study

  • Presence of haematological, rheumatic or haemorrhagic disease time of assessment

  • ACL primary reconstruction in subjects under 35

  • Allergies and/or reactions from hypersensitivity or religious objection to the use of porcine derivation

  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy 40136

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06091488
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ACL-PURE
First Posted:
Oct 19, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Oct 19, 2023
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 19, 2023