A Simultaneous Treatment Regimen Compared to a Sequential Treatment Regimen With Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and 0.05% of Two Areas With Actinic Keratosis on Face/Scalp and Trunk/Extremities
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety of a simultaneous treatment regimen compared to a sequential treatment regimen when two separate areas with AKs (one located on face/scalp and the other located on trunk/ extremities) are treated with ingenol mebutate gel
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %
|
Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %
Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 % (Picato®) on trunk/extremities either applied simultaneously or sequentially
Other Names:
Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %
Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 % (Picato®) on face/scalp either applied simultaneously or sequentially
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %
|
Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %
Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 % (Picato®) on trunk/extremities either applied simultaneously or sequentially
Other Names:
Drug: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %
Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 % (Picato®) on face/scalp either applied simultaneously or sequentially
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Composite Local Skin Reaction (LSR) Score 3 Days After Treatment of Each Selected Treatment Area [3 days after treatment of each selected treatment area]
Composite Local Skin Reaction (LSR) score 3 days after treatment of each selected treatment area in both treatment groups (simultaneous or sequential). The composite LSR score (0 to 24), reflecting the sum of the individual LSR grades (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration, grade 0 to 4), was calculated for each selected treatment area at each visit.The composite LSR score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 24 (worst possible outcome). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm". Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Complete Clearance of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment [8 weeks after treatment]
Complete clearance of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) analysed in each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen given as "percentage of participants" with complete AK clearance. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").
- Partial Clearance of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment [8 weeks after treatment]
Partial clearance of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) defined as 75% or greater reduction in Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) from start of treatment to 8 weeks after treatment, was analysed in each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen given as "percentage of participatns" with complete AK clearance. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").
- Percent Reduction in Number of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment [8 weeks after treatment]
Percent reduction in number of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) analysed for each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged").
- Effectiveness Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) [8 weeks]
Effectiveness TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived effectiveness of medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
- Side Effects TSQM [8 weeks]
Side Effects TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived side effects of medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
- Global Satisfaction TSQM [8 weeks]
Global Satisfaction TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived overall satisfaction with medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
- Convenience TSQM [8 weeks]
Convenience TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived convenience with medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subjects must provide informed consent
-
Subjects with 4 to 8 clinically typical, visible and discrete AKs within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area on face or scalp
-
Subjects with 4 to 8 clinically typical, visible and discrete AKs within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area on trunk or extremities
-
Subjects at least 18 years of age
-
Female subjects must be of either:
-
Non-childbearing potential, i.e. post-menopausal or have a confirmed clinical history of sterility (e.g. the subject is without a uterus) or,
-
Childbearing potential, provided there is a confirmed negative urine pregnancy test prior to trial treatment, to rule out pregnancy.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use effective contraception at trial entry and until completion.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Location of the selected treatment areas:
-
on the periorbital skin
-
within 5 cm of an incompletely healed wound
-
within 10 cm of a suspected basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)
-
Prior treatment with ingenol mebutate gel on face/scalp and on trunk/extremities
-
Lesions in the selected treatment areas that have:
-
atypical clinical appearance (and/or,
-
recalcitrant disease
-
History or evidence of skin conditions other than the trial indication that would interfere with the evaluation of the trial medication
-
Use of cosmetic or therapeutic products and procedures which could interfere with the assessments of the selected treatment areas
-
Clinical diagnosis/history or evidence of any medical condition that would expose a subject to an undue risk of a significant AE or interfere with assessments of safety and efficacy during the course of the trial, as determined by the investigator's clinical judgment.
-
Anticipated need for hospitalisation or out-patient surgery during the first 15 days after the first trial medication application.
-
Known sensitivity or allergy to any of the ingredients in ingenol mebutate gel
-
Presence of sunburn within the selected treatment areas
-
Current enrolment or participation in an investigational clinical trial within 30 days of entry into this trial
-
Subjects previously randomised in the trial
-
Female subjects who are breastfeeding
-
In the opinion of the investigator, the subject is unlikely to comply with the Clinical Study Protocol
Prohibited Therapies and/or Medications within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1:
-
Cosmetic or therapeutic procedures within 2 cm of the selected treatment areas
-
Use of topical keratolytic therapeutic products within 2 cm of the selected treatment areas
-
Use of topical medicated creams, ointments, lotions, gels, foams or sprays including topical steroids : within 2 cm of the selected treatment areas; artificial tanners: within 5 cm of the selected treatment areas
Prohibited Therapies and/or Medications: within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1:
-
Treatment with immunomodulators, cytotoxic drugs or interferon/interferon inducers
-
Treatment with systemic medications that suppress the immune system
-
Treatment/therapy with ultraviolet light A (UVA) or ultraviolet light B (UVB)
Prohibited Therapies and/or Medications within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1:
- Treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), imiquimod, topical diclofenac sodium, or photodynamic therapy within 2 cm of the selected treatment areas.
Prohibited Therapies and/or Medications within 6 months prior to Visit 1:
- Use of systemic retinoids or biologic/monoclonal antibody therapies
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Clinica Dermatologica dell'Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia | Modena | Italy | 41124 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- LEO Pharma
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- LP0041-64
- 2012-002863-88
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | In the clinical study protocol 200 subjects were planned to be enrolled and 199 subjects were actually enrolled and randomised. |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 101 | 98 |
COMPLETED | 92 | 76 |
NOT COMPLETED | 9 | 22 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 % (Picato®) on trunk/extremities applied simultaneously Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 % (Picato®) on face/scalp applied simultaneously | Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 %: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05 % (Picato®) on trunk/extremities applied sequentially Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 %: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.015 % (Picato®) on face/scalp applied sequentially | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 101 | 98 | 199 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
12
11.9%
|
9
9.2%
|
21
10.6%
|
>=65 years |
89
88.1%
|
89
90.8%
|
178
89.4%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [years] |
74.4
|
74.5
|
74.5
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
13
12.9%
|
18
18.4%
|
31
15.6%
|
Male |
88
87.1%
|
80
81.6%
|
168
84.4%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Italy |
63
62.4%
|
61
62.2%
|
124
62.3%
|
Spain |
38
37.6%
|
37
37.8%
|
75
37.7%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Composite Local Skin Reaction (LSR) Score 3 Days After Treatment of Each Selected Treatment Area |
---|---|
Description | Composite Local Skin Reaction (LSR) score 3 days after treatment of each selected treatment area in both treatment groups (simultaneous or sequential). The composite LSR score (0 to 24), reflecting the sum of the individual LSR grades (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration, grade 0 to 4), was calculated for each selected treatment area at each visit.The composite LSR score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 24 (worst possible outcome). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm". Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). |
Time Frame | 3 days after treatment of each selected treatment area |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. |
Measure Participants | 101 | 98 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
10.4
(5.1)
|
9.7
(4.5)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.13 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Complete Clearance of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment |
---|---|
Description | Complete clearance of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) analysed in each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen given as "percentage of participants" with complete AK clearance. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged"). |
Time Frame | 8 weeks after treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. |
Measure Participants | 101 | 98 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
52.7
52.2%
|
46.9
47.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.34 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments |
Title | Partial Clearance of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment |
---|---|
Description | Partial clearance of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) defined as 75% or greater reduction in Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) from start of treatment to 8 weeks after treatment, was analysed in each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen given as "percentage of participatns" with complete AK clearance. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged"). |
Time Frame | 8 weeks after treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. |
Measure Participants | 101 | 98 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
76.6
75.8%
|
68.1
69.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.088 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments |
Title | Percent Reduction in Number of AKs in Each Separate Treatment Area 8 Weeks After Treatment |
---|---|
Description | Percent reduction in number of Actinic Keratosis lesions (AKs) analysed for each separate treatment area and presented by treatment regimen. Each subject could contribute with up to 2 values (1 for each treated area). Both affected areas were calculated together "Per Arm" (e.g. "averaged"). |
Time Frame | 8 weeks after treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. |
Measure Participants | 101 | 98 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage reduction in number of AKs] |
83.4
(22.0)
|
79.1
(26.7)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.20 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Effectiveness Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) |
---|---|
Description | Effectiveness TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived effectiveness of medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome). |
Time Frame | 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Effectiveness TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Effectiveness TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. |
Measure Participants | 90 | 73 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
63.1
(23.4)
|
66.4
(21.4)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.38 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Side Effects TSQM |
---|---|
Description | Side Effects TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived side effects of medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome). |
Time Frame | 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Side EffectsTSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Side Effects TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. |
Measure Participants | 90 | 73 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
93.1
(18.4)
|
96.1
(16.4)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.033 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Global Satisfaction TSQM |
---|---|
Description | Global Satisfaction TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived overall satisfaction with medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome). |
Time Frame | 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Global Satisfaction TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Global Satisfaction TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. |
Measure Participants | 82 | 72 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
64.6
(19.0)
|
67.4
(20.3)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.37 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Convenience TSQM |
---|---|
Description | Convenience TSQM After a Treatment Cycle of 8 Weeks. Measurement of the perceived convenience with medication, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome). |
Time Frame | 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Convenience TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015 %: and 0.05 %) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. The Convenience TSQM compliance was lower than the number of randomised subjects. |
Measure Participants | 83 | 73 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
73.7
(14.6)
|
74.7
(18.1)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment, Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.66 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment | ||
Arm/Group Description | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015% and 0.05%) were applied simultaneously: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. | Ingenol mebutate gel in 2 doses (0.015% and 0.05%) were applied sequentially: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 3 consecutive days on on face/scalp and ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% (Picato®) was applied once daily for 2 consecutive days on trunk/extremities. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/101 (3%) | 4/98 (4.1%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Haemorrhagic erosive gastritis | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Hyperglycaemia | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Squamous cell carcinoma | 1/101 (1%) | 0/98 (0%) | ||
Benign renal neoplasm | 1/101 (1%) | 0/98 (0%) | ||
Basal cell carcinoma | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Amnesia | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Skin ulcer | 1/101 (1%) | 0/98 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Ingenol Mebutate Gel Simultaneous Treatment | Ingenol Mebutate Gel Sequential Treatment | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 22/101 (21.8%) | 22/98 (22.4%) | ||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Vertigo | 1/101 (1%) | 0/98 (0%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Conjunctivitis | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Eyelid oedema | 1/101 (1%) | 0/98 (0%) | ||
Scotoma | 1/101 (1%) | 0/98 (0%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Application site pruritus | 8/101 (7.9%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Application site pain | 5/101 (5%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Feeling cold | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Bronchitis | 1/101 (1%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Application site burn | 1/101 (1%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Fall | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Hyperglycaemia | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Basal cell carcinoma | 3/101 (3%) | 3/98 (3.1%) | ||
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin | 1/101 (1%) | 2/98 (2%) | ||
Malignant melanoma | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 5/101 (5%) | 2/98 (2%) | ||
Loss of consciousness | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Depression | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Oropharyngeal pain | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Actinic keratosis | 1/101 (1%) | 0/98 (0%) | ||
Rash | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | ||
Subcutaneous nodule | 1/101 (1%) | 0/98 (0%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypertension | 0/101 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Clinical trial disclosure manager |
---|---|
Organization | LEO Pharma A/S |
Phone | 00 45 44 94 58 88 |
ctr.disclosure@leopharma.com |
- LP0041-64
- 2012-002863-88