A Double Blinded, Prospective, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled Multi-center Study of Photodynamic Therapy With VisonacĀ® Cream in Patients With Acne Vulgaris

Sponsor
Photocure (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01347879
Collaborator
(none)
153
15
2
12
10.2
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Visonac Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) in patients with severe acne, score 4 on global IGA scale. The null hypothesis is that Visonac PDT is equal to vehicle PDT against the alternative hypothesis that Visonac PDT is different compared to vehicle PDT at week 12.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Visonac PDT
  • Drug: Vehicle cream with PDT
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
153 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
PCTA206/11 A Double Blinded, Prospective, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled Multi Center Study of Photodynamic Therapy With VisonacĀ® Cream in Patients With Acne Vulgaris.
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Visonac cream with PDT

active treatment with light dose of 37 Joule/cm2

Drug: Visonac PDT
cream application prior to illumination with red light
Other Names:
  • red light
  • Placebo Comparator: Vehicle cream with PDT

    Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 Joule/cm2

    Drug: Vehicle cream with PDT
    placebo/vehicle cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Other Names:
  • red light
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Count (Nodules, Papules, and Pustules). [From baseline to 12 weeks after first treatment]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Non-inflammatory Lesion Count (Open and Closed Comedones) [From baseline to 12 weeks after the first treatment]

    2. Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory (Nodules, Papules, and Pustules)Lesion Counts. [From baseline to 12 weeks after the first treatment]

    3. Proportion of Patients With Success According to IGA Scale Based on the Facial Assessment. [From baseline to 12 weeks after first treatment]

      One Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale was used including inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. The investigator qualitatively graded the overall acne severity on a scale from 0 to 4, with 4 being the most severe. Success was defined as an improvement of at least 2 grades from the baseline score.

    4. Pain During Illumination. [Immediately after first treatment]

      Pain during illumination was assessed by patient using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable.

    5. Number of Patients With Adverse Events. [From administration of investigational medicinal product (IMP) until 12 weeks after first IMP administration]

    6. Erythema Score of Mild and Moderate [Immediately after first treatment]

      Clinical assessment using a 4 point scale; none, mild, moderate, severe

    7. Clear and Almost Clear Scarring According to Scarring Score [at week 12 after first treatment]

      Clinical assessment using a 6 point scale; Clear, Almost clear, Mild, Moderate, Severe and Very severe

    8. Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Non-inflammatory Lesion Count (Open and Closed Comedones) [From baseline to 12 weeks after first treatment]

    9. Erythema Score of Severe [Immediately after first treatment]

      Clinical assessment using a 4 point scale; none, mild, moderate, severe

    10. Erythema Score of Mild and Moderate [2 days after first treatment]

      Clinical assessment using a 4 point scale; none, mild, moderate, severe

    11. Erythema Score of Severe [2 days after first treatment]

      Clinical assessment using a 4 point scale; none, mild, moderate, severe

    12. Mild and Moderate Scarring According to Scarring Score [at week 12 after first treatment]

      Clinical assessment using a 6 point scale; Clear, Almost clear, Mild, Moderate, Severe and Very severe

    13. Severe and Very Severe Scarring According to Scarring Score [at week 12 after first treatment]

      Clinical assessment using a 6 point scale; Clear, Almost clear, Mild, Moderate, Severe and Very severe

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    12 Years to 35 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Female and male patients, from 12-35 years of age with severe facial acne vulgaris (IGA score 4 on IGA scale)

    • Signed and verified informed consent form and photo consent form. For subjects under age of 18, an assent form in conjunction with an informed consent form, signed and verified by parent/guardian.

    • Female patients who are surgically sterile, pre-menstrual, postmenopausal, abstinent, or willing to use an adequate means of contraception including birth control pills, or barrier methods and spermicide for at least 14 days prior to T1. Patients using birth control pills must have used the same product and dose for at least 3 months and must agree to stay with the same product and dose for an additional 3 months.

    • Fitzpatrick skin type I through VI,

    • Patients with 25 to 75 inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, and nodules) on the face.

    • Patients with 20 to 100 non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) on the face.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with acne conglobata, acne fulminans, secondary acne (chloracne, drug-induced acne, etc.)

    • Patients with more than 3 nodules on the face.

    • Patient is the investigator or any sub investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the study.

    • Patients unlikely to comply with the protocol, e.g. mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the clinical study, uncooperative attitude or unlikelihood of completing the study (e.g. drug or alcohol abuse).

    • Female patients with childbearing potential (i.e. ovulation, pre-menopausal, not surgically sterilized) and sexually active, not willing to use a medically accepted contraceptive regimen (as described under inclusion criteria) while on treatment.

    • Pregnancy.

    • Nursing.

    • Participation in other clinical studies either currently or within the last 30 days.

    • Patients with porphyria.

    • Patients with cutaneous photosensitivity.

    • Known allergy to MAL, to a similar PDT compound, or to excipients of the cream

    • Patients using testosterone, any other systemic hormonal treatment or hormonal contraceptives solely for control of acne.

    • Patients who have received topical treatments for their facial acne within the last 14 days (e.g steroids, retinoids, glycolic acid, benzoyl peroxide, anti inflammatory agents, antibiotics). Medicated cleansers may be used during the washout period and stopped before the treatment.

    • Patients who have received oral antibiotics for treatment of their acne within the last month.

    • Patients who have received oral isotretinoin within the last 6 months.

    • Patient who have received facial procedures like dermabrasion, chemical or laser peels within the last 1 month.

    • Patients using testosterone, any systemic hormonal treatment for other reasons than acne treatment and has not been on the same product and dose for at least 3 months

    • Patients with moderate, severe or very severe facial acne scarring according to scarring scale described in section 10.4.3.

    • Patients with a beard that might interfere with study assessments.

    • Patients with melanoma or dysplastic nevi in the treatment area.

    • Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVB phototherapy, sun tanning salons) within the last 30 days

    • Exposure to PDT within 12 weeks before T1.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Dermatology Specialists Inc Oceanside California United States 92056
    2 Rady Children's Hospital San Diego California United States 92123
    3 North Florida Dermatology Associates Jacksonville Florida United States 32204
    4 Altman Dermatology Associates Arlington Heights Illinois United States 60005
    5 Dermatology Institute, DuPage Medical Group Naperville Illinois United States 60563
    6 Deaconess Clinic Inc Evansville Indiana United States 47713
    7 ActivMed Practices & Research Inc Haverhill Massachusetts United States 10830
    8 Hamzavi Dermatology Fort Gratiot Michigan United States 48059
    9 Somerset Skin Centre Troy Michigan United States 48084
    10 Penn State Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania United States 17033
    11 Clinical Partners LLC Johnston Rhode Island United States 02919
    12 DermResearch Inc Austin Texas United States 78759
    13 Clinical Trials of Texas San Antonio Texas United States 78229
    14 Virginia Clinical Research, Inc. Norfolk Virginia United States 23507
    15 Premier Clinical Research Spokane Washington United States 99216

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Photocure

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: David Pariser, MD, Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Photocure
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01347879
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • PCTA206/11
    First Posted:
    May 4, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 16, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Keywords provided by Photocure
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Dermatology clinics in the US.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37 J/cm2 Visonac photodynamic therapy (PDT): cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 53 100
    COMPLETED 46 83
    NOT COMPLETED 7 17

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT Total
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 53 100 153
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    35
    66%
    59
    59%
    94
    61.4%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    18
    34%
    41
    41%
    59
    38.6%
    >=65 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    18.6
    (5.8)
    18.6
    (5.5)
    18.6
    (5.6)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    22
    41.5%
    44
    44%
    66
    43.1%
    Male
    31
    58.5%
    56
    56%
    87
    56.9%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    53
    100%
    100
    100%
    153
    100%
    Skin type (participants) [Number]
    Skin type I
    0
    0%
    1
    1%
    1
    0.7%
    Skin type II
    24
    45.3%
    34
    34%
    58
    37.9%
    Skin type III
    15
    28.3%
    38
    38%
    53
    34.6%
    Skin type IV
    7
    13.2%
    15
    15%
    22
    14.4%
    Skin type V
    6
    11.3%
    8
    8%
    14
    9.2%
    Skin type VI
    1
    1.9%
    4
    4%
    5
    3.3%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Count (Nodules, Papules, and Pustules).
    Description
    Time Frame From baseline to 12 weeks after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [lesion count]
    -7.8
    (21.4)
    -15.6
    (16.4)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Vehicle Cream With PDT, Visonac Cream With PDT
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.006
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments Lesion count at baseline and center as covariates
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
    Estimated Value -7.35
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -12.5 to -2.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Non-inflammatory Lesion Count (Open and Closed Comedones)
    Description
    Time Frame From baseline to 12 weeks after the first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [lesion count]
    -10.7
    (22.1)
    -11.8
    (19.0)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Vehicle Cream With PDT, Visonac Cream With PDT
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8527
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments Lesion count at baseline and center as covariates
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
    Estimated Value -0.6
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -6.6 to 5.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory (Nodules, Papules, and Pustules)Lesion Counts.
    Description
    Time Frame From baseline to 12 weeks after the first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Median (Full Range) [percent change]
    -26.6
    -43.8
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Vehicle Cream With PDT, Visonac Cream With PDT
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0032
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments Lesion count at baseline and center as covariates
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
    Estimated Value -20.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -33.2 to -6.8
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Proportion of Patients With Success According to IGA Scale Based on the Facial Assessment.
    Description One Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale was used including inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. The investigator qualitatively graded the overall acne severity on a scale from 0 to 4, with 4 being the most severe. Success was defined as an improvement of at least 2 grades from the baseline score.
    Time Frame From baseline to 12 weeks after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Number [participants]
    14
    26.4%
    44
    44%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Vehicle Cream With PDT, Visonac Cream With PDT
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0125
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Pain During Illumination.
    Description Pain during illumination was assessed by patient using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable.
    Time Frame Immediately after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Mean (Full Range) [VAS score in cm]
    0.52
    3.38
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Patients With Adverse Events.
    Description
    Time Frame From administration of investigational medicinal product (IMP) until 12 weeks after first IMP administration

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Number [participants]
    14
    26.4%
    48
    48%
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Erythema Score of Mild and Moderate
    Description Clinical assessment using a 4 point scale; none, mild, moderate, severe
    Time Frame Immediately after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Number [participants]
    37
    69.8%
    86
    86%
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Clear and Almost Clear Scarring According to Scarring Score
    Description Clinical assessment using a 6 point scale; Clear, Almost clear, Mild, Moderate, Severe and Very severe
    Time Frame at week 12 after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    100 patients were included and 83 patients completed the study in the Visonac treatment arm. However, a few patients came back for the week 12 visit only, and have data for scarring. The total number of patients with scarring data at 12 weeks in this group is 91.
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 46 91
    Number [participants]
    25
    47.2%
    53
    53%
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Non-inflammatory Lesion Count (Open and Closed Comedones)
    Description
    Time Frame From baseline to 12 weeks after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Median (Full Range) [percent change]
    -37.0
    -31.0
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Vehicle Cream With PDT, Visonac Cream With PDT
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7161
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments Lesion count at baseline and center as covariate
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
    Estimated Value -2.56
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -16.5 to 11.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Erythema Score of Severe
    Description Clinical assessment using a 4 point scale; none, mild, moderate, severe
    Time Frame Immediately after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 100
    Number [participants]
    0
    0%
    3
    3%
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Erythema Score of Mild and Moderate
    Description Clinical assessment using a 4 point scale; none, mild, moderate, severe
    Time Frame 2 days after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Of the 100 patients who were included in the Visonac treatment arm, 5 dropped out prior to the day 2 erythema assessment. The number of patients with erythema data at this assessment point is 95.
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 95
    Number [participants]
    26
    49.1%
    65
    65%
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Erythema Score of Severe
    Description Clinical assessment using a 4 point scale; none, mild, moderate, severe
    Time Frame 2 days after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Of the 100 patients who were included in the Visonac treatment arm, 5 dropped out prior to the day 2 erythema assessment. The number of patients with erythema data at this assessment point is 95.
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 53 95
    Number [participants]
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mild and Moderate Scarring According to Scarring Score
    Description Clinical assessment using a 6 point scale; Clear, Almost clear, Mild, Moderate, Severe and Very severe
    Time Frame at week 12 after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    100 patients were included and 83 patients completed the study in the Visonac treatment arm. However, a few patients came back for the week 12 visit only, and have data for scarring. The total number of patients with scarring data at 12 weeks in this group is 91.
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 46 91
    Number [participants]
    21
    39.6%
    38
    38%
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Severe and Very Severe Scarring According to Scarring Score
    Description Clinical assessment using a 6 point scale; Clear, Almost clear, Mild, Moderate, Severe and Very severe
    Time Frame at week 12 after first treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    100 patients were included and 83 patients completed the study in the Visonac treatment arm. However, a few patients came back for the week 12 visit only, and have data for scarring. The total number of patients with scarring data at 12 weeks in this group is 91.
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    Measure Participants 46 91
    Number [participants]
    0
    0%
    0
    0%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Arm/Group Description Placebo treatment, Light dose 37 J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light active treatment with light dose of 37J/cm2 Visonac PDT : cream application prior to illumination with red light
    All Cause Mortality
    Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/53 (0%) 0/100 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Vehicle Cream With PDT Visonac Cream With PDT
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 14/53 (26.4%) 48/100 (48%)
    Eye disorders
    Conjunctivitis bacterial 0/53 (0%) 1/100 (1%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea 0/53 (0%) 3/100 (3%)
    General disorders
    Tooth abscess 1/53 (1.9%) 0/100 (0%)
    Vomiting 0/53 (0%) 2/100 (2%)
    Pyrexia 0/53 (0%) 2/100 (2%)
    Infections and infestations
    Staphylococcal infection 1/53 (1.9%) 0/100 (0%)
    Gastroenteritis 0/53 (0%) 2/100 (2%)
    Nasopharyngitis 0/53 (0%) 2/100 (2%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Concussion 1/53 (1.9%) 1/100 (1%)
    Joint sprain 0/53 (0%) 2/100 (2%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain 0/53 (0%) 2/100 (2%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 3/53 (5.7%) 3/100 (3%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Nasal congestion 2/53 (3.8%) 0/100 (0%)
    Cough 1/53 (1.9%) 0/100 (0%)
    Cough 1/53 (1.9%) 1/100 (1%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Pain of skin 0/53 (0%) 17/100 (17%)
    Skin burning sensation 0/53 (0%) 15/100 (15%)
    Pruritus 1/53 (1.9%) 8/100 (8%)
    Erythema 0/53 (0%) 4/100 (4%)
    Rash 1/53 (1.9%) 2/100 (2%)
    Scab 0/53 (0%) 2/100 (2%)
    Swelling face 1/53 (1.9%) 1/100 (1%)
    Dermatitis 1/53 (1.9%) 0/100 (0%)
    Skin hyperpigmentation 0/53 (0%) 2/100 (2%)
    Blister 0/53 (0%) 1/100 (1%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr David Pariser
    Organization Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.
    Phone 757-625-0151
    Email dpariser@pariserderm.com
    Responsible Party:
    Photocure
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01347879
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • PCTA206/11
    First Posted:
    May 4, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 16, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2013