MRB 0.3% Serum Effectiveness on 2 Early Clinical Markers of Photoinduced Cutaneous Aging: Actinic Lentigo and Actinic Keratosis

Sponsor
NAOS Institute of Life Science (Industry)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05152407
Collaborator
(none)
35
2
17.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of a serum containing 0.3% of MRB, a cosmetic active ingredient, against actinic lentigo and actinic keratosis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Topical application of MRB 0.3% serum and placebo serum (hemi face or skull)
N/A

Detailed Description

Skin aging is an extremely complex multifactorial process that disrupts the functions and structure of epidermal and dermal cells and extracellular matrix components and has multiple causes including extrinsic phenomena (UV radiation, exposure to pollution, etc.).

It has important effects on the skin and is particularly apparent on the face. Indeed, sunlight, in particular ultraviolet light, is an important factor that contributes to cutaneous photoaging by inducing the photo-chronic generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Although skin has its own antioxidant system against ROS, these antioxidant defenses are not fully effective during sun exposure and weaken over time. Photoaging of the skin is characterized by the development of pigmentary disorders, such as actinic lentigos (AL), as well as benign skin tumors such as actinic keratosis (AK), both of which are target pathologies for this study.

AL usually occur in the elderly. They are usually benign but can cause aesthetic problems. They are commonly seen on the hands but can appear on all areas of the body, especially on sun-exposed areas such as the face, back, arms, feet, shoulders and skull. There are different treatment approaches, including physical therapy such as laser therapy, pulsed light, chemical peeling, bleaching and cryotherapy or topical therapy such as hydroquinone (HQ). Although topical therapies are generally more time consuming compared to physical therapies, patients can control their own treatment and side effects can be decreased.

AK is a very common skin lesion caused by chronic sun damage that typically measure less than 1 cm in diameter. KA is considered a premalignant epithelial skin lesion that may progress to squamous cell carcinoma. For this reason, all KA should be treated and clinical follow-up is recommended. The goals of treatment are: (i) to clinically eradicate obvious and subclinical lesions, (ii) to prevent their progression to EC, and (iii) to reduce the number of relapses and consequently increase the quality of life of patients.

Medical treatment with antioxidant properties/actions that would allow the reduction of damaged cells seems to play a role in both the prevention and treatment of AL and KA (Nashan et al., 2013).

In addition, a paper published in early 2020 highlighted a major role for carbonylation in the progression of this type of skin lesion (Tramutola et al., 2020). Based on these elements, we hypothesize that our cosmetic active ingredient - MRB - which has antioxidant activity and a specific and original chaperone effect giving it a strong capacity to fight against protein carbonylation- will be effective in the treatment of photo-induced signs of aging: keratoses and actinic lentigo, by a mechanism that acts on the oxidative stress pathway and the maintenance of cellular proteostasis.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
35 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
MRB 0.3% Serum Effectiveness on 2 Early Clinical Markers of Photoinduced Cutaneous Aging: Actinic Lentigo and Actinic Keratosis A Single-center Clinical Study in Two Phases: First Phase: Randomized Double-blind Clinical Interventional Study Versus Placebo in Split Face or Split Skull Second Phase: Open-label Observational Clinical Study on the Entire Face or Skull
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Active serum on right

Right hemi face or skull will receive active serum (containing 0.3% MRB) / Left hemi face or skull will receive placebo serum for 6 months

Other: Topical application of MRB 0.3% serum and placebo serum (hemi face or skull)
Serums will be topically applied twice a day (mornings and evenings).

Experimental: Active serum on left

Left hemi face or skull will receive active serum (containing 0.3% MRB) / Right hemi face or skull will receive placebo serum for 6 months

Other: Topical application of MRB 0.3% serum and placebo serum (hemi face or skull)
Serums will be topically applied twice a day (mornings and evenings).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. To evaluate MRB 0.3% serum effectiveness after 6 months of treatment on 2 early clinical markers of photoinduced cutaneous aging: actinic lentigo and actinic keratosis [6 months]

    The primary endpoint will be the decrease at 6 months from baseline in the overall score determined by the sum of the total number of actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses on each hemi-face, one receiving MRB 0.3% serum and the other a placebo serum. For men with baldness, the evaluation could be performed on each hemi-skull and/or each hemi-face. The counting of the two types of lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. To evaluate 0.3% MRB serum effectiveness versus a placebo serum at inclusion, 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment on the evolution of actinic lentigos on each hemi- face and/or skull [1, 3 and 6 months]

    Assessment at inclusion (T0), after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of treatment of the number of actinic lentigos on each hemiface and/or hemiskull (in men with baldness) treated with MRB serum 0.3% and placebo serum respectively. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

  2. To evaluate 0.3% MRB serum effectiveness versus a placebo serum at inclusion, 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment on the evolution actinic keratoses on each hemi-face/skull [1, 3 and 6 months]

    Assessment at inclusion (T0), after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of treatment of the number of actinic keratoses on each hemi-facial and/or hemi-cranial area (in men with baldness) treated with MRB 0.3% serum and placebo serum respectively. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

  3. To evaluate 0.3% MRB serum effectiveness versus a placebo serum at inclusion, 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment on the grade of actinic keratoses on each hemi-face/skull [1, 3 and 6 months]

    Assessment at inclusion (T0), after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of treatment of the grade of actinic keratosis defined by the AK-FAS (Actinic Keratosis Field Assessment Scale)

  4. To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on the whole face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses [9 and 12 months]

    Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull of the overall score determined by the sum of the total number of actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses on the whole face and/or skull. The counting of the two types of lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

  5. To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on the whole face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic lentigos [9 and 12 months]

    Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull of the number of actinic lentigos. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

  6. To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on the whole face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic keratoses [9 and 12 months]

    Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull of the number of actinic keratoses. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

  7. To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on the whole face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on the grade of actinic keratoses [9 and 12 months]

    Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull of the AK-FAS grade of actinic keratosis.

  8. To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on each hemi-face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic lentigos [9 and 12 months]

    Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull (in men with baldness) of the number of actinic lentigos. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

  9. To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on each hemi-face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses [9 and 12 months]

    Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull (in men with baldness) of the overall score determined by the sum of the total number of actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses on each hemi-face. The counting of the two types of lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

  10. To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on each hemi-face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic keratoses [9 and 12 months]

    Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull (in men with baldness) of the number of actinic keratoses. The counting of the two types of lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.

  11. To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on each hemi-face and/or skull (in men with baldness) the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on the grade of actinic keratoses [9 and 12 months]

    Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull (in men with baldness) of the AK-FAS grade of actinic keratosis.

  12. To evaluate at each visit, the tolerance of MRB 0.3% serum versus a placebo serum [1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months]

    Tolerance assessed at each visit. It will be assessed by the investigator during the visits using a 5-point scale (0 = Absent, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme) evaluating the following parameters: Erythema Desquamation Burning Pruritus Stretch A global score of tolerance will be calculated by the sum of the 5 parameters. The global score can vary between 0 and 20.

  13. To evaluate at 6 and 12 months from inclusion, the evolution of a lesioned area and an area of normal skin by confocal microscopy on each hemi-face/skull of 10 volunteer subjects. [6 and 12 months]

    Confocal microscopy of a lesioned area and an area of normal skin: a study of the cells of the epidermis (keratinocytes), the dermis (fibroblasts) and the cellular infiltrate will be performed on a predefined area of each hemi-face/skull of 3 x3 cm at T0 (Inclusion) by Confocal Microscopy with a High Resolution Ultrasound (LC-OCT) and will be repeated at 6 and 12 months in 10 subjects The area will include at least one KA lesion, one lentigo lesion, and the peri-lesional healthy skin area.

  14. To evaluate the satisfaction of the subjects at 6 months (in hemi-face and/or skull), at 9 and 12 months (for the whole face and/or skull and in hemi-face and/or skull) regarding the use of a MRB 0.3 % serum [6, 9 and 12 months]

    Subject satisfaction will be evaluated at 6 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull and at 9 and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull and in hemi-face and/or skull via a satisfaction questionnaire (abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9).

  15. To evaluate the satisfaction of the subjects regardind galenic at 6 months (in hemi-face and/or skull), at 9 and 12 months (for the whole face and/or skull and in hemi-face and/or skull) regarding the use of the applied serums [6, 9 and 12 months]

    Subject satisfaction will be evaluated at 6 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull and at 9 and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull and in hemi-face and/or skull via a questionnaire on the galenic quality of the applied products (texture, ease of application, etc.).

  16. To evaluate the satisfaction of the investigator at 6, 9 and 12 months regarding the products used [6, 9 and 12 months]

    The investigator's satisfaction with the products will be evaluated at 6 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull and at 9 and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull on a 5-point scale: = Very good effectiveness = Good effectiveness = Average effectiveness = Poor effectiveness = Not effective at all

  17. To evaluate subjects' compliance with serums application [1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months]

    Product compliance will be assessed during the visits by weighing the tubes of product collected.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
40 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Minimum of 5 actinic lentigos and 3 actinic keratoses of grade 1 or 2 on each hemi-face of the face and/or hemi-cranium (in men with baldness)

  • Phototype I to III

  • Patients with free, informed, written consent to participate in the study.

  • Women unable to conceive or women of childbearing potential with a negative urine pregnancy test and using contraception

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Subjects with less than 5 actinic lentigos or less than 3 actinic keratoses of grade 1 or 2 on each hemiface of the face and/or skull (for men with baldness)

  • Phototype IV to VI

  • Immunocompromised subject

  • Subjects with a history of skin carcinoma in the treated areas

  • Subjects using another active treatment for actinic keratoses or lentigos (or having used one in the past 3 months)

  • Subjects unable to understand the information (due to language or psychiatric reasons)

  • Subjects without social insurance

  • Pregnant women

  • Breastfeeding women

  • Women of childbearing age without contraception

  • Subjects under legal protection measures

  • Subjects unable to express their consent

  • Subjects under legal protection

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • NAOS Institute of Life Science

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
JULIE TISSERAND, PhD, Project manager, NAOS Institute of Life Science
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05152407
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 3020_ILS-MIRORU20
  • ID RCB 2020-A02883-36
First Posted:
Dec 9, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Dec 30, 2021
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 30, 2021