A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Common Facial Acne - W0260-301

Sponsor
Stiefel, a GSK Company (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01017146
Collaborator
GlaxoSmithKline (Industry)
744
22
2
13
33.8
2.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of a new foam formulation of tazarotene in subjects with acne vulgaris.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Tazarotene foam
  • Drug: Vehicle Foam
Phase 3

Detailed Description

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study comparing tazarotene foam with vehicle foam in subjects with acne vulgaris. Approximately 742 subjects will be enrolled and randomized to 1 of the 2 study product groups in a 1:1 ratio (tazarotene foam: vehicle foam). Subjects will apply tazarotene foam or vehicle foam to the entire face once daily for 12 weeks; study visits will occur at baseline (week 0/day 1) and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
744 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 1

Tazarotene foam, 0.1%

Drug: Tazarotene foam
Tazarotene foam once a day application to the face

Placebo Comparator: 2

Vehicle Foam

Drug: Vehicle Foam
Vehicle Foam once a day application to the face

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12 [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12]

    LC: count of all inflammatory lesions (ILs, i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory lesions (NILs, i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. Total lesions (TLs) were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline.

  2. Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12 [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12]

    Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

  3. Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 [Week 12]

    Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12]

    LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Percent change from Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and12 was calculated as the (Week 2/4/8/12 value minus the baseline value divided by baseline value) x 100.

  2. Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8]

    LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at baseline. Calculation was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method for missing data.

  3. Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC) [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12]

    Time to a 50 percent reduction in TLC (sum of ILs and NILs) was the time difference between Baseline and the time to 50 percent reduction in LC. Participants who did not have a >=50 percent reduction from Baseline in TLC during the study were censored at their last visit date.

  4. Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8]

    Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

  5. Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 [Weeks 2, 4, and 8]

    Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.

  6. Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12]

    An SGA of the facial skin, excluding the scalp, was performed by participants using a rating scale of 0 to 4: 0=face is basically free of acne, with only an occasional blackhead (Bh) and/or whitehead (Wh); 1=face has several Bhs and/or Whs and small pimples (P), but there are no tender deep-seated bumps or cysts (DSBCs); 2=face has several to many Bhs and/or Whs and small- to medium-sized P, and may have one DSBC; 3=face has many Bhs and/or Whs, many medium- to large-sized P, and perhaps a few DSBCs; 4=face has Bhs and/or Whs, and several to many medium- to large-sized Ps and DSBCs dominate.

  7. Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12]

    The DLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-5=small effect on the participant's life; 6-10=moderate effect on the participant's life; 11-20=very large effect on the participant's life; 21-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the DLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements.

  8. Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12]

    The CDLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The CDLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6=small effect on the participant's life; 7-12=moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18=very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the CDLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements.

  9. Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12]

    Erythema is a skin condition characterized by redness or rash. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no redness); G1=slight (faint red or pink coloration, barely perceptible); G2=mild (light red or pink coloration); G3=moderate (medium red coloration); G4=severe (beet red coloration). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of erythema reported at any time during treatment.

  10. Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12]

    Dryness: skin epidermis that lacks moisture/sebum. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4. G0=absent (none); G1=slight (barely perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G2=mild (easily perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G3=moderate (easily noted dryness and flakes but no fissure formation); G4=severe (easily noted dryness with flakes and fissure formation). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of drying reported at any time during treatment.

  11. Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12]

    Peeling skin: damage to and loss of the upper layer of skin (epidermis). Local tolerability assessments for peeling were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no peeling); G1=slight (mild localized peeling); G2=mild (mild and diffuse peeling); G3=moderate (moderate and diffuse peeling); G4=severe (moderate to prominent, dense peeling). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of peeling reported at any time during treatment.

  12. Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12]

    Itching is a sensation that causes the desire or reflex to scratch. Local tolerability assessments for itching were performed by the participant at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G3. G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of itching reported at any time during treatment.

  13. Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants [Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12]

    Burning/stinging is a pain and burning sensation. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the participant at each study visit based on severity as G0 to G3: G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of burning/stinging reported at any time during treatment.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
12 Years to 45 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male or female age 12 through 45 years, inclusive, who is in good general health.

  • An ISGA score of 3 or greater at baseline.

  • Lesion counts meeting both of the following criteria:

  1. Between 25 and 50 facial inflammatory lesions and no more than 1 facial nodular lesion (<5mm), with NO cystic lesions.

  2. Between 30 and 125 facial noninflammatory lesions, excluding nasal lesions.

  • Regular menstrual cycle prior to study entry for females of childbearing potential.

  • Negative urine pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential. • Sexually active females of childbearing potential participating in the study must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception while receiving protocol-assigned product. A woman of childbearing potential is defined as one who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant; including perimenopausal women who are less than 2 years from their last menses.

Women who are not currently sexually active must agree to use medically accepted method of contraception should they become sexually active while participating in the study. Male subjects and/or their partners must use a medically acceptable form of contraception.

  • Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent before any protocol specific procedures are performed.

  • Ability and willingness to follow all study procedures, attend all scheduled visits, and successfully complete the study.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Female who is pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breast feeding.

  • Use of topical antibiotics on the face within the past 2 weeks.

  • Use of systemic antibiotics for acne treatment within the past 4 weeks.

  • Concurrent use of medications known to be photosensitizers (eg, thiazides, tetracyclines) because of the possibility of augmented photosensitivity.

  • Use of topical corticosteroids on the face within the past 2 weeks or systemic corticosteroids within the past 4 weeks.

  • Use of systemic retinoids (eg, isotretinoin) within the past 6 months.

  • Treatment with estrogens, androgens, or anti-androgenic agents for 12 weeks or less immediately prior to study enrollment. Subjects that have been treated with these medications for more than 12 consecutive weeks prior to study enrollment are allowed to enroll as long as they do not expect to change the dose or drug, or to discontinue use during the study and it has not been indicated for the treatment of acne vulgaris.

  • Use of topical anti-acne medications (eg, benzoyl peroxide, retinoids, or salicylates) within the past 2 weeks.

  • Concomitant use of facial products such as: abradants, facials, peels containing glycolic or other acids, masks, washes or soaps.

  • Concomitant use of medications that are reported to exacerbate acne (eg, mega-doses of certain vitamins, haloperidol, and immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine) as these may impact efficacy assessments. Multivitamins, iron supplements, and folate are acceptable.

  • Facial procedure (eg, blue light, chemical or laser peel, or microdermabrasion) within the past 4 weeks.

  • Require or desire excessive or prolonged exposure to ultraviolet light during the study.

  • Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any of the active components of the study product.

  • A significant medical history of or currently immunocompromised.

  • Use of any investigational product within the past 4 weeks or currently participating in another clinical study.

  • Any other condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, would put the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in the study.

  • Any major illness within 30 days before study enrollment.

  • Currently lives in the same household as currently enrolled subjects; is an employee of Stiefel, an investigator, or a CRO involved in the study; or is an immediate family member (eg, partner, offspring, parents) of an employee involved in the study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Cherry Creek Research, Inc. Denver Colorado United States 80209
2 Cosmetic Medicine & Treatment Research Insttitute, Inc. Miami Beach Florida United States 33140
3 Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC Indianapolis Indiana United States 46260
4 Minnesota Clinical Study Center Fridley Minnesota United States 55432
5 Academic Dermatology Associates Albuquerque New Mexico United States 87106
6 DermResearch Center of New York, Inc. Stony Brook New York United States 11790
7 Dermatology Consulting Services High Point North Carolina United States 27262
8 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Winston Salem North Carolina United States 27157
9 The Dermatology Research of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio United States 45220
10 Group Health Associates Cincinnatti Ohio United States 45220
11 Haber Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery, Inc. South Euclid Ohio United States 44118
12 Oregon Dermatology and Research Center Portland Oregon United States 97210
13 Yardley Dermatology Associates Yardley Pennsylvania United States 19067
14 The Skin Wellness Center, PC Knoxville Tennessee United States 37922
15 Dermatology Research Associates, Inc. Nashville Tennessee United States 37203
16 DermResearch, Inc. Austin Texas United States 78759
17 J & S Studies, Inc. College Station Texas United States 77845
18 Dermatology Treatment & Research Center Dallas Texas United States 75230
19 Aurora Advanced Healthcare, Inc. Clinical Research Center Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53209
20 Ultranova Skincare Barrie Ontario Canada L4M 6L2
21 Dermatrials Research Hamilton Ontario Canada L8N 1V6
22 Nexus Clinical Research St. John's Canada NL A1B 3E1

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Stiefel, a GSK Company
  • GlaxoSmithKline

Investigators

  • Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

Responsible Party:
Stiefel, a GSK Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01017146
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 114575
First Posted:
Nov 20, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Jan 18, 2017
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Keywords provided by Stiefel, a GSK Company
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 372 372
COMPLETED 306 333
NOT COMPLETED 66 39

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam Total
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 371 372 743
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Years
18.2
(5.7)
18.6
(6.4)
18.4
(6.1)
Gender (Count of Participants)
Female
182
49.1%
192
51.6%
374
50.3%
Male
189
50.9%
180
48.4%
369
49.7%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number]
American Indian or Alaska Native
12
3.2%
3
0.8%
15
2%
Asian
11
3%
4
1.1%
15
2%
Black
53
14.3%
50
13.4%
103
13.9%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
1
0.3%
1
0.1%
White
285
76.8%
307
82.5%
592
79.7%
Mixed Race
10
2.7%
7
1.9%
17
2.3%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12
Description LC: count of all inflammatory lesions (ILs, i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory lesions (NILs, i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. Total lesions (TLs) were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set: all randomized participants who were dispensed study product. Calculation was based on the last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method for missing data, in which missing final values of the outcome variable are replaced by the last known value before the participant was lost to follow up.
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 371 372
ILs
-18.0
(11.01)
-14.1
(12.37)
NILs
-27.9
(21.65)
-16.7
(21.72)
TLs
-45.8
(27.89)
-30.8
(26.68)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tazarotene Foam, Vehicle Foam
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments The p-value indicates treatment differences between tazarotene foam and vehicle foam for ILs
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tazarotene Foam, Vehicle Foam
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments The p-value indicates treatment differences between tazarotene foam and vehicle foam for NILs
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tazarotene Foam, Vehicle Foam
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments The p-value indicates treatment differences between tazarotene foam and vehicle foam for TLs
Method ANCOVA
Comments
2. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12
Description Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 371 372
Number [participants]
132
35.6%
89
23.9%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tazarotene Foam, Vehicle Foam
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Percentage of participants
Estimated Value 35.6
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
30.7 to 40.5
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments The estimated value represents the percentage of participants receiving tazarotene foam with a minimum 2 G improvement in the ISGA score from Baseline at Week 12.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Vehicle Foam
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Percentage of participants
Estimated Value 23.9
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
19.6 to 28.3
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments The estimated value represents the percentage of participants receiving vehicle foam with a minimum 2 G improvement in the ISGA score from Baseline at Week 12.
3. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12
Description Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.
Time Frame Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 371 372
Number [participants]
107
28.8%
60
16.1%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tazarotene Foam, Vehicle Foam
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Percentage of participants
Estimated Value 28.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
24.2 to 33.5
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments The estimated value represents the percentage of participants receiving tazarotene foam with an ISGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 12.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Vehicle Foam
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Percentage of participants
Estimated Value 16.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
12.4 to 19.9
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments The estimated value represents the percentage of participants receiving vehicle foam with an ISGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 12.
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Description LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Percent change from Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and12 was calculated as the (Week 2/4/8/12 value minus the baseline value divided by baseline value) x 100.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set. The LOCF imputation method was used for missing data.
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 371 372
ILs, Week 2
-18.2
(35.84)
-20.9
(33.64)
ILs, Week 4
-33.0
(32.75)
-24.8
(34.42)
ILs, Week 8
-50.1
(31.53)
-42.1
(38.62)
ILs, Week 12
-57.5
(33.39)
-45.2
(38.64)
NILs, Week 2
-24.5
(26.21)
-16.6
(28.64)
NILs, Week 4
-36.6
(28.59)
-25.0
(32.45)
NILs, Week 8
-48.7
(29.20)
-30.6
(36.64)
NILs, Week 12
-55.1
(30.88)
-34.3
(42.56)
TLs, Week 2
-22.5
(23.39)
-18.8
(22.21)
TLs, Week 4
-35.3
(25.41)
-29.3
(26.98)
TLs, Week 8
-49.5
(26.2)
-35.6
(31.16)
TLs, Week 12
-56.3
(28.52)
-39.0
(34.40)
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Description LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at baseline. Calculation was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method for missing data.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data.
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 371 372
ILs, Week 2
-5.5
(11.54)
-6.5
(11.98)
ILs, Week 4
-10.1
(10.44)
-10.9
(11.74)
ILs, Week 8
-15.6
(10.40)
-13.2
(12.71)
NILs, Week 2
-12.6
(15.72)
-8.6
(16.22)
NILs, Week 4
-18.2
(17.70)
-12.2
(18.41)
NILs, Week 8
-24.6
(19.64)
-14.8
(21.63)
TLs, Week 2
-18.1
(20.22)
-15.1
(18.80)
TLs, Week 4
-28.3
(22.77)
-23.1
(23.30)
TLs, Week 8
-40.1
(24.67)
-27.9
(28.09)
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC)
Description Time to a 50 percent reduction in TLC (sum of ILs and NILs) was the time difference between Baseline and the time to 50 percent reduction in LC. Participants who did not have a >=50 percent reduction from Baseline in TLC during the study were censored at their last visit date.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set: only those participants with a >=50 percent reduction from Baseline in TLC were evaluated.
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 273 197
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [days]
57
85
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Description Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 371 372
Week 2
10
2.7%
11
3%
Week 4
23
6.2%
29
7.8%
Week 8
64
17.3%
44
11.8%
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Description Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.
Time Frame Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 371 372
Week 2
4
1.1%
1
0.3%
Week 4
12
3.2%
7
1.9%
Week 8
40
10.8%
22
5.9%
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Description An SGA of the facial skin, excluding the scalp, was performed by participants using a rating scale of 0 to 4: 0=face is basically free of acne, with only an occasional blackhead (Bh) and/or whitehead (Wh); 1=face has several Bhs and/or Whs and small pimples (P), but there are no tender deep-seated bumps or cysts (DSBCs); 2=face has several to many Bhs and/or Whs and small- to medium-sized P, and may have one DSBC; 3=face has many Bhs and/or Whs, many medium- to large-sized P, and perhaps a few DSBCs; 4=face has Bhs and/or Whs, and several to many medium- to large-sized Ps and DSBCs dominate.
Time Frame Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 371 372
Week 2
104
28%
1
0.3%
Week 4
143
38.5%
130
34.9%
Week 8
187
50.4%
165
44.4%
Week 12
220
59.3%
180
48.4%
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older
Description The DLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-5=small effect on the participant's life; 6-10=moderate effect on the participant's life; 11-20=very large effect on the participant's life; 21-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the DLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set: only those participants 17 years of age or older and whose DLQI scores were calculated at Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, or 12 were evaluated for change in DLQI score at the respective week.
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 171 165
Week 2, n=171,165
-0.1
(4.98)
-2.1
(3.68)
Week 4, n=166, 167
-1.9
(4.60)
-2.5
(3.85)
Week 8, n=160, 155
-2.9
(4.86)
-2.7
(4.40)
Week 12, n=154, 155
-3.6
(5.22)
-3.1
(4.31)
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger
Description The CDLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The CDLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6=small effect on the participant's life; 7-12=moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18=very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the CDLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Analysis Set: only those participants 16 years of age or younger and whose CDLQI scores were calculated at Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, or 12 were evaluated for change in DLQI score at the respective week.
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 162 179
Week 2, n=162,179
1.1
(4.16)
-1.4
(3.21)
Week 4, n=153, 180
-0.6
(3.45)
-1.4
(3.23)
Week 8, n=148, 171
-1.2
(3.53)
-1.9
(3.11)
Week 12, n=146, 169
-1.7
(4.09)
-2.0
(3.46)
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
Description Erythema is a skin condition characterized by redness or rash. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no redness); G1=slight (faint red or pink coloration, barely perceptible); G2=mild (light red or pink coloration); G3=moderate (medium red coloration); G4=severe (beet red coloration). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of erythema reported at any time during treatment.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All Randomized Participants: all participants who were randomized in the study
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 372 372
Baseline, G0
250
67.4%
242
65.1%
Baseline, G1
69
18.6%
99
26.6%
Baseline, G2
45
12.1%
24
6.5%
Baseline, G3
7
1.9%
7
1.9%
Baseline, G4
0
0%
0
0%
Baseline, Missing G
1
0.3%
0
0%
Maximum During Treatment (MDT), G0
81
21.8%
133
35.8%
MDT, G1
99
26.7%
152
40.9%
MDT, G2
115
31%
64
17.2%
MDT, G3
64
17.3%
13
3.5%
MDT, G4
3
0.8%
0
0%
MDT, Missing G
10
2.7%
10
2.7%
Week 12, G0
159
42.9%
216
58.1%
Week 12, G1
83
22.4%
87
23.4%
Week 12, G2
50
13.5%
24
6.5%
Week 12, G3
11
3%
3
0.8%
Week 12, G4
1
0.3%
0
0%
Week 12, Missing G
68
18.3%
42
11.3%
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
Description Dryness: skin epidermis that lacks moisture/sebum. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4. G0=absent (none); G1=slight (barely perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G2=mild (easily perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G3=moderate (easily noted dryness and flakes but no fissure formation); G4=severe (easily noted dryness with flakes and fissure formation). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of drying reported at any time during treatment.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All Randomized Participants
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 372 372
Baseline, G0
329
88.7%
327
87.9%
Baseline, G1
34
9.2%
36
9.7%
Baseline, G2
6
1.6%
9
2.4%
Baseline, G3
2
0.5%
0
0%
Baseline, G4
0
0%
0
0%
Baseline, Missing G
1
0.3%
0
0%
MDT, G0
96
25.9%
222
59.7%
MDT, G1
101
27.2%
102
27.4%
MDT, G2
90
24.3%
36
9.7%
MDT, G3
72
19.4%
2
0.5%
MDT, G4
3
0.8%
0
0%
MDT, Missing G
10
2.7%
10
2.7%
Week 12, G0
208
56.1%
292
78.5%
Week 12, G1
67
18.1%
33
8.9%
Week 12, G2
22
5.9%
5
1.3%
Week 12, G3
7
1.9%
0
0%
Week 12, G4
0
0%
0
0%
Week 12, Missing G
68
18.3%
42
11.3%
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
Description Peeling skin: damage to and loss of the upper layer of skin (epidermis). Local tolerability assessments for peeling were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no peeling); G1=slight (mild localized peeling); G2=mild (mild and diffuse peeling); G3=moderate (moderate and diffuse peeling); G4=severe (moderate to prominent, dense peeling). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of peeling reported at any time during treatment.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All Randomized Participants
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 372 372
Baseline, G0
344
92.7%
339
91.1%
Baseline, G1
22
5.9%
29
7.8%
Baseline, G2
5
1.3%
4
1.1%
Baseline, G3
0
0%
0
0%
Baseline, G4
0
0%
0
0%
Baseline, Missing G
1
0.3%
0
0%
MDT, G0
112
30.2%
256
68.8%
MDT, G1
104
28%
76
20.4%
MDT, G2
87
23.5%
28
7.5%
MDT, G3
51
13.7%
2
0.5%
MDT, G4
8
2.2%
0
0%
MDT, Missing G
10
2.7%
10
2.7%
Week 12, G0
221
59.6%
300
80.6%
Week 12, G1
57
15.4%
25
6.7%
Week 12, G2
16
4.3%
5
1.3%
Week 12, G3
10
2.7%
0
0%
Week 12, G4
0
0%
0
0%
Week 12, Missing G
68
18.3%
42
11.3%
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
Description Itching is a sensation that causes the desire or reflex to scratch. Local tolerability assessments for itching were performed by the participant at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G3. G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of itching reported at any time during treatment.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All Randomized Participants
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 372 372
Baseline, G0
237
63.9%
229
61.6%
Baseline, G1
104
28%
109
29.3%
Baseline, G2
26
7%
30
8.1%
Baseline, G3
3
0.8%
4
1.1%
Baseline, Missing G
2
0.5%
0
0%
MDT, G0
68
18.3%
126
33.9%
MDT, G1
164
44.2%
182
48.9%
MDT, G2
92
24.8%
48
12.9%
MDT, G3
38
10.2%
6
1.6%
MDT, Missing G
10
2.7%
10
2.7%
Week 12, G0
174
46.9%
216
58.1%
Week 12, G1
111
29.9%
96
25.8%
Week 12, G2
17
4.6%
16
4.3%
Week 12, G3
2
0.5%
2
0.5%
Week 12, Missing G
68
18.3%
42
11.3%
16. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
Description Burning/stinging is a pain and burning sensation. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the participant at each study visit based on severity as G0 to G3: G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of burning/stinging reported at any time during treatment.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All Randomized Participants
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
Measure Participants 372 372
Baseline, G0
307
82.7%
291
78.2%
Baseline, G1
34
9.2%
64
17.2%
Baseline, G2
26
7%
15
4%
Baseline, G3
3
0.8%
2
0.5%
Baseline, Missing G
2
0.5%
0
0%
MDT, G0
52
14%
137
36.8%
MDT, G1
101
27.2%
159
42.7%
MDT, G2
122
32.9%
55
14.8%
MDT, G3
87
23.5%
11
3%
MDT, Missing G
10
2.7%
10
2.7%
Week 12, G0
179
48.2%
222
59.7%
Week 12, G1
94
25.3%
94
25.3%
Week 12, G2
24
6.5%
13
3.5%
Week 12, G3
7
1.9%
1
0.3%
Week 12, Missing G
68
18.3%
42
11.3%

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Arm/Group Description Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant.
All Cause Mortality
Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 1/371 (0.3%) 1/372 (0.3%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brain contusion 0/371 (0%) 1/372 (0.3%)
Nervous system disorders
Intracranial pressure increased 0/371 (0%) 1/372 (0.3%)
Psychiatric disorders
Adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotion, condu 1/371 (0.3%) 0/372 (0%)
Depression 1/371 (0.3%) 0/372 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Tazarotene Foam Vehicle Foam
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 88/371 (23.7%) 17/372 (4.6%)
General disorders
Application Site Dryness 22/371 (5.9%) 2/372 (0.5%)
Application Site Irritation 66/371 (17.8%) 15/372 (4%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title GSK Response Center
Organization GlaxoSmithKline
Phone 866-435-7343
Email
Responsible Party:
Stiefel, a GSK Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01017146
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 114575
First Posted:
Nov 20, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Jan 18, 2017
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2016