Patient Decision Aid for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study evaluates whether a Patient Decision Aid for the field-directed treatment of actinic keratosis has an effect on shared decision making and patient satisfaction.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Actinic keratosis is the most common epithelial precancerous lesion among the Caucasian race. With an increase in prevalence worldwide due to an aging population and rise of ultraviolet exposure actinic keratosis are among the most frequently encountered skin lesions in clinical practice.
There are many therapeutic modalities for the treatment of actinic keratosis, depending on multiple factors such as distribution, characteristics, patient preference, side effects, availability and costs. Treatment options can be divided into: lesion directed therapy en field directed therapy.
A Patient Decision Aid for field-directed therapies for actinic keratosis may attribute to better shared-decision making and patient satisfaction which on their part may benefits treatment compliance and health outcomes and may lead to fewer disputes between patients and doctors.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Patient Decision Aid Consult about treatment options for field-directed therapies for actinic keratosis by the dermatologist, with the use of a Patient Decision Aid. |
Other: Patient Decision Aid
A designed tool (by us) that help patients and providers talk and decide together about field-directed treatment options for actinic keratosis.
|
No Intervention: Without Patient Decision Aid (conventional) Conventional consult about treatment options for field-directed therapies for actinic keratosis by the dermatologist, without the use of a Patient Decision Aid. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Difference in patient satisfaction [First questionnaire at moment of consultation, between November 2022 and January 2024 (expected). Second questionnaire after finishing the treatment (1 week after consultation up to 6 months after consultation).]
Difference in patient satisfaction making in the group with Patient Decision Aid and the group without Patient Decision Aid, measured with Decision Evaluation Scales. This scale uses 15 questions with a maximum score of 75. Higher scores mean more satisfaction and less insecurity.
- Difference in shared decision making [First questionnaire at moment of consultation, between November 2022 and January 2024 (expected). Second questionnaire after finishing the treatment (1 week after consultation up to 6 months after consultation).]
Difference in shared decision making in the group with Patient Decision Aid and the group without Patient Decision Aid, measured with Shared Decision Making-Q-9 questionnaire Dutch version. This scale uses 9 questions with a maximum score of 45. 0 indicating the lowest and 45 indicating the highest level of perceived shared decision making.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
diagnosis actinic keratosis in MaastrichtUMC+ or CatharinaHospital, Eindhoven
-
age >18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- no knowledge of Dutch language
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ellen Oyen | Maastricht | Netherlands |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Klara Mosterd, prof.dr., Maastricht UMC+
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2022-3292