A Simultaneous Treatment Regimen Compared to a Sequential Treatment Regimen With Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and 0.05% of Two Areas With Actinic Keratosis on Face/Scalp and Trunk/Extremities

Sponsor
LEO Pharma (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01787383
Collaborator
(none)
200
1
2
11
18.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety of a simultaneous treatment regimen compared to a sequential treatment regimen when two separate areas with AKs (one located on face/scalp and the other located on trunk/ extremities) are treated with ingenol mebutate gel

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %
  • Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Simultaneous Treatment Regimen Compared to a Sequential Treatment Regimen With Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and 0.05% of Two Areas With Actinic Keratosis on Face/Scalp and Trunk/Extremities
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %

Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %
Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 % (Picato®) on trunk/extremities either applied simultaneously or sequentially
Other Names:
  • Picato®
  • Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %
    Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 % (Picato®) on face/scalp either applied simultaneously or sequentially
    Other Names:
  • Picato®
  • Active Comparator: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %

    Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %
    Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 % (Picato®) on trunk/extremities either applied simultaneously or sequentially
    Other Names:
  • Picato®
  • Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %
    Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 % (Picato®) on face/scalp either applied simultaneously or sequentially
    Other Names:
  • Picato®
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Composite Local Skin Reaction (LSR) Score 3 Days After Treatment of Each Selected Treatment Area [3 days after treatment of each selected treatment area]

      Composite Local Skin Reaction (LSR) score 3 days after treatment of each selected treatment area in both treatment groups (simultaneous or sequential). The composite LSR score (0 to 24), reflecting the sum of the individual LSR grades (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration, grade 0 to 4), was calculated for each selected treatment area at each visit.The composite LSR score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 24 (worst possible outcome). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm". Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Complete Clearance of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment [8 weeks after treatment]

      Complete clearance of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) analysed in each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen given as "percentage of participants" with complete AK clearance. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").

    2. Partial Clearance of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment [8 weeks after treatment]

      Partial clearance of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) defined as 75% or greater reduction in Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) from start of treatment to 8 weeks after treatment, was analysed in each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen given as "percentage of participatns" with complete AK clearance. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").

    3. Percent Reduction in Number of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment [8 weeks after treatment]

      Percent reduction in number of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) analysed for each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").

    4. Effectiveness Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) [8 weeks]

      Effectiveness TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived effectiveness of medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).

    5. Side Effects TSQM [8 weeks]

      Side Effects TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived side effects of medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).

    6. Global Satisfaction TSQM [8 weeks]

      Global Satisfaction TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived overall satisfaction with medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).

    7. Convenience TSQM [8 weeks]

      Convenience TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived convenience with medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Subjects must provide informed consent

    • Subjects with 4 to 8 clinically typical, visible and discrete AKs within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area on face or scalp

    • Subjects with 4 to 8 clinically typical, visible and discrete AKs within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area on trunk or extremities

    • Subjects at least 18 years of age

    • Female subjects must be of either:

    1. Non-childbearing potential, i.e. post-menopausal or have a confirmed clinical history of sterility (e.g. the subject is without a uterus) or,

    2. Childbearing potential, provided there is a confirmed negative urine pregnancy test prior to trial treatment, to rule out pregnancy.

    • Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use effective contraception at trial entry and until completion.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Location of the selected treatment areas:

    • on the periorbital skin

    • within 5 cm of an incompletely healed wound

    • within 10 cm of a suspected basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)

    • Prior treatment with ingenol mebutate gel on face/scalp and on trunk/extremities

    • Lesions in the selected treatment areas that have:

    • atypical clinical appearance (and/or,

    • recalcitrant disease

    • History or evidence of skin conditions other than the trial indication that would interfere with the evaluation of the trial medication

    • Use of cosmetic or therapeutic products and procedures which could interfere with the assessments of the selected treatment areas

    • Clinical diagnosis/history or evidence of any medical condition that would expose a subject to an undue risk of a significant AE or interfere with assessments of safety and efficacy during the course of the trial, as determined by the investigator's clinical judgment.

    • Anticipated need for hospitalisation or out-patient surgery during the first 15 days after the first trial medication application.

    • Known sensitivity or allergy to any of the ingredients in ingenol mebutate gel

    • Presence of sunburn within the selected treatment areas

    • Current enrolment or participation in an investigational clinical trial within 30 days of entry into this trial

    • Subjects previously randomised in the trial

    • Female subjects who are breastfeeding

    • In the opinion of the investigator, the subject is unlikely to comply with the Clinical Study Protocol

    Prohibited Therapies and/or Medications within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1:
    • Cosmetic or therapeutic procedures within 2 cm of the selected treatment areas

    • Use of topical keratolytic therapeutic products within 2 cm of the selected treatment areas

    • Use of topical medicated creams, ointments, lotions, gels, foams or sprays including topical steroids : within 2 cm of the selected treatment areas; artificial tanners: within 5 cm of the selected treatment areas

    Prohibited Therapies and/or Medications: within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1:
    • Treatment with immunomodulators, cytotoxic drugs or interferon/interferon inducers

    • Treatment with systemic medications that suppress the immune system

    • Treatment/therapy with ultraviolet light A (UVA) or ultraviolet light B (UVB)

    Prohibited Therapies and/or Medications within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1:
    • Treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), imiquimod, topical diclofenac sodium, or photodynamic therapy within 2 cm of the selected treatment areas.
    Prohibited Therapies and/or Medications within 6 months prior to Visit 1:
    • Use of systemic retinoids or biologic/monoclonal antibody therapies

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Clinica Dermatologica dell'Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena Italy 41124

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • LEO Pharma

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    LEO Pharma
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01787383
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • LP0041-64
    • 2012-002863-88
    First Posted:
    Feb 8, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 22, 2021
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2021
    Keywords provided by LEO Pharma
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail In the clinical study protocol 200 subjects were planned to be enrolled and 199 subjects were actually enrolled and randomised.
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 101 98
    COMPLETED 92 76
    NOT COMPLETED 9 22

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment Total
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 % (Picato®) on trunk/extremities applied simultaneously Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 % (Picato®) on face/scalp applied simultaneously Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 % (Picato®) on trunk/extremities applied sequentially Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 % (Picato®) on face/scalp applied sequentially Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 101 98 199
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    12
    11.9%
    9
    9.2%
    21
    10.6%
    >=65 years
    89
    88.1%
    89
    90.8%
    178
    89.4%
    Age (years) [Mean (Full Range) ]
    Mean (Full Range) [years]
    74.4
    74.5
    74.5
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    13
    12.9%
    18
    18.4%
    31
    15.6%
    Male
    88
    87.1%
    80
    81.6%
    168
    84.4%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    Italy
    63
    62.4%
    61
    62.2%
    124
    62.3%
    Spain
    38
    37.6%
    37
    37.8%
    75
    37.7%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Composite Local Skin Reaction (LSR) Score 3 Days After Treatment of Each Selected Treatment Area
    Description Composite Local Skin Reaction (LSR) score 3 days after treatment of each selected treatment area in both treatment groups (simultaneous or sequential). The composite LSR score (0 to 24), reflecting the sum of the individual LSR grades (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration, grade 0 to 4), was calculated for each selected treatment area at each visit.The composite LSR score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 24 (worst possible outcome). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm". Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area).
    Time Frame 3 days after treatment of each selected treatment area

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities.
    Measure Participants 101 98
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    10.4
    (5.1)
    9.7
    (4.5)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.13
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Complete Clearance of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment
    Description Complete clearance of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) analysed in each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen given as "percentage of participants" with complete AK clearance. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").
    Time Frame 8 weeks after treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities.
    Measure Participants 101 98
    Number [percentage of participants]
    52.7
    52.2%
    46.9
    47.9%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.34
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Partial Clearance of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment
    Description Partial clearance of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) defined as 75% or greater reduction in Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) from start of treatment to 8 weeks after treatment, was analysed in each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen given as "percentage of participatns" with complete AK clearance. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").
    Time Frame 8 weeks after treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities.
    Measure Participants 101 98
    Number [percentage of participants]
    76.6
    75.8%
    68.1
    69.5%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.088
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Reduction in Number of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment
    Description Percent reduction in number of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) analysed for each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").
    Time Frame 8 weeks after treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities.
    Measure Participants 101 98
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage reduction in number of AKs]
    83.4
    (22.0)
    79.1
    (26.7)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.20
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Effectiveness Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
    Description Effectiveness TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived effectiveness of medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
    Time Frame 8 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Effectiveness TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Effectiveness TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects.
    Measure Participants 90 73
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    63.1
    (23.4)
    66.4
    (21.4)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Side Effects TSQM
    Description Side Effects TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived side effects of medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
    Time Frame 8 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Side EffectsTSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Side Effects TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects.
    Measure Participants 90 73
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    93.1
    (18.4)
    96.1
    (16.4)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.033
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Global Satisfaction TSQM
    Description Global Satisfaction TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived overall satisfaction with medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
    Time Frame 8 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Global Satisfaction TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Global Satisfaction TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects.
    Measure Participants 82 72
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    64.6
    (19.0)
    67.4
    (20.3)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.37
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Convenience TSQM
    Description Convenience TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived convenience with medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
    Time Frame 8 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Convenience TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Convenience TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects.
    Measure Participants 83 73
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    73.7
    (14.6)
    74.7
    (18.1)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.66
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Arm/Group Description Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015% and 0.05%) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015% and 0.05%) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities.
    All Cause Mortality
    Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 3/101 (3%) 4/98 (4.1%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Haemorrhagic erosive gastritis 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hyperglycaemia 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Squamous cell carcinoma 1/101 (1%) 0/98 (0%)
    Benign renal neoplasm 1/101 (1%) 0/98 (0%)
    Basal cell carcinoma 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Amnesia 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Skin ulcer 1/101 (1%) 0/98 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 22/101 (21.8%) 22/98 (22.4%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo 1/101 (1%) 0/98 (0%)
    Eye disorders
    Conjunctivitis 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Eyelid oedema 1/101 (1%) 0/98 (0%)
    Scotoma 1/101 (1%) 0/98 (0%)
    General disorders
    Application site pruritus 8/101 (7.9%) 1/98 (1%)
    Application site pain 5/101 (5%) 1/98 (1%)
    Feeling cold 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis 1/101 (1%) 1/98 (1%)
    Urinary tract infection 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Application site burn 1/101 (1%) 1/98 (1%)
    Fall 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hyperglycaemia 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Basal cell carcinoma 3/101 (3%) 3/98 (3.1%)
    Squamous cell carcinoma of skin 1/101 (1%) 2/98 (2%)
    Malignant melanoma 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 5/101 (5%) 2/98 (2%)
    Loss of consciousness 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Depression 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Oropharyngeal pain 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Actinic keratosis 1/101 (1%) 0/98 (0%)
    Rash 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)
    Subcutaneous nodule 1/101 (1%) 0/98 (0%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 0/101 (0%) 1/98 (1%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Clinical trial disclosure manager
    Organization LEO Pharma A/S
    Phone 00 45 44 94 58 88
    Email ctr.disclosure@leopharma.com
    Responsible Party:
    LEO Pharma
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01787383
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • LP0041-64
    • 2012-002863-88
    First Posted:
    Feb 8, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 22, 2021
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2021